The goal of this patch is to refine how the `SVal` base and sub-kinds
are represented by forming one unified enum describing the possible
SVals. This means that the `unsigned SVal::Kind` and the attached
bit-packing semantics would be replaced by a single unified enum. This
is more conventional and leads to a better debugging experience by
default. This eases the need of using debug pretty-printers, or the use
of runtime functions doing the printing for us like we do today by
calling `Val.dump()` whenever we inspect the values.
Previously, the first 2 bits of the `unsigned SVal::Kind` discriminated
the following quartet: `UndefinedVal`, `UnknownVal`, `Loc`, or `NonLoc`.
The rest of the upper bits represented the sub-kind, where the value
represented the index among only the `Loc`s or `NonLoc`s, effectively
attaching 2 meanings of the upper bits depending on the base-kind. We
don't need to pack these bits, as we have plenty even if we would use
just a plan-old `unsigned char`.
Consequently, in this patch, I propose to lay out all the (non-abstract)
`SVal` kinds into a single enum, along with some metadata (`BEGIN_Loc`,
`END_Loc`, `BEGIN_NonLoc`, `END_NonLoc`) artificial enum values, similar
how we do with the `MemRegions`.
Note that in the unified `SVal::Kind` enum, to differentiate
`nonloc::ConcreteInt` from `loc::ConcreteInt`, I had to prefix them with
`Loc` and `NonLoc` to resolve this ambiguity.
This should not surface in general, because I'm replacing the
`nonloc::Kind` enum items with `inline constexpr` global constants to
mimic the original behavior - and offer nicer spelling to these enum
values.
Some `SVal` constructors were not marked explicit, which I now mark as
such to follow best practices, and marked others as `/*implicit*/` to
clarify the intent.
During refactoring, I also found at least one function not marked
`LLVM_ATTRIBUTE_RETURNS_NONNULL`, so I did that.
The `TypeRetrievingVisitor` visitor had some accidental dead code,
namely: `VisitNonLocConcreteInt` and `VisitLocConcreteInt`.
Previously, the `SValVisitor` expected visit handlers of
`VisitNonLocXXXXX(nonloc::XXXXX)` and `VisitLocXXXXX(loc::XXXXX)`, where
I felt that envoding `NonLoc` and `Loc` in the name is not necessary as
the type of the parameter would select the right overload anyways, so I
simplified the naming of those visit functions.
The rest of the diff is a lot of times just formatting, because
`getKind()` by nature, frequently appears in switches, which means that
the whole switch gets automatically reformatted. I could probably undo
the formatting, but I didn't want to deviate from the rule unless
explicitly requested.
Depends on D124758. This is the very same thing we have done for
assumeDual, but this time we do it for assumeInclusiveRange. This patch
is basically a no-brainer copy of that previous patch.
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D125892
Summary:
By evaluating both children states, now we are capable of discovering
infeasible parent states. In this patch, `assume` is implemented in the terms
of `assumeDuali`. This might be suboptimal (e.g. where there are adjacent
assume(true) and assume(false) calls, next patches addresses that). This patch
fixes a real CRASH.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54272
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D124758
Summary: Simplify functions SVal::getAsSymbolicExpression SVal::getAsSymExpr and SVal::getAsSymbol. After revision I concluded that `getAsSymbolicExpression` and `getAsSymExpr` repeat functionality of `getAsSymbol`, thus them can be removed.
Fix: Remove functions SVal::getAsSymbolicExpression and SVal::getAsSymExpr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85034
The `SubEngine` interface is an interface with only one implementation
`EpxrEngine`. Adding other implementations are difficult and very
unlikely in the near future. Currently, if anything from `ExprEngine` is
to be exposed to other classes it is moved to `SubEngine` which
restricts the alternative implementations. The virtual methods are have
a slight perofrmance impact. Furthermore, instead of the `LLVM`-style
inheritance a native inheritance is used here, which renders `LLVM`
functions like e.g. `cast<T>()` unusable here. This patch removes this
interface and allows usage of `ExprEngine` directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80548
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary: SimpleConstraintManager is difficult to use, and makes assumptions about capabilities of the constraint manager. This patch refactors out those portions into a new RangedConstraintManager, and also fixes some issues with camel case, formatting, and confusing naming.
