In 2155195131a57f2f01e7cfabb85bb027518c2dc6, the
"system-headers-coverage" option has been added but not used in all
necessary places.
Potential reviewers: @gulfemsavrun @petrhosek
Co-authored-by: Manuel Kalettka <manuel.kalettka@kernkonzept.com>
Note that llvm::support::endianness has been renamed to
llvm::endianness while becoming an enum class. This patch replaces
{big,little,native} with llvm::endianness::{big,little,native}.
This patch completes the migration to llvm::endianness and
llvm::endianness::{big,little,native}. I'll post a separate patch to
remove the migration helpers in llvm/Support/Endian.h:
using endianness = llvm::endianness;
constexpr llvm::endianness big = llvm::endianness::big;
constexpr llvm::endianness little = llvm::endianness::little;
constexpr llvm::endianness native = llvm::endianness::native;
When a user uses a mismatched clang + llvm-profdata, they didn't get a very
informative error message. It would just say "unsupported version".
As a result, users are often confused as to what they are supposed to do and
tend to assume that it's a bug in the profiling runtime.
This patch improves the error message by:
- Adding a new class of error (`raw_profile_version_mismatch`) to make it clear
that, specifically, the *raw profile* version is unsupported because of a
tool mismatch.
- Adding an error message that tells the user which raw profile version was
encountered, which version was expected, and instructs them to align their
tool versions.
To support this, this patch also updates `InstrProfError::take` to also
propagate the optional error message.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149361
As discussed in [0], this diff adds the `skipprofile` attribute to
prevent the function from being profiled while allowing profiled
functions to be inlined into it. The `noprofile` attribute remains
unchanged.
The `noprofile` attribute is used for functions where it is
dangerous to add instrumentation to while the `skipprofile` attribute is
used to reduce code size or performance overhead.
[0] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/why-does-the-noprofile-attribute-restrict-inlining/64108
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130807
Modify the IfStmt node to suppoort constant evaluated expressions.
Add a new ExpressionEvaluationContext::ImmediateFunctionContext to
keep track of immediate function contexts.
This proved easier/better/probably more efficient than walking the AST
backward as it allows diagnosing nested if consteval statements.
This reduces the size of chrome.dll.pdb built with optimizations,
coverage, and line table info from 4,690,210,816 to 2,181,128,192, which
makes it possible to fit under the 4GB limit.
This change can greatly reduce binary size in coverage builds, which do
not need value profiling. IR PGO builds are unaffected. There is a minor
behavior change for frontend PGO.
PGO and coverage both use InstrProfiling to create profile data with
counters. PGO records the address of each function in the __profd_
global. It is used later to map runtime function pointer values back to
source-level function names. Coverage does not appear to use this
information.
Recording the address of every function with code coverage drastically
increases code size. Consider this program:
void foo();
void bar();
inline void inlineMe(int x) {
if (x > 0)
foo();
else
bar();
}
int getVal();
int main() { inlineMe(getVal()); }
With code coverage, the InstrProfiling pass runs before inlining, and it
captures the address of inlineMe in the __profd_ global. This greatly
increases code size, because now the compiler can no longer delete
trivial code.
One downside to this approach is that users of frontend PGO must apply
the -mllvm -enable-value-profiling flag globally in TUs that enable PGO.
Otherwise, some inline virtual method addresses may not be recorded and
will not be able to be promoted. My assumption is that this mllvm flag
is not popular, and most frontend PGO users don't enable it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102818
When a function or a file is excluded using -fprofile-list= option,
don't emit coverage mapping as doing so confuses users since those
functions would always have zero count. This also reduces the binary
size considerably in cases where only a few functions or files are
being instrumented.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96000
This change implements support for applying profile instrumentation
only to selected files or functions. The implementation uses the
sanitizer special case list format to select which files and functions
to instrument, and relies on the new noprofile IR attribute to exclude
functions from instrumentation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94820
This change implements support for applying profile instrumentation
only to selected files or functions. The implementation uses the
sanitizer special case list format to select which files and functions
to instrument, and relies on the new noprofile IR attribute to exclude
functions from instrumentation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94820
This is an enhancement to LLVM Source-Based Code Coverage in clang to track how
many times individual branch-generating conditions are taken (evaluate to TRUE)
and not taken (evaluate to FALSE). Individual conditions may comprise larger
boolean expressions using boolean logical operators. This functionality is
very similar to what is supported by GCOV except that it is very closely
anchored to the ASTs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84467
CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64_t
to uint32_t, use i64 for branch_weights.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88609
CallInst::updateProfWeight() creates branch_weights with i64 instead of i32.
