Issue outcomes from DAGCombiner::MergeConsequtiveStores, more precisely from
mem-ops sequence sorting.
Consider, how MergeConsequtiveStores works for next example:
store i8 1, a[0]
store i8 2, a[1]
store i8 3, a[1] ; a[1] again.
return ; DAG starts here
1. Method will collect all the 3 stores.
2. It sorts them by distance from the base pointer (farthest with highest
index).
3. It takes first consecutive non-overlapping stores and (if possible) replaces
them with a single store instruction.
The point is, we can't determine here which 'store' instruction
would be the second after sorting ('store 2' or 'store 3').
It happens that 'store 3' would be the second, and 'store 2' would be the third.
So after merging we have the next result:
store i16 (1 | 3 << 8), base ; is a[0] but bit-casted to i16
store i8 2, a[1]
So actually we swapped 'store 3' and 'store 2' and got wrong contents in a[1].
Fix: In sort routine just also take into account mem-op sequence number.
llvm-svn: 200201
There are currently two issues, of which I currently know, that prevent TBAA
from being correctly usable in CodeGen:
1. Stack coloring does not update TBAA when merging allocas. This is easy
enough to fix, but is not the largest problem.
2. CGP inserts ptrtoint/inttoptr pairs when sinking address computations.
Because BasicAA does not handle inttoptr, we'll often miss basic type punning
idioms that we need to catch so we don't miscompile real-world code (like LLVM).
I don't yet have a small test case for this, but this fixes self hosting a
non-asserts build of LLVM on PPC64 when using -enable-aa-sched-mi and -misched=shuffle.
llvm-svn: 200093
This option (which is !NDEBUG only) allows restricting the use of alias
analysis in DAGCombiner to a specific function. This has proved extremely
valuable to isolating bugs related to this feature, and mirrors the
misched-only-func option provided by the new instruction scheduler.
llvm-svn: 200088
This commit caused -Woverloaded-virtual warnings. The two new
TargetTransformInfo::getIntImmCost functions were only added to the superclass,
and to the X86 subclass. The other targets were not updated, and the
warning highlighted this by pointing out that e.g. ARMTTI::getIntImmCost was
hiding the two new getIntImmCost variants.
We could pacify the warning by adding "using TargetTransformInfo::getIntImmCost"
to the various subclasses, or turning it off, but I suspect that it's wrong to
leave the functions unimplemnted in those targets. The default implementations
return TCC_Free, which I don't think is right e.g. for ARM.
llvm-svn: 200058
Retry commit r200022 with a fix for the build bot errors. Constant expressions
have (unlike instructions) module scope use lists and therefore may have users
in different functions. The fix is to simply ignore these out-of-function uses.
llvm-svn: 200034
DAGCombiner::GatherAllAliases, which is only used when AA used is enabled
during DAGCombine, had a fundamentally incorrect assumption for which this
change compensates. GatherAllAliases, which is used to find aliasing
predecessor chain nodes (so that a better chain can be selected for a load or
store to enable subsequent optimizations) assumed that walking up the chain
would always catch all possibly-aliasing loads and stores. This is not true: To
really find all aliases, we also need to search for aliases through the value
operand of a store, etc. Consider the following situation:
Token1 = ...
L1 = load Token1, %52
S1 = store Token1, L1, %51
L2 = load Token1, %52+8
S2 = store Token1, L2, %51+8
Token2 = Token(S1, S2)
L3 = load Token2, %53
S3 = store Token2, L3, %52
L4 = load Token2, %53+8
S4 = store Token2, L4, %52+8
If we search for aliases of S3 (which loads address %52), and we look only
through the chain, then we'll miss the trivial dependence on L1 (which loads
from %52). We then might change all loads and stores to use Token1 as their
chain operand, which could result in copying %53 into %52 before copying
%52 into %51 (which should happen first).
The problem is, however, that searching for such data dependencies can become
expensive, and the cost is not directly related to the chain depth. Instead,
we'll rule out such configurations by insisting that we've visited all chain
users (except for users of the original chain, which is not necessary). When
doing this, we need to look through nodes we don't care about (otherwise,
things like register copies will interfere with trivial use cases).
