llvm-project/lld/ELF/Thunks.cpp

1321 lines
48 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===- Thunks.cpp --------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
2016-07-09 23:16:00 +00:00
// This file contains Thunk subclasses.
//
// A thunk is a small piece of code written after an input section
// which is used to jump between "incompatible" functions
// such as MIPS PIC and non-PIC or ARM non-Thumb and Thumb functions.
//
// If a jump target is too far and its address doesn't fit to a
// short jump instruction, we need to create a thunk too, but we
// haven't supported it yet.
//
// i386 and x86-64 don't need thunks.
//
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "Thunks.h"
#include "Config.h"
#include "InputFiles.h"
#include "InputSection.h"
#include "OutputSections.h"
#include "Symbols.h"
#include "SyntheticSections.h"
#include "Target.h"
#include "lld/Common/CommonLinkerContext.h"
#include "llvm/BinaryFormat/ELF.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Casting.h"
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
#include "llvm/Support/MathExtras.h"
#include <cstdint>
#include <cstring>
using namespace llvm;
using namespace llvm::object;
using namespace llvm::ELF;
using namespace lld;
using namespace lld::elf;
namespace {
// AArch64 long range Thunks
class AArch64ABSLongThunk final : public Thunk {
public:
AArch64ABSLongThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend) : Thunk(dest, addend) {}
uint32_t size() override { return 16; }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeTo(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
};
class AArch64ADRPThunk final : public Thunk {
public:
AArch64ADRPThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend) : Thunk(dest, addend) {}
uint32_t size() override { return 12; }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeTo(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
};
// Base class for ARM thunks.
//
// An ARM thunk may be either short or long. A short thunk is simply a branch
// (B) instruction, and it may be used to call ARM functions when the distance
// from the thunk to the target is less than 32MB. Long thunks can branch to any
// virtual address and can switch between ARM and Thumb, and they are
// implemented in the derived classes. This class tries to create a short thunk
// if the target is in range, otherwise it creates a long thunk.
class ARMThunk : public Thunk {
public:
[LLD][ELF][ARM] Refactor inBranchRange to use addend for PC Bias In AArch32 ARM, the PC reads two instructions ahead of the currently executiing instruction. This evaluates to 8 in ARM state and 4 in Thumb state. Branch instructions on AArch32 compensate for this by subtracting the PC bias from the addend. For a branch to symbol this will result in an addend of -8 in ARM state and -4 in Thumb state. The existing ARM Target::inBranchRange function accounted for this implict addend within the function meaning that if the addend were to be taken into account by the caller then it would be double counted. This complicates the interface for all Targets as callers wanting to account for addends had to account for the ARM PC-bias. In certain situations such as: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 the PC-bias compensation code didn't match up. In particular normalizeExistingThunk() didn't put the PC-bias back in as Arm thunks did not store the addend. The simplest fix for the problem is to add the PC bias in normalizeExistingThunk when restoring the addend. However I think it is worth refactoring the Arm inBranchRange implementation so that fewer calls to getPCBias are needed for other Targets. I wasn't able to remove getPCBias completely but hopefully the Relocations.cpp code is simpler now. In principle a test could be written to replicate the linux kernel build failure but I wasn't able to reproduce with a small example that I could build up from scratch. Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97550
2021-02-26 13:14:21 +00:00
ARMThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend) : Thunk(dest, addend) {}
bool getMayUseShortThunk();
uint32_t size() override { return getMayUseShortThunk() ? 4 : sizeLong(); }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeTo(uint8_t *buf) override;
bool isCompatibleWith(const InputSection &isec,
const Relocation &rel) const override;
// Returns the size of a long thunk.
virtual uint32_t sizeLong() = 0;
// Writes a long thunk to Buf.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
virtual void writeLong(uint8_t *buf) = 0;
private:
// This field tracks whether all previously considered layouts would allow
// this thunk to be short. If we have ever needed a long thunk, we always
// create a long thunk, even if the thunk may be short given the current
// distance to the target. We do this because transitioning from long to short
// can create layout oscillations in certain corner cases which would prevent
// the layout from converging.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
bool mayUseShortThunk = true;
};
// Base class for Thumb-2 thunks.
//
// This class is similar to ARMThunk, but it uses the Thumb-2 B.W instruction
// which has a range of 16MB.
class ThumbThunk : public Thunk {
public:
[LLD][ELF][ARM] Refactor inBranchRange to use addend for PC Bias In AArch32 ARM, the PC reads two instructions ahead of the currently executiing instruction. This evaluates to 8 in ARM state and 4 in Thumb state. Branch instructions on AArch32 compensate for this by subtracting the PC bias from the addend. For a branch to symbol this will result in an addend of -8 in ARM state and -4 in Thumb state. The existing ARM Target::inBranchRange function accounted for this implict addend within the function meaning that if the addend were to be taken into account by the caller then it would be double counted. This complicates the interface for all Targets as callers wanting to account for addends had to account for the ARM PC-bias. In certain situations such as: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 the PC-bias compensation code didn't match up. In particular normalizeExistingThunk() didn't put the PC-bias back in as Arm thunks did not store the addend. The simplest fix for the problem is to add the PC bias in normalizeExistingThunk when restoring the addend. However I think it is worth refactoring the Arm inBranchRange implementation so that fewer calls to getPCBias are needed for other Targets. I wasn't able to remove getPCBias completely but hopefully the Relocations.cpp code is simpler now. In principle a test could be written to replicate the linux kernel build failure but I wasn't able to reproduce with a small example that I could build up from scratch. Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97550
2021-02-26 13:14:21 +00:00
ThumbThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend) : Thunk(dest, addend) {
alignment = 2;
}
bool getMayUseShortThunk();
uint32_t size() override { return getMayUseShortThunk() ? 4 : sizeLong(); }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeTo(uint8_t *buf) override;
bool isCompatibleWith(const InputSection &isec,
const Relocation &rel) const override;
// Returns the size of a long thunk.
virtual uint32_t sizeLong() = 0;
// Writes a long thunk to Buf.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
virtual void writeLong(uint8_t *buf) = 0;
private:
// See comment in ARMThunk above.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
bool mayUseShortThunk = true;
};
// Specific ARM Thunk implementations. The naming convention is:
// Source State, TargetState, Target Requirement, ABS or PI, Range
class ARMV7ABSLongThunk final : public ARMThunk {
public:
[LLD][ELF][ARM] Refactor inBranchRange to use addend for PC Bias In AArch32 ARM, the PC reads two instructions ahead of the currently executiing instruction. This evaluates to 8 in ARM state and 4 in Thumb state. Branch instructions on AArch32 compensate for this by subtracting the PC bias from the addend. For a branch to symbol this will result in an addend of -8 in ARM state and -4 in Thumb state. The existing ARM Target::inBranchRange function accounted for this implict addend within the function meaning that if the addend were to be taken into account by the caller then it would be double counted. This complicates the interface for all Targets as callers wanting to account for addends had to account for the ARM PC-bias. In certain situations such as: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 the PC-bias compensation code didn't match up. In particular normalizeExistingThunk() didn't put the PC-bias back in as Arm thunks did not store the addend. The simplest fix for the problem is to add the PC bias in normalizeExistingThunk when restoring the addend. However I think it is worth refactoring the Arm inBranchRange implementation so that fewer calls to getPCBias are needed for other Targets. I wasn't able to remove getPCBias completely but hopefully the Relocations.cpp code is simpler now. In principle a test could be written to replicate the linux kernel build failure but I wasn't able to reproduce with a small example that I could build up from scratch. Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97550
2021-02-26 13:14:21 +00:00
ARMV7ABSLongThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend) : ARMThunk(dest, addend) {}
uint32_t sizeLong() override { return 12; }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeLong(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
};
class ARMV7PILongThunk final : public ARMThunk {
public:
[LLD][ELF][ARM] Refactor inBranchRange to use addend for PC Bias In AArch32 ARM, the PC reads two instructions ahead of the currently executiing instruction. This evaluates to 8 in ARM state and 4 in Thumb state. Branch instructions on AArch32 compensate for this by subtracting the PC bias from the addend. For a branch to symbol this will result in an addend of -8 in ARM state and -4 in Thumb state. The existing ARM Target::inBranchRange function accounted for this implict addend within the function meaning that if the addend were to be taken into account by the caller then it would be double counted. This complicates the interface for all Targets as callers wanting to account for addends had to account for the ARM PC-bias. In certain situations such as: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 the PC-bias compensation code didn't match up. In particular normalizeExistingThunk() didn't put the PC-bias back in as Arm thunks did not store the addend. The simplest fix for the problem is to add the PC bias in normalizeExistingThunk when restoring the addend. However I think it is worth refactoring the Arm inBranchRange implementation so that fewer calls to getPCBias are needed for other Targets. I wasn't able to remove getPCBias completely but hopefully the Relocations.cpp code is simpler now. In principle a test could be written to replicate the linux kernel build failure but I wasn't able to reproduce with a small example that I could build up from scratch. Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97550
2021-02-26 13:14:21 +00:00
