Relanding after fixing NodeId Invariant.
Cleanup cycle/validity checks in ISel (IsLegalToFold,
HandleMergeInputChains) and X86 (isFusableLoadOpStore). Now do a full
search for cycles / dependencies pruning the search when topological
property of NodeId allows.
As part of this propogate the NodeId-based cutoffs to narrow
hasPreprocessorHelper searches.
Reviewers: craig.topper, bogner
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41293
llvm-svn: 327171
Instruction Selection makes use of the topological ordering of nodes
by node id (a node's operands have smaller node id than it) when doing
cycle detection. During selection we may violate this property as a
selection of multiple nodes may induce a use dependence (and thus a
node id restriction) between two unrelated nodes. If a selected node
has an unselected successor this may allow us to miss a cycle in
detection an invalid selection.
This patch fixes this by marking all unselected successors of a
selected node have negated node id. We avoid pruning on such negative
ids but still can reconstruct the original id for pruning.
In-tree targets have been updated to replace DAG-level replacements
with ISel-level ones which enforce this property.
This preemptively fixes PR36312 before triggering commit r324359 relands
Reviewers: craig.topper, bogner, jyknight
Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle, javed.absar, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43198
llvm-svn: 327170
Sadly, r324359 caused at least PR36312. There is a patch out for review
but it seems to be taking a bit and we've already had these crashers in
tree for too long. We're hitting this PR in real code now and are
blocked on shipping new compilers as a consequence so I'm reverting us
back to green.
Sorry for the churn due to the stacked changes that I had to revert. =/
llvm-svn: 325420
Travel all chains paths to first non-tokenfactor node can be
exponential work. Add simple redundency check to avoid this.
Fixes PR36264.
llvm-svn: 324491
Instruction Selection
Cleanup cycle/validity checks in ISel (IsLegalToFold,
HandleMergeInputChains) and X86 (isFusableLoadOpStore). Now do a full
search for cycles / dependencies pruning the search when topological
property of NodeId allows.
As part of this propogate the NodeId-based cutoffs to narrow
hasPreprocessorHelper searches.
Reviewers: craig.topper, bogner
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41293
llvm-svn: 324359
Summary:
In Instruction Selection UpdateChains replaces all matched Nodes'
chain references including interior token factors and deletes them.
This may allow nodes which depend on these interior nodes but are not
part of the set of matched nodes to be left with a dangling dependence.
Avoid this by doing the replacement for matched non-TokenFactor nodes.
Fixes PR36164.
Reviewers: jonpa, RKSimon, bogner
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42754
llvm-svn: 323977
Summary:
Instruction Selection preserves relative orders of all nodes save
TokenFactors which we treat specially. As a result Node Ids for
TokenFactors may violate the topological ordering and should not be
considered as valid pruning candidates in predecessor search.
Fixes PR35316.
Reviewers: RKSimon, hfinkel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42701
llvm-svn: 323880
Previously some targets printed their own message at the start of Select to indicate what they were selecting. For the targets that didn't, it means there was no print of the root node before any custom handling in the target executed. So if the target did something custom and never called SelectNodeCommon, no print would be made. For the targets that did print a message in Select, if they didn't custom handle a node SelectNodeCommon would reprint the root node before walking the isel table.
It seems better to just print the message before the call to Select so all targets behave the same. And then remove the root node printing from SelectNodeCommon and just leave a message that says we're starting the table search.
There were also some oddities in blank line behavior. Usually due to a \n after a call to SelectionDAGNode::dump which already inserted a new line.
llvm-svn: 323551
Apparently checking the pass structure isn't enough to ensure that we don't fall
back to FastISel, as it's set up as part of the SelectionDAGISel.
llvm-svn: 323369
Ingredients in this patch:
1. Add HANDLE_LIBCALL defs for finite mathlib functions that correspond to LLVM intrinsics.
2. Plumbing to send TargetLibraryInfo down to SelectionDAGLegalize.
3. Relaxed math and library checking in SelectionDAGLegalize::ConvertNodeToLibcall() to choose finite libcalls.
There was a bug about determining the availability of the finite calls that should be fixed with:
rL322010
Not in this patch:
This doesn't resolve the question/bug of clang creating the intrinsic IR in the first place.
There's likely follow-up work needed to support the long double variants better.
There's room for improvement to reduce the code duplication.
Create finite calls that don't originate from a corresponding intrinsic or DAG node?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41338
llvm-svn: 322087
When intrinsics are allowed to have mem operands, there
are two ways this can happen. First is an intrinsic
that is marked has having a mem operand, but is not handled
by getTgtMemIntrinsic.