Unfortunately, I don't have a small test case for this problem. Creating the
underlying situation is not hard (a pair of memcpys will do it), but arranging
for the default instruction schedule to be incorrect is very fragile.
This unbreaks self hosting on PPC64 when using
-mllvm -combiner-global-alias-analysis -mllvm -combiner-alias-analysis.
llvm-svn: 200033
These transformations obviously won't work for indexed (pre/post-inc) loads and
stores. In practice, I'm not sure there is any benefit to enabling them for
indexed nodes because other transformations that these might enable likely also
won't handle indexed nodes.
I don't have an in-tree test case that hits this problem, but an upcoming bug
fix will make it much more likely.
llvm-svn: 200023
This pass identifies expensive constants to hoist and coalesces them to
better prepare it for SelectionDAG-based code generation. This works around the
limitations of the basic-block-at-a-time approach.
First it scans all instructions for integer constants and calculates its
cost. If the constant can be folded into the instruction (the cost is
TCC_Free) or the cost is just a simple operation (TCC_BASIC), then we don't
consider it expensive and leave it alone. This is the default behavior and
the default implementation of getIntImmCost will always return TCC_Free.
If the cost is more than TCC_BASIC, then the integer constant can't be folded
into the instruction and it might be beneficial to hoist the constant.
Similar constants are coalesced to reduce register pressure and
materialization code.
When a constant is hoisted, it is also hidden behind a bitcast to force it to
be live-out of the basic block. Otherwise the constant would be just
duplicated and each basic block would have its own copy in the SelectionDAG.
The SelectionDAG recognizes such constants as opaque and doesn't perform
certain transformations on them, which would create a new expensive constant.
This optimization is only applied to integer constants in instructions and
simple (this means not nested) constant cast experessions. For example:
%0 = load i64* inttoptr (i64 big_constant to i64*)
Reviewed by Eric
llvm-svn: 200022
This fixes a regression intruced by r199135.
Revision 199135 tried to simplify part of the logic in method
DAGCombiner::SimplifyVBinOp introducing calls to method BuildVectorSDNode::isConstant().
However, that revision wrongly changed the check performed by method
SimplifyVBinOp to identify dag nodes that can be folded.
Before revision 199135, that method only tried to simplify vector binary operations
if both operands were build_vector of Constant/ConstantFP/Undef only.
After revision 199135, method SimplifyVBinop tried to
simplify also vector binary operations with only one constant operand.
This fixes the problem restoring the old behavior of SimplifyVBinOp.
llvm-svn: 199328
This commit teaches DAG to reassociate vector ops, which in turn enables
constant folding of vector op chains that appear later on during custom lowering
and DAG combine.
Reviewed by Andrea Di Biagio
llvm-svn: 199135
At the moment we expect rotates to have the form:
(or (shl X, Y), (shr X, Z))
where Y == bitsize(X) - Z or Z == bitsize(X) - Y. This form means that
the (or ...) is undefined for Y == 0 or Z == 0. This undefinedness can
be avoided by using Y == (C * bitsize(X) - Z) & (bitsize(X) - 1) or
Z == (C * bitsize(X) - Y) & (bitsize(X) - 1) for any integer C
(including 0, the most natural choice).
llvm-svn: 198861
InstCombine converts (sub 32, (add X, C)) into (sub 32-C, X),
so a rotate left of a 32-bit Y by X+C could appear as either:
(or (shl Y, (add X, C)), (shr Y, (sub 32, (add X, C))))
without InstCombine or:
(or (shl Y, (add X, C)), (shr Y, (sub 32-C, X)))
with it.
We already matched the first form. This patch handles the second too.
llvm-svn: 198860
There is a wrong assumption that the vector element type and the
type of each ConstantSDNode in the build_vector were the same.