ARMV7PILongThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend) : ARMThunk(dest, addend) {}
uint32_t sizeLong() override { return 16; }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeLong(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
};
class ThumbV7ABSLongThunk final : public ThumbThunk {
public:
[LLD][ELF][ARM] Refactor inBranchRange to use addend for PC Bias In AArch32 ARM, the PC reads two instructions ahead of the currently executiing instruction. This evaluates to 8 in ARM state and 4 in Thumb state. Branch instructions on AArch32 compensate for this by subtracting the PC bias from the addend. For a branch to symbol this will result in an addend of -8 in ARM state and -4 in Thumb state. The existing ARM Target::inBranchRange function accounted for this implict addend within the function meaning that if the addend were to be taken into account by the caller then it would be double counted. This complicates the interface for all Targets as callers wanting to account for addends had to account for the ARM PC-bias. In certain situations such as: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 the PC-bias compensation code didn't match up. In particular normalizeExistingThunk() didn't put the PC-bias back in as Arm thunks did not store the addend. The simplest fix for the problem is to add the PC bias in normalizeExistingThunk when restoring the addend. However I think it is worth refactoring the Arm inBranchRange implementation so that fewer calls to getPCBias are needed for other Targets. I wasn't able to remove getPCBias completely but hopefully the Relocations.cpp code is simpler now. In principle a test could be written to replicate the linux kernel build failure but I wasn't able to reproduce with a small example that I could build up from scratch. Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97550
2021-02-26 13:14:21 +00:00
ThumbV7ABSLongThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend)
: ThumbThunk(dest, addend) {}
uint32_t sizeLong() override { return 10; }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeLong(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
};
class ThumbV7PILongThunk final : public ThumbThunk {
public:
[LLD][ELF][ARM] Refactor inBranchRange to use addend for PC Bias In AArch32 ARM, the PC reads two instructions ahead of the currently executiing instruction. This evaluates to 8 in ARM state and 4 in Thumb state. Branch instructions on AArch32 compensate for this by subtracting the PC bias from the addend. For a branch to symbol this will result in an addend of -8 in ARM state and -4 in Thumb state. The existing ARM Target::inBranchRange function accounted for this implict addend within the function meaning that if the addend were to be taken into account by the caller then it would be double counted. This complicates the interface for all Targets as callers wanting to account for addends had to account for the ARM PC-bias. In certain situations such as: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 the PC-bias compensation code didn't match up. In particular normalizeExistingThunk() didn't put the PC-bias back in as Arm thunks did not store the addend. The simplest fix for the problem is to add the PC bias in normalizeExistingThunk when restoring the addend. However I think it is worth refactoring the Arm inBranchRange implementation so that fewer calls to getPCBias are needed for other Targets. I wasn't able to remove getPCBias completely but hopefully the Relocations.cpp code is simpler now. In principle a test could be written to replicate the linux kernel build failure but I wasn't able to reproduce with a small example that I could build up from scratch. Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97550
2021-02-26 13:14:21 +00:00
ThumbV7PILongThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend) : ThumbThunk(dest, addend) {}
uint32_t sizeLong() override { return 12; }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeLong(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
};
// Implementations of Thunks for Arm v6-M. Only Thumb instructions are permitted
class ThumbV6MABSLongThunk final : public ThumbThunk {
public:
ThumbV6MABSLongThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend)
: ThumbThunk(dest, addend) {}
uint32_t sizeLong() override { return 12; }
void writeLong(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
};
class ThumbV6MPILongThunk final : public ThumbThunk {
public:
ThumbV6MPILongThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend)
: ThumbThunk(dest, addend) {}
uint32_t sizeLong() override { return 16; }
void writeLong(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
};
// Architectures v4, v5 and v6 do not support the movt/movw instructions. v5 and
// v6 support BLX to which BL instructions can be rewritten inline. There are no
// Thumb entrypoints for v5 and v6 as there is no Thumb branch instruction on
// these architecture that can result in a thunk.
// LDR on v5 and v6 can switch processor state, so for v5 and v6,
// ARMV5LongLdrPcThunk can be used for both Arm->Arm and Arm->Thumb calls. v4
// can also use this thunk, but only for Arm->Arm calls.
class ARMV5LongLdrPcThunk final : public ARMThunk {
public:
ARMV5LongLdrPcThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend) : ARMThunk(dest, addend) {}
uint32_t sizeLong() override { return 8; }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeLong(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
};
class ARMV4PILongThunk final : public ARMThunk {
public:
ARMV4PILongThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend) : ARMThunk(dest, addend) {}
uint32_t sizeLong() override { return 16; }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeLong(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
};
// Implementations of Thunks for v4. BLX is not supported, and loads
// will not invoke Arm/Thumb state changes.
class ARMV4ABSLongBXThunk final : public ARMThunk {
public:
ARMV4ABSLongBXThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend) : ARMThunk(dest, addend) {}
uint32_t sizeLong() override { return 12; }
void writeLong(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
};
class ThumbV4ABSLongBXThunk final : public ThumbThunk {
public:
ThumbV4ABSLongBXThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend)
[LLD][ELF][ARM] Refactor inBranchRange to use addend for PC Bias In AArch32 ARM, the PC reads two instructions ahead of the currently executiing instruction. This evaluates to 8 in ARM state and 4 in Thumb state. Branch instructions on AArch32 compensate for this by subtracting the PC bias from the addend. For a branch to symbol this will result in an addend of -8 in ARM state and -4 in Thumb state. The existing ARM Target::inBranchRange function accounted for this implict addend within the function meaning that if the addend were to be taken into account by the caller then it would be double counted. This complicates the interface for all Targets as callers wanting to account for addends had to account for the ARM PC-bias. In certain situations such as: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 the PC-bias compensation code didn't match up. In particular normalizeExistingThunk() didn't put the PC-bias back in as Arm thunks did not store the addend. The simplest fix for the problem is to add the PC bias in normalizeExistingThunk when restoring the addend. However I think it is worth refactoring the Arm inBranchRange implementation so that fewer calls to getPCBias are needed for other Targets. I wasn't able to remove getPCBias completely but hopefully the Relocations.cpp code is simpler now. In principle a test could be written to replicate the linux kernel build failure but I wasn't able to reproduce with a small example that I could build up from scratch. Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97550
2021-02-26 13:14:21 +00:00
: ThumbThunk(dest, addend) {}
uint32_t sizeLong() override { return 12; }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeLong(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
};
class ThumbV4ABSLongThunk final : public ThumbThunk {
public:
ThumbV4ABSLongThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend)
[LLD][ELF][ARM] Refactor inBranchRange to use addend for PC Bias In AArch32 ARM, the PC reads two instructions ahead of the currently executiing instruction. This evaluates to 8 in ARM state and 4 in Thumb state. Branch instructions on AArch32 compensate for this by subtracting the PC bias from the addend. For a branch to symbol this will result in an addend of -8 in ARM state and -4 in Thumb state. The existing ARM Target::inBranchRange function accounted for this implict addend within the function meaning that if the addend were to be taken into account by the caller then it would be double counted. This complicates the interface for all Targets as callers wanting to account for addends had to account for the ARM PC-bias. In certain situations such as: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 the PC-bias compensation code didn't match up. In particular normalizeExistingThunk() didn't put the PC-bias back in as Arm thunks did not store the addend. The simplest fix for the problem is to add the PC bias in normalizeExistingThunk when restoring the addend. However I think it is worth refactoring the Arm inBranchRange implementation so that fewer calls to getPCBias are needed for other Targets. I wasn't able to remove getPCBias completely but hopefully the Relocations.cpp code is simpler now. In principle a test could be written to replicate the linux kernel build failure but I wasn't able to reproduce with a small example that I could build up from scratch. Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97550
2021-02-26 13:14:21 +00:00
: ThumbThunk(dest, addend) {}
uint32_t sizeLong() override { return 16; }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeLong(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
};
// MIPS LA25 thunk
class MipsThunk final : public Thunk {
public:
MipsThunk(Symbol &dest) : Thunk(dest, 0) {}
uint32_t size() override { return 16; }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeTo(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
InputSection *getTargetInputSection() const override;
};
// microMIPS R2-R5 LA25 thunk
class MicroMipsThunk final : public Thunk {
public:
MicroMipsThunk(Symbol &dest) : Thunk(dest, 0) {}
uint32_t size() override { return 14; }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeTo(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
InputSection *getTargetInputSection() const override;
};
// microMIPS R6 LA25 thunk
class MicroMipsR6Thunk final : public Thunk {
public:
MicroMipsR6Thunk(Symbol &dest) : Thunk(dest, 0) {}
uint32_t size() override { return 12; }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeTo(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
InputSection *getTargetInputSection() const override;
};
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
class PPC32PltCallStub final : public Thunk {
public:
// For R_PPC_PLTREL24, Thunk::addend records the addend which will be used to
// decide the offsets in the call stub.
