If a add_clang_library call doesn't specify building as static or shared
library they are implicitly added to the list static libraries that is
linked in to clang-cpp shared library here.
315ba77406/clang/cmake/modules/AddClang.cmake (L107)
Because the clang-tools-extra libraries targets were declared after
clang-cpp they by luck never got linked to clang-cpp.
This change is required for clang symbol visibility macros on windows to
work correctly for clang tools since we need to distinguish if a target
being built will be importing or exporting clang symbols from the
clang-cpp DLL.
The modules build trips over this frequently because there is no textual
include of the tablegen output, but the module includes it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157119
Fix various tool libraries not to link to clang's .a libraries and dylib
simultaneously. This may cause breakage, in particular through
duplicate command-line option declarations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81967
This reverts commit 97aa593a8387586095b7eac12974ba2fdd08f4c3 as it
causes problems (PR45453) https://reviews.llvm.org/D77574#1966321.
This additionally adds an explicit reference to FrontendOpenMP to
clang-tidy where ASTMatchers is used.
This is hopefully just a temporary solution. The dependence on
`FrontendOpenMP` from `ASTMatchers` should be handled by CMake
implicitly, not us explicitly.
Reviewed By: aheejin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77666
Summary:
Looks at conditionals and finds cases of ``cast<>``, which will
assert rather than return a null pointer, and ``dyn_cast<>`` where
the return value is not captured. Additionally, finds cases that
match the pattern ``var.foo() && isa<X>(var.foo())``, where the
method is called twice and could be expensive.
.. code-block:: c++
// Finds cases like these:
if (auto x = cast<X>(y)) <...>
if (cast<X>(y)) <...>
// But not cases like these:
if (auto f = cast<Z>(y)->foo()) <...>
if (cast<Z>(y)->foo()) <...>
Reviewers: alexfh, rjmccall, hokein, aaron.ballman, JonasToth
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xbolva00, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59802
llvm-svn: 359142
Summary:
Register readability checks in a separate module. Renamed the checks
and test file names accordingly.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: curdeius, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5936
llvm-svn: 220631
Summary:
This uses a bit hacky way to set the defaults for the spaces before
comments, but it's also one of the simplest ways. Fixed a bug with how the
SpacesBeforeComments option was used.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5410
llvm-svn: 218240
The implementation is split into a generic part and a LLVM-specific part.
Other codebases can implement it with their own style. The specific features
supported are:
- Verification (and fixing) of header guards against a style based on the file path
- Automatic insertion of header guards for headers that are missing them
- A warning when the header guard doesn't enable our fancy header guard optimization
(e.g. when there's an include preceeding the guard)
- Automatic insertion of a comment with the guard name after #endif.
For the LLVM style we disable #endif comments for now, they're not very common
in the codebase. We also only flag headers in the include directories, there
doesn't seem to be a common style outside.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4867
llvm-svn: 215548
Those often cause use after free bugs and should be generally avoided.
Technically it is safe to have a Twine with >=2 components in a variable
but I don't think it is a good pattern to follow. The almost trivial checker
comes with elaborated fix-it hints that turn the Twine into a std::string
if necessary and otherwise fall back to the original type if the Twine
is created from a single value.
llvm-svn: 212535
Summary:
Handle various forms of existing namespace closing comments, fix
existing comments with wrong namespace name, ignore short namespaces.
The state of this check now seems to be enough to enable it by default to gather
user feedback ;)
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3825
llvm-svn: 209141
This is the first version of a possible clang-tidy architecture. The
purpose of clang-tidy is to detect errors in adhering to common coding
patterns, e.g. described in the LLVM Coding Standards.
This is still heavily in flux.
Review: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D884
llvm-svn: 187345
