Teach SimplifyLibcalls that in can treat functions annotated with
apcs, aapcs or aapcs_vfp like normal C functions if they only take
and return integer or pointer values, and the target is not iOS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24453
llvm-svn: 281322
Hal pointed out that the semantic of our intrinsic and the libc
call are slightly different. Add a comment while I'm here to
explain why we can't emit an intrinsic. Thanks Hal!
llvm-svn: 278200
I tried to be as close as possible to the strongest check that
existed before; cleaning these up properly is left for future work.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19469
llvm-svn: 267758
The destination buffer that sprintf uses is restrict qualified, we do
not need to worry about derived pointers referenced via format
specifiers.
This reverts commit r267580.
llvm-svn: 267605
sprintf doesn't read or copy the terminating null byte from it's string
operands. sprintf will append it's own after processing all of the
format specifiers.
This fixes PR27526.
llvm-svn: 267580
Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations.
Found using simple scripts like this one:
clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedMap.h"' | xargs grep -L 'IndexedMap[<]' | xargs grep -n --color=auto 'IndexedMap'
Patch by Eugene Kosov <claprix@yandex.ru>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19219
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266595
We already skip optimizations if the return value
of printf() is used, so CI->use_empty() is always
true.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18656
llvm-svn: 265253
The sinpi/cospi can be replaced with sincospi to remove unnecessary
computations. However, we need to make sure that the calls are within
the same function!
This fixes PR26993.
llvm-svn: 263875
This is a step towards solving PR25892:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25892
It won't handle the reported case. As noted by the 'TODO' comments in the patch,
we need to relax the hasOneUse() constraint and also match patterns that include
memset_chk() and the llvm.memset() intrinsic in addition to memset().
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16337
llvm-svn: 258816
Use the helper function added in r258428.
The check should really be hoisted to the caller of all of these
optimize* functions, but that's another step.
llvm-svn: 258446
This is similar to the bug/fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26211http://reviews.llvm.org/rL258325
The fmin() test case reveals another bug caused by sloppy
code duplication. It will crash without this patch because
fp128 is a valid floating-point type, but we would think
that we had matched a function that used doubles.
The new helper function can be used to replace similar
checks that are used in several other places in this file.
llvm-svn: 258428
The test case will crash without this patch because the subsequent call to
hasUnsafeAlgebra() assumes that the call instruction is an FPMathOperator
(ie, returns an FP type).
This part of the function signature check was omitted for the sqrt() case,
but seems to be in place for all other transforms.
Before:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL257400
...we would have needlessly continued execution in optimizeSqrt(), but the
bug was harmless because we'd eventually fail some other check and return
without damage.
This should fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26211
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16198
llvm-svn: 258325
This is a continuation of adding FMF to call instructions:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL255555
As with D15937, the intent of the patch is to preserve the current behavior of the transform
except that we use the pow call's 'fast' attribute as a trigger rather than a function-level
attribute.
The TODO comment notes a potential follow-on patch that would propagate FMF to the new
instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16122
llvm-svn: 258153
This is a continuation of adding FMF to call instructions:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL255555
The intent of the patch is to preserve the current behavior of the transform except
that we use the sqrt instruction's 'fast' attribute as a trigger rather than the
function-level attribute.
But this raises a bug noted by the new FIXME comment.
In order to do this transform:
sqrt((x * x) * y) ---> fabs(x) * sqrt(y)
...we need all of the sqrt, the first fmul, and the second fmul to be 'fast'.
If any of those ops is strict, we should bail out.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15937
llvm-svn: 257400
If we replace one call-site with another, be sure to move over any
operand bundles that lingered on the old call-site.
This fixes PR26036.
llvm-svn: 256912
Summary:
In order to avoid calling pow function we generate repeated fmul when n is a
positive or negative whole number.
For each exponent we pre-compute Addition Chains in order to minimize the no.
of fmuls.
Refer: http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/achim/addition_chain.html
We pre-compute addition chains for exponents upto 32 (which results in a max of
7 fmuls).
For eg:
4 = 2+2
5 = 2+3
6 = 3+3 and so on
Hence,
pow(x, 4.0) ==> y = fmul x, x
x = fmul y, y
ret x
For negative exponents, we simply compute the reciprocal of the final result.
Note: This transformation is only enabled under fast-math.
Patch by Mandeep Singh Grang <mgrang@codeaurora.org>
Reviewers: weimingz, majnemer, escha, davide, scanon, joerg
Subscribers: probinson, escha, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13994
llvm-svn: 254776
This one is enabled only under -ffast-math. There are cases where the
difference between the value computed and the correct value is huge
even for ffast-math, e.g. as Steven pointed out:
x = -1, y = -4
log(pow(-1), 4) = 0
4*log(-1) = NaN
I checked what GCC does and apparently they do the same optimization
(which result in the dramatic difference). Future work might try to
make this (slightly) less worse.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14400
llvm-svn: 254263
