This had been reverted because the new test failed on non-X86 bots. I moved
the new test to the appropriate subdirectory to correct this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41264
Original submission: r321122 (which was reverted by r321125)
This reverts commit 3c1639b5703c387a0d8cba2862803b4e68dff436.
llvm-svn: 321911
This implements the DWARF 5 feature described at
http://www.dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=141215.1
This allows a consumer to understand whether a composite data type is
trivially copyable and thus should be passed by value instead of by
reference. The canonical example is being able to distinguish the
following two types:
// S is not trivially copyable because of the explicit destructor.
struct S {
~S() {}
};
// T is a POD type.
struct T {
~T() = default;
};
This patch adds two new (DI)flags to LLVM metadata: TypePassByValue
and TypePassByReference.
<rdar://problem/36034922>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41743
llvm-svn: 321844
It appears the code uses nullptr to represent a void type in debug metadata,
which led to an assertion failure when building DeltaAlgorithm.cpp with a
self-hosted clang on Windows.
I'm not sure why/if the problem was Windows-specific.
Fixes bug https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35543
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41264
llvm-svn: 321122
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
In Rust, a trait can be implemented for any type, and if a trait
object pointer is used for the type, then a virtual table will be
emitted for that trait/type combination.
We would like debuggers to be able to inspect trait objects, which
requires finding the concrete type associated with a given vtable.
This patch changes LLVM so that any type can be passed to
replaceVTableHolder. This allows the Rust compiler to emit the needed
debug info -- associating a vtable with the concrete type for which it
was emitted.
This is a DWARF extension: DWARF only specifies the meaning of
DW_AT_containing_type in one specific situation. This style of DWARF
extension is routine, though, and LLVM already has one such case for
DW_AT_containing_type.
Patch by Tom Tromey!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39503
llvm-svn: 317730
Summary:
This patch is part of 3 patches that together form a single patch, but must be introduced in stages in order not to break things.
The way that LLVM interprets DW_OP_plus in DIExpression nodes is basically that of the DW_OP_plus_uconst operator since LLVM expects an unsigned constant operand. This unnecessarily restricts the DW_OP_plus operator, preventing it from being used to describe the evaluation of runtime values on the expression stack. These patches try to align the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus with that of the DWARF definition, which pops two elements off the expression stack, performs the operation and pushes the result back on the stack.
This is done in three stages:
• The first patch (LLVM) adds support for DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The second patch (Clang) contains changes all its uses from DW_OP_plus to DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The third patch (LLVM) changes the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus to be in line with its DWARF meaning. This patch includes the bitcode upgrade from legacy DIExpressions.
Patch by Sander de Smalen.
Reviewers: echristo, pcc, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: fhahn, javed.absar, aprantl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33894
llvm-svn: 305386
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
This function gives the wrong answer on some non-ELF platforms in some
cases. The function that does the right thing lives in Mangler.h. To try to
discourage people from using this function, give it a different name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33162
llvm-svn: 303134
Turns out that the Fission/Split DWARF package format (DWP) is currently
insufficient to handle cross-CU (ref_addr) references. So for now,
duplicate any debug info needed in these situations:
* inlined_subroutine's abstract_origin
* inlined variable's abstract_origin
* types
Keep the ref_addr behavior in general, including in the split DWARF
inline debug info that can be emitted into the object files for online
symbolication.
Keep a flag to use the old (ref_addr) behavior for testing ways of
addressing this limitation in the DWP tool (& for those not using DWP
packaging).
llvm-svn: 302858
Fixes the issue highlighted in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2014-June/037500.html.
The DW_AT_decl_file and DW_AT_decl_line attributes on namespaces can
prevent LLVM from uniquing types that are in the same namespace. They
also don't carry any meaningful information.
rdar://problem/17484998
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32648
llvm-svn: 301706
For Swift we would like to be able to encode the error types that a
function may throw, so the debugger can display them alongside the
function's return value when finish-ing a function.
DWARF defines DW_TAG_thrown_type (intended to be used for C++ throw()
declarations) that is a perfect fit for this purpose. This patch wires
up support for DW_TAG_thrown_type in LLVM by adding a list of thrown
types to DISubprogram.
To offset the cost of the extra pointer, there is a follow-up patch
that turns DISubprogram into a variable-length node.
rdar://problem/29481673
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32559
llvm-svn: 301489
In dwo files the fixed offset can be used - if the dwos are linked into
a dwp, the dwo consumer must use the dwp tables to find out where the
original range of the debug_info was and resolve the "section relative"
value relative to that original range - effectively
avoiding/reimplementing the relocation handling.
llvm-svn: 301072
- introduced in r300522 and found via the Swift LLDB testsuite.
The fix is to set the location kind to memory whenever an FrameIndex
location is emitted.
rdar://problem/31707602
llvm-svn: 300793
- introduced in r300522 and found via the Swift LLDB testsuite.
