The poisoned_hash_helper header was relying on an implicit forward
declaration of std::hash located in <type_traits>. When we improve the
modularization of the library, that causes issues, in addition to being
a fundamentally non-portable assumption in the test suite.
It turns out that the reason for relying on a forward declaration is to
be able to test that std::hash is *not* provided if we don't include any
header that provides it. But testing that is actually both non-portable
and not really useful.
Indeed, what harm does it make if additional headers provide std::hash
specializations? That would certainly be conforming -- the Standard
never requires an implementation to avoid providing a declaration when a
given header is included, instead it mandates what *must* be provided
for sure. In that spirit, it would be conforming for e.g. `<cstddef>` to
define the hash specializations if that was our desire. I also don't
read https://wg21.link/P0513R0 as going against that statement. Hence,
this patch just removes that test which doesn't carry its weight.
Fixes#56938
* Guard `std::__make_from_tuple_impl` tests with `#ifdef _LIBCPP_VERSION` and `LIBCPP_STATIC_ASSERT`.
* Change `_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20` to `TEST_CONSTEXPR_CXX20`.
+ Other functions in `variant.swap/swap.pass.cpp` were already using the proper test macro.
* Mark `what` as `[[maybe_unused]]` when used by `TEST_LIBCPP_REQUIRE`.
+ This updates one occurrence in `libcxx/test/libcxx` for consistency.
* Windows `_putenv_s()` takes 2 arguments, not 3.
+ See MSVC documentation: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-runtime-library/reference/putenv-s-wputenv-s?view=msvc-170
+ POSIX `setenv()` takes `int overwrite`, but Windows `_putenv_s()` always overwrites.
* Avoid non-Standard zero-length arrays.
+ Followup to #74183 and #79792.
* Add `operator++()` to `unsized_it`.
+ The Standard requires this due to [N4981][] [move.iter.requirements]/1 "The template parameter `Iterator` shall
either meet the *Cpp17InputIterator* requirements ([input.iterators])
or model `input_iterator` ([iterator.concept.input])."
+ MSVC's STL requires this because it has a strengthened exception
specification in `move_iterator` that inspects the underlying iterator's
increment operator.
* `uniform_int_distribution` forbids `int8_t`/`uint8_t`.
+ See [N4981][] [rand.req.genl]/1.5. MSVC's STL enforces this.
+ Note that when changing the distribution's `IntType`, we need to be
careful to preserve the original value range of `[0, max_input]`.
* fstreams are constructible from `const fs::path::value_type*` on wide systems.
+ See [ifstream.cons], [ofstream.cons], [fstream.cons].
* In `msvc_stdlib_force_include.h`, map `_HAS_CXX23` to `TEST_STD_VER` 23 instead of 99.
+ On 2023-05-23, 71400505ca
started recognizing 23 as a distinct value.
* Fix test name typo: `destory_elements.pass.cpp` => `destroy_elements.pass.cpp`
[N4981]: https://wg21.link/N4981
This is the last PR that's needed (for now) to get libc++'s tests
working with MSVC's STL.
The ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS machinery is very useful, but also very
problematic for MSVC, as it doesn't understand most of Clang's compiler
options. We've been dealing with this by simply marking anything that
uses ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS as FAIL or SKIPPED, but that creates
significant gaps in test coverage.
Fortunately, ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS also supports "features", which
can be slightly enhanced to send Clang-compatible and MSVC-compatible
options to the right compilers.
This patch adds the gcc-style-warnings and cl-style-warnings Lit features,
and uses that to pass the appropriate warning flags to tests. It also uses
TEST_MEOW_DIAGNOSTIC_IGNORED for a few local suppressions of MSVC
warnings.
This patch re-introduces special support for narrowing conversions to
bool
in std::variant, which was removed in 170810fca6ee in order to make
libc++
Standards-conforming.
The special support is gated by the
`_LIBCPP_ENABLE_NARROWING_CONVERSIONS_IN_VARIANT`
macro and will be supported for LLVM 18 only as a courtesy to help large
code bases migrate over to the Standard behavior.
---------
Co-authored-by: Bogdan Graur <bgraur@google.com>
Co-authored-by: Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@gmail.com>
According to https://developer.apple.com/support/xcode/, quite a few of
our availability macros don't do anything anymore, so we might as well
remove them to clean up the code a bit.
I made sure they all had some expected-error output in them. Many of
these tests would be better implemented as a positive test using SFINAE,
but this is beyond the scope of this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D153980
Instead of writing something like `XFAIL: use_system_cxx_lib && target=...`
to XFAIL back-deployment tests, introduce named Lit features like
`availability-shared_mutex-missing` to represent those. This makes the
XFAIL annotations leaner, and solves the problem of XFAIL comments
potentially getting out of sync. This would also make it easier for
another vendor to add their own annotations to the test suite by simply
changing how the feature is defined for their OS releases, instead
of having to modify hundreds of tests to add repetitive annotations.
This doesn't touch *all* annotations -- only annotations that were widely
duplicated are given named features (e.g. when filesystem or shared_mutex
were introduced). I still think it probably doesn't make sense to have a
named feature for every single fix we make to the dylib.
This is in essence a revert of 2659663, but since then the test suite
has changed significantly. Back when I did 2659663, the configuration
files we have for the test suite right now were being bootstrapped and
it wasn't clear how to provide these features for back-deployment in
that context. Since then, we have a streamlined way of defining these
features in `features.py` and that doesn't impact the ability for a
configuration file to stay minimal.