However, when promoting the integer operand of a legally typed
build_vector, the operand type and the vector element type do not
need to be the same
(See method 'DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntOp_BUILD_VECTOR' in
LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp).
in AArch64 backend, the following dag sequence:
C0: i1 = Constant<0>
C1: i1 = Constant<-1>
V: v8i1 = BUILD_VECTOR C1, C1, C0, C0, C0, C0, C0, C0
is type-legalized into:
NewC0: i32 = Constant<0>
NewC1: i32 = Constant<1>
V: v8i8 = BUILD_VECTOR NewC1, NewC1, NewC0, NewC0, NewC0, NewC0, NewC0, NewC0
Forcing a getZeroExtend to VTBits to ensure that the new constant
is correctly.
llvm-svn: 198582
For AArch64 backend, if DAGCombiner see "sext(setcc)", it will
combine them together to a single setcc with extended value type.
Then if it see "zext(setcc)", it assumes setcc is Vxi1, and try to
create "(and (vsetcc), (1, 1, ...)". While setcc isn't Vxi1,
DAGcombiner will create wrong node and get wrong code emitted.
llvm-svn: 198190
ConstantSDNodes (or UNDEFs) into a simple BUILD_VECTOR.
For example, given the following sequence of dag nodes:
i32 C = Constant<1>
v4i32 V = BUILD_VECTOR C, C, C, C
v4i32 Result = SIGN_EXTEND_INREG V, ValueType:v4i1
The SIGN_EXTEND_INREG node can be folded into a build_vector since
the vector in input is a BUILD_VECTOR of constants.
The optimized sequence is:
i32 C = Constant<-1>
v4i32 Result = BUILD_VECTOR C, C, C, C
llvm-svn: 198084
DAGCombiner could fold (truncate (load)) -> smaller load if the original
load was the width of the truncation result or wider. This patch extends
it to handle cases where the original load was narrower (and so the
extension type stays the same).
llvm-svn: 197030
Summary:
Moved the requirement for SelectionDAG::getConstant() to return legally
typed nodes slightly earlier. There were two optional DAGCombine passes
that were missed out and were required to produce type-legal DAGs.
Simplified a code-path in tryFoldToZero() to use SelectionDAG::getConstant().
This provides support for both promoted and expanded vector types whereas the
previous code only supported promoted vector types.
Fixes a "Type for zero vector elements is not legal" assertion detected by
an llvm-stress generated test.
Reviewers: resistor
CC: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2251
llvm-svn: 195635
This patch is a rewrite of the original patch commited in r194542. Instead of
relying on the type legalizer to do the splitting for us, we now peform the
splitting ourselves in the DAG combiner. This is necessary for the case where
the vector mask is a legal type after promotion and still wouldn't require
splitting.
Patch by: Juergen Ributzka
NOTE: This is a candidate for the 3.4 branch.
llvm-svn: 195397
This is to avoid this transformation in some cases:
fold (conv (load x)) -> (load (conv*)x)
On architectures that don't natively support some vector
loads efficiently casting the load to a smaller vector of
larger types and loading is more efficient.
Patch by Micah Villmow.
llvm-svn: 194783
This patch reapplies r193676 with an additional fix for the Hexagon backend. The
SystemZ backend has already been fixed by r194148.
The Type Legalizer recognizes that VSELECT needs to be split, because the type
is to wide for the given target. The same does not always apply to SETCC,
because less space is required to encode the result of a comparison. As a result
VSELECT is split and SETCC is unrolled into scalar comparisons.
This commit fixes the issue by checking for VSELECT-SETCC patterns in the DAG
Combiner. If a matching pattern is found, then the result mask of SETCC is
promoted to the expected vector mask type for the given target. Now the type
legalizer will split both VSELECT and SETCC.
This allows the following X86 DAG Combine code to sucessfully detect the MIN/MAX
pattern. This fixes PR16695, PR17002, and <rdar://problem/14594431>.
Reviewed by Nadav
llvm-svn: 194542
The Type Legalizer recognizes that VSELECT needs to be split, because the type
is to wide for the given target. The same does not always apply to SETCC,
because less space is required to encode the result of a comparison. As a result
VSELECT is split and SETCC is unrolled into scalar comparisons.
