llvm-project/libcxx/docs/UsingLibcxx.rst

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

437 lines
18 KiB
ReStructuredText
Raw Normal View History

.. _using-libcxx:
============
Using libc++
============
.. contents::
:local:
Usually, libc++ is packaged and shipped by a vendor through some delivery vehicle
(operating system distribution, SDK, toolchain, etc) and users don't need to do
anything special in order to use the library.
This page contains information about configuration knobs that can be used by
users when they know libc++ is used by their toolchain, and how to use libc++
when it is not the default library used by their toolchain.
Using a different version of the C++ Standard
=============================================
Libc++ implements the various versions of the C++ Standard. Changing the version of
the standard can be done by passing ``-std=c++XY`` to the compiler. Libc++ will
automatically detect what Standard is being used and will provide functionality that
matches that Standard in the library.
.. code-block:: bash
$ clang++ -std=c++17 test.cpp
.. warning::
Using ``-std=c++XY`` with a version of the Standard that has not been ratified yet
is considered unstable. Libc++ reserves the right to make breaking changes to the
library until the standard has been ratified.
Enabling experimental C++ Library features
==========================================
Libc++ provides implementations of some experimental features. Experimental features
are either Technical Specifications (TSes) or official features that were voted to
the Standard but whose implementation is not complete or stable yet in libc++. Those
are disabled by default because they are neither API nor ABI stable. However, the
``-fexperimental-library`` compiler flag can be defined to turn those features on.
.. warning::
Experimental libraries are experimental.
* The contents of the ``<experimental/...>`` headers and the associated static
library will not remain compatible between versions.
* No guarantees of API or ABI stability are provided.
* When the standardized version of an experimental feature is implemented,
the experimental feature is removed two releases after the non-experimental
version has shipped. The full policy is explained :ref:`here <experimental features>`.
.. note::
On compilers that do not support the ``-fexperimental-library`` flag, users can
define the ``_LIBCPP_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL`` macro and manually link against the
appropriate static library (usually shipped as ``libc++experimental.a``) to get
access to experimental library features.
Using libc++ when it is not the system default
==============================================
On systems where libc++ is provided but is not the default, Clang provides a flag
called ``-stdlib=`` that can be used to decide which standard library is used.
Using ``-stdlib=libc++`` will select libc++:
.. code-block:: bash
$ clang++ -stdlib=libc++ test.cpp
On systems where libc++ is the library in use by default such as macOS and FreeBSD,
this flag is not required.
.. _alternate libcxx:
Using a custom built libc++
===========================
Most compilers provide a way to disable the default behavior for finding the
standard library and to override it with custom paths. With Clang, this can
be done with:
.. code-block:: bash
$ clang++ -nostdinc++ -nostdlib++ \
-isystem <install>/include/c++/v1 \
-L <install>/lib \
-Wl,-rpath,<install>/lib \
-lc++ \
test.cpp
The option ``-Wl,-rpath,<install>/lib`` adds a runtime library search path,
which causes the system's dynamic linker to look for libc++ in ``<install>/lib``
whenever the program is loaded.
GCC does not support the ``-nostdlib++`` flag, so one must use ``-nodefaultlibs``
instead. Since that removes all the standard system libraries and not just libc++,
the system libraries must be re-added manually. For example:
.. code-block:: bash
$ g++ -nostdinc++ -nodefaultlibs \
-isystem <install>/include/c++/v1 \
-L <install>/lib \
-Wl,-rpath,<install>/lib \
-lc++ -lc++abi -lm -lc -lgcc_s -lgcc \
test.cpp
GDB Pretty printers for libc++
==============================
GDB does not support pretty-printing of libc++ symbols by default. However, libc++ does
provide pretty-printers itself. Those can be used as:
.. code-block:: bash
$ gdb -ex "source <libcxx>/utils/gdb/libcxx/printers.py" \
-ex "python register_libcxx_printer_loader()" \
<args>
[libc++] Add a lightweight overridable assertion handler This patch adds a lightweight assertion handler mechanism that can be overriden at link-time in a fashion similar to `operator new`. This is a third take on https://llvm.org/D121123 (which allowed customizing the assertion handler at compile-time), and https://llvm.org/D119969 (which allowed customizing the assertion handler at runtime only). This approach is, I think, the best of all three explored approaches. Indeed, replacing the assertion handler in user code is ergonomic, yet we retain the ability to provide a custom assertion handler when deploying to older platforms that don't have a default handler in the dylib. As-is, this patch provides a pretty good amount of backwards compatibility with the previous debug mode: - Code that used to set _LIBCPP_DEBUG=0 in order to get basic assertions in their code will still get basic assertions out of the box, but those assertions will be using the new assertion handler support. - Code that was previously compiled with references to __libcpp_debug_function and friends will work out-of-the-box, no changes required. This is because we provide the same symbols in the dylib as we used to. - Code that used to set a custom __libcpp_debug_function will stop compiling, because we don't provide that declaration anymore. Users will have to migrate to the new way of setting a custom assertion handler, which is extremely easy. I suspect that pool of users is very limited, so breaking them at compile-time is probably acceptable. The main downside of this approach is that code being compiled with assertions enabled but deploying to an older platform where the assertion handler didn't exist yet will fail to compile. However users can easily fix the problem by providing a custom assertion handler and defining the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_ASSERTION_HANDLER_PROVIDED macro to let the library know about the custom handler. In a way, this is actually a feature because it avoids a load-time error that one would otherwise get when trying to run the code on the older target. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121478
2022-03-03 17:37:03 -05:00
.. _assertions-mode:
Enabling the "safe libc++" mode
===============================
Libc++ contains a number of assertions whose goal is to catch undefined behavior in the
library, usually caused by precondition violations. Those assertions do not aim to be
exhaustive -- instead they aim to provide a good balance between safety and performance.
