PartialDiagnostic misses some functions compared to DiagnosticBuilder.
This patch refactors DiagnosticBuilder and PartialDiagnostic, extracts
the common functionality so that the streaming << operators are
shared.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84362
This reverts commit 849c60541b630ddf8cabf9179fa771b3f4207ec8 because it
results in a stage 2 build failure:
llvm-project/clang/include/clang/AST/ExternalASTSource.h:409:20: error:
definition with same mangled name
'_ZN5clang25LazyGenerationalUpdatePtrIPKNS_4DeclEPS1_XadL_ZNS_17ExternalASTSource19CompleteRedeclChainES3_EEE9makeValueERKNS_10ASTContextES4_'
as another definition
static ValueType makeValue(const ASTContext &Ctx, T Value);
parameter in its notion of template argument identity.
We already did this for all the other kinds of non-type template
argument. We're still missing the type from the mangling, so we continue
to be able to see collisions at link time; that's an open ABI issue.
This reverts commit 8e780a1653e6f87755a447e921b8f929d8b70996.
DiagnosticBuilder is a value type, created on the stack everywhere. IMO
we should not be adding a vtable to it, and making very operator<< use a
virtual interface. There are other feasible designs for implementing
this. The original review, D84362, was approved by @tra, who is
responsible for Clang's CUDA support, but it wasn't reviewed by @rsmith
or anyone responsible for clang's diagnostic library.
This recommits 829d14ee0a6aa79c89f7f3d9fcd9d27d3efd2b91.
The patch was reverted due to a regression in some CUDA app
which was thought to be caused by this patch. However, investigation
showed that the regression was due to some other issues, therefore
recommit this patch.
PartialDiagnostic misses some functions compared to DiagnosticBuilder.
This patch refactors DiagnosticBuilder and PartialDiagnostic, extracts
the common functionality so that the streaming << operators are
shared.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84362
Summary:
This changes introduces an enum to represent dependencies as a bitmask
and extract common patterns from code that computes dependency bits into
helper functions.
Reviewers: rsmith, martong, shafik, ilya-biryukov, hokein
Subscribers: hokein, sammccall, Mordante, riccibruno, merge_guards_bot, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71920
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Resubmit after fixing MSAN failures caused by incomplete initialization of AutoTypeLocs in TypeSpecLocFiller.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Resubmit after incorrect check in NonTypeTemplateParmDecl broke lldb.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
This patch implements P1141R2 "Yet another approach for constrained declarations".
General strategy for this patch was:
- Expand AutoType to include optional type-constraint, reflecting the wording and easing the integration of constraints.
- Replace autos in parameter type specifiers with invented parameters in GetTypeSpecTypeForDeclarator, using the same logic
previously used for generic lambdas, now unified with abbreviated templates, by:
- Tracking the template parameter lists in the Declarator object
- Tracking the template parameter depth before parsing function declarators (at which point we can match template
parameters against scope specifiers to know if we have an explicit template parameter list to append invented parameters
to or not).
- When encountering an AutoType in a parameter context we check a stack of InventedTemplateParameterInfo structures that
contain the info required to create and accumulate invented template parameters (fields that were already present in
LambdaScopeInfo, which now inherits from this class and is looked up when an auto is encountered in a lambda context).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65042
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but in these cases we should be able to use castAs<> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 373904
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
So I wrote a clang-tidy check to lint out redundant `isa`, `cast`, and
`dyn_cast`s for fun. This is a portion of what it found for clang; I
plan to do similar cleanups in LLVM and other subprojects when I find
time.
Because of the volume of changes, I explicitly avoided making any change
that wasn't highly local and obviously correct to me (e.g. we still have
a number of foo(cast<Bar>(baz)) that I didn't touch, since overloading
is a thing and the cast<Bar> did actually change the type -- just up the
class hierarchy).
I also tried to leave the types we were cast<>ing to somewhere nearby,
in cases where it wasn't locally obvious what we were dealing with
before.
llvm-svn: 326416
fail the merge if the arguments have different types (except if one of them was
deduced from an array bound, in which case take the type from the other).
This is correct because (except in the array bound case) the type of the
template argument in each deduction must match the type of the parameter, so at
least one of the two deduced arguments must have a mismatched type.
This is necessary because we would otherwise lose the type information for the
discarded template argument in the merge, and fail to diagnose the mismatch.
In order to power this, we now properly retain the type of a deduced non-type
template argument deduced from a declaration, rather than giving it the type of
the template parameter; we'll convert it to the template parameter type when
checking the deduced arguments.
llvm-svn: 290399
So, also:
- Moved the TemplateArgumentLoc array out of the
ASTTemplateKWAndArgsInfo class (making it a simple fixed-size object),
to avoid needing to have a variable-length object as part of a
variable-length object. Now the objects that have a
ASTTemplateKWAndArgsInfo also have some TemplateArgumentLoc objects
appended directly.
- Removed some internal-use accessors which became simply a wrapper on
getTrailingObjects.
- Moved MemberNameQualifier out of the MemberExpr class, renamed it
MemberExprNameQualifier, because the template can't
refer to a class nested within the class it's defining.
llvm-svn: 256570
Doing so required separating them so that the former doesn't inherit
from the latter anymore. Investigating that, it became clear that the
inheritance wasn't actually providing real value in any case.
So also:
- Remove a bunch of redundant functions (getExplicitTemplateArgs,
getOptionalExplicitTemplateArgs) on various Expr subclasses which
depended on the inheritance relationship.
- Switched external callers to use pre-existing accessors that return the
data they're actually interested in (getTemplateArgs,
getNumTemplateArgs, etc).
- Switched internal callers to use pre-existing getTemplateKWAndArgsInfo.
llvm-svn: 256359
template specialization type dependent, even if it has no dependent template
arguments. I've filed a corresponding bug against the C++ standard.
llvm-svn: 220088
Plumb through the full QualType of the TemplateArgument::Declaration, as
it's insufficient to only know whether the type is a reference or
pointer (that was necessary for mangling, but insufficient for debug
info). This shouldn't increase the size of TemplateArgument as
TemplateArgument::Integer is still longer by another 32 bits.
Several bits of code were testing that the reference-ness of the
parameters matched, but this seemed to be insufficient (various other
features of the type could've mismatched and wouldn't've been caught)
and unnecessary, at least insofar as removing those tests didn't cause
anything to fail.
(Richard - perchaps you can hypothesize why any of these checks might
need to test reference-ness of the parameters (& explain why
reference-ness is part of the mangling - I would've figured that for the
reference-ness to be different, a prior template argument would have to
be different). I'd be happy to add them in/beef them up and add test
cases if there's a reason for them)
llvm-svn: 219900
For namespaces, this is consistent with mangling and GCC's debug info
behavior. For structs, GCC uses <anonymous struct> but we prefer
consistency between all anonymous entities but don't want to confuse
them with template arguments, etc, so we'll just go with parens in all
cases.
llvm-svn: 205398
This fixes several (7 out of 16) cases of PR14492 in the GDB 7.5 test
suite. It seems GDB was bailing out whenever it had even the slightest
problem with the template argument list (& I assume it didn't like
seeing template value parameters that were just simple names - perhaps
assuming that lone names must be types, not values)
llvm-svn: 181556
The TypeLoc hierarchy used the llvm::cast machinery to perform undefined
behavior by casting pointers/references to TypeLoc objects to derived types
and then using the derived copy constructors (or even returning pointers to
derived types that actually point to the original TypeLoc object).
Some context is in this thread:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-December/056804.html
Though it's spread over a few months which can be hard to read in the mail
archive.
llvm-svn: 175462