This commit fixes the issue by checking for VSELECT-SETCC patterns in the DAG
Combiner. If a matching pattern is found, then the result mask of SETCC is
promoted to the expected vector mask type for the given target. This mask has
usually the same size as the VSELECT return type (except for Intel KNL). Now the
type legalizer will split both VSELECT and SETCC.
This allows the following X86 DAG Combine code to sucessfully detect the MIN/MAX
pattern. This fixes PR16695, PR17002, and <rdar://problem/14594431>.
Reviewed by Nadav
llvm-svn: 193676
Making useAA() default to true for SystemZ showed that the combiner alias
analysis wasn't handling volatile accesses. This hit many of the SystemZ
tests, but I arbitrarily picked one for the purpose of this patch.
llvm-svn: 193518
Most SelectionDAG code drops the TBAA info when creating a new form of a
load and store (e.g. during legalization, or when converting a plain
load to an extending one). This patch tries to catch all cases where
the TBAA information can legitimately be carried over.
The patch adds alternative forms of getLoad() and getExtLoad() that take
a MachineMemOperand instead of individual fields. (The corresponding
getTruncStore() already exists.) The idea is to use the MachineMemOperand
forms when all fields are carried over (size, pointer info, isVolatile,
isNonTemporal, alignment and TBAA info). If some adjustment is being
made, e.g. to narrow the load, then we still pass the individual fields
but also pass the TBAA info.
llvm-svn: 193517
This optimization is not SSE specific so I am moving it to DAGco.
The new scalar_to_vector dag node exposed a missing pattern in the AArch64 target that I needed to add.
llvm-svn: 193393
When canonicalizing dags according to the rule
(shl (zext (shr X, c1) ), c1) ==> (zext (shl (shr X, c1), c1))
remember to add the new shl dag to the DAGCombiner worklist of nodes.
If we don't explicitly add it to the worklist of nodes to visit, we
may not trigger later on the rule that folds the shift left + logical
shift right into a AND instruction with bitmask.
llvm-svn: 192883
This happens e.g. with <2 x i64> -1 on x86_32. It cannot be generated directly
because i64 is illegal. It would be nice if getNOT would handle this
transparently, but I don't see a way to generate a legal constant there right
now. Fixes PR17487.
llvm-svn: 192795
This should fix the buildbots.
Original commit message:
[DAGCombiner] Slice a big load in two loads when the element are next to each
other in memory and the target has paired load and performs post-isel loads
combining.
E.g., this optimization will transform something like this:
a = load i64* addr
b = trunc i64 a to i32
c = lshr i64 a, 32
d = trunc i64 c to i32
into:
b = load i32* addr1
d = load i32* addr2
Where addr1 = addr2 +/- sizeof(i32), if the target supports paired load and
performs post-isel loads combining.
One should overload TargetLowering::hasPairedLoad to provide this information.
The default is false.
<rdar://problem/14477220>
llvm-svn: 192476
other in memory and the target has paired load and performs post-isel loads
combining.
E.g., this optimization will transform something like this:
a = load i64* addr
b = trunc i64 a to i32
c = lshr i64 a, 32
d = trunc i64 c to i32
into:
b = load i32* addr1
d = load i32* addr2
Where addr1 = addr2 +/- sizeof(i32), if the target supports paired load and
performs post-isel loads combining.
One should overload TargetLowering::hasPairedLoad to provide this information.
The default is false.
<rdar://problem/14477220>
llvm-svn: 192471
DAGCombiner::visitFP_EXTEND will apply the following transformation:
fold (fpext (load x)) -> (fpext (fptrunc (extload x)))
but the implementation does not handle indexed loads (pre/post inc.), but did
not specifically ignore them either (unlike for extending loads, which it
already ignored), causing an assert when the transformation was applied to an
indexed load. This is the minimal fix for correctness (causing the
transformation to be skipped for indexed loads).
Unfortunately, I don't have an in-tree test case.
llvm-svn: 191989
This change fixes the problem reported in pr17380 and re-add the dagcombine
transformation ensuring that the value types are always legal if the
transformation is triggered after Legalization took place.
Added the test case from pr17380.
llvm-svn: 191509
