This patch-set aims to simplify the existing RVV segment load/store
intrinsics to use a type that represents a tuple of vectors instead.
To achieve this, first we need to relax the current limitation for an
aggregate type to be a target of load/store/alloca when the aggregate
type contains homogeneous scalable vector types. Then to adjust the
prolog of an LLVM function during lowering to clang. Finally we
re-define the RVV segment load/store intrinsics to use the tuple types.
The pull request under the RVV intrinsic specification is
riscv-non-isa/rvv-intrinsic-doc#198
---
This is the 1st patch of the patch-set. This patch is originated from
D98169.
This patch allows aggregate type (StructType) that contains homogeneous
scalable vector types to be a target of load/store/alloca. The RFC of
this patch was posted in LLVM Discourse.
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-ir-permit-load-store-alloca-for-struct-of-the-same-scalable-vector-type/69527
The main changes in this patch are:
Extend `StructLayout::StructSize` from `uint64_t` to `TypeSize` to
accommodate an expression of scalable size.
Allow `StructType:isSized` to also return true for homogeneous
scalable vector types.
Let `Type::isScalableTy` return true when `Type` is `StructType`
and contains scalable vectors
Extra description is added in the LLVM Language Reference Manual on the
relaxation of this patch.
Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <kai.wang@sifive.com>
Co-Authored-by: eop Chen <eop.chen@sifive.com>
Reviewed By: craig.topper, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146872
Define intersectWith and unionWith as two complementary ways of
combining KnownBits. The names are chosen for consistency with
ConstantRange.
Deprecate commonBits as a synonym for intersectWith.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150443
After function argument lowering, but prior to instruction selection,
dbg declares pointing to function arguments are lowered using special
logic.
Later, during instruction selection (both "fast" and regular ISel), this
logic is "repeated" in order to identify which intrinsics have already
been lowered. This is bad for two reasons:
1. The logic is not _really_ repeated, the code is different, which
could lead to duplicate lowering of the intrinsic.
2. Even if the logic were repeated properly, this is still code
duplication.
This patch addresses these issues by storing all preprocessed
dbg.declare intrinsics in a set inside FuncInfo; the set is queried upon
instruction selection.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149682
This patch replaces the uses of PointerUnion.is function by llvm::isa,
PointerUnion.get function by llvm::cast, and PointerUnion.dyn_cast by
llvm::dyn_cast_if_present. This is according to the FIXME in
the definition of the class PointerUnion.
This patch does not remove them as they are being used in other
subprojects.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148449
Switch DAGISel over to UniformityAnalysis, which was one of the last remaining users of the DivergenceAnalysis.
No explosions seen during internal testing so this looks like a smooth transition.
Reviewed By: sameerds
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145918
Switch DAGISel over to UniformityAnalysis, which was one of the last remaining users of the DivergenceAnalysis.
No explosions seen during internal testing so this looks like a smooth transition.
Reviewed By: sameerds
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145918
Alignment of an alloca in IR can be lower than the preferred alignment
on purpose, but this override essentially treats the preferred
alignment as the minimum alignment.
The patch changes this behavior to always use the specified
alignment. If alignment is not set explicitly in LLVM IR, it is set to
DL.getPrefTypeAlign(Ty) in computeAllocaDefaultAlign.
Tests are changed as well: explicit alignment is increased to match
the preferred alignment if it changes output, or omitted when it is
hard to determine the right value (e.g. for pointers, some structs, or
weird types).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135462
Alignment of an alloca in IR can be lower than the preferred alignment
on purpose, but this override essentially treats the preferred
alignment as the minimum alignment.
The patch changes this behavior to always use the specified
alignment. If alignment is not set explicitly in LLVM IR, it is set to
DL.getPrefTypeAlign(Ty) in computeAllocaDefaultAlign.