In particular, these assertions do not change the complexity of algorithms. However, they
might, in some cases, interfere with compiler optimizations.
By default, these assertions are turned off. Vendors can decide to turn them on while building
the compiled library by defining ``LIBCXX_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON`` at CMake configuration time.
When ``LIBCXX_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS`` is used, the compiled library will be built with assertions
enabled, **and** user code will be built with assertions enabled by default. If
``LIBCXX_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=OFF`` at CMake configure time, the compiled library will not contain
assertions and the default when building user code will be to have assertions disabled.
As a user, you can consult your vendor to know whether assertions are enabled by default.
Furthermore, independently of any vendor-selected default, users can always control whether
assertions are enabled in their code by defining ``_LIBCPP_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=0|1`` before
including any libc++ header (we recommend passing ``-D_LIBCPP_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=X`` to the
compiler). Note that if the compiled library was built by the vendor without assertions,
functions compiled inside the static or shared library won't have assertions enabled even
if the user defines ``_LIBCPP_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=1`` (the same is true for the inverse case
where the static or shared library was compiled **with** assertions but the user tries to
disable them). However, most of the code in libc++ is in the headers, so the user-selected
value for ``_LIBCPP_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS`` (if any) will usually be respected.
When an assertion fails, the program is aborted through a special verbose termination function. The
library provides a default function that prints an error message and calls ``std::abort()``. Note
that this function is provided by the static or shared library, so it is only available when deploying
to a platform where the compiled library is sufficiently recent. On older platforms, the program will
terminate in an unspecified unsuccessful manner, but the quality of diagnostics won't be great.
However, users can also override that function with their own, which can be useful to either provide
custom behavior or when deploying to an older platform where the default function isn't available.
[libc++] Add a lightweight overridable assertion handler This patch adds a lightweight assertion handler mechanism that can be overriden at link-time in a fashion similar to `operator new`. This is a third take on https://llvm.org/D121123 (which allowed customizing the assertion handler at compile-time), and https://llvm.org/D119969 (which allowed customizing the assertion handler at runtime only). This approach is, I think, the best of all three explored approaches. Indeed, replacing the assertion handler in user code is ergonomic, yet we retain the ability to provide a custom assertion handler when deploying to older platforms that don't have a default handler in the dylib. As-is, this patch provides a pretty good amount of backwards compatibility with the previous debug mode: - Code that used to set _LIBCPP_DEBUG=0 in order to get basic assertions in their code will still get basic assertions out of the box, but those assertions will be using the new assertion handler support. - Code that was previously compiled with references to __libcpp_debug_function and friends will work out-of-the-box, no changes required. This is because we provide the same symbols in the dylib as we used to. - Code that used to set a custom __libcpp_debug_function will stop compiling, because we don't provide that declaration anymore. Users will have to migrate to the new way of setting a custom assertion handler, which is extremely easy. I suspect that pool of users is very limited, so breaking them at compile-time is probably acceptable. The main downside of this approach is that code being compiled with assertions enabled but deploying to an older platform where the assertion handler didn't exist yet will fail to compile. However users can easily fix the problem by providing a custom assertion handler and defining the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_ASSERTION_HANDLER_PROVIDED macro to let the library know about the custom handler. In a way, this is actually a feature because it avoids a load-time error that one would otherwise get when trying to run the code on the older target. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121478
2022-03-03 17:37:03 -05:00
Replacing the default verbose termination function is done by defining the
``_LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_VERBOSE_ABORT_PROVIDED`` macro in all translation units of your program
and defining the following function in exactly one translation unit:
[libc++] Add a lightweight overridable assertion handler This patch adds a lightweight assertion handler mechanism that can be overriden at link-time in a fashion similar to `operator new`. This is a third take on https://llvm.org/D121123 (which allowed customizing the assertion handler at compile-time), and https://llvm.org/D119969 (which allowed customizing the assertion handler at runtime only). This approach is, I think, the best of all three explored approaches. Indeed, replacing the assertion handler in user code is ergonomic, yet we retain the ability to provide a custom assertion handler when deploying to older platforms that don't have a default handler in the dylib. As-is, this patch provides a pretty good amount of backwards compatibility with the previous debug mode: - Code that used to set _LIBCPP_DEBUG=0 in order to get basic assertions in their code will still get basic assertions out of the box, but those assertions will be using the new assertion handler support. - Code that was previously compiled with references to __libcpp_debug_function and friends will work out-of-the-box, no changes required. This is because we provide the same symbols in the dylib as we used to. - Code that used to set a custom __libcpp_debug_function will stop compiling, because we don't provide that declaration anymore. Users will have to migrate to the new way of setting a custom assertion handler, which is extremely easy. I suspect that pool of users is very limited, so breaking them at compile-time is probably acceptable. The main downside of this approach is that code being compiled with assertions enabled but deploying to an older platform where the assertion handler didn't exist yet will fail to compile. However users can easily fix the problem by providing a custom assertion handler and defining the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_ASSERTION_HANDLER_PROVIDED macro to let the library know about the custom handler. In a way, this is actually a feature because it avoids a load-time error that one would otherwise get when trying to run the code on the older target. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121478
2022-03-03 17:37:03 -05:00
.. code-block:: cpp
void __libcpp_verbose_abort(char const* format, ...)