To be more consistent everywhere and remove lots of casts from uint64_t
to uint32_t, use i64 for branch_weights.
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88609
Implementing the likelihood attributes for the iteration statements adds
a new helper function. This function can't be const qualified since
these non-modifying members aren't const qualified.
- Skip generating profile data on `__global__` function in the host
compilation. It's a host-side stub function only and don't have
profile instrumentation generated on the real function body. The extra
profile data results in the malformed instrumentation profile data.
- Skip generating region mapping on functions in the wrong-side, i.e.,
+ For the device compilation, skip host-only functions; and,
+ For the host compilation, skip device-only functions (including
`__global__` functions.)
- As the device-side profiling is not ready yet, only host-side profile
code generation is checked.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85276
And bump its version number accordingly.
This is a patched recommit of 7c298c104bfe725d4315926a656263e8a5ac3054
Previous hash implementation was incorrectly passing an uint64_t, that got converted
to an uint8_t, to finalize the hash computation. This led to different functions
having the same hash if they only differ by the remaining statements, which is
incorrect.
Added a new test case that trivially tests that a small function change is
reflected in the hash value.
Not that as this patch fixes the hash computation, it would invalidate all hashes
computed before that patch applies, this is why we bumped the version number.
Update profile data hash entries due to hash function update, except for binary
version, in which case we keep the buggy behavior for backward compatibility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79961
Previous implementation was incorrectly passing an uint64_t, that got converted
to an uint8_t, to finalize the hash computation. This led to different functions
having the same hash if they only differ by the remaining statements, which is
incorrect.
Added a new test case that trivially tests that a small function change is
reflected in the hash value.
Not that as this patch fixes the hash computation, it invalidates all hashes
computed before that patch applies, which could be an issue for large build
system that pre-compute the profile data and let client download them as part of
the build process.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79961
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
Summary:
The MS C++ ABI has no constructor variants, but it has destructor
variants, so we should move the deleting destructor variant check
outside the check for "does the ABI have constructor variants".
Fixes PR37561, so basic code coverage works on Windows with C++.
Reviewers: vsk
Subscribers: jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58691
llvm-svn: 354924
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This fixes ASTContext's parent map for nodes in such classes (e.g. operator()).
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39949
This also changes the observed shape of the AST for implicit RAVs.
- this includes AST MatchFinder: cxxRecordDecl() now matches lambda classes,
functionDecl() matches the call operator, and the parent chain is body -> call
operator -> lambda class -> lambdaexpr rather than body -> lambdaexpr.
- this appears not to matter for the ASTImporterLookupTable builder
- this doesn't matter for the other RAVs in-tree.
In order to do this, we remove the TraverseLambdaBody hook. The problem is it's
hard/weird to ensure this hook is called when traversing via the implicit class.
There were just two users of this hook in-tree, who use it to skip bodies.
I replaced these with explicitly traversing the captures only. Another approach
would be recording the bodies when the lambda is visited, and then recognizing
them later.
I'd be open to suggestion on how to preserve this hook, instead.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, JonasToth
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rsmith, jdennett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56444
llvm-svn: 351047
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
These command line options are not intended for public use, and often
don't even make sense in the context of a particular tool anyway. About
90% of them are already hidden, but when people add new options they
forget to hide them, so if you were to make a brand new tool today, link
against one of LLVM's libraries, and run tool -help you would get a
bunch of junk that doesn't make sense for the tool you're writing.