The second way can occur even for intrinsics which do not
have a mem operand. It seems the selector table does
some kind of sorting based on the opcode, and the
mem ref recording can happen in the same scope for
intrinsics that both do and do not have mem refs.
I haven't been able to figure out exactly why this happens
(although it happens even with the matcher optimizations disabled).
I'm not sure if it's worth trying to avoid hitting this for
these nodes since I think it's still reasonable to handle
this in case getTgtMemIntrinic is not implemented.
llvm-svn: 321208
Introduces the AddrFI "addressing mode", which is necessary simply because
it's not possible to write a pattern that directly matches a frameindex.
Ensure callee-saved registers are accessed relative to the stackpointer. This
is necessary as callee-saved register spills are performed before the frame
pointer is set.
Move HexagonDAGToDAGISel::isOrEquivalentToAdd to SelectionDAGISel, so we can
make use of it in the RISC-V backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39848
llvm-svn: 320353
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.
The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422
llvm-svn: 319665
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been extended, such that it promotes Scale to
accommodate similar operand appearing in the DAG e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will now look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs so that if there is an opportunity
then complex LEAs (having 3 operands) could be factored out e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops, thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
4/ Simplify LEA converts (lea (BASE,1,INDEX,0) --> add (BASE, INDEX) which offers better through put.
PR32755 will be taken care of by this pathc.
Previous patch revisions : r313343 , r314886
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy, jbhateja
Reviewed By: lsaba, RKSimon, jbhateja
Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 319543
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
processDbgDeclares assumes pointer size is the same for different addr spaces.
It uses pointer size for addr space 0 for all pointers, which causes assertion
in stripAndAccumulateInBoundsConstantOffsets for amdgcn---amdgiz since
pointer in addr space 5 has different size than in addr space 0.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40085
llvm-svn: 318370
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
Similar to how llvm::salvagDebugInfo hooks into InstCombine, this adds
a hook that can be invoked before an SDNode that is associated with an
SDDbgValue is erased to capture the effect of the deleted node in a
DIExpression.
The motivating example is an SDDebugValue attached to an ADD operation
that gets folded into a LOAD+OFFSET operation.
rdar://problem/32121503
llvm-svn: 316525
It broke the Chromium / SQLite build; see PR34830.
> Summary:
> 1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
> extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
> appearing in the DAG.
> e.g.
> T1 = A + B
> T2 = T1 + 10
> T3 = T2 + A
> For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
> Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
>
> 2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
> so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
> could be factored out.
> e.g.
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
> will be factored as following
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
>
> 3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
> thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
>
> Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy
>
> Reviewed By: lsaba
>
> Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 314919
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
appearing in the DAG.
e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
could be factored out.
e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy
Reviewed By: lsaba
Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 314886
Add support for passing SwiftError through a register on the Windows x64
calling convention. This allows the use of swifterror attributes on
parameters which is used by the swift front end for the `Error`
parameter. This partially enables building the swift standard library
for Windows x86_64.
llvm-svn: 313791
This caused PR34629: asserts firing when building Chromium. It also broke some
buildbots building test-suite as reported on the commit thread.
> Summary:
> 1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
> extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
> appearing in the DAG.
> e.g.
> T1 = A + B
> T2 = T1 + 10
> T3 = T2 + A
> For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
> Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
>
> 2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
> so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
> could be factored out.
> e.g.
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
> will be factored as following
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
>
> 3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
> thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
>
> Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet
>
> Reviewed By: lsaba
>
> Subscribers: spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 313376
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
appearing in the DAG.
e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
could be factored out.
e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet
Reviewed By: lsaba
Subscribers: spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 313343
Summary:
This intrinsic represents a label with a list of associated metadata
strings. It is modelled as reading and writing inaccessible memory so
that it won't be removed as dead code. I think the intention is that the
annotation strings should appear at most once in the debug info, so I
marked it noduplicate. We are allowed to inline code with annotations as
long as we strip the annotation, but that can be done later.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36904
llvm-svn: 312569
The NewNodesMustHaveLegalTypes flag is set to false at the beginning of CodeGenAndEmitDAG, and set to true after legalizing types.
But before calling CodeGenAndEmitDAG we build the DAG for the basic block.
So for the first basic block NewNodesMustHaveLegalTypes would be 'false' during the SDAG building, and for all other basic blocks it would be 'true'.