PPC32PltCallStub(const InputSection &isec, const Relocation &rel,
Symbol &dest)
: Thunk(dest, rel.addend), file(isec.file) {}
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
uint32_t size() override { return 16; }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeTo(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
bool isCompatibleWith(const InputSection &isec, const Relocation &rel) const override;
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
private:
// Records the call site of the call stub.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
const InputFile *file;
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
};
class PPC32LongThunk final : public Thunk {
public:
PPC32LongThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend) : Thunk(dest, addend) {}
uint32_t size() override { return config->isPic ? 32 : 16; }
void writeTo(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
};
// PPC64 Plt call stubs.
// Any call site that needs to call through a plt entry needs a call stub in
// the .text section. The call stub is responsible for:
// 1) Saving the toc-pointer to the stack.
// 2) Loading the target functions address from the procedure linkage table into
// r12 for use by the target functions global entry point, and into the count
// register.
// 3) Transferring control to the target function through an indirect branch.
class PPC64PltCallStub final : public Thunk {
public:
PPC64PltCallStub(Symbol &dest) : Thunk(dest, 0) {}
uint32_t size() override { return 20; }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeTo(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
bool isCompatibleWith(const InputSection &isec,
const Relocation &rel) const override;
};
// PPC64 R2 Save Stub
// When the caller requires a valid R2 TOC pointer but the callee does not
// require a TOC pointer and the callee cannot guarantee that it doesn't
// clobber R2 then we need to save R2. This stub:
// 1) Saves the TOC pointer to the stack.
// 2) Tail calls the callee.
class PPC64R2SaveStub final : public Thunk {
public:
PPC64R2SaveStub(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend) : Thunk(dest, addend) {
alignment = 16;
}
// To prevent oscillations in layout when moving from short to long thunks
// we make sure that once a thunk has been set to long it cannot go back.
bool getMayUseShortThunk() {
if (!mayUseShortThunk)
return false;
if (!isInt<26>(computeOffset())) {
mayUseShortThunk = false;
return false;
}
return true;
}
uint32_t size() override { return getMayUseShortThunk() ? 8 : 32; }
void writeTo(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
bool isCompatibleWith(const InputSection &isec,
const Relocation &rel) const override;
private:
// Transitioning from long to short can create layout oscillations in
// certain corner cases which would prevent the layout from converging.
// This is similar to the handling for ARMThunk.
bool mayUseShortThunk = true;
int64_t computeOffset() const {
return destination.getVA() - (getThunkTargetSym()->getVA() + 4);
}
};
// PPC64 R12 Setup Stub
// When a caller that does not maintain a toc-pointer performs a local call to
// a callee which requires a toc-pointer then we need this stub to place the
// callee's global entry point into r12 without a save of R2.
class PPC64R12SetupStub final : public Thunk {
public:
PPC64R12SetupStub(Symbol &dest) : Thunk(dest, 0) { alignment = 16; }
uint32_t size() override { return 32; }
void writeTo(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
bool isCompatibleWith(const InputSection &isec,
const Relocation &rel) const override;
};
// PPC64 PC-relative PLT Stub
// When a caller that does not maintain a toc-pointer performs an extern call
// then this stub is needed for:
// 1) Loading the target functions address from the procedure linkage table into
// r12 for use by the target functions global entry point, and into the count
// register with pc-relative instructions.
// 2) Transferring control to the target function through an indirect branch.
class PPC64PCRelPLTStub final : public Thunk {
public:
PPC64PCRelPLTStub(Symbol &dest) : Thunk(dest, 0) { alignment = 16; }
uint32_t size() override { return 32; }
void writeTo(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
bool isCompatibleWith(const InputSection &isec,
const Relocation &rel) const override;
};
// A bl instruction uses a signed 24 bit offset, with an implicit 4 byte
// alignment. This gives a possible 26 bits of 'reach'. If the call offset is
// larger than that we need to emit a long-branch thunk. The target address
// of the callee is stored in a table to be accessed TOC-relative. Since the
// call must be local (a non-local call will have a PltCallStub instead) the
// table stores the address of the callee's local entry point. For
// position-independent code a corresponding relative dynamic relocation is
// used.
class PPC64LongBranchThunk : public Thunk {
public:
uint32_t size() override { return 32; }
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void writeTo(uint8_t *buf) override;
void addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) override;
bool isCompatibleWith(const InputSection &isec,
const Relocation &rel) const override;
protected:
PPC64LongBranchThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend) : Thunk(dest, addend) {}
};
class PPC64PILongBranchThunk final : public PPC64LongBranchThunk {
public:
PPC64PILongBranchThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend)
: PPC64LongBranchThunk(dest, addend) {
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
assert(!dest.isPreemptible);
if (std::optional<uint32_t> index =
in.ppc64LongBranchTarget->addEntry(&dest, addend)) {
mainPart->relaDyn->addRelativeReloc(
target->relativeRel, *in.ppc64LongBranchTarget, *index * UINT64_C(8),
dest, addend + getPPC64GlobalEntryToLocalEntryOffset(dest.stOther),
target->symbolicRel, R_ABS);
}
}
};
class PPC64PDLongBranchThunk final : public PPC64LongBranchThunk {
public:
PPC64PDLongBranchThunk(Symbol &dest, int64_t addend)
: PPC64LongBranchThunk(dest, addend) {
in.ppc64LongBranchTarget->addEntry(&dest, addend);
}
};
} // end anonymous namespace
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
Defined *Thunk::addSymbol(StringRef name, uint8_t type, uint64_t value,
InputSectionBase &section) {
Defined *d = addSyntheticLocal(name, type, value, /*size=*/0, section);
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
syms.push_back(d);
return d;
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void Thunk::setOffset(uint64_t newOffset) {
for (Defined *d : syms)
d->value = d->value - offset + newOffset;
offset = newOffset;
}
// AArch64 long range Thunks
static uint64_t getAArch64ThunkDestVA(const Symbol &s, int64_t a) {
uint64_t v = s.isInPlt() ? s.getPltVA() : s.getVA(a);
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
return v;
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void AArch64ABSLongThunk::writeTo(uint8_t *buf) {
const uint8_t data[] = {
0x50, 0x00, 0x00, 0x58, // ldr x16, L0
0x00, 0x02, 0x1f, 0xd6, // br x16
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, // L0: .xword S
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
};
uint64_t s = getAArch64ThunkDestVA(destination, addend);
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
memcpy(buf, data, sizeof(data));
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 8, R_AARCH64_ABS64, s);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void AArch64ABSLongThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__AArch64AbsLongThunk_" + destination.getName()),
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
STT_FUNC, 0, isec);
addSymbol("$x", STT_NOTYPE, 0, isec);
addSymbol("$d", STT_NOTYPE, 8, isec);
}
// This Thunk has a maximum range of 4Gb, this is sufficient for all programs
// using the small code model, including pc-relative ones. At time of writing
// clang and gcc do not support the large code model for position independent
// code so it is safe to use this for position independent thunks without
// worrying about the destination being more than 4Gb away.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void AArch64ADRPThunk::writeTo(uint8_t *buf) {
const uint8_t data[] = {
0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0x90, // adrp x16, Dest R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21(Dest)
0x10, 0x02, 0x00, 0x91, // add x16, x16, R_AARCH64_ADD_ABS_LO12_NC(Dest)
0x00, 0x02, 0x1f, 0xd6, // br x16
};
uint64_t s = getAArch64ThunkDestVA(destination, addend);
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
uint64_t p = getThunkTargetSym()->getVA();
memcpy(buf, data, sizeof(data));
target->relocateNoSym(buf, R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21,
getAArch64Page(s) - getAArch64Page(p));
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 4, R_AARCH64_ADD_ABS_LO12_NC, s);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void AArch64ADRPThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__AArch64ADRPThunk_" + destination.getName()),
STT_FUNC, 0, isec);
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
addSymbol("$x", STT_NOTYPE, 0, isec);
}
// ARM Target Thunks
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
static uint64_t getARMThunkDestVA(const Symbol &s) {
uint64_t v = s.isInPlt() ? s.getPltVA() : s.getVA();
return SignExtend64<32>(v);
}
// This function returns true if the target is not Thumb and is within 2^26, and
// it has not previously returned false (see comment for mayUseShortThunk).
