Summary:
Update makefiles to specify -fPIC in Makefile.rules and only throw -fPIC when building a shared library. This change is necessary to allow building the lldb tests on Windows where -fPIC is not a valid option.
Update a few places to Python 3.x syntax
Reviewers: zturner, lldb-commits
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: stella.stamenova, labath, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42994
llvm-svn: 324671
This patch creates a <test>.dwarf, <test>.dwo, etc., build directory for each testcase variant.
Most importantly, this eliminates the need for the per-test lock file in the source directory.
Tests that are marked as NO_DEBUG_INFO_TESTCASE and build with
buildDefault() are built in a <test>.default build directory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42763
llvm-svn: 324368
This patch is the result of a discussion on lldb-dev, see
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2018-January/013111.html for
background.
For each test (should be eventually: each test configuration) a
separate build directory is created and we execute
make VPATH=$srcdir/path/to/test -C $builddir/path/to/test -f $srcdir/path/to/test/Makefile -I $srcdir/path/to/test
In order to make this work all LLDB tests need to be updated to find
the executable in the test build directory, since CWD still points at
the test's source directory, which is a requirement for unittest2.
Although we have done extensive testing, I'm expecting that this first
attempt will break a few bots. Please DO NOT HESITATE TO REVERT this
patch in order to get the bots green again. We will likely have to
iterate on this some more.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42281
llvm-svn: 323803
When rendezvous structure is not initialized we need to set up
rendezvous breakpoint anyway. In this case the code will locate
dynamic loader (interpreter) and look for known function names.
This is r322209, but with fixed VDSO loading fixed.
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25806
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41533
llvm-svn: 322251
When rendezvous structure is not initialized we need to set up
rendezvous breakpoint anyway. In this case the code will locate
dynamic loader (interpreter) and look for known function names.
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25806
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41533
llvm-svn: 322209
unambiguously on one bit of code. On macOS these
lines mapped to two distinct locations, and that
was artificially throwing off the test.
llvm-svn: 319472
When introduced, breakpoint names were just tags that you could
apply to breakpoints that would allow you to refer to a breakpoint
when you couldn't capture the ID, or to refer to a collection of
breakpoints.
This change makes the names independent holders of breakpoint options
that you can then apply to breakpoints when you add the name to the
breakpoint. It adds the "breakpoint name configure" command to set
up or reconfigure breakpoint names. There is also full support for
then in the SB API, including a new SBBreakpointName class.
The connection between the name and the breakpoints
sharing the name remains live, so if you reconfigure the name, all the
breakpoint options all change as well. This allows a quick way
to share complex breakpoint behavior among a bunch of breakpoints, and
a convenient way to iterate on the set.
You can also create a name from a breakpoint, allowing a quick way
to copy options from one breakpoint to another.
I also added the ability to make hidden and delete/disable protected
names. When applied to a breakpoint, you will only be able to list,
delete or disable that breakpoint if you refer to it explicitly by ID.
This feature will allow GUI's that need to use breakpoints for their
own purposes to keep their breakpoints from getting accidentally
disabled or deleted.
<rdar://problem/22094452>
llvm-svn: 313292
The auto-continue test was using the new (better) name
for providing commands (-C) but I haven't checked in that change
yet. Put the test back to the old way for now.
llvm-svn: 313221
You can get a breakpoint to auto-continue by adding "continue"
as a command, but that has the disadvantage that if you hit two
breakpoints simultaneously, the continue will force the process
to continue, and maybe even forstalling the commands on the other.
The auto-continue flag means the breakpoints can negotiate about
whether to stop.
Writing tests, I wanted to supply some commands when I made the
breakpoints, so I also added that ability.
llvm-svn: 309969
When an option was set at on a location, I was just copying the whole option set
to the location, and letting it shadow the breakpoint options. That was wrong since
it meant changes to unrelated options on the breakpoint would no longer take on this
location. I added a mask of set options and use that for option propagation.
I also added a "location" property to breakpoints, and added SBBreakpointLocation.{G,S}etCommandLineCommands
since I wanted to use them to write some more test cases.
