Patch by Nitesh Jain.
Summary: When incorrect type used for 'char' then (at least) one of the expression evaluates to incorrect value. Please refer to bug llvm.org/pr23069
Reviewers: ovyalov, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, mohit.bhakkad, sagar, bhushan, jaydeep
Differential: reviews.llvm.org/D16132
llvm-svn: 258684
Starting with Windows 10, the Windows loader is itself multi-threaded,
meaning that the loader spins up a few threads to do process
initialization before it executes main. Windows delivers these
notifications asynchronously and they can come out of order, so
we can't be sure that the first thread we get a notification about
is actually the zero'th thread.
This patch fixes this by requesting the thread stopped at the
breakpoint that was specified, rather than getting thread 0 and
verifying that it is stopped at a breakpoint.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16247
llvm-svn: 258432
Summary:
DWARF 5 proposes a reinvented .debug_macro section. This change follows
that spec.
Currently, only GCC produces the .debug_macro section and hence
the added test is annottated with expectedFailureClang.
Reviewers: spyffe, clayborg, tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15437
llvm-svn: 255729
This is a resubmit of r254403, see that commit's message for context. This fixes an issue in the
original commit, where we would incorrectly interrupt the process if the interrupt request came
just as we were about to send the stopped event to the public.
llvm-svn: 254902
Summary:
The following situation was occuring in TestAttachResume:
- we did a "continue" from a breakpoint (which involves a private start-stop to step over the
breakpoint)
- after receiving the stop-reply from the step-over, we issue a "detach" (which requires a
process interrupt)
- at this moment, the public state is "running", private state is "about-to-be-stopped" (the
stopped event was broadcast, but it was not received yet)
- StopForDestroyOrDetach (public thread) notes the public state is running, sends an interrupt
request to the private thread
- private thread gets the eBroadcastBitInterrupt (before the eStateStopped message), and asks the
process plugin to stop (via Halt())
- process plugin says it has nothing to do as the process is already stopped
- private thread shrugs and carries on. receives the stop event, restores the breakpoint and
resumes the process.
- after a while, the public thread times out and says it failed to stop the process
This patch does the following:
- splits Halt() into two functions, private and public, their usage depends on the context
- public Halt(): sends eBroadcastBitInterrupt to the private thread and waits for the Stop
event
- HaltPrivate(): asks the plugin to stop and makes a note that the halt was requested. When the
next stop event comes it sets the interrupt flag on it.
- removes HijackPrivateProcessEvents(), as the only user (old Halt()) has gone away
- removes the m_currently_handling_event hack, as the new Halt() does not need it
- adds a use_run_lock parameter to public Halt() and WaitForProcessToStop(). This was needed
because RunThreadPlan uses Halt() while holding the run lock and we don't want Halt() to take
it away from him.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14989
llvm-svn: 254403
Summary:
- Reason of both bugs:
1. For the very first frame, Unwinder doesn't check the validity
of Full UnwindPlan before creating StackFrame from it:
When 'process launch' command is run after setting a breakpoint
in inferior, the Unwinder runs and saves only Frame 0 (the frame
in which breakpoint was set) in thread's StackFrameList i.e.
m_curr_frames_sp. However, it doesn't check the validity of the
Full UnwindPlan for this frame by unwinding 2 more frames further.
2. Unwinder doesn't update the CFA value of Cursor when Full UnwindPlan
fails and FallBack UnwindPlan succeeds in providing valid CFA values
for frames:
Sometimes during unwinding of stack frames, the Full UnwindPlan
inside the RegisterContextLLDB object may fail to provide valid
CFA values for these frames. Then the Fallback UnwindPlan is used
to unwind the frames.
If the Fallback UnwindPlan succeeds, then it provides a valid new
CFA value. The RegisterContextLLDB::m_cfa field of Cursor object
is updated during the Fallback UnwindPlan execution. However,
UnwindLLDB misses the implementation to update the 'cfa' field
of this Cursor with this valid new CFA value.
- This patch fixes both these issues.
- Remove XFAIL in test files corresponding to these 2 Bugs
Change-Id: I932ea407545ceee2d628f946ecc61a4806d4cc86
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Aggarwal <abhishek.a.aggarwal@intel.com>
Reviewers: jingham, lldb-commits, jasonmolenda
Subscribers: lldb-commits, ovyalov, tberghammer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14226
llvm-svn: 253026
This module was originally intended to be imported by top-level
scripts to be able to find the LLDB packages and third party
libraries. Packages themselves shouldn't need to import it,
because by the time it gets into the package, the top-level
script should have already done this. Indeed, it was just
adding the same values to sys.path multiple times, so this
patch is essentially no functional change.
To make sure it doesn't get re-introduced, we also delete the
`use_lldb_suite` module from `lldbsuite/test`, although the
original copy still remains in `lldb/test`
llvm-svn: 251963
For convenience, we had added the folder that dotest.py was in
to sys.path, so that we could easily write things like
`import lldbutil` from anywhere and any test. This introduces
a subtle problem when using Python's package system, because when
unittest2 imports a particular test suite, the test suite is detached
from the package. Thus, writing "import lldbutil" from dotest imports
it as part of the package, and writing the same line from a test
does a fresh import since the importing module was not part of
the same package.
The real way to fix this is to use absolute imports everywhere. Instead
of writing "import lldbutil", we need to write "import
lldbsuite.test.util". This patch fixes up that and all other similar
cases, and additionally removes the script directory from sys.path
to ensure that this can't happen again.
llvm-svn: 251886
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code
structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number
of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share
Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python
infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with
`test`).
llvm-svn: 251532
