This reverts commit 317a0fe5bd7113c0ac9d30b2de58ca409e5ff754.
This reverts commit 30c4b97aec60895a6905816670f493cdd1d7c546.
See post-commit discussions on https://reviews.llvm.org/D157750 that
we should use a different mechanism to handle the error with --cuda-gpu-arch=
The IR/DiagnosticInfo.cpp, warn_drv_for_elf_only, codegne tests in
clang/test/Driver, and the following driver behavior (downgrading error
to warning) changes are undesired.
```
% clang --target=riscv64 -fsplit-machine-functions -c a.c
warning: -fsplit-machine-functions is not valid for riscv64 [-Wbackend-plugin]
```
When building a fatbinary, the driver invokes the compiler multiple
times with different "--target". (For example, with "-x cuda
--cuda-gpu-arch=sm_70" flags, clang will be invoded twice, once with
--target=x86_64_...., once with --target=sm_70) If we use
-fsplit-machine-functions or -fno-split-machine-functions for such
invocation, the driver reports an error.
This CL changes the behavior so:
- "-fsplit-machine-functions" is now passed to all targets, for non-X86
targets, the flag is a NOOP and causes a warning.
- "-fno-split-machine-functions" now negates -fsplit-machine-functions (if
-fno-split-machine-functions appears after any -fsplit-machine-functions)
for any target triple, previously, it causes an error.
- "-fsplit-machine-functions -Xarch_device -fno-split-machine-functions"
enables MFS on host but disables MFS for GPUS without warnings/errors.
- "-Xarch_host -fsplit-machine-functions" enables MFS on host but disables
MFS for GPUS without warnings/errors.
Reviewed by: xur, dhoekwater
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157750
As suggested by @erichkeane in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141451#inline-1429549
There's potential for a lot more cleanups around these APIs. This is
just a start.
Callers need to be more careful about sub-expressions producing strings
that don't outlast the expression using `llvm::demangle`. Add a
release note.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149104
This reverts commit c117c2c8ba4afd45a006043ec6dd858652b2ffcc.
itaniumDemangle calls std::strlen with the results of
std::string_view::data() which may not be NUL-terminated. This causes
lld/test/wasm/why-extract.s to fail when "expensive checks" are enabled
via -DLLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS=ON. See D149675 for further
discussion. Back this out until the individual demanglers are converted
to use std::string_view.
As suggested by @erichkeane in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D141451#inline-1429549
There's potential for a lot more cleanups around these APIs. This is
just a start.
Callers need to be more careful about sub-expressions producing strings
that don't outlast the expression using ``llvm::demangle``. Add a
release note.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, #lld-macho
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149104
As pointed out by @arsenm in https://reviews.llvm.org/D141451#4045099,
we don't handle ConstantExpressions for dontcall-{warn|error} IR Fn
Attrs.
Use CallBase::getCalledOperand() and Value::stripPointerCasts() should
the call to CallBase::getCalledFunction return nullptr.
I don't know how to express the IR test case in C, otherwise I'd add a
clang test, too.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142058
We have some odd redundancy where clang specially handles
the stack size case. If clang prints it, the source location is first
followed by "warning". The backend diagnostic, as printed by other tools
puts "warning" first.
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
Based on the output of include-what-you-use.
This is a big chunk of changes. It is very likely to break downstream code
unless they took a lot of care in avoiding hidden ehader dependencies, something
the LLVM codebase doesn't do that well :-/
I've tried to summarize the biggest change below:
- llvm/include/llvm-c/Core.h: no longer includes llvm-c/ErrorHandling.h
- llvm/IR/DIBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/IR/DebugInfo.h
- llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h no longer includes llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h
- llvm/IR/LLVMRemarkStreamer.h no longer includes llvm/Support/ToolOutputFile.h
- llvm/IR/LegacyPassManager.h no longer include llvm/Pass.h
- llvm/IR/Type.h no longer includes llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h
- llvm/IR/PassManager.h no longer includes llvm/Pass.h nor llvm/Support/Debug.h
And the usual count of preprocessed lines:
$ clang++ -E -Iinclude -I../llvm/include ../llvm/lib/IR/*.cpp -std=c++14 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions | wc -l
before: 6400831
after: 6189948
200k lines less to process is no that bad ;-)
Discourse thread on the topic: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/include-what-you-use-include-cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118652
To avoid using the AST when emitting diagnostics, split the "dontcall"
attribute into "dontcall-warn" and "dontcall-error", and also add the
frontend attribute value as the LLVM attribute value. This gives us all
the information to report diagnostics we need from within the IR (aside
from access to the original source).
One downside is we directly use LLVM's demangler rather than using the
existing Clang diagnostic pretty printing of symbols.
