This patch fixes the logic in the DAGCombiner that folds an AND node according
to rule: (and (X (load V)), C) -> (X (load V))
An AND between a vector load 'X' and a constant build_vector 'C' can be folded
into the load itself only if we can prove that the AND operation is redundant.
The algorithm implemented by 'visitAND' firstly computes the splat value 'S'
from C, and then checks if S has the lower 'B' bits set (where B is the size in
bits of the vector element type). The algorithm takes into account also the
'undef' bits in the splat mask.
Unfortunately, the algorithm only worked under the assumption that the size of S
is a multiple of the vector element type. With this patch, we conservatively
avoid folding the AND if the splat bits are not compatible with the vector
element type.
Added X86 test and-load-fold.ll
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8085
llvm-svn: 231563
This patch attempts to convert a SCALAR_TO_VECTOR using an operand from an EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT into a VECTOR_SHUFFLE.
This prevents many cases of spilling scalar data between the gpr + simd registers.
At present the optimization only accepts cases where there is no TRUNC of the scalar type (i.e. all types must match).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8132
llvm-svn: 231554
This is based on the following equivalences:
select(C0 & C1, X, Y) <=> select(C0, select(C1, X, Y), Y)
select(C0 | C1, X, Y) <=> select(C0, X, select(C1, X, Y))
Many target cannot perform and/or on the CPU flags and therefore the
right side should be choosen to avoid materializign the i1 flags in an
integer register. If the target can perform this operation efficiently
we normalize to the left form.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7622
llvm-svn: 231507
This is in preparation for changing visitSELECT to normalize towards
select(Cond0, select(Cond1, X, Y), Y);
select(Cond0, X, select(Cond1, X, Y)) which perfom an implicit and/or of
the conditions.
The factored function contains all DAGCombine rules which reduce two values
combined by an And/Or operation to a single value. This does not include rules
involving constants as visitSELECT already handles that case.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8026
llvm-svn: 231506
Currently shuffles may only be combined if they are of the same type, despite the fact that bitcasts are often introduced in between shuffle nodes (e.g. x86 shuffle type widening).
This patch allows a single input shuffle to peek through bitcasts and if the input is another shuffle will merge them, shuffling using the smallest sized type, and re-applying the bitcasts at the inputs and output instead.
Dropped old ShuffleToZext test - this patch removes the use of the zext and vector-zext.ll covers these anyhow.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7939
llvm-svn: 231380
When trying to convert a BUILD_VECTOR into a shuffle, we try to split a single source vector that is twice as wide as the destination vector.
We can not do this when we also need the zero vector to create a blend.
This fixes PR22774.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8040
llvm-svn: 231219
Accidentally committed a few more of these cleanup changes than
intended. Still breaking these out & tidying them up.
This reverts commit r231135.
llvm-svn: 231136
There doesn't seem to be any need to assert that iterator assignment is
between iterators over the same node - if you want to reuse an iterator
variable to iterate another node, that's perfectly acceptable. Just
don't mix comparisons between iterators into disjoint sequences, as
usual.
llvm-svn: 231135
We were missing a check for the following fold in DAGCombiner:
// fold (fmul (fmul x, c1), c2) -> (fmul x, (fmul c1, c2))
If 'x' is also a constant, then we shouldn't do anything. Otherwise, we could end up swapping the operands back and forth forever.
This should fix:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22698
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7917
llvm-svn: 230884
have the debugger step through each one individually. Turn off the
combine for adjacent stores at -O0 so we get this behavior.
Possibly, DAGCombine shouldn't run at all at -O0, but that's for
another day; see PR22346.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7181
llvm-svn: 230659
Author: Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>
Date: Mon Feb 23 23:04:28 2015 +0000
Fix based on post-commit comment on D7816 & rL230177 - BUILD_VECTOR operand truncation was using the the BV's output scalar type instead of the input type.
and
Author: Simon Pilgrim <llvm-dev@redking.me.uk>
Date: Sun Feb 22 18:17:28 2015 +0000
[DagCombiner] Generalized BuildVector Vector Concatenation
The CONCAT_VECTORS combiner pass can transform the concat of two BUILD_VECTOR nodes into a single BUILD_VECTOR node.
