Remove ASTContext parameter from DeclContext's methods. This change cascaded down to other Decl's methods and changes to call sites started "escalating".
Timings using pre-tokenized "cocoa.h" showed only a ~1% increase in time run between and after this commit.
llvm-svn: 74506
The implementations of these methods can Use Decl::getASTContext() to get the ASTContext.
This commit touches a lot of files since call sites for these methods are everywhere.
I used pre-tokenized "carbon.h" and "cocoa.h" headers to do some timings, and there was no real time difference between before the commit and after it.
llvm-svn: 74501
variables in ObjC's Next runtime mode. Next runtime also implicitly applies
'used' attribute on some of its meta-data. This results in two
'llvm.used' arrays to be generated, and one of them is renamed to
'llvm.used1'.
llvm-svn: 74008
message dispage API for all but a few messages. This is
a runtime performance improvement and there is not meant
to be a functional change.
llvm-svn: 71467
compensating for super classes). This was making the reported class
sizes for empty classes very, very wrong.
- Also, we now report the size info for an empty class like gcc (as
the offset of the start, not as 0, 0).
- Add a few more test cases we were mishandling before (padding bit
field at end of struct, for example).
llvm-svn: 70938
via CollectObjCIvars.
- In places where we need them, we should have the implementation and
access the properties through it.
This is a fairly substantial functionality change:
1. @encode no longer encodes synthesized ivars, ever.
2. The ivar layout bitmap no longer encodes information for
synthesized ivars in superclasses. Well, actually I had already
broken that, but it is intentional now.
We are now differing substantially from llvm-gcc and gcc
here. However, in my opinion this fundamentally *must* work if
non-fragile classes are to work. Without this change, the result of
@encode and the ivar layout depend on the order that the
implementation is seen in a file (if it is in the same file with its
superclass). Since both scenarios should work the same, our behavior
is now consistent with gcc behavior as if an implementation is never
seen following an implementation of its superclass.
Note that #2 is only a functionality change when (A) an
implementation appears in the same translation unit with the
implementation of its superclass, and (B) the superclass has
synthesized ivars. My belief is that this situation does not occur in
practice.
I am not yet sure of the role/semantics of @encode when synthesized
ivars are present... it's use is fairly unsound in a non-fragile world.
llvm-svn: 70822
struct.
- We still need to do more lookup than necessary because ivars don't
live in a reasonable DeclContext.
- The only remaining client of the interface shadow struct is the
ivar layout bitmap.
llvm-svn: 70756
