llvm-project/clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-dependent-nested-name.cpp

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
// expected-no-diagnostics
// PR4382
template<typename T> struct X { static const T A = 1; };
template<typename T, bool = X<T>::A> struct Y { typedef T A; };
template<typename T> struct Z { typedef typename Y<T>::A A; };
extern int x;
extern Z<int>::A x;
Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'. - This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable" which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set a default target). llvm-svn: 91446 2009-12-15 20:14:24 +00:00			`// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s`
Revert "Don't build invalid AST nodes during recovery" This reverts commit r224451. It caused us to reject some valid existing code. This code appears to run in non-error cases as well as error cases. If the scope of a DependentScopeDeclRefExpr is still incomplete it probably means we still have more instantiation to do. llvm-svn: 224526 2014-12-18 18:17:42 +00:00			`// expected-no-diagnostics`
Fix for PR4382: allow instantiating dependent nested name specifiers. I'm not completely sure this is the right way to fix this issue, but it seems reasonable, and it's consistent with the non-template code for this construct. llvm-svn: 73285 2009-06-13 04:51:30 +00:00			`// PR4382`
			`template<typename T> struct X { static const T A = 1; };`
			`template<typename T, bool = X<T>::A> struct Y { typedef T A; };`
			`template<typename T> struct Z { typedef typename Y<T>::A A; };`
			`extern int x;`
			`extern Z<int>::A x;`