From eeee08d6d9e02e9be9f87465526d8bed39013e9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Orlando Cazalet-Hyams <orlando.hyams@sony.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 18:43:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [KeyInstr][Clang] Switch stmt atom
This patch is part of a stack that teaches Clang to generate Key Instructions
metadata for C and C++.
The Key Instructions project is introduced, including a "quick summary" section
at the top which adds context for this PR, here:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-improving-is-stmt-placement-for-better-interactive-debugging/82668
The feature is only functional in LLVM if LLVM is built with CMake flag
LLVM_EXPERIMENTAL_KEY_INSTRUCTIONs. Eventually that flag will be removed.
The Clang-side work is demoed here:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130943
---
clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp | 2 ++
clang/test/KeyInstructions/switch.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 clang/test/KeyInstructions/switch.c
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp
index 3562b4ea22a2..7dd82d73d6b6 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp
@@ -2276,6 +2276,8 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitSwitchStmt(const SwitchStmt &S) {
// failure.
llvm::BasicBlock *DefaultBlock = createBasicBlock("sw.default");
SwitchInsn = Builder.CreateSwitch(CondV, DefaultBlock);
+ addInstToNewSourceAtom(SwitchInsn, CondV);
+
if (HLSLControlFlowAttr != HLSLControlFlowHintAttr::SpellingNotCalculated) {
llvm::MDBuilder MDHelper(CGM.getLLVMContext());
llvm::ConstantInt *BranchHintConstant =
diff --git a/clang/test/KeyInstructions/switch.c b/clang/test/KeyInstructions/switch.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..cff6b834106e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/KeyInstructions/switch.c
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+// RUN: %clang -gkey-instructions -x c++ -std=c++17 %s -gmlt -S -emit-llvm -o - \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not atomGroup --implicit-check-not atomRank --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-CXX
+
+// RUN: %clang -gkey-instructions -x c %s -gmlt -S -emit-llvm -o - \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not atomGroup --implicit-check-not atomRank
+
+int g;
+void a(int A, int B) {
+// CHECK: entry:
+// The load gets associated with the branch rather than the store.
+// FIXME: Is that the best thing to do?
+// CHECK: %0 = load i32, ptr %A.addr{{.*}}, !dbg [[G2R2:!.*]]
+// CHECK: store i32 %0, ptr @g{{.*}}, !dbg [[G1R1:!.*]]
+// CHECK: switch i32 %0, label %{{.*}} [
+// CHECK: i32 0, label %sw.bb
+// CHECK: i32 1, label %sw.bb1
+// CHECK: ], !dbg [[G2R1:!.*]]
+ switch ((g = A)) {
+ case 0: break;
+ case 1: {
+// CHECK: sw.bb1:
+// CHECK: %1 = load i32, ptr %B.addr{{.*}}, !dbg [[G3R2:!.*]]
+// CHECK: switch i32 %1, label %{{.*}} [
+// CHECK: i32 0, label %sw.bb2
+// CHECK: ], !dbg [[G3R1:!.*]]
+ switch ((B)) {
+ case 0: {
+// Test that assignments in constant-folded switches don't go missing.
+// CHECK-CXX: sw.bb2:
+// CHECK-CXX: store i32 1, ptr %C{{.*}}, !dbg [[G4R1:!.*]]
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+ switch (const int C = 1; C) {
+ case 0: break;
+ case 1: break;
+ default: break;
+ }
+#endif
+ } break;
+ default: break;
+ }
+ } break;
+ default: break;
+ }
+}
+
+// CHECK: [[G2R2]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 2, atomRank: 2)
+// CHECK: [[G1R1]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 1, atomRank: 1)
+// CHECK: [[G2R1]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 2, atomRank: 1)
+// CHECK: [[G3R2]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 3, atomRank: 2)
+// CHECK: [[G3R1]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 3, atomRank: 1)
+// CHECK-CXX: [[G4R1]] = !DILocation({{.*}}, atomGroup: 4, atomRank: 1)