[libc++] Add a lightweight overridable assertion handler This patch adds a lightweight assertion handler mechanism that can be overriden at link-time in a fashion similar to `operator new`. This is a third take on https://llvm.org/D121123 (which allowed customizing the assertion handler at compile-time), and https://llvm.org/D119969 (which allowed customizing the assertion handler at runtime only). This approach is, I think, the best of all three explored approaches. Indeed, replacing the assertion handler in user code is ergonomic, yet we retain the ability to provide a custom assertion handler when deploying to older platforms that don't have a default handler in the dylib. As-is, this patch provides a pretty good amount of backwards compatibility with the previous debug mode: - Code that used to set _LIBCPP_DEBUG=0 in order to get basic assertions in their code will still get basic assertions out of the box, but those assertions will be using the new assertion handler support. - Code that was previously compiled with references to __libcpp_debug_function and friends will work out-of-the-box, no changes required. This is because we provide the same symbols in the dylib as we used to. - Code that used to set a custom __libcpp_debug_function will stop compiling, because we don't provide that declaration anymore. Users will have to migrate to the new way of setting a custom assertion handler, which is extremely easy. I suspect that pool of users is very limited, so breaking them at compile-time is probably acceptable. The main downside of this approach is that code being compiled with assertions enabled but deploying to an older platform where the assertion handler didn't exist yet will fail to compile. However users can easily fix the problem by providing a custom assertion handler and defining the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_ASSERTION_HANDLER_PROVIDED macro to let the library know about the custom handler. In a way, this is actually a feature because it avoids a load-time error that one would otherwise get when trying to run the code on the older target. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121478
2022-03-03 17:37:03 -05:00
This mechanism is similar to how one can replace the default definition of ``operator new``
and ``operator delete``. For example:
.. code-block:: cpp
// In HelloWorldHandler.cpp
#include <version> // must include any libc++ header before defining the function (C compatibility headers excluded)
[libc++] Add a lightweight overridable assertion handler This patch adds a lightweight assertion handler mechanism that can be overriden at link-time in a fashion similar to `operator new`. This is a third take on https://llvm.org/D121123 (which allowed customizing the assertion handler at compile-time), and https://llvm.org/D119969 (which allowed customizing the assertion handler at runtime only). This approach is, I think, the best of all three explored approaches. Indeed, replacing the assertion handler in user code is ergonomic, yet we retain the ability to provide a custom assertion handler when deploying to older platforms that don't have a default handler in the dylib. As-is, this patch provides a pretty good amount of backwards compatibility with the previous debug mode: - Code that used to set _LIBCPP_DEBUG=0 in order to get basic assertions in their code will still get basic assertions out of the box, but those assertions will be using the new assertion handler support. - Code that was previously compiled with references to __libcpp_debug_function and friends will work out-of-the-box, no changes required. This is because we provide the same symbols in the dylib as we used to. - Code that used to set a custom __libcpp_debug_function will stop compiling, because we don't provide that declaration anymore. Users will have to migrate to the new way of setting a custom assertion handler, which is extremely easy. I suspect that pool of users is very limited, so breaking them at compile-time is probably acceptable. The main downside of this approach is that code being compiled with assertions enabled but deploying to an older platform where the assertion handler didn't exist yet will fail to compile. However users can easily fix the problem by providing a custom assertion handler and defining the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_ASSERTION_HANDLER_PROVIDED macro to let the library know about the custom handler. In a way, this is actually a feature because it avoids a load-time error that one would otherwise get when trying to run the code on the older target. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121478
2022-03-03 17:37:03 -05:00
void std::__libcpp_verbose_abort(char const* format, ...) {
va_list list;
va_start(list, format);
std::vfprintf(stderr, format, list);
va_end(list);
[libc++] Add a lightweight overridable assertion handler This patch adds a lightweight assertion handler mechanism that can be overriden at link-time in a fashion similar to `operator new`. This is a third take on https://llvm.org/D121123 (which allowed customizing the assertion handler at compile-time), and https://llvm.org/D119969 (which allowed customizing the assertion handler at runtime only). This approach is, I think, the best of all three explored approaches. Indeed, replacing the assertion handler in user code is ergonomic, yet we retain the ability to provide a custom assertion handler when deploying to older platforms that don't have a default handler in the dylib. As-is, this patch provides a pretty good amount of backwards compatibility with the previous debug mode: - Code that used to set _LIBCPP_DEBUG=0 in order to get basic assertions in their code will still get basic assertions out of the box, but those assertions will be using the new assertion handler support. - Code that was previously compiled with references to __libcpp_debug_function and friends will work out-of-the-box, no changes required. This is because we provide the same symbols in the dylib as we used to. - Code that used to set a custom __libcpp_debug_function will stop compiling, because we don't provide that declaration anymore. Users will have to migrate to the new way of setting a custom assertion handler, which is extremely easy. I suspect that pool of users is very limited, so breaking them at compile-time is probably acceptable. The main downside of this approach is that code being compiled with assertions enabled but deploying to an older platform where the assertion handler didn't exist yet will fail to compile. However users can easily fix the problem by providing a custom assertion handler and defining the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_ASSERTION_HANDLER_PROVIDED macro to let the library know about the custom handler. In a way, this is actually a feature because it avoids a load-time error that one would otherwise get when trying to run the code on the older target. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121478
