llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/instantiate-init-list.cpp

// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm-only -verify
// expected-no-diagnostics

struct F {
  void (*x)();
};
void G();
template<class T> class A {
public: A();
};
template<class T> A<T>::A() {
  static F f = { G };
}
A<int> a;
Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'. - This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable" which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set a default target). llvm-svn: 91446 2009-12-15 20:14:24 +00:00			`// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm-only -verify`
Prior to adding the new "expected-no-diagnostics" directive to VerifyDiagnosticConsumer, make the necessary adjustment to 580 test-cases which will henceforth require this new directive. llvm-svn: 166280 2012-10-19 12:44:48 +00:00			`// expected-no-diagnostics`
Add hack to make the given testcase work. As far as I can tell, this change is reasonably safe, but it doesn't seem like the right solution. llvm-svn: 86508 2009-11-09 03:59:26 +00:00
			`struct F {`
			`void (*x)();`
			`};`
			`void G();`
			`template<class T> class A {`
Turn access control on by default in -cc1. Remove -faccess-control from -cc1; add -fno-access-control. Make the driver pass -fno-access-control by default. Update a bunch of tests to be correct under access control. llvm-svn: 100880 2010-04-09 19:03:51 +00:00			`public: A();`
Add hack to make the given testcase work. As far as I can tell, this change is reasonably safe, but it doesn't seem like the right solution. llvm-svn: 86508 2009-11-09 03:59:26 +00:00			`};`
			`template<class T> A<T>::A() {`
			`static F f = { G };`
			`}`
			`A<int> a;`