The fix is to set the location kind to memory whenever an FrameIndex
location is emitted.
rdar://problem/31707602
llvm-svn: 300790
The DWARF specification knows 3 kinds of non-empty simple location
descriptions:
1. Register location descriptions
- describe a variable in a register
- consist of only a DW_OP_reg
2. Memory location descriptions
- describe the address of a variable
3. Implicit location descriptions
- describe the value of a variable
- end with DW_OP_stack_value & friends
The existing DwarfExpression code is pretty much ignorant of these
restrictions. This used to not matter because we only emitted very
short expressions that we happened to get right by accident. This
patch makes DwarfExpression aware of the rules defined by the DWARF
standard and now chooses the right kind of location description for
each expression being emitted.
This would have been an NFC commit (for the existing testsuite) if not
for the way that clang describes captured block variables. Based on
how the previous code in LLVM emitted locations, DW_OP_deref
operations that should have come at the end of the expression are put
at its beginning. Fixing this means changing the semantics of
DIExpression, so this patch bumps the version number of DIExpression
and implements a bitcode upgrade.
There are two major changes in this patch:
I had to fix the semantics of dbg.declare for describing function
arguments. After this patch a dbg.declare always takes the *address*
of a variable as the first argument, even if the argument is not an
alloca.
When lowering a DBG_VALUE, the decision of whether to emit a register
location description or a memory location description depends on the
MachineLocation — register machine locations may get promoted to
memory locations based on their DIExpression. (Future) optimization
passes that want to salvage implicit debug location for variables may
do so by appending a DW_OP_stack_value. For example:
DBG_VALUE, [RBP-8] --> DW_OP_fbreg -8
DBG_VALUE, RAX --> DW_OP_reg0 +0
DBG_VALUE, RAX, DIExpression(DW_OP_deref) --> DW_OP_reg0 +0
All testcases that were modified were regenerated from clang. I also
added source-based testcases for each of these to the debuginfo-tests
repository over the last week to make sure that no synchronized bugs
slip in. The debuginfo-tests compile from source and run the debugger.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32382
<rdar://problem/31205000>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31439
llvm-svn: 300522
and mark the methods as protected.
Besides reducing the surface area of DwarfExpression, this is in
preparation for an upcoming bugfix in the DwarfExpression
implementation, for which it will be necessary to defer emitting
register operations until the rest of the expression is known.
NFC
llvm-svn: 298309
This reverts commit r242302. External type refs of this form were
never used by any LLVM frontend so this is effectively dead code.
(They were introduced to support clang module debug info, but in the
end we came up with a better design that doesn't use this feature at
all.)
rdar://problem/25897929
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30917
llvm-svn: 297684
DWARF may define a default lower-bound for arrays in languages defined
in a particular DWARF version. But the logic to suppress an
unnecessary lower-bound attribute was looking at the hard-coded
default DWARF version, not the version that had been requested.
Also updated the list with all languages defined in DWARF v5.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D30484
llvm-svn: 296652
Requesting DWARF v5 will now get you the new compile-unit and
type-unit headers. llvm-dwarfdump will also recognize them.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D30206
llvm-svn: 296514
While looking to add support for placing singular types (types that will
only be emitted in one place (such as attached to a strong vtable or
explicit template instantiation definition)) not in type units (since
type units have overhead) I stumbled across that change causing an
increase in pubtypes.
Turns out we were missing some types from type units if they were only
referenced from other type units and not from the debug_info section.
This fixes that, following GCC's line of describing the offset of such
entities as the CU die (since there's no compile unit-relative offset
that would describe such an entity - they aren't in the CU). Also like
GCC, this change prefers to describe the type stub within the CU rather
than the "just use the CU offset" fallback where possible. This may give
the DWARF consumer some opportunity to find the extra info in the type
stub - though I'm not sure GDB does anything with this currently.
The size of the pubnames/pubtypes sections now match exactly with or
without type units enabled.
This nearly triples (+189%) the pubtypes section for a clang self-host
and grows pubnames by 0.07% (without compression). For a total of 8%
increase in debug info sections of the objects of a Split DWARF build
when using type units.
llvm-svn: 293971
Support for DW_FORM_implicit_const DWARFv5 feature.
When this form is used attribute value goes to .debug_abbrev section (as SLEB).
As this form would break any debug tool which doesn't support DWARFv5
it is guarded by dwarf version check. Attempt to use this form with
dwarf version <= 4 is considered a fatal error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28456
llvm-svn: 291599
LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a
misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset
argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location
that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset
into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the
DWARF specification.
This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct
offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly
emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable,
thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression.
While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this
to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the
correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are
gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if
individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't
interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present
undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an
old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly,
because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at
the top of the stack.
As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient
encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a
non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the
value into place manually.
This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't
exercised before.
