Make the ?: precedence warning handle pointers to the left of ?

Previously, Clang would fail to warn on:

  int n = x + foo ? 1 : 2;

when foo is a pointer.

llvm-svn: 226870
This commit is contained in:
Hans Wennborg 2015-01-22 22:11:56 +00:00
parent bd4ccc89e6
commit b60dfbea0e
2 changed files with 11 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -6129,6 +6129,8 @@ static bool ExprLooksBoolean(Expr *E) {
return IsLogicOp(OP->getOpcode());
if (UnaryOperator *OP = dyn_cast<UnaryOperator>(E))
return OP->getOpcode() == UO_LNot;
if (E->getType()->isPointerType())
return true;
return false;
}

View File

@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ void bitwise_rel(unsigned i) {
_Bool someConditionFunc();
void conditional_op(int x, int y, _Bool b) {
void conditional_op(int x, int y, _Bool b, void* p) {
(void)(x + someConditionFunc() ? 1 : 2); // expected-warning {{operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'}} \
// expected-note {{place parentheses around the '+' expression to silence this warning}} \
// expected-note {{place parentheses around the '?:' expression to evaluate it first}}
@ -116,6 +116,14 @@ void conditional_op(int x, int y, _Bool b) {
// CHECK: fix-it:"{{.*}}":{[[@LINE-6]]:24-[[@LINE-6]]:24}:")"
(void)(x % 2 ? 1 : 2); // no warning
(void)(x + p ? 1 : 2); // expected-warning {{operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'}} expected-note 2{{place parentheses}}
(void)(p + x ? 1 : 2); // no warning
(void)(p + b ? 1 : 2); // expected-warning {{operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'}} expected-note 2{{place parentheses}}
(void)(x + y > 0 ? 1 : 2); // no warning
(void)(x + (y > 0) ? 1 : 2); // expected-warning {{operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'}} expected-note 2{{place parentheses}}
}
// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wparentheses -Werror -fdiagnostics-show-option %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-FLAG