This patch generalises this to support any number of BUILD_VECTOR nodes, and also permits UNDEF nodes to be included as well.
This was noticed as AVX vec128 -> vec256 canonicalization sometimes creates a CONCAT_VECTOR with a real vec128 lower and an vec128 UNDEF upper.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7816
as the root cause of PR22678 which is causing an assertion inside the DAG combiner.
I'll follow up to the main thread as well.
llvm-svn: 230358
The CONCAT_VECTORS combiner pass can transform the concat of two BUILD_VECTOR nodes into a single BUILD_VECTOR node.
This patch generalises this to support any number of BUILD_VECTOR nodes, and also permits UNDEF nodes to be included as well.
This was noticed as AVX vec128 -> vec256 canonicalization sometimes creates a CONCAT_VECTOR with a real vec128 lower and an vec128 UNDEF upper.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7816
llvm-svn: 230177
DAGCombine will rewrite an BUILD_VECTOR where all non-undef inputs some from
[US]INT_TO_FP, as a BUILD_VECTOR of integers with the conversion applied as a
vector operation. We check operation legality of the conversion, but fail to
check legality of the integer vector type itself. Because targets don't
normally override operation legality defaults for illegal types, we need to
check this also.
This came up in the context of the QPX vector entensions for PowerPC (which can
have legal floating-point vector types without corresponding legal integer
vector types). No in-tree test case for this yes, but one can be added once
the QPX support has been committed.
llvm-svn: 230176
This allows sharing of FMA forming combines to work
with instructions that have the same semantics as a separate
multiply and add.
This is expand by default, and only formed post legalization
so it shouldn't have much impact on targets that do not want it.
llvm-svn: 230070
First, don't combine bit masking into vector shuffles (even ones the
target can handle) once operation legalization has taken place. Custom
legalization of vector shuffles may exist for these patterns (making the
predicate return true) but that custom legalization may in some cases
produce the exact bit math this matches. We only really want to handle
this prior to operation legalization.
However, the x86 backend, in a fit of awesome, relied on this. What it
would do is mark VSELECTs as expand, which would turn them into
arithmetic, which this would then match back into vector shuffles, which
we would then lower properly. Amazing.
Instead, the second change is to teach the x86 backend to directly form
vector shuffles from VSELECT nodes with constant conditions, and to mark
all of the vector types we support lowering blends as shuffles as custom
VSELECT lowering. We still mark the forms which actually support
variable blends as *legal* so that the custom lowering is bypassed, and
the legal lowering can even be used by the vector shuffle legalization
(yes, i know, this is confusing. but that's how the patterns are
written).
This makes the VSELECT lowering much more sensible, and in fact should
fix a bunch of bugs with it. However, as you'll see in the test cases,
right now what it does is point out the *hilarious* deficiency of the
new vector shuffle lowering when it comes to blends. Fortunately, my
very next patch fixes that. I can't submit it yet, because that patch,
somewhat obviously, forms the exact and/or pattern that the DAG combine
is matching here! Without this patch, teaching the vector shuffle
lowering to produce the right code infloops in the DAG combiner. With
this patch alone, we produce terrible code but at least lower through
the right paths. With both patches, all the regressions here should be
fixed, and a bunch of the improvements (like using 2 shufps with no
memory loads instead of 2 andps with memory loads and an orps) will
stay. Win!
There is one other change worth noting here. We had hilariously wrong
vectorization cost estimates for vselect because we fell through to the
code path that assumed all "expand" vector operations are scalarized.