This patch sets the flag to false before SDAG building each basic block.
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33435
llvm-svn: 310239
Summary:
We are crashing in LLC at O0 when gc intrinsics are present in the block.
The reason being FastISel performs basic block ISel by modifying GC.relocates
to be the first instruction in the block. This can cause us to visit the GC
relocate before it's corresponding GC.statepoint is visited, which is incorrect.
When we lower the statepoint, we record the base and derived pointers, along
with the gc.relocates. After this we can visit the gc.relocate.
This patch avoids fastISel from incorrectly creating the block with gc.relocate
as the first instruction.
Reviewers: qcolombet, skatkov, qikon, reames
Reviewed by: skatkov
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34421
llvm-svn: 307084
The code assumed that we process instructions in basic block order. FastISel
processes instructions in reverse basic block order. We need to pre-assign
virtual registers before selecting otherwise we get def-use relationships wrong.
This only affects code with swifterror registers.
rdar://32659327
llvm-svn: 305484
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
Running `llc -verify-dom-info` on the attached testcase results in a
crash in the verifier, due to a stale dominator tree.
i.e.
DominatorTree is not up to date!
Computed:
=============================--------------------------------
Inorder Dominator Tree:
[1] %safe_mod_func_uint8_t_u_u.exit.i.i.i {0,7}
[2] %lor.lhs.false.i61.i.i.i {1,2}
[2] %safe_mod_func_int8_t_s_s.exit.i.i.i {3,6}
[3] %safe_div_func_int64_t_s_s.exit66.i.i.i {4,5}
Actual:
=============================--------------------------------
Inorder Dominator Tree:
[1] %safe_mod_func_uint8_t_u_u.exit.i.i.i {0,9}
[2] %lor.lhs.false.i61.i.i.i {1,2}
[2] %safe_mod_func_int8_t_s_s.exit.i.i.i {3,8}
[3] %safe_div_func_int64_t_s_s.exit66.i.i.i {4,5}
[3] %safe_mod_func_int8_t_s_s.exit.i.i.i.lor.lhs.false.i61.i.i.i_crit_edge {6,7}
This is because in `SelectionDAGIsel` we split critical edges without
updating the corresponding dominator for the function (and we claim
in `MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage()` that the domtree is preserved).
We could either stop preserving the domtree in `getAnalysisUsage`
or tell `splitCriticalEdge()` to update it.
As the second option is easy to implement, that's the one I chose.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33800
llvm-svn: 304742
The recursive implementation of findNonImmUse may overflow stack
on extremely long use chains. This patch replaces it with an equivalent
iterative implementation.
Reviewed By: bogner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33775
llvm-svn: 304522
Before r247167, the pass manager builder controlled which AA
implementations were used, exporting them all in the AliasAnalysis
analysis group.
Now, AAResultsWrapperPass always uses BasicAA, but still uses other AA
implementations if made available in the pass pipeline.
But regardless, SDAGISel is required at O0, and really doesn't need to
be doing fancy optimizations based on useful AA results.
Don't require AA at CodeGenOpt::None, and only use it otherwise.
This does have a functional impact (and one testcase is pessimized
because we can't reuse a load). But I think that's desirable no matter
what.
Note that this alone doesn't result in less DT computations: TwoAddress
was previously able to reuse the DT we computed for SDAG. That will be
fixed separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32766
llvm-svn: 302611
Summary:
For inalloca functions, this is a very common code pattern:
%argpack = type <{ i32, i32, i32 }>
define void @f(%argpack* inalloca %args) {
entry:
%a = getelementptr inbounds %argpack, %argpack* %args, i32 0, i32 0
%b = getelementptr inbounds %argpack, %argpack* %args, i32 0, i32 1
%c = getelementptr inbounds %argpack, %argpack* %args, i32 0, i32 2
tail call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %a, ... "a")
tail call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %c, ... "b")
tail call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %b, ... "c")
Even though these GEPs can be simplified to a constant offset from EBP
or RSP, we don't do that at -O0, and each GEP is computed into a
register. Registers used to compute argument addresses are typically
spilled and clobbered very quickly after the initial computation, so
live debug variable tracking loses information very quickly if we use
DBG_VALUE instructions.
This change moves processing of dbg.declare between argument lowering
and basic block isel, so that we can ask if an argument has a frame
index or not. If the argument lives in a register as is the case for
byval arguments on some targets, then we don't put it in the side table
and during ISel we emit DBG_VALUE instructions.
Reviewers: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32980
llvm-svn: 302483
