This PR implements [LWG2381](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue2381)
by rejecting `'i'`, `'I'`, `'n'`, `'N'` in FP parsing, as inf and NaN
are intendedly rejected by that LWG issue.
The source character array used for parsing is
`"0123456789abcdefABCDEFxX+-pPiInN"`, whose first 26 or 28 characters
are used for parsing integers or floating-point values respectively.
Previously, libc++ used 32 characters, including `'i'`, `'I'`, `'n'`,
`'N'`, for FP parsing, which was inconsistent with LWG2381. This PR also
replaces magic numbers 26 and 28 (formerly 32) with named constants.
Drive-by change: when the first character (possibly after the leading
`'+'` or `'-'`) is not a decimal digit but an acceptable character
(e.g., `'p'` or `'e'`), the character is not accumulated now (per Stage
2 in [facet.num.get.virtuals]/3).
#65168 may be rendered invalid, see
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65168#issuecomment-1868533342.
Apple back-deployment targets remain broken, likely due to dylib. XFAIL
is marked in related tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Mark de Wever <koraq@xs4all.nl>
## Abstract
This pull request implements LWG3672: `common_iterator::operator->()`
should return by value. The current implementation specifies that this
function should return the underlying pointer by reference (`T*
const&`), but it would be more intuitive to return it by value (`T*`).
## Reference
- [Draft C++ Standard:
[common.iter.access]](https://eel.is/c++draft/common.iter.access)
- [LWG3672](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3672)
This pull request implements LWG3643: Missing constexpr in
std::counted_iterator. Specifically, one overload of
std::counted_operator::operator++ was not marked as constexpr,
despite being eligible for it after the introduction of try-block
support in constexpr functions in C++20.
Justifications:
- LWG3950: Done in #66206
- LWG3975: Wording changes only
- LWG4011: Wording changes only
- LWG4030: Wording changes only
- LWG4043: Wording changes only
- LWG3036 and P2875R4: We implemented neither, but the latter reverts
the former, so now we implement both without doing anything!
Implement [LWG3528](https://wg21.link/LWG3528).
Based on LWG3528(https://wg21.link/LWG3528) and
http://eel.is/c++draft/description#structure.requirements-9, the
standard allows to impose requirements, we constraint
`std::make_from_tuple` to make `std::make_from_tuple` SFINAE friendly
and also avoid worse diagnostic messages. We still keep the constraints
of `std::__make_from_tuple_impl` so that `std::__make_from_tuple_impl`
will have the same advantages when used alone.
---------
Signed-off-by: yronglin <yronglin777@gmail.com>
## Abstract
This pull request implements LWG3715: `view_interface::empty` is
overconstrained. Here is an example similar to those described in the
report, which compiles with `-stdlib=libstdc++` but failed to compile
with `-stdlib=libc++`:
```cpp
// https://godbolt.org/z/EWEoTzah3
std::istringstream input("1 2 3 4 5");
auto i = std::views::istream<int>(input);
auto r = std::views::counted(i.begin(), 4) | std::views::take(2);
assert(!r.empty());
```
## Reference
- [Draft C++ Standard:
[view.interface.general]](https://eel.is/c++draft/view.interface.general)
- [LWG3715](https://wg21.link/LWG3715)
Since we implemented `copyable-box` in
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D102135,
6829db727e),
this issue got addressed.
---------
Signed-off-by: yronglin <yronglin777@gmail.com>
The specifications of format had a contradiction, libc++ always
implemented the code as-if LWG3462 has been done; the contradiction was
a bit hard to spot.
Marks as nothing to do:
- LWG3462 §[formatter.requirements]: Formatter requirements forbid use
of fc.arg()
The issue has been resolved in https://reviews.llvm.org/D121138 since it
was needed to implement format. This updates the status of the LWG-issue
filed for this review.
Marks as complete:
- LWG3701 Make formatter<remove_cvref_t<const charT[N]>, charT>
requirement explicit
This patch implements `std::basic_syncbuf` and `std::basic_osyncstream` as specified in paper p0053r7. ~~For ease of reviewing I am submitting this patch before submitting a patch for `std::basic_osyncstream`. ~~
~~Please note, this patch is not 100% complete. I plan on adding more tests (see comments), specifically I plan on adding tests for multithreading and synchronization.~~
Edit: I decided that it would be far easier for me to keep track of this and make changes that affect both `std::basic_syncbuf` and `std::basic_osyncstream` if both were in one patch.
The patch was originally written by @zoecarver
Implements
- P0053R7 - C++ Synchronized Buffered Ostream
- LWG-3127 basic_osyncstream::rdbuf needs a const_cast
- LWG-3334 basic_osyncstream move assignment and destruction calls basic_syncbuf::emit() twice
- LWG-3570 basic_osyncstream::emit should be an unformatted output function
- LWG-3867 Should std::basic_osyncstream's move assignment operator be noexcept?
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67086
This change has a few additional effects:
- Abstract classes are now formattable.
- Volatile objects are no longer formattable.
Implements
- LWG3631 basic_format_arg(T&&) should use remove_cvref_t<T> throughout
- LWG3925 Concept formattable's definition is incorrect
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152092
The development of C++23 is complete, so these issues will be adopted in
C++26 (or later).
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153053
During the ISO C++ Committee meeting plenary session the C++23 Standard
has been voted as technical complete.
This updates the reference to c++2b to c++23 and updates the __cplusplus
macro.
Note since we use clang-tidy 16 a small work-around is needed. Clang
knows -std=c++23 but clang-tidy not so for now force the lit compiler
flag to use -std=c++2b instead of -std=c++23.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, jloser, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150795
