This partially reverts commit e30a148b098, which removed the base
template for std::char_traits. That base template had been marked as
deprecated since LLVM 16 and we were planning to remove it in LLVM 18.
However, as explained in the post-commit comments in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D157058, the deprecation mechanism didn't work
as expected. Basically, the deprecation warnings were never shown to
users since libc++ headers are system headers and Clang doesn't show
warnings in system headers.
As a result, this removal came with basically no lead time as far as
users are concerned, which is a poor experience. For this reason, I am
re-introducing the deprecated char_traits specialization until we have a
proper way of phasing it out in a way that is not a surprise for users.
This has been deprecated and should be removed now.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Spies: Mordante, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157058
Replace most uses of `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` with
`_LIBCPP_ASSERT_UNCATEGORIZED`.
This is done as a prerequisite to introducing hardened mode to libc++.
The idea is to make enabling assertions an opt-in with (somewhat)
fine-grained controls over which categories of assertions are enabled.
The vast majority of assertions are currently uncategorized; the new
macro will allow turning on `_LIBCPP_ASSERT` (the underlying mechanism
for all kinds of assertions) without enabling all the uncategorized
assertions (in the future; this patch preserves the current behavior).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153816
This makes it less ambiguous what the parameter is meant to get.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Spies: ldionne, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D152040
We already have a clang-tidy check for making sure that `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` is on free functions. This patch extends this to class members. The places where we don't check for `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI` are classes for which we have an instantiation in the library.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: jplehr, mikhail.ramalho, sstefan1, libcxx-commits, krytarowski, miyuki, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142332
This change is almost fully mechanical. The only interesting change is in `generate_feature_test_macro_components.py` to generate `_LIBCPP_STD_VER >=` instead. To avoid churn in the git-blame this commit should be added to the `.git-blame-ignore-revs` once committed.
Reviewed By: ldionne, var-const, #libc
Spies: jloser, libcxx-commits, arichardson, arphaman, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143962
This allows us to reuse workarounds for compilers that don't provide the builtins or constexpr support.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139555
This patch removes the base template implementation for std::char_traits.
If my reading of http://eel.is/c++draft/char.traits is correct, the
Standard mandates that the library provides specializations for several
types like char and wchar_t, but not any implementation in the base
template. Indeed, such an implementation is bound to be incorrect for
most types anyways, since things like `eof()` and `int_type` will definitely
have to be customized.
Since the base template implementation should not have worked for anyone,
this shouldn't be a breaking change (I expect that anyone defining a
custom character type today will already have to provide their own
specialization of char_traits). However, since we're aware of some users
of char_traits for unsigned char and signed char, we're keeping those two
specializations around for two releases to give people some time to migrate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138307
compressed_pair is widely used in the library, but most of the uses don't use the tuple parts. To avoid including <tuple> everywhere, use the forward declaration instead in compressed_pair.h
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133331
This was discussed on Discord with the consensus that we should rename the macros.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, avogelsgesang, jloser, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131498