bool ARMThunk::getMayUseShortThunk() {
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
if (!mayUseShortThunk)
return false;
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
uint64_t s = getARMThunkDestVA(destination);
if (s & 1) {
mayUseShortThunk = false;
return false;
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
uint64_t p = getThunkTargetSym()->getVA();
int64_t offset = s - p - 8;
mayUseShortThunk = llvm::isInt<26>(offset);
return mayUseShortThunk;
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void ARMThunk::writeTo(uint8_t *buf) {
if (!getMayUseShortThunk()) {
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
writeLong(buf);
return;
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
uint64_t s = getARMThunkDestVA(destination);
uint64_t p = getThunkTargetSym()->getVA();
int64_t offset = s - p - 8;
const uint8_t data[] = {
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0xea, // b S
};
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
memcpy(buf, data, sizeof(data));
target->relocateNoSym(buf, R_ARM_JUMP24, offset);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
bool ARMThunk::isCompatibleWith(const InputSection &isec,
const Relocation &rel) const {
// v4T does not have BLX, so also deny R_ARM_THM_CALL
if (!config->armHasBlx && rel.type == R_ARM_THM_CALL)
return false;
// Thumb branch relocations can't use BLX
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
return rel.type != R_ARM_THM_JUMP19 && rel.type != R_ARM_THM_JUMP24;
}
// This function returns true if:
// the target is Thumb
// && is within branch range
// && this function has not previously returned false
// (see comment for mayUseShortThunk)
// && the arch supports Thumb branch range extension.
bool ThumbThunk::getMayUseShortThunk() {
if (!mayUseShortThunk || !config->armJ1J2BranchEncoding)
return false;
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
uint64_t s = getARMThunkDestVA(destination);
if ((s & 1) == 0) {
mayUseShortThunk = false;
return false;
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
uint64_t p = getThunkTargetSym()->getVA() & ~1;
int64_t offset = s - p - 4;
mayUseShortThunk = llvm::isInt<25>(offset);
return mayUseShortThunk;
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void ThumbThunk::writeTo(uint8_t *buf) {
if (!getMayUseShortThunk()) {
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
writeLong(buf);
return;
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
uint64_t s = getARMThunkDestVA(destination);
uint64_t p = getThunkTargetSym()->getVA();
int64_t offset = s - p - 4;
const uint8_t data[] = {
0x00, 0xf0, 0x00, 0xb0, // b.w S
};
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
memcpy(buf, data, sizeof(data));
target->relocateNoSym(buf, R_ARM_THM_JUMP24, offset);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
bool ThumbThunk::isCompatibleWith(const InputSection &isec,
const Relocation &rel) const {
// v4T does not have BLX, so also deny R_ARM_CALL
if (!config->armHasBlx && rel.type == R_ARM_CALL)
return false;
// ARM branch relocations can't use BLX
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
return rel.type != R_ARM_JUMP24 && rel.type != R_ARM_PC24 && rel.type != R_ARM_PLT32;
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void ARMV7ABSLongThunk::writeLong(uint8_t *buf) {
const uint8_t data[] = {
0x00, 0xc0, 0x00, 0xe3, // movw ip,:lower16:S
0x00, 0xc0, 0x40, 0xe3, // movt ip,:upper16:S
0x1c, 0xff, 0x2f, 0xe1, // bx ip
};
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
uint64_t s = getARMThunkDestVA(destination);
memcpy(buf, data, sizeof(data));
target->relocateNoSym(buf, R_ARM_MOVW_ABS_NC, s);
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 4, R_ARM_MOVT_ABS, s);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void ARMV7ABSLongThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__ARMv7ABSLongThunk_" + destination.getName()),
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
STT_FUNC, 0, isec);
addSymbol("$a", STT_NOTYPE, 0, isec);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void ThumbV7ABSLongThunk::writeLong(uint8_t *buf) {
const uint8_t data[] = {
0x40, 0xf2, 0x00, 0x0c, // movw ip, :lower16:S
0xc0, 0xf2, 0x00, 0x0c, // movt ip, :upper16:S
0x60, 0x47, // bx ip
};
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
uint64_t s = getARMThunkDestVA(destination);
memcpy(buf, data, sizeof(data));
target->relocateNoSym(buf, R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC, s);
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 4, R_ARM_THM_MOVT_ABS, s);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void ThumbV7ABSLongThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__Thumbv7ABSLongThunk_" + destination.getName()),
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
STT_FUNC, 1, isec);
addSymbol("$t", STT_NOTYPE, 0, isec);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void ARMV7PILongThunk::writeLong(uint8_t *buf) {
const uint8_t data[] = {
0xf0, 0xcf, 0x0f, 0xe3, // P: movw ip,:lower16:S - (P + (L1-P) + 8)
0x00, 0xc0, 0x40, 0xe3, // movt ip,:upper16:S - (P + (L1-P) + 8)
0x0f, 0xc0, 0x8c, 0xe0, // L1: add ip, ip, pc
0x1c, 0xff, 0x2f, 0xe1, // bx ip
};
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
uint64_t s = getARMThunkDestVA(destination);
uint64_t p = getThunkTargetSym()->getVA();
int64_t offset = s - p - 16;
memcpy(buf, data, sizeof(data));
target->relocateNoSym(buf, R_ARM_MOVW_PREL_NC, offset);
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 4, R_ARM_MOVT_PREL, offset);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void ARMV7PILongThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__ARMV7PILongThunk_" + destination.getName()),
STT_FUNC, 0, isec);
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
addSymbol("$a", STT_NOTYPE, 0, isec);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void ThumbV7PILongThunk::writeLong(uint8_t *buf) {
const uint8_t data[] = {
0x4f, 0xf6, 0xf4, 0x7c, // P: movw ip,:lower16:S - (P + (L1-P) + 4)
0xc0, 0xf2, 0x00, 0x0c, // movt ip,:upper16:S - (P + (L1-P) + 4)
0xfc, 0x44, // L1: add ip, pc
0x60, 0x47, // bx ip
};
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
uint64_t s = getARMThunkDestVA(destination);
uint64_t p = getThunkTargetSym()->getVA() & ~0x1;
int64_t offset = s - p - 12;
memcpy(buf, data, sizeof(data));
target->relocateNoSym(buf, R_ARM_THM_MOVW_PREL_NC, offset);
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 4, R_ARM_THM_MOVT_PREL, offset);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void ThumbV7PILongThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__ThumbV7PILongThunk_" + destination.getName()),
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
STT_FUNC, 1, isec);
addSymbol("$t", STT_NOTYPE, 0, isec);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void ThumbV6MABSLongThunk::writeLong(uint8_t *buf) {
// Most Thumb instructions cannot access the high registers r8 - r15. As the
// only register we can corrupt is r12 we must instead spill a low register
// to the stack to use as a scratch register. We push r1 even though we
// don't need to get some space to use for the return address.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
const uint8_t data[] = {
0x03, 0xb4, // push {r0, r1} ; Obtain scratch registers
0x01, 0x48, // ldr r0, [pc, #4] ; L1
0x01, 0x90, // str r0, [sp, #4] ; SP + 4 = S
0x01, 0xbd, // pop {r0, pc} ; restore r0 and branch to dest
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 // L1: .word S
};
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
uint64_t s = getARMThunkDestVA(destination);
memcpy(buf, data, sizeof(data));
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 8, R_ARM_ABS32, s);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void ThumbV6MABSLongThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__Thumbv6MABSLongThunk_" + destination.getName()),
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
STT_FUNC, 1, isec);
addSymbol("$t", STT_NOTYPE, 0, isec);
addSymbol("$d", STT_NOTYPE, 8, isec);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void ThumbV6MPILongThunk::writeLong(uint8_t *buf) {
// Most Thumb instructions cannot access the high registers r8 - r15. As the
// only register we can corrupt is ip (r12) we must instead spill a low
// register to the stack to use as a scratch register.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
const uint8_t data[] = {
0x01, 0xb4, // P: push {r0} ; Obtain scratch register
