If an instruction is sunk into a loop then any kill flags on
operands declared outside the loop must be cleared as these
will be live for all loop iterations.
Fixes#46827
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126754
The use operand may be undefined. In that case we can just continue to
check the next operand since it won't increase register pressure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127848
reapply 62a9b36fcf728b104ea87e6eb84c0be69b779df7 and fix module build
failue:
1: remove MachineCycleInfoWrapperPass in MachinePassRegistry.def
MachineCycleInfoWrapperPass is a anylysis pass, should not be there.
2: move the definition for MachineCycleInfoPrinterPass to cpp file.
Otherwise, there are module conflicit for MachineCycleInfoWrapperPass
in MachinePassRegistry.def and MachineCycleAnalysis.h after
62a9b36fcf728b104ea87e6eb84c0be69b779df7.
MachineCycle can handle irreducible loop. Natural loop
analysis (MachineLoop) can not return correct loop depth if
the loop is irreducible loop. And MachineSink is sensitive
to the loop depth, see MachineSinking::isProfitableToSinkTo().
This patch tries to use MachineCycle so that we can handle
irreducible loop better.
Reviewed By: sameerds, MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123995
MachineCycle can handle irreducible loop. Natural loop
analysis (MachineLoop) can not return correct loop depth if
the loop is irreducible loop. And MachineSink is sensitive
to the loop depth, see MachineSinking::isProfitableToSinkTo().
This patch tries to use MachineCycle so that we can handle
irreducible loop better.
Reviewed By: sameerds, MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123995
Sinking must check for interference between the block prologue
and the instruction being sunk.
Specifically check for clobbering of uses by the prologue, and
overwrites to prologue defined registers by the sunk instruction.
Reviewed By: rampitec, ruiling
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121277
This reverts commit 7f230feeeac8a67b335f52bd2e900a05c6098f20.
Breaks CodeGenCUDA/link-device-bitcode.cu in check-clang,
and many LLVM tests, see comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D121169
This is an alternative to D120330, which disables MachineSink for
functions with irreducible cycles entirely. This avoids both the
correctness problem, and ensures we don't perform non-profitable
sinks into cycles. At the same time, it may also disable
profitable sinks in the same function. This can be made more
precise by using MachineCycleInfo in the future.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53990.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120800
For AMDGPU the insertion point for a block may not be the first
non-PHI instruction. This happens when a block contains EXEC
mask manipulation related to control flow (converging lanes).
Use SkipPHIsAndLabels to determine the block insertion point
so that the target can skip any block prologue instructions.
Reviewed By: rampitec, ruiling
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119399
For AMDGPU, any use of the physical register EXEC prevents sinking even if it is not a real physical register read. Add check to see if a physical
register use can be ignored for sinking.
Also perform same constant and ignorable physical register check when considering sinking in loops.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D116053
Register uses that are MRI->isConstantPhysReg() should not inhibit
sinking transformation.
Reviewed By: StephenTozer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111531
We did a experiment and observed dramatic decrease on compilation time which spent on clearing kill flags.
Before:
Number of BasicBlocks:33357
Number of Instructions:162067
Number of Cleared Kill Flags:32869
Time of handling kill flags(ms):1.607509e+05
After:
Number of BasicBlocks:33357
Number of Instructions:162067
Number of Cleared Kill Flags:32869
Time of handling kill flags:3.987371e+03
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111688
This is a cleanup patch -- we're now able to support all flavours of
variable location in instruction referencing mode. This patch updates
various tests for debug instructions to be broader: numerous code paths
try to ignore debug isntructions, and they now have to ignore the
additional DBG_PHI and DBG_INSTR_REFs that we can generate.
A small amount of rework happens for LiveDebugVariables: as we don't need
to track live intervals through regalloc any more, we can get away with
unlinking debug instructions before regalloc, then re-inserting them after.
Note that this isn't (yet) true of DBG_VALUE_LISTs, they still have to go
through live interval tracking.
In SelectionDAG, add a helper lambda that emits half-formed DBG_INSTR_REFs
for arguments in instr-ref mode, DBG_VALUE otherwise. This is one of the
final locations where DBG_VALUEs are emitted for vreg arguments.
X86InstrInfo now un-sets the debug instr number on SUB instructions that
get mutated into CMP instructions. As the instruction no longer computes a
subtraction, we can't use it for variable locations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88898
Pseudo probe are currently given a slot index like other regular instructions. This affects register pressure and lifetime weight computation because of enlarged lifetime length with pseudo probe instructions. As a consequence, program could get different code generated w/ and w/o pseudo probes. I'm closing the gap by excluding pseudo probes from stack index and downstream register allocation related passes.