Previous revisions didn't properly declare the new dependencies.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110364
To avoid using the AST when emitting diagnostics, split the "dontcall"
attribute into "dontcall-warn" and "dontcall-error", and also add the
frontend attribute value as the LLVM attribute value. This gives us all
the information to report diagnostics we need from within the IR (aside
from access to the original source).
One downside is we directly use LLVM's demangler rather than using the
existing Clang diagnostic pretty printing of symbols.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110364
And always print it.
This makes some LLVM diagnostics match up better with Clang's diagnostics.
Updated some AMDGPU uses of DiagnosticInfoResourceLimit and now we print
better diagnostics for those.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110204
Add support for the GNU C style __attribute__((error(""))) and
__attribute__((warning(""))). These attributes are meant to be put on
declarations of functions whom should not be called.
They are frequently used to provide compile time diagnostics similar to
_Static_assert, but which may rely on non-ICE conditions (ie. relying on
compiler optimizations). This is also similar to diagnose_if function
attribute, but can diagnose after optimizations have been run.
While users may instead simply call undefined functions in such cases to
get a linkage failure from the linker, these provide a much more
ergonomic and actionable diagnostic to users and do so at compile time
rather than at link time. Users instead may be able use inline asm .err
directives.
These are used throughout the Linux kernel in its implementation of
BUILD_BUG and BUILD_BUG_ON macros. These macros generally cannot be
converted to use _Static_assert because many of the parameters are not
ICEs. The Linux kernel still needs to be modified to make use of these
when building with Clang; I have a patch that does so I will send once
this feature is landed.
To do so, we create a new IR level Function attribute, "dontcall" (both
error and warning boil down to one IR Fn Attr). Then, similar to calls
to inline asm, we attach a !srcloc Metadata node to call sites of such
attributed callees.
The backend diagnoses these during instruction selection, while we still
know that a call is a call (vs say a JMP that's a tail call) in an arch
agnostic manner.
The frontend then reconstructs the SourceLocation from that Metadata,
and determines whether to emit an error or warning based on the callee's
attribute.
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16428
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1173
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106030
Summary:
Currently, only `OptimizationRemarks` can be emitted using a Function.
Add constructors to allow this for `OptimizationRemarksAnalysis` and
`OptimizationRemarkMissed` as well.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert thegameg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102784
The situation with inline asm/MC error reporting is kind of messy at the
moment. The errors from MC layout are not reliably propagated and users
have to specify an inlineasm handler separately to get inlineasm
diagnose. The latter issue is not a correctness issue but could be improved.
* Kill LLVMContext inlineasm diagnose handler and migrate it to use
DiagnoseInfo/DiagnoseHandler.
* Introduce `DiagnoseInfoSrcMgr` to diagnose SourceMgr backed errors. This
covers use cases like inlineasm, MC, and any clients using SourceMgr.
* Move AsmPrinter::SrcMgrDiagInfo and its instance to MCContext. The next step
is to combine MCContext::SrcMgr and MCContext::InlineSrcMgr because in all
use cases, only one of them is used.
* If LLVMContext is available, let MCContext uses LLVMContext's diagnose
handler; if LLVMContext is not available, MCContext uses its own default
diagnose handler which just prints SMDiagnostic.
* Change a few clients(Clang, llc, lldb) to use the new way of reporting.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97449
This is the first in a series of patches that attempts to migrate
existing cost instructions to return a new InstructionCost class
in place of a simple integer. This new class is intended to be
as light-weight and simple as possible, with a full range of
arithmetic and comparison operators that largely mirror the same
sets of operations on basic types, such as integers. The main
advantage to using an InstructionCost is that it can encode a
particular cost state in addition to a value. The initial
implementation only has two states - Normal and Invalid - but these
could be expanded over time if necessary. An invalid state can
be used to represent an unknown cost or an instruction that is
prohibitively expensive.
This patch adds the new class and changes the getInstructionCost
interface to return the new class. Other cost functions, such as
getUserCost, etc., will be migrated in future patches as I believe
this to be less disruptive. One benefit of this new class is that
it provides a way to unify many of the magic costs in the codebase
where the cost is set to a deliberately high number to prevent
optimisations taking place, e.g. vectorization. It also provides
a route to represent the extremely high, and unknown, cost of
scalarization of scalable vectors, which is not currently supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91174
See discussion in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45073 / https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324#2334485
the implementation is known-broken for certain inputs,
the bugreport was up for a significant amount of timer,
and there has been no activity to address it.
Therefore, just completely rip out all of misexpect handling.
I suspect, fixing it requires redesigning the internals of MD_misexpect.
Should anyone commit to fixing the implementation problem,
starting from clean slate may be better anyways.
This reverts commit 7bdad08429411e7d0ecd58cd696b1efe3cff309e,
and some of it's follow-ups, that don't stand on their own.
Changes:
* Change `ToVectorTy` to deal directly with `ElementCount` instances.
* `VF == 1` replaced with `VF.isScalar()`.