0x02, 0x48, // ldr r0, [pc, #8] ; L2
0x84, 0x46, // mov ip, r0 ; high to low register
0x01, 0xbc, // pop {r0} ; restore scratch register
0xe7, 0x44, // L1: add pc, ip ; transfer control
0xc0, 0x46, // nop ; pad to 4-byte boundary
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, // L2: .word S - (P + (L1 - P) + 4)
};
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
uint64_t s = getARMThunkDestVA(destination);
uint64_t p = getThunkTargetSym()->getVA() & ~0x1;
memcpy(buf, data, sizeof(data));
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 12, R_ARM_REL32, s - p - 12);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void ThumbV6MPILongThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__Thumbv6MPILongThunk_" + destination.getName()),
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
STT_FUNC, 1, isec);
addSymbol("$t", STT_NOTYPE, 0, isec);
addSymbol("$d", STT_NOTYPE, 12, isec);
}
void ARMV5LongLdrPcThunk::writeLong(uint8_t *buf) {
const uint8_t data[] = {
0x04, 0xf0, 0x1f, 0xe5, // ldr pc, [pc,#-4] ; L1
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, // L1: .word S
};
memcpy(buf, data, sizeof(data));
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 4, R_ARM_ABS32, getARMThunkDestVA(destination));
}
void ARMV5LongLdrPcThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__ARMv5LongLdrPcThunk_" + destination.getName()),
STT_FUNC, 0, isec);
addSymbol("$a", STT_NOTYPE, 0, isec);
addSymbol("$d", STT_NOTYPE, 4, isec);
}
void ARMV4ABSLongBXThunk::writeLong(uint8_t *buf) {
const uint8_t data[] = {
0x00, 0xc0, 0x9f, 0xe5, // ldr r12, [pc] ; L1
0x1c, 0xff, 0x2f, 0xe1, // bx r12
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, // L1: .word S
};
memcpy(buf, data, sizeof(data));
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 8, R_ARM_ABS32, getARMThunkDestVA(destination));
}
void ARMV4ABSLongBXThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__ARMv4ABSLongBXThunk_" + destination.getName()),
STT_FUNC, 0, isec);
addSymbol("$a", STT_NOTYPE, 0, isec);
addSymbol("$d", STT_NOTYPE, 8, isec);
}
void ThumbV4ABSLongBXThunk::writeLong(uint8_t *buf) {
const uint8_t data[] = {
0x78, 0x47, // bx pc
0xfd, 0xe7, // b #-6 ; Arm recommended sequence to follow bx pc
0x04, 0xf0, 0x1f, 0xe5, // ldr pc, [pc, #-4] ; L1
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, // L1: .word S
};
memcpy(buf, data, sizeof(data));
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 8, R_ARM_ABS32, getARMThunkDestVA(destination));
}
void ThumbV4ABSLongBXThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__Thumbv4ABSLongBXThunk_" + destination.getName()),
STT_FUNC, 1, isec);
addSymbol("$t", STT_NOTYPE, 0, isec);
addSymbol("$a", STT_NOTYPE, 4, isec);
addSymbol("$d", STT_NOTYPE, 8, isec);
}
void ThumbV4ABSLongThunk::writeLong(uint8_t *buf) {
const uint8_t data[] = {
0x78, 0x47, // bx pc
0xfd, 0xe7, // b #-6 ; Arm recommended sequence to follow bx pc
0x00, 0xc0, 0x9f, 0xe5, // ldr r12, [pc] ; L1
0x1c, 0xff, 0x2f, 0xe1, // bx r12
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, // L1: .word S
};
memcpy(buf, data, sizeof(data));
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 12, R_ARM_ABS32, getARMThunkDestVA(destination));
}
void ThumbV4ABSLongThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__Thumbv4ABSLongThunk_" + destination.getName()),
STT_FUNC, 1, isec);
addSymbol("$t", STT_NOTYPE, 0, isec);
addSymbol("$a", STT_NOTYPE, 4, isec);
addSymbol("$d", STT_NOTYPE, 12, isec);
}
void ARMV4PILongThunk::writeLong(uint8_t *buf) {
const uint8_t data[] = {
0x04, 0xc0, 0x9f, 0xe5, // P: ldr ip, [pc,#4] ; L2
0x0c, 0xc0, 0x8f, 0xe0, // L1: add ip, pc, ip
0x1c, 0xff, 0x2f, 0xe1, // bx ip
0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, // L2: .word S - (P + (L1 - P) + 8)
};
uint64_t s = getARMThunkDestVA(destination);
uint64_t p = getThunkTargetSym()->getVA() & ~0x1;
memcpy(buf, data, sizeof(data));
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 12, R_ARM_REL32, s - p - 12);
}
void ARMV4PILongThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__ARMv4PILongThunk_" + destination.getName()),
STT_FUNC, 0, isec);
addSymbol("$a", STT_NOTYPE, 0, isec);
addSymbol("$d", STT_NOTYPE, 12, isec);
}
// Write MIPS LA25 thunk code to call PIC function from the non-PIC one.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void MipsThunk::writeTo(uint8_t *buf) {
uint64_t s = destination.getVA();
write32(buf, 0x3c190000); // lui $25, %hi(func)
write32(buf + 4, 0x08000000 | (s >> 2)); // j func
write32(buf + 8, 0x27390000); // addiu $25, $25, %lo(func)
write32(buf + 12, 0x00000000); // nop
target->relocateNoSym(buf, R_MIPS_HI16, s);
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 8, R_MIPS_LO16, s);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void MipsThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__LA25Thunk_" + destination.getName()), STT_FUNC, 0,
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
isec);
}
InputSection *MipsThunk::getTargetInputSection() const {
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
auto &dr = cast<Defined>(destination);
return dyn_cast<InputSection>(dr.section);
}
// Write microMIPS R2-R5 LA25 thunk code
// to call PIC function from the non-PIC one.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void MicroMipsThunk::writeTo(uint8_t *buf) {
uint64_t s = destination.getVA();
write16(buf, 0x41b9); // lui $25, %hi(func)
write16(buf + 4, 0xd400); // j func
write16(buf + 8, 0x3339); // addiu $25, $25, %lo(func)
write16(buf + 12, 0x0c00); // nop
target->relocateNoSym(buf, R_MICROMIPS_HI16, s);
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 4, R_MICROMIPS_26_S1, s);
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 8, R_MICROMIPS_LO16, s);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void MicroMipsThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
Defined *d =
addSymbol(saver().save("__microLA25Thunk_" + destination.getName()),
STT_FUNC, 0, isec);
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
d->stOther |= STO_MIPS_MICROMIPS;
}
InputSection *MicroMipsThunk::getTargetInputSection() const {
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
auto &dr = cast<Defined>(destination);
return dyn_cast<InputSection>(dr.section);
}
// Write microMIPS R6 LA25 thunk code
// to call PIC function from the non-PIC one.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void MicroMipsR6Thunk::writeTo(uint8_t *buf) {
uint64_t s = destination.getVA();
uint64_t p = getThunkTargetSym()->getVA();
write16(buf, 0x1320); // lui $25, %hi(func)
write16(buf + 4, 0x3339); // addiu $25, $25, %lo(func)
write16(buf + 8, 0x9400); // bc func
target->relocateNoSym(buf, R_MICROMIPS_HI16, s);
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 4, R_MICROMIPS_LO16, s);
target->relocateNoSym(buf + 8, R_MICROMIPS_PC26_S1, s - p - 12);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void MicroMipsR6Thunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
Defined *d =
addSymbol(saver().save("__microLA25Thunk_" + destination.getName()),
STT_FUNC, 0, isec);
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
d->stOther |= STO_MIPS_MICROMIPS;
}
InputSection *MicroMipsR6Thunk::getTargetInputSection() const {
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
auto &dr = cast<Defined>(destination);
return dyn_cast<InputSection>(dr.section);
}
void elf::writePPC32PltCallStub(uint8_t *buf, uint64_t gotPltVA,
const InputFile *file, int64_t addend) {
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
if (!config->isPic) {
write32(buf + 0, 0x3d600000 | (gotPltVA + 0x8000) >> 16); // lis r11,ha
write32(buf + 4, 0x816b0000 | (uint16_t)gotPltVA); // lwz r11,l(r11)
write32(buf + 8, 0x7d6903a6); // mtctr r11
write32(buf + 12, 0x4e800420); // bctr
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
return;
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
uint32_t offset;
if (addend >= 0x8000) {
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
// The stub loads an address relative to r30 (.got2+Addend). Addend is
// almost always 0x8000. The address of .got2 is different in another object
// file, so a stub cannot be shared.
offset = gotPltVA -
(in.ppc32Got2->getParent()->getVA() +
(file->ppc32Got2 ? file->ppc32Got2->outSecOff : 0) + addend);
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
} else {
// The stub loads an address relative to _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ (which is
// currently the address of .got).