The original motivation for this change was that I am about to propose
a change that would touch essentially all XFAIL annotations for back-deployment
in the test suite, and this greatly reduces the number of lines changed
by that upcoming change, in addition to making the test suite generally
better.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146359
This has been done using the following command
find libcxx/test -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|^([^/]+?)((?<!::)size_t)|\1std::\2|' \{} \;
And manually removed some false positives in std/depr/depr.c.headers.
The `std` module doesn't export `::size_t`, this is a preparation for that module.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, EricWF, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146088
`std::variant::operator<=>` is missing a requires clause ensuring that
`operator<=>` only exists when all of the types in the variant are
`three_way_comparable`.
Add the missing requires clause and adjust the existing test which was
incorrect.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58192.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136050
There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides to
do so.
This patch adds a dummy deduction guide to those types to suppress
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported (which gets emitted in user code).
This is a re-application of the original patch by Eric Fiselier in
fcd549a7d828 which had been reverted due to reasons lost at this point.
I also added the macro to a few more types. Reviving this patch was
prompted by the discussion on https://llvm.org/D133425.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133535
Noticed this while working on D133326. Let's see whehter all compilers
now support this feature.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134818
While testing a test failure of C++17 with Clang ToT it was noticed the
paper
P0602R4 variant and optional should propagate copy/move triviality
was not applied as a DR in libc++.
This was discovered while investigating the issue "caused by" D131479.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133326
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3eb115b1c3592514590a19987ffc498.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Display 'static_assert failed: message' instead of
'static_assert failed "message"' to be consistent
with other implementations and be slightly more
readable.
Reviewed By: #libc, aaron.ballman, philnik, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128844
This should make CI consistent on all the compilers we support. Most of
this patch is working around various warnings emitted by GCC in our code
base, which are now being shown when we compile the tests.
After this patch, the whole test suite should be warning free on all
compilers we support and test, except for a few warnings on GCC that
we silence explicitly until we figure out the proper fix for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120684
... it's easier to suppress warnings internally, where we can detect the compiler.
* Rename `TEST_COMPILER_C1XX` to `TEST_COMPILER_MSVC`
* Rename all `TEST_WORKAROUND_C1XX_<meow>` to `TEST_WORKAROUND_MSVC_<meow>`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117422
... from testing with MSVC's STL. Mostly truncation warnings and variables that are only used in `LIBCPP_ASSERT`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116878
Even if these comments have a benefit in .h files (for editors that
care about language but can't be configured to treat .h as C++ code),
they certainly have no benefit for files with the .cpp extension.
Discussed in D110794.
Now that Lit supports regular expressions inside XFAIL & friends, it is
much easier to write Lit annotations based on the triple.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104747
This fixes a long standing issue where the triple is not always set
consistently in all configurations. This change also moves the
back-deployment Lit features to using the proper target triple
instead of using something ad-hoc.
This will be necessary for using from scratch Lit configuration files
in both normal testing and back-deployment testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102012
This patch changes the variant even in pre-C++2b.
It should not break anything, only allow use cases that didn't work previously.
Notes:
`__as_variant` is used in `__visitation::__variant::__visit_alt`, but I haven't used it in `__visitation::__variant::__visit_alt_at`.
That's because it is used only in `__visit_value_at`, which in turn is always used on variant specializations (that's in comparison operators).
* https://wg21.link/P2162
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97394
These changes cause substantial binary size increases for non-opt builds.
For example, the visit.pass.cpp test grows from 20k to 420k.
Further work will be done to re-land this patch without the size increases,
but that work is proving too tricky to fix forward.
This patch fully reverts:
* 35d226911165a9aae1f01f521a0019f1a9c0a25f
And it partially reverts:
* bb43a0cd4adc4f1fa12e0d2fd1fe9aa6b5c00e34
The latter of which added XFAIL's to new variant tests
because the new implementation needlessly makes non-throwing code
paths in variant invoke throwing code.
This means the reverted change also breaks source backwards compat
with code compiled on OS X targeting older system dylibs. There is no
need for this to be the case. We should fix it before recommitting.
Reviewed as:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D91662
The current way we test this is pretty cheap, i.e. we download previously
released macOS dylibs and run against that. Ideally, we would require a
full host running the appropriate version of macOS, and we'd execute the
tests using SSH on that host. But since we don't have such hosts available
easily for now, this is better than nothing.
At the same time, also fix some tests that were failing when back
deploying.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90869
Some time ago, I introduced shortcut features like dylib-has-no-shared_mutex
to encode whether the deployment target supported shared_mutex (say). This
made the test suite annotations cleaner.
However, the problem with building Lit features on top of other Lit
features is that it's easier for them to become stale, especially when
they are generated programmatically. Furthermore, it makes the bar for
defining configurations from scratch higher, since more features have
to be defined. Instead, I think it's better to put the XFAILs in the
tests directly, which allows cleaning them up with a simple grep.
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
Instead of having different names for the same Lit feature accross code
bases, use the same name everywhere. This NFC commit is in preparation
for a refactor where all three projects will be using the same Lit
feature detection logic, and hence it won't be convenient to use
different names for the feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78370
The libc++ test suite has a lot of old Lit features used to XFAIL tests
and mark them as UNSUPPORTED. Many of them are to workaround problems on
old compilers or old platforms. As time goes by, it is good to go and
clean those up to simplify the configuration of the test suite, and also
to reflect the testing reality. It's not useful to have markup that gives
the impression that e.g. clang-3.3 is supported, when we don't really
test on it anymore (and hence several new tests probably don't have the
necessary markup on them).
* Add the conventional `return 0` to `main` in `variant.assign/conv.pass.cpp` and `variant.ctor/conv.pass.cpp`
* Fix some MSVC signed-to-unsigned conversion warnings by replacing `int` literarls with `unsigned int` literals
llvm-svn: 374723