Tests are changed as well: explicit alignment is increased to match
the preferred alignment if it changes output, or omitted when it is
hard to determine the right value (e.g. for pointers, some structs, or
weird types).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135462
I'm unsure what the code does without the semicolon. On the surface it
seems like the assert below it would be considered part of the if
and thus the assert would only execute if DestReg is 0. But 0 isn't
considered a virtual register so the assert should fail.
Found by PVS Studio.
Reported https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1003/ (N7)
There are two different senses in which a block can be "address-taken".
There can be a BlockAddress involved, which means we need to map the
IR-level value to some specific block of machine code. Or there can be
constructs inside a function which involve using the address of a basic
block to implement certain kinds of control flow.
Mixing these together causes a problem: if target-specific passes are
marking random blocks "address-taken", if we have a BlockAddress, we
can't actually tell which MachineBasicBlock corresponds to the
BlockAddress.
So split this into two separate bits: one for BlockAddress, and one for
the machine-specific bits.
Discovered while trying to sort out related stuff on D102817.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124697
Most clients only used these methods because they wanted to be able to
extend or truncate to the same bit width (which is a no-op). Now that
the standard zext, sext and trunc allow this, there is no reason to use
the OrSelf versions.
The OrSelf versions additionally have the strange behaviour of allowing
extending to a *smaller* width, or truncating to a *larger* width, which
are also treated as no-ops. A small amount of client code relied on this
(ConstantRange::castOp and MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::mangleNumber) and
needed rewriting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125557
Materializing constants on RISCV is simpler if the constant is sign
extended from i32. By default i32 constant operands of phis are
zero extended.
This patch adds a hook to allow RISCV to override this for i32. We
have an existing isSExtCheaperThanZExt, but it operates on EVT which
we don't have at these places in the code.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122951
Instead of using operator[], use DenseMap::find to prevent default
constructing an entry if it isn't already in the map.
Also simplify a condition to check for 0 instead of a virtual register.
I'm pretty sure we can only get 0 or a virtual register out of the value
map.
This is only called for instructions and the caller is already holding
an Instruction *. This makes the code more explicit and makes it
obvious the code doesn't make decisions about constants.
This reverts commit add08c874147638e52d89eb07e40797dbc98d73b.
There was a compile time jump on tramp3d-v4 on https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/
Want to see if it goes away with this reverted.
Previously we pre-calculated this and cached it for every
instruction in the function. Most of the calculated results will
never be used. So instead calculate it only on the first use, and
then cache it.
The cache was originally added to fix a compile time issue which
caused r216066 to be reverted.
This change exposed that we weren't pre-computing the Value for
Arguments. I've explicitly disabled that for now as it seemed to
regress some tests on AArch64 which has sext built into its compare
instructions.
Spotted while investigating how to improve heuristics to work better
with RISCV preferring sign extend for unsigned compares for i32 on RV64.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107976
D97247 added the reverse mapping from unwind destination to their
source, but it had a critical bug; sources can be multiple, because
multiple BBs can have a single BB as their unwind destination.
This changes `WasmEHFuncInfo::getUnwindSrc` to `getUnwindSrcs` and makes
it return a vector rather than a single BB. It does not return the const
reference to the existing vector but creates a new vector because
`WasmEHFuncInfo` stores not `BasicBlock*` or `MachineBasicBlock*` but
`PointerUnion` of them. Also I hoped to unify those methods for
`BasicBlock` and `MachineBasicBlock` into one using templates to reduce
duplication, but failed because various usages require `BasicBlock*` to
be `const` but it's hard to make it `const` for `MachineBasicBlock`
usages.
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13514.
(More precisely, fixes
https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13514#issuecomment-784708744)
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97583
This CL is not big but contains changes that span multiple analyses and
passes. This description is very long because it tries to explain basics
on what each pass/analysis does and why we need this change on top of
that. Please feel free to skip parts that are not necessary for your
understanding.