offset = gotPltVA - in.got->getVA();
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
uint16_t ha = (offset + 0x8000) >> 16, l = (uint16_t)offset;
if (ha == 0) {
write32(buf + 0, 0x817e0000 | l); // lwz r11,l(r30)
write32(buf + 4, 0x7d6903a6); // mtctr r11
write32(buf + 8, 0x4e800420); // bctr
write32(buf + 12, 0x60000000); // nop
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
} else {
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
write32(buf + 0, 0x3d7e0000 | ha); // addis r11,r30,ha
write32(buf + 4, 0x816b0000 | l); // lwz r11,l(r11)
write32(buf + 8, 0x7d6903a6); // mtctr r11
write32(buf + 12, 0x4e800420); // bctr
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
}
}
void PPC32PltCallStub::writeTo(uint8_t *buf) {
writePPC32PltCallStub(buf, destination.getGotPltVA(), file, addend);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void PPC32PltCallStub::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
std::string buf;
raw_string_ostream os(buf);
os << format_hex_no_prefix(addend, 8);
if (!config->isPic)
os << ".plt_call32.";
else if (addend >= 0x8000)
os << ".got2.plt_pic32.";
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
else
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
os << ".plt_pic32.";
os << destination.getName();
addSymbol(saver().save(os.str()), STT_FUNC, 0, isec);
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
bool PPC32PltCallStub::isCompatibleWith(const InputSection &isec,
const Relocation &rel) const {
return !config->isPic || (isec.file == file && rel.addend == addend);
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
}
void PPC32LongThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__LongThunk_" + destination.getName()), STT_FUNC, 0,
isec);
}
void PPC32LongThunk::writeTo(uint8_t *buf) {
auto ha = [](uint32_t v) -> uint16_t { return (v + 0x8000) >> 16; };
auto lo = [](uint32_t v) -> uint16_t { return v; };
uint32_t d = destination.getVA(addend);
if (config->isPic) {
uint32_t off = d - (getThunkTargetSym()->getVA() + 8);
write32(buf + 0, 0x7c0802a6); // mflr r12,0
write32(buf + 4, 0x429f0005); // bcl r20,r31,.+4
write32(buf + 8, 0x7d8802a6); // mtctr r12
write32(buf + 12, 0x3d8c0000 | ha(off)); // addis r12,r12,off@ha
write32(buf + 16, 0x398c0000 | lo(off)); // addi r12,r12,off@l
write32(buf + 20, 0x7c0803a6); // mtlr r0
buf += 24;
} else {
write32(buf + 0, 0x3d800000 | ha(d)); // lis r12,d@ha
write32(buf + 4, 0x398c0000 | lo(d)); // addi r12,r12,d@l
buf += 8;
}
write32(buf + 0, 0x7d8903a6); // mtctr r12
write32(buf + 4, 0x4e800420); // bctr
}
void elf::writePPC64LoadAndBranch(uint8_t *buf, int64_t offset) {
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
uint16_t offHa = (offset + 0x8000) >> 16;
uint16_t offLo = offset & 0xffff;
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
write32(buf + 0, 0x3d820000 | offHa); // addis r12, r2, OffHa
write32(buf + 4, 0xe98c0000 | offLo); // ld r12, OffLo(r12)
write32(buf + 8, 0x7d8903a6); // mtctr r12
write32(buf + 12, 0x4e800420); // bctr
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void PPC64PltCallStub::writeTo(uint8_t *buf) {
int64_t offset = destination.getGotPltVA() - getPPC64TocBase();
// Save the TOC pointer to the save-slot reserved in the call frame.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
write32(buf + 0, 0xf8410018); // std r2,24(r1)
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the .glink entry. On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence. On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in .glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and `__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT). An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use `bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc, which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC (though on many architectures it works in practice): Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations. If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need an entry for it, but we currently do that. This patch makes // clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c // clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c #include <stdio.h> static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); } void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver"))); void *resolver(void) { return &impl; } int main(void) { thefunc(); void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc; theptr(); } work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-13 18:30:21 -08:00
writePPC64LoadAndBranch(buf + 4, offset);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void PPC64PltCallStub::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
Defined *s = addSymbol(saver().save("__plt_" + destination.getName()),
STT_FUNC, 0, isec);
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
s->needsTocRestore = true;
s->file = destination.file;
}
bool PPC64PltCallStub::isCompatibleWith(const InputSection &isec,
const Relocation &rel) const {
return rel.type == R_PPC64_REL24 || rel.type == R_PPC64_REL14;
}
void PPC64R2SaveStub::writeTo(uint8_t *buf) {
const int64_t offset = computeOffset();
write32(buf + 0, 0xf8410018); // std r2,24(r1)
// The branch offset needs to fit in 26 bits.
if (getMayUseShortThunk()) {
write32(buf + 4, 0x48000000 | (offset & 0x03fffffc)); // b <offset>
} else if (isInt<34>(offset)) {
int nextInstOffset;
uint64_t tocOffset = destination.getVA() - getPPC64TocBase();
if (tocOffset >> 16 > 0) {
const uint64_t addi = ADDI_R12_TO_R12_NO_DISP | (tocOffset & 0xffff);
const uint64_t addis =
ADDIS_R12_TO_R2_NO_DISP | ((tocOffset >> 16) & 0xffff);
write32(buf + 4, addis); // addis r12, r2 , top of offset
write32(buf + 8, addi); // addi r12, r12, bottom of offset
nextInstOffset = 12;
} else {
const uint64_t addi = ADDI_R12_TO_R2_NO_DISP | (tocOffset & 0xffff);
write32(buf + 4, addi); // addi r12, r2, offset
nextInstOffset = 8;
}
write32(buf + nextInstOffset, MTCTR_R12); // mtctr r12
write32(buf + nextInstOffset + 4, BCTR); // bctr
} else {
in.ppc64LongBranchTarget->addEntry(&destination, addend);
const int64_t offsetFromTOC =
in.ppc64LongBranchTarget->getEntryVA(&destination, addend) -
getPPC64TocBase();
writePPC64LoadAndBranch(buf + 4, offsetFromTOC);
}
}
void PPC64R2SaveStub::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
Defined *s = addSymbol(saver().save("__toc_save_" + destination.getName()),
STT_FUNC, 0, isec);
s->needsTocRestore = true;
}
bool PPC64R2SaveStub::isCompatibleWith(const InputSection &isec,
const Relocation &rel) const {
return rel.type == R_PPC64_REL24 || rel.type == R_PPC64_REL14;
}
void PPC64R12SetupStub::writeTo(uint8_t *buf) {
int64_t offset = destination.getVA() - getThunkTargetSym()->getVA();
if (!isInt<34>(offset))
reportRangeError(buf, offset, 34, destination, "R12 setup stub offset");
int nextInstOffset;
if (!config->power10Stubs) {
uint32_t off = destination.getVA(addend) - getThunkTargetSym()->getVA() - 8;
write32(buf + 0, 0x7c0802a6); // mflr r12
write32(buf + 4, 0x429f0005); // bcl 20,31,.+4
write32(buf + 8, 0x7d6802a6); // mflr r11
write32(buf + 12, 0x7d8803a6); // mtlr r12
write32(buf + 16, 0x3d8b0000 | computeHiBits(off));// addis r12,r11,off@ha
write32(buf + 20, 0x398c0000 | (off & 0xffff)); // addi r12,r12,off@l
nextInstOffset = 24;
} else {
uint64_t paddi = PADDI_R12_NO_DISP | (((offset >> 16) & 0x3ffff) << 32) |
(offset & 0xffff);
writePrefixedInstruction(buf + 0, paddi); // paddi r12, 0, func@pcrel, 1
nextInstOffset = 8;
}
write32(buf + nextInstOffset, MTCTR_R12); // mtctr r12
write32(buf + nextInstOffset + 4, BCTR); // bctr
}
void PPC64R12SetupStub::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__gep_setup_" + destination.getName()), STT_FUNC, 0,
isec);
}
bool PPC64R12SetupStub::isCompatibleWith(const InputSection &isec,
const Relocation &rel) const {
return rel.type == R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC;
}
void PPC64PCRelPLTStub::writeTo(uint8_t *buf) {
int nextInstOffset = 0;
int64_t offset = destination.getGotPltVA() - getThunkTargetSym()->getVA();
if (config->power10Stubs) {
if (!isInt<34>(offset))
reportRangeError(buf, offset, 34, destination,
"PC-relative PLT stub offset");
const uint64_t pld = PLD_R12_NO_DISP | (((offset >> 16) & 0x3ffff) << 32) |
(offset & 0xffff);
writePrefixedInstruction(buf + 0, pld); // pld r12, func@plt@pcrel
nextInstOffset = 8;
} else {
uint32_t off = destination.getVA(addend) - getThunkTargetSym()->getVA() - 8;
write32(buf + 0, 0x7c0802a6); // mflr r12
write32(buf + 4, 0x429f0005); // bcl 20,31,.+4
write32(buf + 8, 0x7d6802a6); // mflr r11
write32(buf + 12, 0x7d8803a6); // mtlr r12
write32(buf + 16, 0x3d8b0000 | computeHiBits(off)); // addis r12,r11,off@ha
write32(buf + 20, 0x398c0000 | (off & 0xffff)); // addi r12,r12,off@l
nextInstOffset = 24;
}
write32(buf + nextInstOffset, MTCTR_R12); // mtctr r12
write32(buf + nextInstOffset + 4, BCTR); // bctr
}
void PPC64PCRelPLTStub::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__plt_pcrel_" + destination.getName()), STT_FUNC, 0,
isec);
}
bool PPC64PCRelPLTStub::isCompatibleWith(const InputSection &isec,
const Relocation &rel) const {
return rel.type == R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC;
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void PPC64LongBranchThunk::writeTo(uint8_t *buf) {
int64_t offset = in.ppc64LongBranchTarget->getEntryVA(&destination, addend) -
getPPC64TocBase();
[ELF][PPC64] Implement IPLT code sequence for non-preemptible IFUNC Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the .glink entry. On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence. On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in .glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and `__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT). An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use `bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc, which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC (though on many architectures it works in practice): Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations. If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need an entry for it, but we currently do that. This patch makes // clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c // clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c #include <stdio.h> static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); } void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver"))); void *resolver(void) { return &impl; } int main(void) { thefunc(); void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc; theptr(); } work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
2019-12-13 18:30:21 -08:00
writePPC64LoadAndBranch(buf, offset);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
void PPC64LongBranchThunk::addSymbols(ThunkSection &isec) {
addSymbol(saver().save("__long_branch_" + destination.getName()), STT_FUNC, 0,
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
isec);
}
bool PPC64LongBranchThunk::isCompatibleWith(const InputSection &isec,
const Relocation &rel) const {
return rel.type == R_PPC64_REL24 || rel.type == R_PPC64_REL14;
}
Thunk::Thunk(Symbol &d, int64_t a) : destination(d), addend(a), offset(0) {}
Thunk::~Thunk() = default;
static Thunk *addThunkAArch64(RelType type, Symbol &s, int64_t a) {
if (type != R_AARCH64_CALL26 && type != R_AARCH64_JUMP26 &&
type != R_AARCH64_PLT32)
fatal("unrecognized relocation type");
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
if (config->picThunk)
return make<AArch64ADRPThunk>(s, a);
return make<AArch64ABSLongThunk>(s, a);
}
// Creates a thunk for long branches or Thumb-ARM interworking.
