Tests where the RUN-lines/CHECK-ed output refer to line numbers in the test
file are a maintenance burden, as inserting text in the appropriate place
invalidates all the subsequent line numbers.
Lit supports %(line+n) for this, and FileCheck supports [[@LINE+N]].
But many existing tests don't make use of it and still need to be modified.
This commit adds a script that can find line numbers in tests according to a
regex and replace them with the appropriate relative-line reference.
It contains some options to avoid inappropriately rewriting tests where absolute
numbers are appropriate: a "nearby" threshold and a refusal by default to
replace only some matched line numbers.
I've applied it to CodeComplete tests, this proves the concept but also are the
single worst group of tests I've seen in this respect.
These changes are likely to hit merge conflicts, but can be regenerated with:
```
find ../clang/test/CodeCompletion/ -type f | grep -v /Inputs/ | xargs ../llvm/utils/relative_lines.py --verbose --near=20 --pattern='-code-completion-at[ =]%s:(\\d+):' --pattern='requires fix-it: {(\d+):\d+-(\d+):\d+}'
````
As requested in https://reviews.llvm.org/D140044
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59553
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140217
Summary:
...that fires when running completion inside an argument of
UnresolvedMemberExpr (see the added test).
The assertion that fires is from Sema::TryObjectArgumentInitialization:
assert(FromClassification.isLValue());
This happens because Sema::AddFunctionCandidates does not account for
object types which are pointers. It ends up classifying them incorrectly.
All usages of the function outside code completion are used to run
overload resolution for operators. In those cases the object type being
passed is always a non-pointer type, so it's not surprising the function
did not expect a pointer in the object argument.
However, code completion reuses the same function and calls it with the
object argument coming from UnresolvedMemberExpr, which can be a pointer
if the member expr is an arrow ('->') access.
Extending AddFunctionCandidates to allow pointer object types does not
seem too crazy since all the functions down the call chain can properly
handle pointer object types if we properly classify the object argument
as an l-value, i.e. the classification of the implicitly dereferenced
pointer.
Reviewers: kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55331
llvm-svn: 348590
