A dependent alignment attribute (like __attribute__((aligned(...))) or
__declspec(align(...))) on a non-dependent typedef or using declaration
poses a considerable challenge: the type is _not_ dependent, the size
_may_ be dependent if the type is used as an array type, the alignment
_is_ dependent.
It is reasonable for a compiler to be able to query the size and
alignment of a complete type. Let's help that become an invariant.
This fixes PR22042.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8693
llvm-svn: 234280
deterministically.
This fixes a latent issue where even Clang's Sema (and diagnostics) were
non-deterministic in the face of this pragma. The fix is super simple --
just use a MapVector so we track the order in which these are parsed (or
imported). Especially considering how rare they are, this seems like the
perfect tradeoff. I've also simplified the client code with judicious
use of auto and range based for loops.
I've added some pretty hilarious code to my stress test which now
survives the binary diff without issue.
llvm-svn: 233261
This warns when using decls that are not available on all deployment targets.
For example, a call to
- (void)ppartialMethod __attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.8)));
will warn if -mmacosx-version-min is set to less than 10.8.
To silence the warning, one has to explicitly redeclare the method like so:
@interface Whatever(MountainLionAPI)
- (void)ppartialMethod;
@end
This way, one cannot accidentally call a function that isn't available
everywhere. Having to add the redeclaration will hopefully remind the user
to add an explicit respondsToSelector: call as well.
Some projects build against old SDKs to get this effect, but building against
old SDKs suppresses some bug fixes -- see http://crbug.com/463171 for examples.
The hope is that SDK headers are annotated well enough with availability
attributes that new SDK + this warning offers the same amount of protection
as using an old SDK.
llvm-svn: 232750
MSVC doesn't warn on this. Users are expected to apply the WINAPI macro
to functions passed by pointer to the Win32 API, and this macro expands
to __stdcall. This means we end up with a lot of useless noisy warnings
about ignored calling conventions when compiling code with clang for
Win64.
llvm-svn: 230668
This adds a new __freebsd_kprintf__ format string type, which enables
checking when used in __attribute__((format(...))) attributes. It can
check the FreeBSD kernel specific %b, %D, %r and %y specifiers, using
existing diagnostic messages. Also adds test cases for all these
specifiers.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7154
llvm-svn: 229921
Un-parameterize the warning as there is exactly one attribute added in C++14.
Partially addresses post-commit review comments from Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 229636
The deprecated attribute was adopted as part of the C++14, however, there is a
GNU version available in C++11. When using C++ earlier than C++14, diagnose the
use of the attribute without the GNU scope, but only when using the generalised
attribute syntax.
llvm-svn: 229447
__declspec(restrict) and __attribute(malloc) are both handled
identically by clang: they are allowed to the noalias LLVM attribute.
Seeing as how noalias models the C99 notion of 'restrict', rename the
internal clang attribute to Restrict from Malloc.
llvm-svn: 228120
It is common for COM interface classes to be marked as 'novtable' to
tell the compiler that constructors and destructors should not reference
virtual function tables.
This commit implements this feature in clang.
llvm-svn: 227796
Summary:
It was used for interoperability with PNaCl's calling conventions, but
it's no longer needed.
Also Remove NaCl*ABIInfo which just existed to delegate to either the portable
or native ABIInfo, and remove checkCallingConvention which was now a no-op
override.
Reviewers: jvoung
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7206
llvm-svn: 227362
We didn't consider any alignment attributes on an EnumDecl when
calculating alignment.
While we are here, ignore alignment specifications on typedef types if
one is used as the underlying type. Otherwise, weird things happen:
enum Y : int;
Y y;
typedef int __attribute__((aligned(64))) u;
enum Y : u {};
What is the alignment of 'Y'? It would be more consistent with the
overall design of enums with fixed underlying types to consider the
underlying type's UnqualifiedDesugaredType.
This fixes PR22279.
llvm-svn: 226653
Things that are OK:
extern int var1 __attribute((alias("v1")));
static int var2 __attribute((alias("v2")));
Things that are not OK:
int var3 __attribute((alias("v3")));
extern int var4 __attribute((alias("v4"))) = 4;
We choose to accpet:
struct S { static int var5 __attribute((alias("v5"))); };
This code causes assertion failues in GCC 4.8 and ICC 13.0.1, we have
no reason to reject it.
This partially fixes PR22217.
llvm-svn: 226436
conflicting attribute, warn about the conflict and pick a "winning"
attribute to preserve, instead of emitting an error. This matches the
behavior when the conflicting attributes are on different declarations.