Reviewers: zaks.anna, dcoughlin
Subscribers: mgorny, xazax.hun, NoQ, rgov, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26061
llvm-svn: 296242
The patch also simplifies an assume of a constraint of the form: "(exp comparison_op expr) != 0" to true into an assume of "exp comparison_op expr" to true. (And similarly, an assume of the form "(exp comparison_op expr) == 0" to true as an assume of exp comparison_op expr to false.) which improves precision overall.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22862
llvm-svn: 290505
The patch also simplifies an assume of a constraint of the form: "(exp comparison_op expr) != 0" to true into an assume of "exp comparison_op expr" to true. (And similarly, an assume of the form "(exp comparison_op expr) == 0" to true as an assume of exp comparison_op expr to false.) which improves precision overall.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22862
llvm-svn: 290413
Add a new type of NonLoc SVal for C++ pointer-to-member operations. This SVal
supports both pointers to member functions and pointers to member data.
A patch by Kirill Romanenkov!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25475
llvm-svn: 289873
Summary: The name is slightly confusing, since the constraint is not necessarily within the range unless `Assumption` is true. Split out renaming for ConstraintManager.h from D26061
Reviewers: zaks.anna, dcoughlin
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26644
llvm-svn: 286927
Summary: It breaks the build for the ASTMatchers
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13893
llvm-svn: 250827
This fixes PR16833, in which the analyzer was using large amounts of memory
for switch statements with large case ranges.
rdar://problem/14685772
A patch by Aleksei Sidorin!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5102
llvm-svn: 248318
When casting the address of a FunctionTextRegion to bool, or when adding
constraints to such an address, use a stand-in symbol to represent the
presence or absence of the function if the function is weakly linked.
This is groundwork for possible simple availability testing checks, and
can already catch mistakes involving inverted null checks for
weakly-linked functions.
Currently, the implementation reuses the "extent" symbols, originally created
for tracking the size of a malloc region. Since FunctionTextRegions cannot
be dereferenced, the extent symbol will never be used for anything else.
Still, this probably deserves a refactoring in the future.
This patch does not attempt to support testing the presence of weak
/variables/ (global variables), which would likely require much more of
a change and a generalization of "region structure metadata", like the
current "extents", vs. "region contents metadata", like CStringChecker's
"string length".
Patch by Richard <tarka.t.otter@googlemail.com>!
llvm-svn: 189492
Introduce a new helper function, which computes the first symbolic region in
the base region chain. The corresponding symbol has been used for assuming that
a pointer is null. Now, it will also be used for checking if it is null.
This ensures that we are tracking a null pointer correctly in the BugReporter.
llvm-svn: 179916
Previously, the analyzer used isIntegerType() everywhere, which uses the C
definition of "integer". The C++ predicate with the same behavior is
isIntegerOrUnscopedEnumerationType().
However, the analyzer is /really/ using this to ask if it's some sort of
"integrally representable" type, i.e. it should include C++11 scoped
enumerations as well. hasIntegerRepresentation() sounds like the right
predicate, but that includes vectors, which the analyzer represents by its
elements.
This commit audits all uses of isIntegerType() and replaces them with the
general isIntegerOrEnumerationType(), except in some specific cases where
it makes sense to exclude scoped enumerations, or any enumerations. These
cases now use isIntegerOrUnscopedEnumerationType() and getAs<BuiltinType>()
plus BuiltinType::isInteger().
isIntegerType() is hereby banned in the analyzer - lib/StaticAnalysis and
include/clang/StaticAnalysis. :-)
Fixes real assertion failures. PR15703 / <rdar://problem/12350701>
llvm-svn: 179081
These aren't generated by default, but they are needed when either side of
the comparison is tainted.
Should fix our internal buildbot.
llvm-svn: 177846
In C, comparisons between signed and unsigned numbers are always done in
unsigned-space. Thus, we should know that "i >= 0U" is always true, even
if 'i' is signed. Similarly, "u >= 0" is also always true, even though '0'
is signed.
Part of <rdar://problem/13239003> (false positives related to std::vector)
llvm-svn: 177806
We can support the full range of comparison operations between two locations
by canonicalizing them as subtraction, as in the previous commit.
