is difficult because they're so terribly, terribly ambiguous.
We implement access declarations in terms of using declarations, which is
quite reasonable. However, we should really persist the access/using
distinction in the AST and use the appropriate name in diagnostics. This
isn't a priority, so I'll just file a PR and hope someone else does it. :)
llvm-svn: 91095
declaration. Rename note_using_decl to note_using, which is possibly less confusing.
Add a test for non-class-scope using decl collisions and be sure to note the case
we can't diagnose yet.
llvm-svn: 91057
are a couple of O(n^2) operations in this, some analogous to the usual O(n^2)
redeclaration problem and some not. In particular, retroactively removing
shadow declarations when they're hidden by later decls is pretty unfortunate.
I'm not yet convinced it's worse than the alternative, though.
llvm-svn: 91045
new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the
computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic
information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an
expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit
callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow.
Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the
diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit
better than before. Some examples:
p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Derived'
cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base'
Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to
a value of
type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers
Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}}
^ ~~
p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class
'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base':
struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base
struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base
Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from
...
^~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long'
cannot bind to
a value of unrelated type 'int'
long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Base' cannot
bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base'
Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field
'i'
int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here
int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}}
^
llvm-svn: 90992
instantiation, to ensure that we mark class template specilizations as
abstract when we need to and perform checking of abstract classes.
Also, move the checking that determines whether we are creating a
variable of abstract class type *after* we check whether the type is
complete. Otherwise, we won't see when we have an abstract class
template specialization that is implicitly instantiated by this
declaration. This is the "something else" that Sebastian had noted
earlier.
llvm-svn: 90467
overloaded-operator resolution is wildly untested, but the parallel code for
methods seems to satisfy some trivial tests.
Also change some overload-resolution APIs to take a type instead of an expression,
which lets us avoid creating a spurious CXXThisExpr when resolving implicit
member accesses.
llvm-svn: 90410
common to both parsing and template instantiation, so that we'll find
overridden virtuals for member functions of class templates when they
are instantiated.
Additionally, factor out the checking for pure virtual functions, so
that it will be executed both at parsing time and at template
instantiation time.
These changes fix PR5656 (for real), although one more tweak
w.r.t. member function templates will be coming along shortly.
llvm-svn: 90241
ValueDecl, because that isn't always the case in ill-formed
code. Diagnose a common mistake (forgetting to provide a template
argument list for a class template, PR5655) and dyn_cast so that we
handle the general problem of referring to a non-value declaration
gracefully.
llvm-svn: 90239
function templates (in C++98), friend function templates, and
out-of-line definitions of members of class templates.
Also handles merging of default template arguments from previous
declarations of function templates, for C++0x. However, we don't yet
make use of those default template arguments.
llvm-svn: 89872
All statements that involve conditions can now hold on to a separate
condition declaration (a VarDecl), and will use a DeclRefExpr
referring to that VarDecl for the condition expression. ForStmts now
have such a VarDecl (I'd missed those in previous commits).
Also, since this change reworks the Action interface for
if/while/switch/for, use FullExprArg for the full expressions in those
expressions, to ensure that we're emitting
Note that we are (still) not generating the right cleanups for
condition variables in for statements. That will be a follow-on
commit.
llvm-svn: 89817
into pretty much everything about overload resolution in order to wean
BuildDeclarationNameExpr off LookupResult::getAsSingleDecl(). Replace
UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr with UnresolvedLookupExpr, which generalizes the
idea of a non-member lookup that we haven't totally resolved yet, whether by
overloading, argument-dependent lookup, or (eventually) the presence of
a function template in the lookup results.
Incidentally fixes a problem with argument-dependent lookup where we were
still performing ADL even when the lookup results contained something from
a block scope.
Incidentally improves a diagnostic when using an ObjC ivar from a class method.
This just fell out from rewriting BuildDeclarationNameExpr's interaction with
lookup, and I'm too apathetic to break it out.
The only remaining uses of OverloadedFunctionDecl that I know of are in
TemplateName and MemberExpr.
llvm-svn: 89544
The following attributes are currently supported in C++0x attribute
lists (and in GNU ones as well):
- align() - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations and what entities it may apply to
- final - semantics believed to be conformant to CWG issue 817's proposed
wording, except for redeclarations
- noreturn - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations
- carries_dependency - currently ignored (this is an optimization hint)
llvm-svn: 89543
two classes, one for typenames and one for values; this seems to have some
support from Doug if not necessarily from the extremely-vague-on-this-point
standard. Track the location of the 'typename' keyword in a using-typename
decl. Make a new lookup result for unresolved values and deal with it in
most places.
llvm-svn: 89184
LookupResult RAII powers to diagnose ambiguity in the results. Other diagnostics
(e.g. access control and deprecation) will be moved to automatically trigger
during lookup as part of this same mechanism.
This abstraction makes it much easier to encapsulate aliasing declarations
(e.g. using declarations) inside the lookup system: eventually, lookup will
just produce the aliases in the LookupResult, and the standard access methods
will naturally strip the aliases off.
llvm-svn: 89027