* `VF > 1` and `VF >=2` replaced with `VF.isVector()`.
* `VF <=1` is replaced with `VF.isZero() || VF.isScalar()`.
* Replaced the uses of `llvm::SmallSet<ElementCount, ...>` with
`llvm::SmallSetVector<ElementCount, ...>`. This avoids the need of an
ordering function for the `ElementCount` class.
* Bits and pieces around printing the `ElementCount` to string streams.
To guarantee that this change is a NFC, `VF.Min` and asserts are used
in the following places:
1. When it doesn't make sense to deal with the scalable property, for
example:
a. When computing unrolling factors.
b. When shuffle masks are built for fixed width vector types
In this cases, an
assert(!VF.Scalable && "<mgs>") has been added to make sure we don't
enter coepaths that don't make sense for scalable vectors.
2. When there is a conscious decision to use `FixedVectorType`. These
uses of `FixedVectorType` will likely be removed in favour of
`VectorType` once the vectorizer is generic enough to deal with both
fixed vector types and scalable vector types.
3. When dealing with building constants out of the value of VF, for
example when computing the vectorization `step`, or building vectors
of indices. These operation _make sense_ for scalable vectors too,
but changing the code in these places to be generic and make it work
for scalable vectors is to be submitted in a separate patch, as it is
a functional change.
4. When building the potential VFs in VPlan. Making the VPlan generic
enough to handle scalable vectorization factors is a functional change
that needs a separate patch. See for example `void
LoopVectorizationPlanner::buildVPlans(unsigned MinVF, unsigned
MaxVF)`.
5. The class `IntrinsicCostAttribute`: this class still uses `unsigned
VF` as updating the field to use `ElementCount` woudl require changes
that could result in changing the behavior of the compiler. Will be done
in a separate patch.
7. When dealing with user input for forcing the vectorization
factor. In this case, adding support for scalable vectorization is a
functional change that migh require changes at command line.
Note that in some places the idiom
```
unsigned VF = ...
auto VTy = FixedVectorType::get(ScalarTy, VF)
```
has been replaced with
```
ElementCount VF = ...
assert(!VF.Scalable && ...);
auto VTy = VectorType::get(ScalarTy, VF)
```
The assertion guarantees that the new code is (at least in debug mode)
functionally equivalent to the old version. Notice that this change had been
possible because none of the methods that are specific to `FixedVectorType`
were used after the instantiation of `VTy`.
Reviewed By: rengolin, ctetreau
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85794
Reverting because the commit message doesn't reflect the one agreed on
phabricator at https://reviews.llvm.org/D85794.
This reverts commit c8d2b065b98fa91139cc7bb1fd1407f032ef252e.
Changes:
* Change `ToVectorTy` to deal directly with `ElementCount` instances.
* `VF == 1` replaced with `VF.isScalar()`.
* `VF > 1` and `VF >=2` replaced with `VF.isVector()`.
* `VF <=1` is replaced with `VF.isZero() || VF.isScalar()`.
* Add `<` operator to `ElementCount` to be able to use
`llvm::SmallSetVector<ElementCount, ...>`.
* Bits and pieces around printing the ElementCount to string streams.
* Added a static method to `ElementCount` to represent a scalar.
To guarantee that this change is a NFC, `VF.Min` and asserts are used
in the following places:
1. When it doesn't make sense to deal with the scalable property, for
example:
a. When computing unrolling factors.
b. When shuffle masks are built for fixed width vector types
In this cases, an
assert(!VF.Scalable && "<mgs>") has been added to make sure we don't
enter coepaths that don't make sense for scalable vectors.
2. When there is a conscious decision to use `FixedVectorType`. These
uses of `FixedVectorType` will likely be removed in favour of
`VectorType` once the vectorizer is generic enough to deal with both
fixed vector types and scalable vector types.
3. When dealing with building constants out of the value of VF, for
example when computing the vectorization `step`, or building vectors
of indices. These operation _make sense_ for scalable vectors too,
but changing the code in these places to be generic and make it work
for scalable vectors is to be submitted in a separate patch, as it is
a functional change.
4. When building the potential VFs in VPlan. Making the VPlan generic
enough to handle scalable vectorization factors is a functional change
that needs a separate patch. See for example `void
LoopVectorizationPlanner::buildVPlans(unsigned MinVF, unsigned
MaxVF)`.
5. The class `IntrinsicCostAttribute`: this class still uses `unsigned
VF` as updating the field to use `ElementCount` woudl require changes
that could result in changing the behavior of the compiler. Will be done
in a separate patch.
7. When dealing with user input for forcing the vectorization
factor. In this case, adding support for scalable vectorization is a
functional change that migh require changes at command line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85794
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's
annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and
discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a
prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300
We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the
LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in
addition to frontend instrumentation.
We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly
influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select)
when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains
information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can
check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the
compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight.