This patch hides these options. The real solution is to not have
libraries defining command line options, but that's a much larger effort
and not something I'm prepared to take on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40674
llvm-svn: 319505
Lifting from Bob Wilson's notes: The hash value that we compute and
store in PGO profile data to detect out-of-date profiles does not
include enough information. This means that many significant changes to
the source will not cause compiler warnings about the profile being out
of date, and worse, we may continue to use the outdated profile data to
make bad optimization decisions. There is some tension here because
some source changes won't affect PGO and we don't want to invalidate the
profile unnecessarily.
This patch adds a new hashing scheme which is more sensitive to loop
nesting, conditions, and out-of-order control flow. Here are examples
which show snippets which get the same hash under the current scheme,
and different hashes under the new scheme:
Loop Nesting Example
--------------------
// Snippet 1
while (foo()) {
while (bar()) {}
}
// Snippet 2
while (foo()) {}
while (bar()) {}
Condition Example
-----------------
// Snippet 1
if (foo())
bar();
baz();
// Snippet 2
if (foo())
bar();
else
baz();
Out-of-order Control Flow Example
---------------------------------
// Snippet 1
while (foo()) {
if (bar()) {}
baz();
}
// Snippet 2
while (foo()) {
if (bar())
continue;
baz();
}
In each of these cases, it's useful to differentiate between the
snippets because swapping their profiles gives bad optimization hints.
The new hashing scheme considers some logical operators in an effort to
detect more changes in conditions. This isn't a perfect scheme. E.g, it
does not produce the same hash for these equivalent snippets:
// Snippet 1
bool c = !a || b;
if (d && e) {}
// Snippet 2
bool f = d && e;
bool c = !a || b;
if (f) {}
This would require an expensive data flow analysis. Short of that, the
new hashing scheme looks reasonably complete, based on a scan over the
statements we place counters on.
Profiles which use the old version of the PGO hash remain valid and can
be used without issue (there are tests in tree which check this).
rdar://17068282
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39446
llvm-svn: 318229
The root cause of the issues reported in D32406 and D34680 is that clang
instruments functions without bodies. Make it stop doing that, and also
teach it how to use old (incorrectly generated) profiles without
crashing.
llvm-svn: 306883
In doing so, clean up the MD5 interface a little. Most
existing users only care about the lower 8 bytes of an MD5,
but for some users that care about the upper and lower,
there wasn't a good interface. Furthermore, consumers
of the MD5 checksum were required to handle endianness
details on their own, so it seems reasonable to abstract
this into a nicer interface that just gives you the right
value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31105
llvm-svn: 298322
2nd attempt: the first was in r296231, but it had a use after lifetime
bug.
Clang has logic to lower certain conditional expressions directly into llvm
select instructions. However, it does not emit the correct profile counter
increment as it does this: it emits an unconditional increment of the counter
for the 'then branch', even if the value selected is from the 'else branch'
(this is PR32019).
That means, given the following snippet, we would report that "0" is selected
twice, and that "1" is never selected:
int f1(int x) {
return x ? 0 : 1;
^2 ^0
}
f1(0);
f1(1);
Fix the problem by using the instrprof_increment_step intrinsic to do the
proper increment.
llvm-svn: 296245
Clang has logic to lower certain conditional expressions directly into
llvm select instructions. However, it does not emit the correct profile
counter increment as it does this: it emits an unconditional increment
of the counter for the 'then branch', even if the value selected is from
the 'else branch' (this is PR32019).
That means, given the following snippet, we would report that "0" is
selected twice, and that "1" is never selected:
int f1(int x) {
return x ? 0 : 1;
^2 ^0
}
f1(0);
f1(1);
Fix the problem by using the instrprof_increment_step intrinsic to do
the proper increment.
llvm-svn: 296231
Fix the fact that we don't assign profile counters to constructors in
classes with virtual bases, or constructors with variadic parameters.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30131
llvm-svn: 296062