---
`WasmEHFuncInfo` contains the mapping of <EH pad, the EH pad's next
unwind destination>. The value (unwind dest) here is where an exception
should end up when it is not caught by the key (EH pad). We record this
info in WasmEHPrepare to fix catch mismatches, because the CFG itself
does not have this info. A CFG only contains BBs and
predecessor-successor relationship between them, but in `WasmEHFuncInfo`
the unwind destination BB is not necessarily a successor or the key EH
pad BB. Their relationship can be intuitively explained by this C++ code
snippet:
```
try {
try {
foo();
} catch (int) { // EH pad
...
}
} catch (...) { // unwind destination
}
```
So when `foo()` throws, it goes to `catch (int)` first. But if it is not
caught by it, it ends up in the next unwind destination `catch (...)`.
This unwind destination is what you see in `catchswitch`'s
`unwind label %bb` part.
---
`WebAssemblyExceptionInfo` groups exceptions so that they can be sorted
continuously together in CFGSort, as we do for loops. What this analysis
does is very simple: it creates a single `WebAssemblyException` per EH
pad, and all BBs that are dominated by that EH pad are included in this
exception. We also identify subexception relationship in this way: if
EHPad A domiantes EHPad B, EHPad B's exception is a subexception of
EHPad A's exception.
This simple rule turns out to be incorrect in some cases. In
`WasmEHFuncInfo`, if EHPad A's unwind destination is EHPad B, it means
semantically EHPad B should not be included in EHPad A's exception,
because it does not make sense to rethrow/delegate to an inner scope.
This is what happened in CFGStackify as a result of this:
```
try
try
catch
... <- %dest_bb is among here!
end
delegate %dest_bb
```
So this patch adds a phase in `WebAssemblyExceptionInfo::recalculate` to
make sure excptions' unwind destinations are not subexceptions of
their unwind sources in `WasmEHFuncInfo`.
But this alone does not prevent `dest_bb` in the example above from
being sorted within the inner `catch`'s exception, even if its exception
is not a subexception of that `catch`'s exception anymore, because of
how CFGSort works, which will be explained below.
---
CFGSort places BBs within the same `SortRegion` (loop or exception)
continuously together so they can be demarcated with `loop`-`end_loop`
or `catch`-`end_try` in CFGStackify.
`SortRegion` is a wrapper for one of `MachineLoop` or
`WebAssemblyException`. `SortRegionInfo` already does some complicated
things because there discrepancies between those two data structures.
`WebAssemblyException` is what we control, and it is defined as an EH
pad as its header and BBs dominated by the header as its BBs (with a
newly added exception of unwind destinations explained in the previous
paragraph). But `MachineLoop` is an LLVM data structure and uses the
standard loop detection algorithm. So by the algorithm, BBs that are 1.
dominated by the loop header and 2. have a path back to its header.
Because of the second condition, many BBs that are dominated by the loop
header are not included in the loop. So BBs that contain `return` or
branches to outside of the loop are not technically included in
`MachineLoop`, but they can be sorted together with the loop with no
problem.
Maybe to relax the condition, in CFGSort, when we are in a `SortRegion`
we allow sorting of not only BBs that belong to the current innermost
region but also BBs that are by the current region header.
(This was written this way from the first version written by Dan, when
only loops existed.) But now, we have cases in exceptions when EHPad B
is the unwind destination for EHPad A, even if EHPad B is dominated by
EHPad A it should not be included in EHPad A's exception, and should not
be sorted within EHPad A.
One way to make things work, at least correctly, is change `dominates`
condition to `contains` condition for `SortRegion` when sorting BBs, but
this will change compilation results for existing non-EH code and I
can't be sure it will not degrade performance or code size. I think it
will degrade performance because it will force many BBs dominated by a
loop, which don't have the path back to the header, to be placed after
the loop and it will likely to create more branches and blocks.
So this does a little hacky check when adding BBs to `Preferred` list:
(`Preferred` list is a ready list. CFGSort maintains ready list in two
priority queues: `Preferred` and `Ready`. I'm not very sure why, but it
was written that way from the beginning. BBs are first added to
`Preferred` list and then some of them are pushed to `Ready` list, so
here we only need to guard condition for `Preferred` list.)