However, the "expand" lowering of VSELECT is vector bit math, most
definitely not scalarized. So now we go back to the correct if horribly
naive cost of "1" for "not scalarized". If anyone wants to add actual
modeling of shuffle costs, that would be cool, but this seems an
improvement on its own. Note the removal of 16 and 32 "costs" for doing
a blend. Even in SSE2 we can blend in fewer than 16 instructions. ;] Of
course, we don't right now because of OMG bad code, but I'm going to fix
that. Next patch. I promise.
llvm-svn: 229835
This is a follow-on patch to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7093
That patch canonicalized constant splats as build_vectors,
and this patch removes the constant check so we can canonicalize
all splats as build_vectors.
This fixes the 2nd test case in PR22283:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22283
The unfortunate code duplication between SelectionDAG and DAGCombiner
is discussed in the earlier patch review. At least this patch is just
removing code...
This improves an existing x86 AVX test and changes codegen in an ARM test.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7389
llvm-svn: 229511
test.
This was just a matter of the DAG combine for vector shuffles being too
aggressive. This is a bit of a grey area, but I think generally if we
can re-use intermediate shuffles, we should. Certainly, given the test
cases I have available, this seems like the right call.
llvm-svn: 229285
Canonicalize access to function attributes to use the simpler API.
getAttributes().getAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Kind)
=> getFnAttribute(Kind)
getAttributes().hasAttribute(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex, Kind)
=> hasFnAttribute(Kind)
Also, add `Function::getFnStackAlignment()`, and canonicalize:
getAttributes().getStackAlignment(AttributeSet::FunctionIndex)
=> getFnStackAlignment()
llvm-svn: 229208
We used to do this DAG combine, but it's not always correct:
If the first fp_round isn't a value preserving truncation, it might
introduce a tie in the second fp_round, that wouldn't occur in the
single-step fp_round we want to fold to.
In other words, double rounding isn't the same as rounding.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7571
llvm-svn: 228911
Add new token factor node and its users to worklist if alias analysis is
turned on, in DAGCombiner::visitTokenFactor(). Alias analysis may cause
a lot of new token factors to be inserted into the DAG, and they need to
be optimized to avoid significant slow-downs.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 228841
nodes when folding bitcasts of constants.
We can't fold things and then check after-the-fact whether it was legal.
Once we have formed the DAG node, arbitrary other nodes may have been
collapsed to it. There is no easy way to go back. Instead, we need to
test for the specific folding cases we're interested in and ensure those
are legal first.
This could in theory make this less powerful for bitcasting from an
integer to some vector type, but AFAICT, that can't actually happen in
the SDAG so its fine. Now, we *only* whitelist specific int->fp and
fp->int bitcasts for post-legalization folding. I've added the test case
from the PR.
(Also as a note, this does not appear to be in 3.6, no backport needed)
llvm-svn: 228656
The combine that forms extloads used to be disabled on vector types,
because "None of the supported targets knows how to perform load and
sign extend on vectors in one instruction."
That's not entirely true, since at least SSE4.1 X86 knows how to do
those sextloads/zextloads (with PMOVS/ZX).
But there are several aspects to getting this right.
First, vector extloads are controlled by a profitability callback.
For instance, on ARM, several instructions have folded extload forms,
so it's not always beneficial to create an extload node (and trying to
match extloads is a whole 'nother can of worms).
The interesting optimization enables folding of s/zextloads to illegal
(splittable) vector types, expanding them into smaller legal extloads.
It's not ideal (it introduces some legalization-like behavior in the
combine) but it's better than the obvious alternative: form illegal
extloads, and later try to split them up. If you do that, you might
generate extloads that can't be split up, but have a valid ext+load
expansion. At vector-op legalization time, it's too late to generate
this kind of code, so you end up forced to scalarize. It's better to
just avoid creating egregiously illegal nodes.
This optimization is enabled unconditionally on X86.
Note that the splitting combine is happy with "custom" extloads. As
is, this bypasses the actual custom lowering, and just unrolls the
extload. But from what I've seen, this is still much better than the
current custom lowering, which does some kind of unrolling at the end
anyway (see for instance load_sext_4i8_to_4i64 on SSE2, and the added
FIXME).
Also note that the existing combine that forms extloads is now also
enabled on legal vectors. This doesn't have a big effect on X86
(because sext+load is usually combined to sext_inreg+aextload).