Reviewed By: wmi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100334
This patch adds handling for DBG_VALUE_LIST in the MIR-passes (after
finalize-isel), excluding the debug liveness passes and DWARF emission. This
most significantly affects MachineSink, which now needs to consider all used
registers of a debug value when sinking, but for most passes this change is
simply replacing getDebugOperand(0) with an iteration over all debug operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92578
To make sure compile-times don't regress, add an option to restrict the number
of instructions considered for sinking as alias analysis can be expensive and
for the same reason also skip large blocks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96485
This moves SinkIntoLoop from MachineLICM to MachineSink. The motivation for
this work is that hoisting is a canonicalisation transformation, but we do not
really have a good story to sink instructions back if that is better, e.g. to
reduce live-ranges, register pressure and spilling. This has been discussed a
few times on the list, the latest thread is:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-December/147184.html
There it was pointed out that we have the LoopSink IR pass, but that works on
IR, lacks register pressure informatiom, and is focused on profile guided
optimisations, and then we have MachineLICM and MachineSink that both perform
sinking. MachineLICM is more about hoisting and CSE'ing of hoisted
instructions. It also contained a very incomplete and disabled-by-default
SinkIntoLoop feature, which we now move to MachineSink.
Getting loop-sinking to do something useful is going to be at least a 3-step
approach:
1) This is just moving the code and is almost a NFC, but contains a bug fix.
This uses helper function `isLoopInvariant` that was factored out in D94082 and
added to MachineLoop.
2) A first functional change to make loop-sink a little bit less restrictive,
which it really is at the moment, is the change in D94308. This lets it do
more (alias) analysis using functions in MachineSink, making it a bit more
powerful. Nothing changes much: still off by default. But it shows that
MachineSink is a better home for this, and it starts using its functionality
like `hasStoreBetween`, and in the next step we can use `isProfitableToSinkTo`.
3) This is the going to be he interesting step: decision making when and how
many instructions to sink. This will be driven by the register pressure, and
deciding if reducing live-ranges and loop sinking will help in better
performance.
4) Once we are happy with 3), this should be enabled by default, that should be
the end goal of this exercise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93694
Add more profitable sinking patterns if the target bb register pressure
is not too high.
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88126
The refactoring encapsulates frequency calculation in MachineBlockFrequencyInfo,
and renames the API to clarify its motivation. It should clarify
frequencies may not be reset 'freely' by users of the analysis, as the
API serves as a partial update to avoid a full analysis recomputation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84427
Summary:
Avoid exposing details about how children are stored. This will enable
subsequent type-erasure changes.
New methods are introduced to cover common access patterns.
Change-Id: Idb5f4b1b9c84e4cc71ddb39bb52a388682f5674f
Reviewers: arsenm, RKSimon, mehdi_amini, courbet
Subscribers: qcolombet, sdardis, wdng, hiraditya, jrtc27, zzheng, atanasyan, asbirlea, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83083
Before this instruction supported output values, it fit fairly
naturally as a terminator. However, being a terminator while also
supporting outputs causes some trouble, as the physreg->vreg COPY
operations cannot be in the same block.
Modeling it as a non-terminator allows it to be handled the same way
as invoke is handled already.
Most of the changes here were created by auditing all the existing
users of MachineBasicBlock::isEHPad() and
MachineBasicBlock::hasEHPadSuccessor(), and adding calls to
isInlineAsmBrIndirectTarget or mayHaveInlineAsmBr, as appropriate.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, void
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79794
Following on from this RFC[0] from a while back, this is the first patch towards
implementing variadic debug values.
This patch specifically adds a set of functions to MachineInstr for performing
operations specific to debug values, and replacing uses of the more general
functions where appropriate. The most prevalent of these is replacing
getOperand(0) with getDebugOperand(0) for debug-value-specific code, as the
operands corresponding to values will no longer be at index 0, but index 2 and
upwards: getDebugOperand(x) == getOperand(x+2). Similar replacements have been
added for the other operands, along with some helper functions to replace
oft-repeated code and operate on a variable number of value operands.
[0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139376.html<Paste>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81852
BreakPHIEdge would be set based on whether the instruction needs to
insert a new critical edge to allow sinking into a block where the uses
are PHI nodes. But for instructions with multiple defs it would be reset
on the second def, allowing the instruciton to sink where it should not.
