This patch implements the forwarding to frozen C++03 headers as
discussed in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-freezing-c-03-headers-in-libc. In the
RFC, we initially proposed selecting the right headers from the Clang
driver, however consensus seemed to steer towards handling this in the
library itself. This patch implements that direction.
At a high level, the changes basically amount to making each public
header look like this:
```
// inside <vector>
#ifdef _LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG
# include <__cxx03/vector>
#else
// normal <vector> content
#endif
```
In most cases, public headers are simple umbrella headers so there isn't
much code in the #else branch. In other cases, the #else branch contains
the actual implementation of the header.
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
This was contributed ~10 years ago, but we don't officially support it
and I am not aware of any bot testing it, so this has likely rotten to
the point where it is unusable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138680
When we define the const-correct overloads of <string.h> functions in
libc++ itself, use builtins whenever possible. This avoids depending on
the presence of these functions in the C library headers.
Also, as a fly-by, improve the tests for these functions since we
basically didn't check anything but their signature. We could have
used the wrong builtin (as long as the signature matched) without ever
noticing, which was quite scary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138684
Some platforms don't provide all C library headers. In practice, libc++
only requires a few C library headers to exist, and only a few functions
on those headers. Missing functions that libc++ doesn't need for its own
implementation are handled properly by the using_if_exists attribute,
however a missing header is currently a hard error when we try to
do #include_next.
This patch should make libc++ more flexible on platforms that do not
provide C headers that libc++ doesn't actually require for its own
implementation. The only downside is that it may move some errors from
the #include_next point to later in the compilation if we actually try
to use something that isn't provided, which could be somewhat confusing.
However, these errors should be caught by folks trying to port libc++
over to a new platform (when running the libc++ test suite), not by end
users.
NOTE: This is a reapplicaton of 226409, which was reverted in 674729813
because it broke the build. The issue has now been fixed with
https://reviews.llvm.org/D138062.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136683
Some platforms don't provide all C library headers. In practice, libc++
only requires a few C library headers to exist, and only a few functions
on those headers. Missing functions that libc++ doesn't need for its own
implementation are handled properly by the using_if_exists attribute,
however a missing header is currently a hard error when we try to
do #include_next.
This patch should make libc++ more flexible on platforms that do not
provide C headers that libc++ doesn't actually require for its own
implementation. The only downside is that it may move some errors from
the #include_next point to later in the compilation if we actually try
to use something that isn't provided, which could be somewhat confusing.
However, these errors should be caught by folks trying to port libc++
over to a new platform (when running the libc++ test suite), not by end
users.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136683
We've stopped doing it in libc++ for a while now because these names
would end up rotting as we move things around and copy/paste stuff.
This cleans up all the existing files so as to stop the spreading
as people copy-paste headers around.
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
functions, ask it whether it did provide them after the fact. Some versions of
glibc fail to compile if you make this request and don't also claim to be at
least GCC 4.3.
llvm-svn: 260622
<string.h> and wcschr, wcspbrk, wcsrchr, wmemchr, and wcsstr from <wchar.h> to
provide a const-correct overload set even when the underlying C library does
not.
This change adds a new macro, _LIBCPP_PREFERRED_OVERLOAD, which (if defined)
specifies that a given overload is a better match than an otherwise equally
good function declaration without the overload. This is implemented in modern
versions of Clang via __attribute__((enable_if)), and not elsewhere.
We use this new macro to define overloads in the global namespace for these
functions that displace the overloads provided by the C library, unless we
believe the C library is already providing the correct signatures.
llvm-svn: 260337
This change caused problems when building code like povray that:
a) uses 'using namespace std;'
b) is built on an environment where the C library provides the "wrong"
(non-const-correct) interface for the str* functions
c) makes an unqualified call to one of those str* functions
A patch is out for review to add a facility to fix this (and to give the
correct signatures for these functions whenever possible, even when the C
library does not do so). This revert is expected to be temporary.
llvm-svn: 251665
Also fix the overload set for the five functions whose signatures change in the
case where we can fix it. This is already covered by existing tests for the
affected systems.
llvm-svn: 249929