<rdar://problem/24397798>
llvm-svn: 309772
Summary:
SBBreakpointLocation exposed the ignore count, but didn't expose
the hit count. Both values were exposed by SBBreakpoint and
SBWatchpoint, so this makes things a bit more consistent.
Reviewers: lldb-commits
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31283
llvm-svn: 308480
It seems that on darwin we are not able to resolve breakpoints in the
test shared library until the process has started. That seems
unfortunate, but it is not the purpose of this test, so work around that
by starting the process before doing the rest of our checks.
llvm-svn: 297830
Summary:
This fixes the case where a user tries to set a breakpoint on a source
line outside of any function (e.g. because that code is #ifdefed out, or
the compiler did not emit code for the function, etc.) and we would
silently move the breakpoint to the next function.
Now we check whether the line range of the resolved symbol context
function matches the original line number. We reject any breakpoint
locations that appear to move the breakpoint into a new function. This
filtering only happens if we have full debug info available (e.g. in
case of -gline-tables-only compilation, we still set the breakpoint on
the nearest source line).
Reviewers: jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30817
llvm-svn: 297817
Summary:
There is nothing we can do with the breakpoint once the associated
target becomes deleted. This will make sure we don't hold on to more
resources than we need in this case. In particular, this fixes the case
TestStepOverBreakpoint on windows, where a lingering SBBreakpoint object
causes us to nor unmap the executable file from memory.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30249
llvm-svn: 296328
Fixed by additional completed plans detection, and applying them on breakpoint condition fail.
Thread::GetStopInfo reworked. New test added.
Review https://reviews.llvm.org/D26497
Many thanks to Jim
llvm-svn: 290168
Summary:
Use os.getcwd() instead of get_process_working_directory() as prefix for
souce file.
Reviewers: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25217
llvm-svn: 283171
CommandData breakpoint commands didn't know whether they were
Python or Command line commands, so they couldn't serialize &
deserialize themselves properly. Fix that.
I also changed the "breakpoint list" command to note in the output
when the commands are Python commands. Fortunately only one test
was relying on this explicit bit of text output.
llvm-svn: 282432
Serialize breakpoint names & the hardware_requested attributes.
Also added a few missing affordances to SBBreakpoint whose absence
writing the tests pointed out.
<rdar://problem/12611863>
llvm-svn: 282036
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
This test was using a condition that would compare a variable against the register that would hold
it. It was failing with clang on arm64 because clang put the variable on the stack.
This is not a supportable way to write tests.
llvm-svn: 279345
It's always hard to remember when to include this file, and
when you do include it it's hard to remember what preprocessor
check it needs to be behind, and then you further have to remember
whether it's windows.h or win32.h which you need to include.
This patch changes the name to PosixApi.h, which is more appropriately
named, and makes it independent of any preprocessor setting.
There's still the issue of people not knowing when to include this,
because there's not a well-defined set of things it exposes other
than "whatever is missing on Windows", but at least this should
make it less painful to fix when problems arise.
This patch depends on LLVM revision r278170.
llvm-svn: 278177
This was a shadowed variable error from the big Expression Parser plugin-ification. I also
added a test case for this.
<rdar://problem/27682376>
llvm-svn: 277662
review it for consistency, accuracy, and clarity. These changes attempt to
address all of the above while keeping the text relatively terse.
<rdar://problem/24868841>
llvm-svn: 275485
This enables a couple of tests which have been shown to run reliably on the
linux x86 buildbot. If you see a failure after this commit, feel free to add
the xfail back, but please make it as specific as possible (i.e., try to make
it not cover i386/x86_64 with clang-3.5, clang-3.9 or gcc-4.9).
llvm-svn: 272326
The error was not getting propagated to the caller, so the higher layers thought the breakpoint
was successfully set & resolved.
I added a testcase, but it assumes 0x0 is not a valid place to set a breakpoint. On most systems
that is true, but if it isn't true of your system, either find another good place and add it to the
test, or x-fail the test.
<rdar://problem/26345962>
llvm-svn: 270014
Test uses x1 in breakpoint expression while objdump shows that x1 is never used in the code and may have random values.
Using x0 make sure that we are using a registe that will have a positive value and breakpoint expression will evaluate true atleast once.
llvm-svn: 269164