2022-03-03 17:37:03 -05:00
std::abort();
}
// In HelloWorld.cpp
#include <vector>
int main() {
std::vector<int> v;
int& x = v[0]; // Your termination function will be called here if _LIBCPP_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=1
[libc++] Add a lightweight overridable assertion handler This patch adds a lightweight assertion handler mechanism that can be overriden at link-time in a fashion similar to `operator new`. This is a third take on https://llvm.org/D121123 (which allowed customizing the assertion handler at compile-time), and https://llvm.org/D119969 (which allowed customizing the assertion handler at runtime only). This approach is, I think, the best of all three explored approaches. Indeed, replacing the assertion handler in user code is ergonomic, yet we retain the ability to provide a custom assertion handler when deploying to older platforms that don't have a default handler in the dylib. As-is, this patch provides a pretty good amount of backwards compatibility with the previous debug mode: - Code that used to set _LIBCPP_DEBUG=0 in order to get basic assertions in their code will still get basic assertions out of the box, but those assertions will be using the new assertion handler support. - Code that was previously compiled with references to __libcpp_debug_function and friends will work out-of-the-box, no changes required. This is because we provide the same symbols in the dylib as we used to. - Code that used to set a custom __libcpp_debug_function will stop compiling, because we don't provide that declaration anymore. Users will have to migrate to the new way of setting a custom assertion handler, which is extremely easy. I suspect that pool of users is very limited, so breaking them at compile-time is probably acceptable. The main downside of this approach is that code being compiled with assertions enabled but deploying to an older platform where the assertion handler didn't exist yet will fail to compile. However users can easily fix the problem by providing a custom assertion handler and defining the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_ASSERTION_HANDLER_PROVIDED macro to let the library know about the custom handler. In a way, this is actually a feature because it avoids a load-time error that one would otherwise get when trying to run the code on the older target. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121478
2022-03-03 17:37:03 -05:00
}
Also note that the verbose termination function should never return. Since assertions in libc++
catch undefined behavior, your code will proceed with undefined behavior if your function is called
and does return.
Furthermore, exceptions should not be thrown from the function. Indeed, many functions in the
library are ``noexcept``, and any exception thrown from the termination function will result
in ``std::terminate`` being called.
Libc++ Configuration Macros
===========================
Libc++ provides a number of configuration macros which can be used to enable
or disable extended libc++ behavior, including enabling "debug mode" or
thread safety annotations.
**_LIBCPP_ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY_ANNOTATIONS**:
This macro is used to enable -Wthread-safety annotations on libc++'s
``std::mutex`` and ``std::lock_guard``. By default, these annotations are
disabled and must be manually enabled by the user.
**_LIBCPP_DISABLE_VISIBILITY_ANNOTATIONS**:
This macro is used to disable all visibility annotations inside libc++.
Defining this macro and then building libc++ with hidden visibility gives a
build of libc++ which does not export any symbols, which can be useful when
building statically for inclusion into another library.
**_LIBCPP_DISABLE_ADDITIONAL_DIAGNOSTICS**:
This macro disables the additional diagnostics generated by libc++ using the
`diagnose_if` attribute. These additional diagnostics include checks for:
* Giving `set`, `map`, `multiset`, `multimap` and their `unordered_`
counterparts a comparator which is not const callable.
* Giving an unordered associative container a hasher that is not const
callable.
**_LIBCPP_NO_VCRUNTIME**:
Microsoft's C and C++ headers are fairly entangled, and some of their C++
headers are fairly hard to avoid. In particular, `vcruntime_new.h` gets pulled
in from a lot of other headers and provides definitions which clash with
libc++ headers, such as `nothrow_t` (note that `nothrow_t` is a struct, so
there's no way for libc++ to provide a compatible definition, since you can't
have multiple definitions).
By default, libc++ solves this problem by deferring to Microsoft's vcruntime
headers where needed. However, it may be undesirable to depend on vcruntime
headers, since they may not always be available in cross-compilation setups,
or they may clash with other headers. The `_LIBCPP_NO_VCRUNTIME` macro
prevents libc++ from depending on vcruntime headers. Consequently, it also
prevents libc++ headers from being interoperable with vcruntime headers (from
the aforementioned clashes), so users of this macro are promising to not
attempt to combine libc++ headers with the problematic vcruntime headers. This
macro also currently prevents certain `operator new`/`operator delete`
replacement scenarios from working, e.g. replacing `operator new` and
expecting a non-replaced `operator new[]` to call the replaced `operator new`.
**_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT**:
This macro disables library-extensions of ``[[nodiscard]]``.
See :ref:`Extended Applications of [[nodiscard]] <nodiscard extension>` for more information.