<rdar://problem/29335809>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550
llvm-svn: 289266
so we can stop using DW_OP_bit_piece with the wrong semantics.
The entire back story can be found here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20161114/405934.html
The gist is that in LLVM we've been misinterpreting DW_OP_bit_piece's
offset field to mean the offset into the source variable rather than
the offset into the location at the top the DWARF expression stack. In
order to be able to fix this in a subsequent patch, this patch
introduces a dedicated DW_OP_LLVM_fragment operation with the
semantics that we used to apply to DW_OP_bit_piece, which is what we
actually need while inside of LLVM. This patch is complete with a
bitcode upgrade for expressions using the old format. It does not yet
fix the DWARF backend to use DW_OP_bit_piece correctly.
Implementation note: We discussed several options for implementing
this, including reserving a dedicated field in DIExpression for the
fragment size and offset, but using an custom operator at the end of
the expression works just fine and is more efficient because we then
only pay for it when we need it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27361
rdar://problem/29335809
llvm-svn: 288683
In r266692, we made it possible to emit linkage names for just inlined
functions, putting the attribute on the abstract origin. Make sure we
don't think the linkage-name was already emitted on a declaration.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D27320
llvm-svn: 288450
The DIEUnit class represents a compile or type unit and it owns the unit DIE as an instance variable. This allows anyone with a DIE, to get the unit DIE, and then get back to its DIEUnit without adding any new ivars to the DIE class. Why was this needed? The DIE class has an Offset that is always the CU relative DIE offset, not the "offset in debug info section" as was commented in the header file (the comment has been corrected). This is great for performance because most DIE references are compile unit relative and this means most code that accessed the DIE's offset didn't need to make it into a compile unit relative offset because it already was. When we needed to emit a DW_FORM_ref_addr though, we needed to find the absolute offset of the DIE by finding the DIE's compile/type unit. This class did have the absolute debug info/type offset and could be added to the CU relative offset to compute the absolute offset. With this change we can easily get back to a DIE's DIEUnit which will have this needed offset. Prior to this is required having a DwarfDebug and required calling:
DwarfCompileUnit *DwarfDebug::lookupUnit(const DIE *CU) const;
Now we can use the DIEUnit class to do so without needing DwarfDebug. All clients now use DIEUnit objects (the DwarfDebug stack and the DwarfLinker). A follow on patch for the DWARF generator will also take advantage of this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27170
llvm-svn: 288399
This patch makes AsmPrinter less reliant on DwarfDebug by relying on the DWARF version in the AsmPrinter's MCStreamer's MCContext. This allows us to remove the redundant DWARF version from DwarfDebug. It also lets us change code that used to access the AsmPrinter's DwarfDebug just to get to the DWARF version by changing the DWARF version accessor on AsmPrinter so that it grabs the version from its MCStreamer's MCContext.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27032
llvm-svn: 287839
DW_TAG_atomic_type was already included in Dwarf.defs and emitted correctly,
however Verifier didn't recognize it as valid.
Thus we introduce the following changes:
* Make DW_TAG_atomic_type valid tag for IR and DWARF (enabled only with -gdwarf-5)
* Add it to related docs
* Add DebugInfo tests
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26144
llvm-svn: 285624
Change type of some missed DebugInfo-related alignment variables,
that are still uint64_t, to uint32_t.
Original change introduced in r284482.
llvm-svn: 285242
* Assume that clang passes non-zero alignment value to DIBuilder
only in case when it was forced by C++11 'alignas', C11 '_Alignas'
or compiler attribute '__attribute__((aligned (N)))'.
* Emit DW_AT_alignment if alignment is specified for type/object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24425
llvm-svn: 285189
* Assume that clang passes non-zero alignment value to DIBuilder
only in case when it was forced by C++11 'alignas', C11 '_Alignas'
or compiler attribute '__attribute__((aligned (N)))'.
* Emit DW_AT_alignment if alignment is specified for type/object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24425
llvm-svn: 285181
- Add alignment attribute to DIVariable family
- Modify bitcode format to match new DIVariable representation
- Update tests to match these changes (also add bitcode upgrade test)
- Expect that frontend passes non-zero align value only when it is not default
(was forcibly aligned by alignas()/_Alignas()/__atribute__(aligned())
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25073
llvm-svn: 284678
In futher patches we shall have alignment field added to DIVariable family
and switching from uint64_t to uint32_t will save 4 bytes per variable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25620
llvm-svn: 284482
This is used to mark functions with the C++11 [[ noreturn ]] or C11 _Noreturn
attributes.
Patch by Victor Leschuk!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23167
llvm-svn: 278940
Added support for:
1. Multi dimension array.
2. Array of structure type, which previously was declared incompletely.
3. Dynamic size array.
4. Array where element type is a typedef, volatile or constant (this should resolve PR28311).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21526
llvm-svn: 275167