// Arm Architectures v4t does not support Thumb2 technology, and does not
// support BLX or LDR Arm/Thumb state switching. This means that
// - MOVT and MOVW instructions cannot be used.
// - We can't rewrite BL in place to BLX. We will need thunks.
//
// TODO: Support PIC interworking thunks for V4T.
// TODO: More efficient PIC non-interworking thunks for V4T.
// TODO: use B for short Thumb->Arm thunks instead of LDR (this doesn't work for
// Arm->Thumb, as in Arm state no BX PC trick; it doesn't switch state).
static Thunk *addThunkArmv4(RelType reloc, Symbol &s, int64_t a) {
bool thumb_target = s.getVA(a) & 1;
switch (reloc) {
case R_ARM_PC24:
case R_ARM_PLT32:
case R_ARM_JUMP24:
case R_ARM_CALL:
if (config->picThunk)
// can be used for both Arm->Arm and Arm->Thumb
return make<ARMV4PILongThunk>(s, a);
if (thumb_target)
return make<ARMV4ABSLongBXThunk>(s, a);
return make<ARMV5LongLdrPcThunk>(s, a);
case R_ARM_THM_CALL:
if (config->picThunk && !thumb_target)
fatal("PIC relocations across state change not supported for Armv4T");
if (config->picThunk && thumb_target)
return make<ThumbV6MPILongThunk>(s, a);
if (thumb_target)
return make<ThumbV4ABSLongThunk>(s, a);
return make<ThumbV4ABSLongBXThunk>(s, a);
}
fatal("relocation " + toString(reloc) + " to " + toString(s) +
" not supported for Armv4 or Armv4T target");
}
// Creates a thunk for Thumb-ARM interworking compatible with Armv5 and Armv6.
// Arm Architectures v5 and v6 do not support Thumb2 technology. This means that
// - MOVT and MOVW instructions cannot be used
// - Only Thumb relocation that can generate a Thunk is a BL, this can always
// be transformed into a BLX
static Thunk *addThunkArmv5v6(RelType reloc, Symbol &s, int64_t a) {
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
switch (reloc) {
case R_ARM_PC24:
case R_ARM_PLT32:
case R_ARM_JUMP24:
case R_ARM_CALL:
case R_ARM_THM_CALL:
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
if (config->picThunk)
return make<ARMV4PILongThunk>(s, a);
return make<ARMV5LongLdrPcThunk>(s, a);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
fatal("relocation " + toString(reloc) + " to " + toString(s) +
" not supported for Armv5 or Armv6 targets");
}
// Create a thunk for Thumb long branch on V6-M.
// Arm Architecture v6-M only supports Thumb instructions. This means
// - MOVT and MOVW instructions cannot be used.
// - Only a limited number of instructions can access registers r8 and above
// - No interworking support is needed (all Thumb).
[LLD][ELF][ARM] Refactor inBranchRange to use addend for PC Bias In AArch32 ARM, the PC reads two instructions ahead of the currently executiing instruction. This evaluates to 8 in ARM state and 4 in Thumb state. Branch instructions on AArch32 compensate for this by subtracting the PC bias from the addend. For a branch to symbol this will result in an addend of -8 in ARM state and -4 in Thumb state. The existing ARM Target::inBranchRange function accounted for this implict addend within the function meaning that if the addend were to be taken into account by the caller then it would be double counted. This complicates the interface for all Targets as callers wanting to account for addends had to account for the ARM PC-bias. In certain situations such as: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 the PC-bias compensation code didn't match up. In particular normalizeExistingThunk() didn't put the PC-bias back in as Arm thunks did not store the addend. The simplest fix for the problem is to add the PC bias in normalizeExistingThunk when restoring the addend. However I think it is worth refactoring the Arm inBranchRange implementation so that fewer calls to getPCBias are needed for other Targets. I wasn't able to remove getPCBias completely but hopefully the Relocations.cpp code is simpler now. In principle a test could be written to replicate the linux kernel build failure but I wasn't able to reproduce with a small example that I could build up from scratch. Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97550
2021-02-26 13:14:21 +00:00
static Thunk *addThunkV6M(RelType reloc, Symbol &s, int64_t a) {
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
switch (reloc) {
case R_ARM_THM_JUMP19:
case R_ARM_THM_JUMP24:
case R_ARM_THM_CALL:
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
if (config->isPic)
[LLD][ELF][ARM] Refactor inBranchRange to use addend for PC Bias In AArch32 ARM, the PC reads two instructions ahead of the currently executiing instruction. This evaluates to 8 in ARM state and 4 in Thumb state. Branch instructions on AArch32 compensate for this by subtracting the PC bias from the addend. For a branch to symbol this will result in an addend of -8 in ARM state and -4 in Thumb state. The existing ARM Target::inBranchRange function accounted for this implict addend within the function meaning that if the addend were to be taken into account by the caller then it would be double counted. This complicates the interface for all Targets as callers wanting to account for addends had to account for the ARM PC-bias. In certain situations such as: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 the PC-bias compensation code didn't match up. In particular normalizeExistingThunk() didn't put the PC-bias back in as Arm thunks did not store the addend. The simplest fix for the problem is to add the PC bias in normalizeExistingThunk when restoring the addend. However I think it is worth refactoring the Arm inBranchRange implementation so that fewer calls to getPCBias are needed for other Targets. I wasn't able to remove getPCBias completely but hopefully the Relocations.cpp code is simpler now. In principle a test could be written to replicate the linux kernel build failure but I wasn't able to reproduce with a small example that I could build up from scratch. Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97550
2021-02-26 13:14:21 +00:00
return make<ThumbV6MPILongThunk>(s, a);
return make<ThumbV6MABSLongThunk>(s, a);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
fatal("relocation " + toString(reloc) + " to " + toString(s) +
" not supported for Armv6-M targets");
}
// Creates a thunk for Thumb-ARM interworking or branch range extension.
[LLD][ELF][ARM] Refactor inBranchRange to use addend for PC Bias In AArch32 ARM, the PC reads two instructions ahead of the currently executiing instruction. This evaluates to 8 in ARM state and 4 in Thumb state. Branch instructions on AArch32 compensate for this by subtracting the PC bias from the addend. For a branch to symbol this will result in an addend of -8 in ARM state and -4 in Thumb state. The existing ARM Target::inBranchRange function accounted for this implict addend within the function meaning that if the addend were to be taken into account by the caller then it would be double counted. This complicates the interface for all Targets as callers wanting to account for addends had to account for the ARM PC-bias. In certain situations such as: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 the PC-bias compensation code didn't match up. In particular normalizeExistingThunk() didn't put the PC-bias back in as Arm thunks did not store the addend. The simplest fix for the problem is to add the PC bias in normalizeExistingThunk when restoring the addend. However I think it is worth refactoring the Arm inBranchRange implementation so that fewer calls to getPCBias are needed for other Targets. I wasn't able to remove getPCBias completely but hopefully the Relocations.cpp code is simpler now. In principle a test could be written to replicate the linux kernel build failure but I wasn't able to reproduce with a small example that I could build up from scratch. Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97550
2021-02-26 13:14:21 +00:00
static Thunk *addThunkArm(RelType reloc, Symbol &s, int64_t a) {
// Decide which Thunk is needed based on:
// Available instruction set
// - An Arm Thunk can only be used if Arm state is available.
// - A Thumb Thunk can only be used if Thumb state is available.
// - Can only use a Thunk if it uses instructions that the Target supports.
// Relocation is branch or branch and link
// - Branch instructions cannot change state, can only select Thunk that
// starts in the same state as the caller.
// - Branch and link relocations can change state, can select Thunks from
// either Arm or Thumb.
// Position independent Thunks if we require position independent code.
