[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
//===--- MinGW.h - MinGW ToolChain Implementations --------------*- C++ -*-===//
|
|
|
|
//
|
2019-01-19 08:50:56 +00:00
|
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef LLVM_CLANG_LIB_DRIVER_TOOLCHAINS_MINGW_H
|
|
|
|
#define LLVM_CLANG_LIB_DRIVER_TOOLCHAINS_MINGW_H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "Cuda.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "Gnu.h"
|
2024-01-23 13:14:17 -08:00
|
|
|
#include "LazyDetector.h"
|
2020-07-11 10:04:27 -04:00
|
|
|
#include "ROCm.h"
|
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "clang/Driver/Tool.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "clang/Driver/ToolChain.h"
|
2020-06-29 18:27:02 -04:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorOr.h"
|
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace clang {
|
|
|
|
namespace driver {
|
|
|
|
namespace tools {
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-17 23:27:07 -04:00
|
|
|
/// Directly call GNU Binutils assembler and linker
|
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
namespace MinGW {
|
|
|
|
class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY Assembler : public Tool {
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
Assembler(const ToolChain &TC) : Tool("MinGW::Assemble", "assembler", TC) {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool hasIntegratedCPP() const override { return false; }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction &JA,
|
|
|
|
const InputInfo &Output, const InputInfoList &Inputs,
|
|
|
|
const llvm::opt::ArgList &TCArgs,
|
|
|
|
const char *LinkingOutput) const override;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2023-10-27 15:53:14 -04:00
|
|
|
class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY Linker final : public Tool {
|
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
public:
|
2020-06-29 18:27:02 -04:00
|
|
|
Linker(const ToolChain &TC) : Tool("MinGW::Linker", "linker", TC) {}
|
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool hasIntegratedCPP() const override { return false; }
|
|
|
|
bool isLinkJob() const override { return true; }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void ConstructJob(Compilation &C, const JobAction &JA,
|
|
|
|
const InputInfo &Output, const InputInfoList &Inputs,
|
|
|
|
const llvm::opt::ArgList &TCArgs,
|
|
|
|
const char *LinkingOutput) const override;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
private:
|
|
|
|
void AddLibGCC(const llvm::opt::ArgList &Args,
|
|
|
|
llvm::opt::ArgStringList &CmdArgs) const;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
} // end namespace MinGW
|
|
|
|
} // end namespace tools
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace toolchains {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY MinGW : public ToolChain {
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
MinGW(const Driver &D, const llvm::Triple &Triple,
|
|
|
|
const llvm::opt::ArgList &Args);
|
|
|
|
|
[clang] [MinGW] Guess the right ix86 arch name spelling as sysroot
For x86, most contempory mingw toolchains use i686 as 32 bit
x86 arch target.
As long as the target triple is set to the right form, this works
fine, either as the compiler's default target, or via e.g.
a triple prefix like i686-w64-mingw32-clang.
However, if the unprefixed toolchain targets x86_64, but the user
tries to switch it to target 32 bit by adding the -m32 option, the
computeTargetTriple function in Clang, together with
Triple::get32BitArchVariant, sets the arch to i386. This causes
the right sysroot to not be found.
When targeting an arch where there are potential spelling ambiguities
with respect to the sysroots (i386 and arm), check if the driver can
find a sysroot with the arch name - if not, try a couple other
candidates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111952
2021-10-16 17:30:28 +03:00
|
|
|
static void fixTripleArch(const Driver &D, llvm::Triple &Triple,
|
|
|
|
const llvm::opt::ArgList &Args);
|
|
|
|
|
2018-10-12 20:15:51 +00:00
|
|
|
bool HasNativeLLVMSupport() const override;
|
|
|
|
|
2022-09-09 10:01:02 +01:00
|
|
|
UnwindTableLevel
|
|
|
|
getDefaultUnwindTableLevel(const llvm::opt::ArgList &Args) const override;
|
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
bool isPICDefault() const override;
|
2021-10-06 23:55:26 -04:00
|
|
|
bool isPIEDefault(const llvm::opt::ArgList &Args) const override;
|
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
bool isPICDefaultForced() const override;
|
2017-11-29 07:25:12 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-01 20:53:25 +00:00
|
|
|
SanitizerMask getSupportedSanitizers() const override;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-29 07:25:12 +00:00
|
|
|
llvm::ExceptionHandling GetExceptionModel(
|
|
|
|
const llvm::opt::ArgList &Args) const override;
|
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
AddClangSystemIncludeArgs(const llvm::opt::ArgList &DriverArgs,
|
|
|
|
llvm::opt::ArgStringList &CC1Args) const override;
|
2022-09-09 09:18:02 +03:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
addClangTargetOptions(const llvm::opt::ArgList &DriverArgs,
|
|
|
|
llvm::opt::ArgStringList &CC1Args,
|
|
|
|
Action::OffloadKind DeviceOffloadKind) const override;
|
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
void AddClangCXXStdlibIncludeArgs(
|
|
|
|
const llvm::opt::ArgList &DriverArgs,
|
|
|
|
llvm::opt::ArgStringList &CC1Args) const override;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void AddCudaIncludeArgs(const llvm::opt::ArgList &DriverArgs,
|
|
|
|
llvm::opt::ArgStringList &CC1Args) const override;
|
2020-07-11 10:04:27 -04:00
|
|
|
void AddHIPIncludeArgs(const llvm::opt::ArgList &DriverArgs,
|
|
|
|
llvm::opt::ArgStringList &CC1Args) const override;
|
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void printVerboseInfo(raw_ostream &OS) const override;
|
|
|
|
|
2022-02-09 15:15:25 +02:00
|
|
|
unsigned GetDefaultDwarfVersion() const override { return 4; }
|
|
|
|
|
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
protected:
|
|
|
|
Tool *getTool(Action::ActionClass AC) const override;
|
|
|
|
Tool *buildLinker() const override;
|
|
|
|
Tool *buildAssembler() const override;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
private:
|
2024-01-23 13:14:17 -08:00
|
|
|
LazyDetector<CudaInstallationDetector> CudaInstallation;
|
|
|
|
LazyDetector<RocmInstallationDetector> RocmInstallation;
|
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::string Base;
|
|
|
|
std::string GccLibDir;
|
2022-07-07 00:20:42 +03:00
|
|
|
clang::driver::toolchains::Generic_GCC::GCCVersion GccVer;
|
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
std::string Ver;
|
2021-10-16 17:20:16 +03:00
|
|
|
std::string SubdirName;
|
[clang] [MinGW] Improve detection of libstdc++ headers on Fedora
There's some variation in where different toolchain distributions
(and linux distributions) package the mingw sysroots - this is
so far handled by adding specific known subdirectory paths
to the include and lib directory lists.