On ARM it fires on some rare occasions; that's for a separate commit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6904
llvm-svn: 228325
This commit creates infinite loop in DAG combine for in the LLVM test-suite
for aarch64 with mcpu=cylcone (just having neon may be enough to expose this).
llvm-svn: 227272
This patch resolves part of PR21711 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21711 ).
The 'f3' test case in that report presents a situation where we have two 128-bit
stores extracted from a 256-bit source vector.
Instead of producing this:
vmovaps %xmm0, (%rdi)
vextractf128 $1, %ymm0, 16(%rdi)
This patch merges the 128-bit stores into a single 256-bit store:
vmovups %ymm0, (%rdi)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7208
llvm-svn: 227242
This is a 2nd try at the same optimization as http://reviews.llvm.org/D6698.
That patch was checked in at r224611, but reverted at r225031 because it
caused a failure outside of the regression tests.
The cause of the crash was not recognizing consecutive stores that have mixed
source values (loads and vector element extracts), so this patch adds a check
to bail out if any store value is not coming from a vector element extract.
This patch also refactors the shared logic of the constant source and vector
extracted elements source cases into a helper function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6850
llvm-svn: 226845
This solves PR22276.
Splats of constants would sometimes produce redundant shuffles, sometimes ridiculously so (see the PR for details). Fold these shuffles into BUILD_VECTORs early on instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7093
Fixed recommit of r226811.
llvm-svn: 226816
This solves PR22276.
Splats of constants would sometimes produce redundant shuffles, sometimes ridiculously so (see the PR for details). Fold these shuffles into BUILD_VECTORs early on instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7093
llvm-svn: 226811
The problem occurs when after vectorization we have type
<2 x i32>. This type is promoted to <2 x i64> and then requires
additional efforts for expanding loads and truncating stores.
I added EXPAND / TRUNCATE attributes to the masked load/store
SDNodes. The code now contains additional shuffles.
I've prepared changes in the cost estimation for masked memory
operations, it will be submitted separately.
llvm-svn: 226808
Type MVT::i1 became legal in KNL, but store operation can't be narrowed to this type,
since the size of VT (1 bit) is not equal to its actual store size(8 bits).
Added a test provided by David (dag@cray.com)
llvm-svn: 226805
Loading 2 2x32-bit float vectors into the bottom half of a 256-bit vector
produced suboptimal code in AVX2 mode with certain IR combinations.
In particular, the IR optimizer folded 2f32 + 2f32 -> 4f32, 4f32 + 4f32
(undef) -> 8f32 into a 2f32 + 2f32 -> 8f32, which seems more canonical,
but then mysteriously generated rather bad code; the movq/movhpd combination
didn't match.
The problem lay in the BUILD_VECTOR optimization path. The 2f32 inputs
would get promoted to 4f32 by the type legalizer, eventually resulting
in a BUILD_VECTOR on two 4f32 into an 8f32. The BUILD_VECTOR then, recognizing
these were both half the output size, concatted them and then produced
a shuffle. However, the resulting concat + shuffle was more complex than
it should be; in the case where the upper half of the output is undef, we
probably want to generate shuffle + concat instead.
This enhancement causes the vector_shuffle combine step to recognize this
suboptimal pattern and correct it. I included it there instead of in BUILD_VECTOR
in case the same suboptimal pattern occurs for other reasons.
This results in the optimizer correctly producing the optimal movq + movhpd
sequence for all three variations on this IR, even with AVX2.
I've included a test case.
Radar link: rdar://problem/19287012
Fix for PR 21943.
From: Fiona Glaser <fglaser@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 226360
utils/sort_includes.py.
I clearly haven't done this in a while, so more changed than usual. This
even uncovered a missing include from the InstrProf library that I've
added. No functionality changed here, just mechanical cleanup of the
include order.
llvm-svn: 225974
In case folding a node end up with a NaN as operand for the select,
the folding of the condition of the selectcc node returns "UNDEF".
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6889
llvm-svn: 225952