[libc++] Add _LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD and _LIBCPP_NODISCARD_EXT to allow pre-C++2a [[nodiscard]] Summary: The `[[nodiscard]]` attribute is intended to help users find bugs where function return values are ignored when they shouldn't be. After C++17 the C++ standard has started to declared such library functions as `[[nodiscard]]`. However, this application is limited and applies only to dialects after C++17. Users who want help diagnosing misuses of STL functions may desire a more liberal application of `[[nodiscard]]`. For this reason libc++ provides an extension that does just that! The extension must be enabled by defining `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD`. The extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]` takes two forms: 1. Backporting `[[nodiscard]]` to entities declared as such by the standard in newer dialects, but not in the present one. 2. Extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]`, at the libraries discretion, applied to entities never declared as such by the standard. Users may also opt-out of additional applications `[[nodiscard]]` using additional macros. Applications of the first form, which backport `[[nodiscard]]` from a newer dialect may be disabled using macros specific to the dialect it was added. For example `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_AFTER_CXX17`. Applications of the second form, which are pure extensions, may be disabled by defining `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT`. This patch was originally written by me (Roman Lebedev), then but then reworked by Eric Fiselier. Reviewers: mclow.lists, thakis, EricWF Reviewed By: thakis, EricWF Subscribers: llvm-commits, mclow.lists, lebedev.ri, EricWF, rjmccall, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits, christof Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45179 llvm-svn: 342808
2018-09-22 17:54:48 +00:00
**_LIBCPP_DISABLE_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS**:
This macro disables warnings when using deprecated components. For example,
using `std::auto_ptr` when compiling in C++11 mode will normally trigger a
warning saying that `std::auto_ptr` is deprecated. If the macro is defined,
no warning will be emitted. By default, this macro is not defined.
[libc++] Add _LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD and _LIBCPP_NODISCARD_EXT to allow pre-C++2a [[nodiscard]] Summary: The `[[nodiscard]]` attribute is intended to help users find bugs where function return values are ignored when they shouldn't be. After C++17 the C++ standard has started to declared such library functions as `[[nodiscard]]`. However, this application is limited and applies only to dialects after C++17. Users who want help diagnosing misuses of STL functions may desire a more liberal application of `[[nodiscard]]`. For this reason libc++ provides an extension that does just that! The extension must be enabled by defining `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD`. The extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]` takes two forms: 1. Backporting `[[nodiscard]]` to entities declared as such by the standard in newer dialects, but not in the present one. 2. Extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]`, at the libraries discretion, applied to entities never declared as such by the standard. Users may also opt-out of additional applications `[[nodiscard]]` using additional macros. Applications of the first form, which backport `[[nodiscard]]` from a newer dialect may be disabled using macros specific to the dialect it was added. For example `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_AFTER_CXX17`. Applications of the second form, which are pure extensions, may be disabled by defining `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT`. This patch was originally written by me (Roman Lebedev), then but then reworked by Eric Fiselier. Reviewers: mclow.lists, thakis, EricWF Reviewed By: thakis, EricWF Subscribers: llvm-commits, mclow.lists, lebedev.ri, EricWF, rjmccall, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits, christof Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45179 llvm-svn: 342808
2018-09-22 17:54:48 +00:00
C++17 Specific Configuration Macros
-----------------------------------
**_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_FEATURES**:
This macro is used to re-enable all the features removed in C++17. The effect
is equivalent to manually defining each macro listed below.
**_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_AUTO_PTR**:
This macro is used to re-enable `auto_ptr`.
**_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_BINDERS**:
This macro is used to re-enable the `binder1st`, `binder2nd`,
`pointer_to_unary_function`, `pointer_to_binary_function`, `mem_fun_t`,
`mem_fun1_t`, `mem_fun_ref_t`, `mem_fun1_ref_t`, `const_mem_fun_t`,
`const_mem_fun1_t`, `const_mem_fun_ref_t`, and `const_mem_fun1_ref_t`
class templates, and the `bind1st`, `bind2nd`, `mem_fun`, `mem_fun_ref`,
and `ptr_fun` functions.
**_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE**:
This macro is used to re-enable the `random_shuffle` algorithm.
**_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_UNEXPECTED_FUNCTIONS**:
This macro is used to re-enable `set_unexpected`, `get_unexpected`, and
`unexpected`.