There are multiple degrees of combinatorics involved here though;
the distros may use different locations such as
/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include or
/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include.
So far, this setup has been treated as base=/usr, subdir=x86_64-w64-mingw32,
and the driver tries to add further subdirectories such as
<base>/<subdir>/include, <base>/<subdir>/sys-root/mingw/include.
When it comes to libstdc++ (and libc++), each of these come with
a large number of potential subdirectories. Instead of further
exploding the combinatorics another step by adding all combinations
of all paths, check whether <base>/<subdir>/sys-root/mingw/include
exists, and if it does, append that subpath into the subdir variable.
This allows finding libstdc++ headers in e.g.
/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/c++/x86_64-w64-mingw32
on Fedora.
The same logic (where everything belonging to this target fits
under one expanded <subdir> path, with just /include and /lib
under it) doesn't seem to apply on Gentoo, where the includes
are found in <base>/<subdir>/usr/include while the libraries
are in <base>/<subdir>/mingw/lib (see
8e218026f8d5eabfdef9141ae5e26aa91d1933e6). But apparently
the libstdc++ headers aren't installed under
<base>/<subdir>/usr/include, so that path hierarchy quirk doesn't
need to be taken into account in AddClangCXXStdlibIncludeArgs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138693
2022-11-22 14:39:39 +02:00
|
|
|
std::string TripleDirName;
|
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
mutable std::unique_ptr<tools::gcc::Preprocessor> Preprocessor;
|
|
|
|
mutable std::unique_ptr<tools::gcc::Compiler> Compiler;
|
[clang] [MinGW] Improve/extend the gcc/sysroot detection logic
There are three functions that try to detect the right implicit
sysroot and libgcc directory setup to use
- One which looks for mingw sysroots located in
<clangbin>/../<sysrootname>
- One which looks for a mingw-targeting gcc executables in the PATH
- One which looks in the <gccroot>/lib/gcc directory to find the
right one to use, and the right specific triple used for arch
specific directories in the gcc/libstdc++ install
These have mostly tried to look for executables named
"<arch>-w64-mingw32-gcc" or "mingw32-gcc" or subdirectories
named "<arch>-w64-mingw32" or "mingw32".
In the case of findClangRelativeSysroot, it also has looked
for directories with the name of the actual triple. This
was added in deff7536278d355977171726124f83aa4bb95419,
with the intent of looking for a directory matching exactly
the user provided literal triple - however the triple here
is the normalized one, not the one provided by the user on
the command line.
Improve and unify this logic somewhat:
- Always first look for things based on the literal triple
provided by the user.
- Secondly look for things based on the normalized triple
(which usually ends up as e.g. x86_64-w64-windows-gnu),
accessed via the Triple which is passed to the constructor
- Then look for the common triple form <arch>-w64-mingw32
The literal triple provided by the user is available via
Driver::getTargetTriple(), but computeTargetTriple() may
change e.g. the architecture of it, so we need to
reapply the effective architecture on the literal triple
spelling from Driver::getTargetTriple().
Do this consistently for all of findGcc, findClangRelativeSysroot
and findGccLibDir (while keeping the existing plain "mingw32"
cases in findGcc and findGccLibDir too).
Fedora 37 started shipping mingw sysroots targeting UCRT,
in addition to the traditional msvcrt.dll, and these use
triples in the form <arch>-w64-mingw32ucrt - see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F37MingwUCRT.
Thus, in addition to the existing default tested triples,
try looking for triples in the form <arch>-w64-mingw32ucrt,
to automatically find the UCRT sysroots on Fedora 37.
By explicitly setting a specific target on the Clang command
line, the user can be more explicit with which flavour is
to be preferred.
This should fix the main issue in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59001.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138692
2022-11-22 14:38:54 +02:00
|
|
|
void findGccLibDir(const llvm::Triple &LiteralTriple);
|
2018-10-12 20:15:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool NativeLLVMSupport;
|
[Driver] Consolidate tools and toolchains by target platform. (NFC)
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
2017-03-08 01:02:16 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} // end namespace toolchains
|
|
|
|
} // end namespace driver
|
|
|
|
} // end namespace clang
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif // LLVM_CLANG_LIB_DRIVER_TOOLCHAINS_MINGW_H
|