This won't work (well) if either location includes an offset, or (again)
if the comparisons are not consistent about which region comes first.
<rdar://problem/13239003>
llvm-svn: 177803
Canonicalizing these two forms allows us to better model containers like
std::vector, which use "m_start != m_finish" to implement empty() but
"m_finish - m_start" to implement size(). The analyzer should have a
consistent interpretation of these two symbolic expressions, even though
it's not properly reasoning about either one yet.
The other unfortunate thing is that while the size() expression will only
ever be written "m_finish - m_start", the comparison may be written
"m_finish == m_start" or "m_start == m_finish". Right now the analyzer does
not attempt to canonicalize those two expressions, since it doesn't know
which length expression to pick. Doing this correctly will probably require
implementing unary minus as a new SymExpr kind (<rdar://problem/12351075>).
For now, the analyzer inverts the order of arguments in the comparison to
build the subtraction, on the assumption that "begin() != end()" is
written more often than "end() != begin()". This is purely speculation.
<rdar://problem/13239003>
llvm-svn: 177801
It is possible and valid to have a state manager and associated objects
without having a SubEngine or checkers.
Patch by Olaf Krzikalla!
llvm-svn: 164947
with at least one subtle bug in MacOSXKeyChainAPIChecker where the
calling the method was a substitute for assuming a symbolic value
was null (which is not the case).
We still keep ConstraintManager::getSymVal(), but we use that as
an optimization in SValBuilder and ProgramState::getSVal() to
constant-fold SVals. This is only if the ConstraintManager can
provide us with that information, which is no longer a requirement.
As part of this, introduce a default implementation of
ConstraintManager::getSymVal() which returns null.
For Checkers, introduce ConstraintManager::isNull(), which queries
the state to see if the symbolic value is constrained to be a null
value. It does this without assuming it has been implicitly constant
folded.
llvm-svn: 163428
This reduces duplication across the Basic and Range constraint managers, and
keeps their internals free of dealing with the semantics of C++. It's still
a little unfortunate that the constraint manager is dealing with this at all,
but this is pretty much the only place to put it so that it will apply to all
symbolic values, even when embedded in larger expressions.
llvm-svn: 162313
to reason about.
As part of taint propagation, we now allow creation of non-integer
symbolic expressions like a cast from int to float.
Addresses PR12511 (radar://11215362).
llvm-svn: 156578
This involves keeping track of three separate types: the symbol type, the
adjustment type, and the comparison type. For example, in "$x + 5 > 0ULL",
if the type of $x is 'signed char', the adjustment type is 'int' and the
comparison type is 'unsigned long long'. Most of the time these three types
will be the same, but we should still do the right thing when the
comparison value is out of range, and wraparound should be calculated in
the adjustment type.
This also re-disables an out-of-bounds test; we were extracting the symbol
from non-additive SymIntExprs, but then throwing away the integer.
Sorry for the large patch; both the basic and range constraint managers needed
to be updated together, since they share code in SimpleConstraintManager.
llvm-svn: 156361
At this point this is largely cosmetic, but it opens the door to replace
ProgramStateRef with a smart pointer that more eagerly acts in the role
of reclaiming unused ProgramState objects.
llvm-svn: 149081
class.
We are going into the direction of handling SymbolData and other SymExpr
uniformly, so it makes less sense to keep two different SVal classes.
For example, the checkers would have to take an extra step to reason
about each type separately.
The classes have the same members, we were just using the SVal kind
field for easy differentiation in 3 switch statements. The switch
statements look more ugly now, but we can make the code more readable in
other ways, for example, moving some code into separate functions.
llvm-svn: 145833
ExprEngine.
Teach SimpleConstraintManager::assumeSymRel() to propagate constraints
to symbolic expressions.
+ One extra warning (real bug) is now generated due to enhanced
assumeSymRel().
llvm-svn: 145832
ConstraintManager::canReasonAbout() from the ExprEngine.
ExprEngine should not care if the constraint solver can reason about
something or not. The solver should be able to handle all the SymExprs.
To do this, the solver should be able to keep track of not only the
SymbolData but of all SymExprs. This is why we change SymbolRef to be an
alias of SymExpr*. When encountering an expression it cannot simplify,
the solver should just add the constraints to it.
llvm-svn: 145831