Along the way I discovered that conflicts involving __forceinline were
reported as 'always_inline' (alternate spelling, same attribute) so
fixed that up to report the attribute as spelled in the source.
llvm-svn: 225813
Sema::handleAnnotateAttr expects that some basic validation is done on
the given AttributeList. However, ProcessAccessDeclAttributeList called
it directly. Instead, pass the list to ProcessDeclAttribute.
This fixes PR21847.
llvm-svn: 224204
Placing the attribute after the kernel keyword would incorrectly
reject the attribute, so use the smae workaround that other
kernel only attributes use.
Also add a FIXME because there are two different phrasings now
for the same error, althoug amdgpu_num_[sv]gpr uses a consistent one.
llvm-svn: 223490
This attribute serves as a hint to improve warnings about the ranges of
enumerators used as flag types. It currently has no working C++ implementation
due to different semantics for enums in C++. For more explanation, see the docs
and testcases.
Reviewed by Aaron Ballman.
llvm-svn: 222906
It turns out that MinGW never dllimports of exports inline functions.
This means that code compiled with Clang would fail to link with
MinGW-compiled libraries since we might try to import functions that
are not imported.
To fix this, make Clang never dllimport inline functions when targeting
MinGW.
llvm-svn: 221154
Wire it through everywhere we have support for fastcall, essentially.
This allows us to parse the MSVC "14" CTP headers, but we will
miscompile them because LLVM doesn't support __vectorcall yet.
Reviewed By: Aaron Ballman
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5808
llvm-svn: 220573
This adds support for the align_value attribute. This attribute is supported by
Intel's compiler (versions 14.0+), and several of my HPC users have requested
support in Clang. It specifies an alignment assumption on the values to which a
pointer points, and is used by numerical libraries to encourage efficient
generation of vector code.
Of course, we already have an aligned attribute that can specify enhanced
alignment for a type, so why is this additional attribute important? The
problem is that if you want to specify that an input array of T is, say,
64-byte aligned, you could try this:
typedef double aligned_double attribute((aligned(64)));
void foo(aligned_double *P) {
double x = P[0]; // This is fine.
double y = P[1]; // What alignment did those doubles have again?
}
the access here to P[1] causes problems. P was specified as a pointer to type
aligned_double, and any object of type aligned_double must be 64-byte aligned.
But if P[0] is 64-byte aligned, then P[1] cannot be, and this access causes
undefined behavior. Getting round this problem requires a lot of awkward
casting and hand-unrolling of loops, all of which is bad.
With the align_value attribute, we can accomplish what we'd like in a well
defined way:
typedef double *aligned_double_ptr attribute((align_value(64)));
void foo(aligned_double_ptr P) {
double x = P[0]; // This is fine.
double y = P[1]; // This is fine too.
}
This attribute does not create a new type (and so it not part of the type
system), and so will only "propagate" through templates, auto, etc. by
optimizer deduction after inlining. This seems consistent with Intel's
implementation (thanks to Alexey for confirming the various Intel-compiler
behaviors).
As a final note, I would have chosen to call this aligned_value, not
align_value, for better naming consistency with the aligned attribute, but I
think it would be more useful to users to adopt Intel's name.
llvm-svn: 218910
In addition to __builtin_assume_aligned, GCC also supports an assume_aligned
attribute which specifies the alignment (and optional offset) of a function's
return value. Here we implement support for the assume_aligned attribute by making
use of the @llvm.assume intrinsic.
llvm-svn: 218500
This makes use of the recently-added @llvm.assume intrinsic to implement a
__builtin_assume(bool) intrinsic (to provide additional information to the
optimizer). This hooks up __assume in MS-compatibility mode to mirror
__builtin_assume (the semantics have been intentionally kept compatible), and
implements GCC's __builtin_assume_aligned as assume((p - o) & mask == 0). LLVM
now contains special logic to deal with assumptions of this form.
llvm-svn: 217349
the no-arguments case. Don't expand this to an __attribute__((nonnull(A, B,
C))) attribute, since that does the wrong thing for function templates and
varargs functions.
In passing, fix a grammar error in the diagnostic, a crash if
__attribute__((nonnull(N))) is applied to a varargs function,
a bug where the same null argument could be diagnosed multiple
times if there were multiple nonnull attributes referring to it,
and a bug where nonnull attributes would not be accumulated correctly
across redeclarations.
llvm-svn: 216520
Updating the diagnostics in the launch_bounds test since they have been improved in that case. Adding a test for nonnull since it has little test coverage, but has truly variadic arguments.
llvm-svn: 214407