[libc++] Add _LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD and _LIBCPP_NODISCARD_EXT to allow pre-C++2a [[nodiscard]] Summary: The `[[nodiscard]]` attribute is intended to help users find bugs where function return values are ignored when they shouldn't be. After C++17 the C++ standard has started to declared such library functions as `[[nodiscard]]`. However, this application is limited and applies only to dialects after C++17. Users who want help diagnosing misuses of STL functions may desire a more liberal application of `[[nodiscard]]`. For this reason libc++ provides an extension that does just that! The extension must be enabled by defining `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD`. The extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]` takes two forms: 1. Backporting `[[nodiscard]]` to entities declared as such by the standard in newer dialects, but not in the present one. 2. Extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]`, at the libraries discretion, applied to entities never declared as such by the standard. Users may also opt-out of additional applications `[[nodiscard]]` using additional macros. Applications of the first form, which backport `[[nodiscard]]` from a newer dialect may be disabled using macros specific to the dialect it was added. For example `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_AFTER_CXX17`. Applications of the second form, which are pure extensions, may be disabled by defining `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT`. This patch was originally written by me (Roman Lebedev), then but then reworked by Eric Fiselier. Reviewers: mclow.lists, thakis, EricWF Reviewed By: thakis, EricWF Subscribers: llvm-commits, mclow.lists, lebedev.ri, EricWF, rjmccall, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits, christof Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45179 llvm-svn: 342808
2018-09-22 17:54:48 +00:00
C++20 Specific Configuration Macros
-----------------------------------
[libc++] Add _LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD and _LIBCPP_NODISCARD_EXT to allow pre-C++2a [[nodiscard]] Summary: The `[[nodiscard]]` attribute is intended to help users find bugs where function return values are ignored when they shouldn't be. After C++17 the C++ standard has started to declared such library functions as `[[nodiscard]]`. However, this application is limited and applies only to dialects after C++17. Users who want help diagnosing misuses of STL functions may desire a more liberal application of `[[nodiscard]]`. For this reason libc++ provides an extension that does just that! The extension must be enabled by defining `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD`. The extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]` takes two forms: 1. Backporting `[[nodiscard]]` to entities declared as such by the standard in newer dialects, but not in the present one. 2. Extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]`, at the libraries discretion, applied to entities never declared as such by the standard. Users may also opt-out of additional applications `[[nodiscard]]` using additional macros. Applications of the first form, which backport `[[nodiscard]]` from a newer dialect may be disabled using macros specific to the dialect it was added. For example `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_AFTER_CXX17`. Applications of the second form, which are pure extensions, may be disabled by defining `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT`. This patch was originally written by me (Roman Lebedev), then but then reworked by Eric Fiselier. Reviewers: mclow.lists, thakis, EricWF Reviewed By: thakis, EricWF Subscribers: llvm-commits, mclow.lists, lebedev.ri, EricWF, rjmccall, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits, christof Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45179 llvm-svn: 342808
2018-09-22 17:54:48 +00:00
**_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_AFTER_CXX17**:
This macro can be used to disable diagnostics emitted from functions marked
``[[nodiscard]]`` in dialects after C++17. See :ref:`Extended Applications of [[nodiscard]] <nodiscard extension>`
for more information.
**_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_FEATURES**:
This macro is used to re-enable all the features removed in C++20. The effect
is equivalent to manually defining each macro listed below.
**_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS**:
This macro is used to re-enable redundant members of `allocator<T>`,
including `pointer`, `reference`, `rebind`, `address`, `max_size`,
`construct`, `destroy`, and the two-argument overload of `allocate`.
**_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_VOID_SPECIALIZATION**:
This macro is used to re-enable the library-provided specializations of
`allocator<void>` and `allocator<const void>`.
Use it in conjunction with `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS`
to ensure that removed members of `allocator<void>` can be accessed.
**_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_BINDER_TYPEDEFS**:
This macro is used to re-enable the `argument_type`, `result_type`,
`first_argument_type`, and `second_argument_type` members of class
templates such as `plus`, `logical_not`, `hash`, and `owner_less`.
**_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_NEGATORS**:
This macro is used to re-enable `not1`, `not2`, `unary_negate`,
and `binary_negate`.
**_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_RAW_STORAGE_ITERATOR**:
This macro is used to re-enable `raw_storage_iterator`.
**_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_TYPE_TRAITS**:
This macro is used to re-enable `is_literal_type`, `is_literal_type_v`,
`result_of` and `result_of_t`.
[libc++] Add _LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD and _LIBCPP_NODISCARD_EXT to allow pre-C++2a [[nodiscard]] Summary: The `[[nodiscard]]` attribute is intended to help users find bugs where function return values are ignored when they shouldn't be. After C++17 the C++ standard has started to declared such library functions as `[[nodiscard]]`. However, this application is limited and applies only to dialects after C++17. Users who want help diagnosing misuses of STL functions may desire a more liberal application of `[[nodiscard]]`. For this reason libc++ provides an extension that does just that! The extension must be enabled by defining `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD`. The extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]` takes two forms: 1. Backporting `[[nodiscard]]` to entities declared as such by the standard in newer dialects, but not in the present one. 2. Extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]`, at the libraries discretion, applied to entities never declared as such by the standard. Users may also opt-out of additional applications `[[nodiscard]]` using additional macros. Applications of the first form, which backport `[[nodiscard]]` from a newer dialect may be disabled using macros specific to the dialect it was added. For example `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_AFTER_CXX17`. Applications of the second form, which are pure extensions, may be disabled by defining `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT`. This patch was originally written by me (Roman Lebedev), then but then reworked by Eric Fiselier. Reviewers: mclow.lists, thakis, EricWF Reviewed By: thakis, EricWF Subscribers: llvm-commits, mclow.lists, lebedev.ri, EricWF, rjmccall, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits, christof Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45179 llvm-svn: 342808
2018-09-22 17:54:48 +00:00
[libc++] Add _LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD and _LIBCPP_NODISCARD_EXT to allow pre-C++2a [[nodiscard]] Summary: The `[[nodiscard]]` attribute is intended to help users find bugs where function return values are ignored when they shouldn't be. After C++17 the C++ standard has started to declared such library functions as `[[nodiscard]]`. However, this application is limited and applies only to dialects after C++17. Users who want help diagnosing misuses of STL functions may desire a more liberal application of `[[nodiscard]]`. For this reason libc++ provides an extension that does just that! The extension must be enabled by defining `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD`. The extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]` takes two forms: 1. Backporting `[[nodiscard]]` to entities declared as such by the standard in newer dialects, but not in the present one. 2. Extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]`, at the libraries discretion, applied to entities never declared as such by the standard. Users may also opt-out of additional applications `[[nodiscard]]` using additional macros. Applications of the first form, which backport `[[nodiscard]]` from a newer dialect may be disabled using macros specific to the dialect it was added. For example `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_AFTER_CXX17`. Applications of the second form, which are pure extensions, may be disabled by defining `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT`. This patch was originally written by me (Roman Lebedev), then but then reworked by Eric Fiselier. Reviewers: mclow.lists, thakis, EricWF Reviewed By: thakis, EricWF Subscribers: llvm-commits, mclow.lists, lebedev.ri, EricWF, rjmccall, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits, christof Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45179 llvm-svn: 342808
2018-09-22 17:54:48 +00:00
Libc++ Extensions
=================
This section documents various extensions provided by libc++, how they're
provided, and any information regarding how to use them.
