These were useful primarily for the Python 2 to 3 transition. Python 2
is no longer supported so these are no longer necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157759
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
This just adds the simulator platforms to the lldbplatform enumerations
and the respective test decorator.
The platform names for the simulator are just the SDK names since D85537, so
that's why we are not using LLDB's usual platform names here (e.g., SDK =
"iphonesimulator" vs LLDB platform ="ios-simulator").
Also removes the duplicate platform enumaration in lldbplatformutil.py.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89694
Normal customer devices won't be able to run these tests, we're hoping to get
a public facing bot set up at some point. Both devices pass the testsuite without
any errors or failures.
I have seen some instability with the armv7 test runs, I may submit additional patches
to address this. arm64 looks good.
I'll be watching the bots for the rest of today; if any problems are introduced by
this patch I'll revert it - if anyone sees a problem with their bot that I don't
see, please do the same. I know it's a rather large patch.
One change I had to make specifically for iOS devices was that debugserver can't
create files. There were several tests that launch the inferior process redirecting
its output to a file, then they retrieve the file. They were not trying to test
file redirection in these tests, so I rewrote those to write their output to a file
directly.
llvm-svn: 314132
Normal customer devices won't be able to run these devices, we're hoping to get
a public facing bot set up at some point. Both devices pass the testsuite without
any errors or failures.
I have seen some instability with the armv7 test runs, I may submit additional patches
to address this. arm64 looks good.
I'll be watching the bots for the rest of today; if any problems are introduced by
this patch I'll revert it - if anyone sees a problem with their bot that I don't
see, please do the same. I know it's a rather large patch.
One change I had to make specifically for iOS devices was that debugserver can't
create files. There were several tests that launch the inferior process redirecting
its output to a file, then they retrieve the file. They were not trying to test
file redirection in these tests, so I rewrote those to write their output to a file
directly.
llvm-svn: 314038
Normal customer devices won't be able to run these devices, we're hoping to get
a public facing bot set up at some point.
There will be some smaller follow-on patches. The changes to tools/lldb-server are
verbose and I'm not thrilled with having to skip all of these tests manually.
There are a few places where I'm making the assumption that "armv7", "armv7k", "arm64"
means it's an ios device, and I need to review & clean these up with an OS check
as well. (Android will show up as "arm" and "aarch64" so by pure luck they shouldn't
cause problems, but it's not an assumption I want to rely on).
I'll be watching the bots for the rest of today; if any problems are introduced by
this patch I'll revert it - if anyone sees a problem with their bot that I don't
see, please do the same. I know it's a rather large patch.
One change I had to make specifically for iOS devices was that debugserver can't
create files. There were several tests that launch the inferior process redirecting
its output to a file, then they retrieve the file. They were not trying to test
file redirection in these tests, so I rewrote those to write their output to a file
directly.
llvm-svn: 313932
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