When adding a BB to `Preferred` list, we check if that BB is an unwind
destination of another BB. To do this, this adds the reverse mapping,
`UnwindDestToSrc`, and getter methods to `WasmEHFuncInfo`. And if the BB
is an unwind destination, it checks if the current stack of regions
(`Entries`) contains its source BB by traversing the stack backwards. If
we find its unwind source in there, we add the BB to its `Deferred`
list, to make sure that unwind destination BB is added to `Preferred`
list only after that region with the unwind source BB is sorted and
popped from the stack.
---
This does not contain a new test that crashes because of this bug, but
this fix changes the result for one of existing test case. This test
case didn't crash because it fortunately didn't contain `delegate` to
the incorrectly placed unwind destination BB.
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13514.
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97247
This renames variable and method names in `WasmEHFuncInfo` class to be
simpler and clearer. For example, unwind destinations are EH pads by
definition so it doesn't necessarily need to be included in every method
name. Also I am planning to add the reverse mapping in a later CL,
something like `UnwindDestToSrc`, so this renaming will make meanings
clearer.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97173
Change the way we track how a particular pointer was relocated at a statepoint in selection dag. Previously, we used an optional<location> for the spill lowering, and a block local Register for the newly introduced vreg lowering. Combine all three lowerings (norelocate, spill, and vreg) into a single helper class, and keep a single copy of the information.
This is submitted separately as it really does make the code more readible on it's own, but the indirect motivation is to move vreg tracking from StatepointLowering to FunctionLoweringInfo. This is the last piece needed to support cross block relocations with vregs; that will follow in a separate (non-NFC) patch.
Along the lines of D77454 and D79968. Unlike loads and stores, the
default alignment is getPrefTypeAlign, to match the existing handling in
various places, including SelectionDAG and InstCombine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80044
allocas in LLVM IR have a specified alignment. When that alignment is
specified, the alloca has at least that alignment at runtime.
If the specified type of the alloca has a higher preferred alignment,
SelectionDAG currently ignores that specified alignment, and increases
the alignment. It does this even if it would trigger stack realignment.
I don't think this makes sense, so this patch changes that.
I was looking into this for SVE in particular: for SVE, overaligning
vscale'ed types is extra expensive because it requires realigning the
stack multiple times, or using dynamic allocation. (This currently isn't
implemented.)
I updated the expected assembly for a couple tests; in particular, for
arg-copy-elide.ll, the optimization in question does not increase the
alignment the way SelectionDAG normally would. For the rest, I just
increased the specified alignment on the allocas to match what
SelectionDAG was inferring.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79532
This method has been commented as deprecated for a while. Remove
it and replace all uses with the equivalent getCalledOperand().
I also made a few cleanups in here. For example, to removes use
of getElementType on a pointer when we could just use getFunctionType
from the call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78882
Summary:
Remove usages of asserting vector getters in Type in preparation for the
VectorType refactor. The existence of these functions complicates the
refactor while adding little value.
Reviewers: stoklund, sdesmalen, efriedma
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77272
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76551
Summary:
This was a very odd API, where you had to pass a flag into a zext
function to say whether the extended bits really were zero or not. All
callers passed in a literal true or false.
I think it's much clearer to make the function name reflect the
operation being performed on the value we're tracking (rather than on
the KnownBits Zero and One fields), so zext means the value is being
zero extended and new function anyext means the value is being extended
with unknown bits.
NFC.
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74482
This patch adds a target interface to set the StackID for a given type,
which allows scalable vectors (e.g. `<vscale x 16 x i8>`) to be assigned a
'sve-vec' StackID, so it is allocated in the SVE area of the stack frame.
Reviewers: ostannard, efriedma, rengolin, cameron.mcinally
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70080