// Handle architectures that have restrictions on the instructions that they
// can use in Thunks. The flags below are set by reading the BuildAttributes
// of the input objects. InputFiles.cpp contains the mapping from ARM
// architecture to flag.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
if (!config->armHasMovtMovw) {
if (config->armJ1J2BranchEncoding)
return addThunkV6M(reloc, s, a);
if (config->armHasBlx)
return addThunkArmv5v6(reloc, s, a);
return addThunkArmv4(reloc, s, a);
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
switch (reloc) {
case R_ARM_PC24:
case R_ARM_PLT32:
case R_ARM_JUMP24:
case R_ARM_CALL:
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
if (config->picThunk)
[LLD][ELF][ARM] Refactor inBranchRange to use addend for PC Bias In AArch32 ARM, the PC reads two instructions ahead of the currently executiing instruction. This evaluates to 8 in ARM state and 4 in Thumb state. Branch instructions on AArch32 compensate for this by subtracting the PC bias from the addend. For a branch to symbol this will result in an addend of -8 in ARM state and -4 in Thumb state. The existing ARM Target::inBranchRange function accounted for this implict addend within the function meaning that if the addend were to be taken into account by the caller then it would be double counted. This complicates the interface for all Targets as callers wanting to account for addends had to account for the ARM PC-bias. In certain situations such as: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 the PC-bias compensation code didn't match up. In particular normalizeExistingThunk() didn't put the PC-bias back in as Arm thunks did not store the addend. The simplest fix for the problem is to add the PC bias in normalizeExistingThunk when restoring the addend. However I think it is worth refactoring the Arm inBranchRange implementation so that fewer calls to getPCBias are needed for other Targets. I wasn't able to remove getPCBias completely but hopefully the Relocations.cpp code is simpler now. In principle a test could be written to replicate the linux kernel build failure but I wasn't able to reproduce with a small example that I could build up from scratch. Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97550
2021-02-26 13:14:21 +00:00
return make<ARMV7PILongThunk>(s, a);
return make<ARMV7ABSLongThunk>(s, a);
case R_ARM_THM_JUMP19:
case R_ARM_THM_JUMP24:
case R_ARM_THM_CALL:
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
if (config->picThunk)
[LLD][ELF][ARM] Refactor inBranchRange to use addend for PC Bias In AArch32 ARM, the PC reads two instructions ahead of the currently executiing instruction. This evaluates to 8 in ARM state and 4 in Thumb state. Branch instructions on AArch32 compensate for this by subtracting the PC bias from the addend. For a branch to symbol this will result in an addend of -8 in ARM state and -4 in Thumb state. The existing ARM Target::inBranchRange function accounted for this implict addend within the function meaning that if the addend were to be taken into account by the caller then it would be double counted. This complicates the interface for all Targets as callers wanting to account for addends had to account for the ARM PC-bias. In certain situations such as: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 the PC-bias compensation code didn't match up. In particular normalizeExistingThunk() didn't put the PC-bias back in as Arm thunks did not store the addend. The simplest fix for the problem is to add the PC bias in normalizeExistingThunk when restoring the addend. However I think it is worth refactoring the Arm inBranchRange implementation so that fewer calls to getPCBias are needed for other Targets. I wasn't able to remove getPCBias completely but hopefully the Relocations.cpp code is simpler now. In principle a test could be written to replicate the linux kernel build failure but I wasn't able to reproduce with a small example that I could build up from scratch. Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97550
2021-02-26 13:14:21 +00:00
return make<ThumbV7PILongThunk>(s, a);
return make<ThumbV7ABSLongThunk>(s, a);
}
fatal("unrecognized relocation type");
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
static Thunk *addThunkMips(RelType type, Symbol &s) {
if ((s.stOther & STO_MIPS_MICROMIPS) && isMipsR6())
return make<MicroMipsR6Thunk>(s);
if (s.stOther & STO_MIPS_MICROMIPS)
return make<MicroMipsThunk>(s);
return make<MipsThunk>(s);
}
static Thunk *addThunkPPC32(const InputSection &isec, const Relocation &rel,
Symbol &s) {
assert((rel.type == R_PPC_LOCAL24PC || rel.type == R_PPC_REL24 ||
rel.type == R_PPC_PLTREL24) &&
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
"unexpected relocation type for thunk");
if (s.isInPlt())
return make<PPC32PltCallStub>(isec, rel, s);
return make<PPC32LongThunk>(s, rel.addend);
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
}
static Thunk *addThunkPPC64(RelType type, Symbol &s, int64_t a) {
assert((type == R_PPC64_REL14 || type == R_PPC64_REL24 ||
type == R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC) &&
"unexpected relocation type for thunk");
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
if (s.isInPlt())
return type == R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC ? (Thunk *)make<PPC64PCRelPLTStub>(s)
: (Thunk *)make<PPC64PltCallStub>(s);
// This check looks at the st_other bits of the callee. If the value is 1
// then the callee clobbers the TOC and we need an R2 save stub when RelType
// is R_PPC64_REL14 or R_PPC64_REL24.
if ((type == R_PPC64_REL14 || type == R_PPC64_REL24) && (s.stOther >> 5) == 1)
return make<PPC64R2SaveStub>(s, a);
if (type == R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC)
return make<PPC64R12SetupStub>(s);
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
if (config->picThunk)
return make<PPC64PILongBranchThunk>(s, a);
return make<PPC64PDLongBranchThunk>(s, a);
}
Thunk *elf::addThunk(const InputSection &isec, Relocation &rel) {
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
Symbol &s = *rel.sym;
int64_t a = rel.addend;
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
if (config->emachine == EM_AARCH64)
return addThunkAArch64(rel.type, s, a);
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
if (config->emachine == EM_ARM)
[LLD][ELF][ARM] Refactor inBranchRange to use addend for PC Bias In AArch32 ARM, the PC reads two instructions ahead of the currently executiing instruction. This evaluates to 8 in ARM state and 4 in Thumb state. Branch instructions on AArch32 compensate for this by subtracting the PC bias from the addend. For a branch to symbol this will result in an addend of -8 in ARM state and -4 in Thumb state. The existing ARM Target::inBranchRange function accounted for this implict addend within the function meaning that if the addend were to be taken into account by the caller then it would be double counted. This complicates the interface for all Targets as callers wanting to account for addends had to account for the ARM PC-bias. In certain situations such as: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 the PC-bias compensation code didn't match up. In particular normalizeExistingThunk() didn't put the PC-bias back in as Arm thunks did not store the addend. The simplest fix for the problem is to add the PC bias in normalizeExistingThunk when restoring the addend. However I think it is worth refactoring the Arm inBranchRange implementation so that fewer calls to getPCBias are needed for other Targets. I wasn't able to remove getPCBias completely but hopefully the Relocations.cpp code is simpler now. In principle a test could be written to replicate the linux kernel build failure but I wasn't able to reproduce with a small example that I could build up from scratch. Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1305 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97550
2021-02-26 13:14:21 +00:00
return addThunkArm(rel.type, s, a);
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
if (config->emachine == EM_MIPS)
return addThunkMips(rel.type, s);
[PPC32] Improve the 32-bit PowerPC port Many -static/-no-pie/-shared/-pie applications linked against glibc or musl should work with this patch. This also helps FreeBSD PowerPC64 to migrate their lib32 (PR40888). * Fix default image base and max page size. * Support new-style Secure PLT (see below). Old-style BSS PLT is not implemented, so it is not suitable for FreeBSD rtld now because it doesn't support Secure PLT yet. * Support more initial relocation types: R_PPC_ADDR32, R_PPC_REL16*, R_PPC_LOCAL24PC, R_PPC_PLTREL24, and R_PPC_GOT16. The addend of R_PPC_PLTREL24 is special: it decides the call stub PLT type but it should be ignored for the computation of target symbol VA. * Support GNU ifunc * Support .glink used for lazy PLT resolution in glibc * Add a new thunk type: PPC32PltCallStub that is similar to PPC64PltCallStub. It is used by R_PPC_REL24 and R_PPC_PLTREL24. A PLT stub used in -fPIE/-fPIC usually loads an address relative to .got2+0x8000 (-fpie/-fpic code uses _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ relative addresses). Two .got2 sections in two object files have different addresses, thus a PLT stub can't be shared by two object files. To handle this incompatibility, change the parameters of Thunk::isCompatibleWith to `const InputSection &, const Relocation &`. PowerPC psABI specified an old-style .plt (BSS PLT) that is both writable and executable. Linkers don't make separate RW- and RWE segments, which causes all initially writable memory (think .data) executable. This is a big security concern so a new PLT scheme (secure PLT) was developed to address the security issue. TLS will be implemented in D62940. glibc older than ~2012 requires .rela.dyn to include .rela.plt, it can not handle the DT_RELA+DT_RELASZ == DT_JMPREL case correctly. A hack (not included in this patch) in LinkerScript.cpp addOrphanSections() to work around the issue: if (Config->EMachine == EM_PPC) { // Older glibc assumes .rela.dyn includes .rela.plt Add(In.RelaDyn); if (In.RelaPlt->isLive() && !In.RelaPlt->Parent) In.RelaDyn->getParent()->addSection(In.RelaPlt); } Reviewed By: ruiu Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62464 llvm-svn: 362721
2019-06-06 17:03:00 +00:00
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
if (config->emachine == EM_PPC)
return addThunkPPC32(isec, rel, s);
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 05:00:37 +00:00
if (config->emachine == EM_PPC64)
return addThunkPPC64(rel.type, s, a);
llvm_unreachable("add Thunk only supported for ARM, Mips and PowerPC");
}