.. _nodiscard extension:
Extended applications of ``[[nodiscard]]``
------------------------------------------
The ``[[nodiscard]]`` attribute is intended to help users find bugs where
function return values are ignored when they shouldn't be. After C++17 the
C++ standard has started to declared such library functions as ``[[nodiscard]]``.
However, this application is limited and applies only to dialects after C++17.
Users who want help diagnosing misuses of STL functions may desire a more
liberal application of ``[[nodiscard]]``.
For this reason libc++ provides an extension that does just that! The
extension is enabled by default and can be disabled by defining ``_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT``.
The extended applications of ``[[nodiscard]]`` takes two forms:
[libc++] Add _LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD and _LIBCPP_NODISCARD_EXT to allow pre-C++2a [[nodiscard]] Summary: The `[[nodiscard]]` attribute is intended to help users find bugs where function return values are ignored when they shouldn't be. After C++17 the C++ standard has started to declared such library functions as `[[nodiscard]]`. However, this application is limited and applies only to dialects after C++17. Users who want help diagnosing misuses of STL functions may desire a more liberal application of `[[nodiscard]]`. For this reason libc++ provides an extension that does just that! The extension must be enabled by defining `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD`. The extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]` takes two forms: 1. Backporting `[[nodiscard]]` to entities declared as such by the standard in newer dialects, but not in the present one. 2. Extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]`, at the libraries discretion, applied to entities never declared as such by the standard. Users may also opt-out of additional applications `[[nodiscard]]` using additional macros. Applications of the first form, which backport `[[nodiscard]]` from a newer dialect may be disabled using macros specific to the dialect it was added. For example `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_AFTER_CXX17`. Applications of the second form, which are pure extensions, may be disabled by defining `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT`. This patch was originally written by me (Roman Lebedev), then but then reworked by Eric Fiselier. Reviewers: mclow.lists, thakis, EricWF Reviewed By: thakis, EricWF Subscribers: llvm-commits, mclow.lists, lebedev.ri, EricWF, rjmccall, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits, christof Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45179 llvm-svn: 342808
2018-09-22 17:54:48 +00:00
1. Backporting ``[[nodiscard]]`` to entities declared as such by the
standard in newer dialects, but not in the present one.
2. Extended applications of ``[[nodiscard]]``, at the library's discretion,
[libc++] Add _LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD and _LIBCPP_NODISCARD_EXT to allow pre-C++2a [[nodiscard]] Summary: The `[[nodiscard]]` attribute is intended to help users find bugs where function return values are ignored when they shouldn't be. After C++17 the C++ standard has started to declared such library functions as `[[nodiscard]]`. However, this application is limited and applies only to dialects after C++17. Users who want help diagnosing misuses of STL functions may desire a more liberal application of `[[nodiscard]]`. For this reason libc++ provides an extension that does just that! The extension must be enabled by defining `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD`. The extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]` takes two forms: 1. Backporting `[[nodiscard]]` to entities declared as such by the standard in newer dialects, but not in the present one. 2. Extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]`, at the libraries discretion, applied to entities never declared as such by the standard. Users may also opt-out of additional applications `[[nodiscard]]` using additional macros. Applications of the first form, which backport `[[nodiscard]]` from a newer dialect may be disabled using macros specific to the dialect it was added. For example `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_AFTER_CXX17`. Applications of the second form, which are pure extensions, may be disabled by defining `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT`. This patch was originally written by me (Roman Lebedev), then but then reworked by Eric Fiselier. Reviewers: mclow.lists, thakis, EricWF Reviewed By: thakis, EricWF Subscribers: llvm-commits, mclow.lists, lebedev.ri, EricWF, rjmccall, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits, christof Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45179 llvm-svn: 342808
2018-09-22 17:54:48 +00:00
applied to entities never declared as such by the standard.
Entities declared with ``_LIBCPP_NODISCARD_EXT``
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This section lists all extended applications of ``[[nodiscard]]`` to entities
which no dialect declares as such (See the second form described above).