We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the
diagnostic to the user.
A future patch should address the comment at the top of
LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and
UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed
outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the
misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller.
In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the
misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have
avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata
tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions
are influenced by the use of llvm.expect
Patch By: paulkirth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324
llvm-svn: 371635
This reverts commit r371584. It introduced a dependency from compiler-rt
to llvm/include/ADT, which is problematic for multiple reasons.
One is that it is a novel dependency edge, which needs cross-compliation
machinery for llvm/include/ADT (yes, it is true that right now
compiler-rt included only header-only libraries, however, if we allow
compiler-rt to depend on anything from ADT, other libraries will
eventually get used).
Secondly, depending on ADT from compiler-rt exposes ADT symbols from
compiler-rt, which would cause ODR violations when Clang is built with
the profile library.
llvm-svn: 371598
This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's
annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and
discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a
prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300
We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the
LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in
addition to frontend instrumentation.
We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly
influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select)
when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains
information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can
check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the
compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight.
We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the
diagnostic to the user.
A future patch should address the comment at the top of
LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and
UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed
outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the
misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller.
In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the
misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have
avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata
tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions
are influenced by the use of llvm.expect
Patch By: paulkirth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324
llvm-svn: 371584
This patch contains the basic functionality for reporting potentially
incorrect usage of __builtin_expect() by comparing the developer's
annotation against a collected PGO profile. A more detailed proposal and
discussion appears on the CFE-dev mailing list
(http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-July/062971.html) and a
prototype of the initial frontend changes appear here in D65300
We revised the work in D65300 by moving the misexpect check into the
LLVM backend, and adding support for IR and sampling based profiles, in
addition to frontend instrumentation.
We add new misexpect metadata tags to those instructions directly
influenced by the llvm.expect intrinsic (branch, switch, and select)
when lowering the intrinsics. The misexpect metadata contains
information about the expected target of the intrinsic so that we can
check against the correct PGO counter when emitting diagnostics, and the
compiler's values for the LikelyBranchWeight and UnlikelyBranchWeight.
We use these branch weight values to determine when to emit the
diagnostic to the user.
A future patch should address the comment at the top of
LowerExpectIntrisic.cpp to hoist the LikelyBranchWeight and
UnlikelyBranchWeight values into a shared space that can be accessed
outside of the LowerExpectIntrinsic pass. Once that is done, the
misexpect metadata can be updated to be smaller.
In the long term, it is possible to reconstruct portions of the
misexpect metadata from the existing profile data. However, we have
avoided this to keep the code simple, and because some kind of metadata
tag will be required to identify which branch/switch/select instructions
are influenced by the use of llvm.expect
Patch By: paulkirth
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324
llvm-svn: 371484
Separate the remark serialization to YAML from the LLVM Diagnostics.
This adds a new serialization abstraction: remarks::Serializer. It's
completely independent from lib/IR and it provides an easy way to
replace YAML by providing a new remarks::Serializer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62632
llvm-svn: 362160
* Add support for uniquing strings in the remark streamer and emitting the string table in the remarks section.
* Add parsing support for the string table in the RemarkParser.
From this remark:
```
--- !Missed
Pass: inline
Name: NoDefinition
DebugLoc: { File: 'test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar.c',
Line: 7, Column: 3 }
Function: printArgsNoRet
Args:
- Callee: printf
- String: ' will not be inlined into '
- Caller: printArgsNoRet
DebugLoc: { File: 'test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar.c',
Line: 6, Column: 0 }
- String: ' because its definition is unavailable'
...
```
to:
```
--- !Missed
Pass: 0
Name: 1
DebugLoc: { File: 3, Line: 7, Column: 3 }
Function: 2
Args:
- Callee: 4
- String: 5
- Caller: 2
DebugLoc: { File: 3, Line: 6, Column: 0 }
- String: 6
...
```
And the string table in the .remarks/__remarks section containing:
```
inline\0NoDefinition\0printArgsNoRet\0
test-suite/SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar.c\0printf\0
will not be inlined into \0 because its definition is unavailable\0
```
This is mostly supposed to be used for testing purposes, but it gives us
a 2x reduction in the remark size, and is an incremental change for the
updates to the remarks file format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60227
llvm-svn: 359050
This allows us to store more info about where we're emitting the remarks
without cluttering LLVMContext. This is needed for future support for
the remark section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58996
llvm-svn: 355507
This patch adds a new type StringBlockVal which can be used to emit a
YAML block scalar, which preserves newlines in a multiline string. It
also updates MappingTraits<DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::Argument> to
use it for argument values with more than a single newline.
This is helpful for remarks that want to display more in-depth
information in a more structured way.
Reviewers: thegameg, anemet
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: hfinkel, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57159
llvm-svn: 352216
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