Fixes PR44981
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78087
Summary:
This prevents BFI queries on new blocks (from
MachineSinking::GetAllSortedSuccessors) and fixes a bunch of assert failures
under -check-bfi-unknown-block-queries=true.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74511
Summary:
Making `Scale` a `TypeSize` in AArch64InstrInfo::getMemOpInfo,
has the effect that all places where this information is used
(notably, TargetInstrInfo::getMemOperandWithOffset) will need
to consider Scale - and derived, Offset - possibly being scalable.
This patch adds a new operand `bool &OffsetIsScalable` to
TargetInstrInfo::getMemOperandWithOffset and fixes up all
the places where this function is used, to consider the
offset possibly being scalable.
In most cases, this means bailing out because the algorithm does not
(or cannot) support scalable offsets in places where it does some
form of alias checking for example.
Reviewers: rovka, efriedma, kristof.beyls
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: wuzish, kerbowa, MatzeB, arsenm, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72758
This caused non-determinism in the compiler, see command on the Phabricator
code review.
> This patch addresses a performance problem reported in PR43855, and
> present in the reapplication in in 001574938e5. It turns out that
> MachineSink will (often) move instructions to the first block that
> post-dominates the current block, and then try to sink further. This
> means if we have a lot of conditionals, we can needlessly create large
> numbers of DBG_VALUEs, one in each block the sunk instruction passes
> through.
>
> To fix this, rather than immediately sinking DBG_VALUEs, record them in
> a pass structure. When sinking is complete and instructions won't be
> sunk any further, new DBG_VALUEs are added, avoiding lots of
> intermediate DBG_VALUE $noregs being created.
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70676
This patch addresses a performance problem reported in PR43855, and
present in the reapplication in in 001574938e5. It turns out that
MachineSink will (often) move instructions to the first block that
post-dominates the current block, and then try to sink further. This
means if we have a lot of conditionals, we can needlessly create large
numbers of DBG_VALUEs, one in each block the sunk instruction passes
through.
To fix this, rather than immediately sinking DBG_VALUEs, record them in
a pass structure. When sinking is complete and instructions won't be
sunk any further, new DBG_VALUEs are added, avoiding lots of
intermediate DBG_VALUE $noregs being created.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70676
Fix part of PR43855, resolving a problem that comes from the reapplication
in 001574938e5. If we have two DBG_VALUE insts in a block that specify
the location of the same variable, for example:
%0 = someinst
DBG_VALUE %0, !123, !DIExpression()
%1 = anotherinst
DBG_VALUE %1, !123, !DIExpression()
if %0 were to sink, the corresponding DBG_VALUE would sink too, past the
next DBG_VALUE, effectively re-ordering assignments. To fix this, I've
added a SeenDbgVars set recording what variable locations have been seen in
a block already (working bottom up), and now flag DBG_VALUEs that would
pass a later DBG_VALUE for the same variable.
NB, this only works for repeated DBG_VALUEs in the same basic block, the
general case involving control flow is much harder, which I've written
up in PR44117.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70672
These were:
* D58386 / f5e1b718a67 / reverted in d382a8a768b
* D58238 / ee50590e168 / reverted in a8db456b53a
Of which the latter has a performance regression tracked in PR43855,
fixed by D70672 / D70676, which will be committed atomically with this
reapplication.
Contains a minor difference to account for a change in the IsCopyInstr
signature.
This file lists every pass in LLVM, and is included by Pass.h, which is
very popular. Every time we add, remove, or rename a pass in LLVM, it
caused lots of recompilation.
I found this fact by looking at this table, which is sorted by the
number of times a file was changed over the last 100,000 git commits
multiplied by the number of object files that depend on it in the
current checkout:
recompiles touches affected_files header
342380 95 3604 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h
314730 234 1345 llvm/include/llvm/InitializePasses.h
307036 118 2602 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h
213049 59 3611 llvm/include/llvm/Support/MathExtras.h
170422 47 3626 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Compiler.h
162225 45 3605 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Optional.h
158319 63 2513 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
140322 39 3598 llvm/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
137647 59 2333 llvm/include/llvm/Support/Error.h
131619 73 1803 llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
Before this change, touching InitializePasses.h would cause 1345 files
to recompile. After this change, touching it only causes 550 compiles in
an incremental rebuild.
Reviewers: bkramer, asbirlea, bollu, jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70211