2019-04-03 18:13:08 +00:00
* ``adjacent_find``
* ``all_of``
* ``any_of``
* ``binary_search``
* ``clamp``
* ``count_if``
* ``count``
* ``equal_range``
* ``equal``
* ``find_end``
* ``find_first_of``
* ``find_if_not``
* ``find_if``
* ``find``
[libc++] Add _LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD and _LIBCPP_NODISCARD_EXT to allow pre-C++2a [[nodiscard]] Summary: The `[[nodiscard]]` attribute is intended to help users find bugs where function return values are ignored when they shouldn't be. After C++17 the C++ standard has started to declared such library functions as `[[nodiscard]]`. However, this application is limited and applies only to dialects after C++17. Users who want help diagnosing misuses of STL functions may desire a more liberal application of `[[nodiscard]]`. For this reason libc++ provides an extension that does just that! The extension must be enabled by defining `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD`. The extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]` takes two forms: 1. Backporting `[[nodiscard]]` to entities declared as such by the standard in newer dialects, but not in the present one. 2. Extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]`, at the libraries discretion, applied to entities never declared as such by the standard. Users may also opt-out of additional applications `[[nodiscard]]` using additional macros. Applications of the first form, which backport `[[nodiscard]]` from a newer dialect may be disabled using macros specific to the dialect it was added. For example `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_AFTER_CXX17`. Applications of the second form, which are pure extensions, may be disabled by defining `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT`. This patch was originally written by me (Roman Lebedev), then but then reworked by Eric Fiselier. Reviewers: mclow.lists, thakis, EricWF Reviewed By: thakis, EricWF Subscribers: llvm-commits, mclow.lists, lebedev.ri, EricWF, rjmccall, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits, christof Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45179 llvm-svn: 342808
2018-09-22 17:54:48 +00:00
* ``get_temporary_buffer``
2019-04-03 18:13:08 +00:00
* ``includes``
* ``is_heap_until``
* ``is_heap``
* ``is_partitioned``
* ``is_permutation``
* ``is_sorted_until``
* ``is_sorted``
* ``lexicographical_compare``
* ``lower_bound``
* ``max_element``
* ``max``
* ``min_element``
* ``min``
* ``minmax_element``
* ``minmax``
* ``mismatch``
* ``none_of``
* ``remove_if``
* ``remove``
* ``search_n``
* ``search``
* ``unique``
* ``upper_bound``
* ``lock_guard``'s constructors
* ``as_const``
* ``bit_cast``
* ``forward``
* ``move``
* ``move_if_noexcept``
* ``identity::operator()``
* ``to_integer``
* ``to_underlying``
[libc++] Support int8_t and uint8_t in integer distributions as an extension In D125283, we ensured that integer distributions would not compile when used with arbitrary unsupported types. This effectively enforced what the Standard mentions here: http://eel.is/c++draft/rand#req.genl-1.5. However, this also had the effect of breaking some users that were using integer distributions with unsupported types like int8_t. Since we already support using __int128_t in those distributions, it is reasonable to also support smaller types like int8_t and its unsigned variant. This commit implements that, adds tests and documents the extension. Note that we voluntarily don't add support for instantiating these distributions with bool and char, since those are not integer types. However, it is trivial to replace uses of these random distributions on char using int8_t. It is also interesting to note that in the process of adding tests for smaller types, I discovered that our distributions sometimes don't provide as faithful a distribution when instantiated with smaller types, so I had to relax a couple of tests. In particular, we do a really bad job at implementing the negative binomial, geometric and poisson distributions for small types. I think this all boils down to the algorithm we use in std::poisson_distribution, however I am running out of time to investigate that and changing the algorithm would be an ABI break (which might be reasonable). As part of this patch, I also added a mitigation for a very likely integer overflow bug we were hitting in our tests in negative_binomial_distribution. I also filed http://llvm.org/PR56656 to track fixing the problematic distributions with int8_t and uint8_t. Supersedes D125283. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126823
2022-06-01 15:25:14 -04:00
Extended integral type support
------------------------------
Several platforms support types that are not specified in the Standard, such as
the 128-bit integral types ``__int128_t`` and ``__uint128_t``. As an extension,
libc++ does a best-effort attempt to support these types like other integral
types, by supporting them notably in:
* ``<bits>``
* ``<charconv>``
* ``<functional>``
* ``<type_traits>``
* ``<format>``
* ``<random>``
Additional types supported in random distributions
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The `C++ Standard <http://eel.is/c++draft/rand#req.genl-1.5>`_ mentions that instantiating several random number
distributions with types other than ``short``, ``int``, ``long``, ``long long``, and their unsigned versions is
undefined. As an extension, libc++ supports instantiating ``binomial_distribution``, ``discrete_distribution``,
``geometric_distribution``, ``negative_binomial_distribution``, ``poisson_distribution``, and ``uniform_int_distribution``
with ``int8_t``, ``__int128_t`` and their unsigned versions.
Extensions to ``<format>``
--------------------------
The exposition only type ``basic-format-string`` and its typedefs
``format-string`` and ``wformat-string`` became ``basic_format_string``,
``format_string``, and ``wformat_string`` in C++23. Libc++ makes these types
available in C++20 as an extension.