1463 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Utkarsh Saxena
38b9d313e6 [C++20][Clang] P2468R2 The Equality Operator You Are Looking For
Implement
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2468r2.html.

Primarily we now accept
```
template<typename T> struct CRTPBase {
  bool operator==(const T&) const;
  bool operator!=(const T&) const;
};
struct CRTP : CRTPBase<CRTP> {};
bool cmp_crtp = CRTP() == CRTP();
bool cmp_crtp2 = CRTP() != CRTP();
```

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134529
2022-10-06 13:21:34 +02:00
Roy Jacobson
6523814c4e [Clang] P1169R4: static operator()
Implements 'P1169R4: static operator()' from C++2b.

Reviewed By: #clang-language-wg, aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133659
2022-09-29 23:03:26 +03:00
Erich Keane
684a78968b Reapply "[Concepts] Recover properly from a RecoveryExpr in a concept"
This reverts commit 192d69f7e65a625e344421841e731e39f80595f5.

This fixes the condition to check whether this is a situation where we
are in a recovery-expr'ed concept a little better, so we don't access an
inactive member of a union, which should make the bots happy.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134542
2022-09-26 08:39:10 -07:00
Erich Keane
192d69f7e6 Revert "[Concepts] Recover properly from a RecoveryExpr in a concept"
This reverts commit e3d14bee238b672a7a112311eefee55e142eaefc.

There are apparently a large number of crashes in libcxx and some JSON
Parser thing, so clearly this has some sort of serious issue.  Reverting
so I can take some time to figure out what is going on.
2022-09-26 06:55:25 -07:00
Erich Keane
e3d14bee23 [Concepts] Recover properly from a RecoveryExpr in a concept
Discovered by reducing a different problem, we currently assert because
we failed to make the constraint expressions not dependent, since a
RecoveryExpr cannot be transformed.

This patch fixes that, and gets reasonably nice diagnostics by
introducing a concept (hah!) of "ContainsErrors" to the Satisfaction
types, which causes us to treat the candidate as non-viable.

However, just making THAT candidate non-viable would result in choosing
the 'next best' canddiate, which can result in awkward errors, where we
start evaluating a candidate that is not intended to be selected.
Because of this, and to make diagnostics more relevant, we now just
cause the entire lookup to result in a 'no-viable-candidates'.

This means we will only emit the list of candidates, rather than any
cascading failures.
2022-09-26 06:33:48 -07:00
Erich Keane
babdef27c5 Re-apply "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation"
This reverts commit 95d94a67755620c0a2871ac6f056ca8e9731d5e9.

This implements the deferred concepts instantiation, which should allow
the libstdc++ ranges to properly compile, and for the CRTP to work for
constrained functions.

Since the last attempt, this has fixed the issues from @wlei and
@mordante.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907
2022-09-22 05:53:59 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov
989f76ce90
[clang] template / auto deduction deduces common sugar
After upgrading the type deduction machinery to retain type sugar in
D110216, we were left with a situation where there is no general
well behaved mechanism in Clang to unify the type sugar of multiple
deductions of the same type parameter.

So we ended up making an arbitrary choice: keep the sugar of the first
deduction, ignore subsequent ones.

In general, we already had this problem, but in a smaller scale.
The result of the conditional operator and many other binary ops
could benefit from such a mechanism.

This patch implements such a type sugar unification mechanism.

The basics:

This patch introduces a `getCommonSugaredType(QualType X, QualType Y)`
method to ASTContext which implements this functionality, and uses it
for unifying the results of type deduction and return type deduction.
This will return the most derived type sugar which occurs in both X and
Y.

Example:

Suppose we have these types:
```
using Animal = int;
using Cat = Animal;
using Dog = Animal;

using Tom = Cat;
using Spike = Dog;
using Tyke = Dog;
```
For `X = Tom, Y = Spike`, this will result in `Animal`.
For `X = Spike, Y = Tyke`, this will result in `Dog`.

How it works:

We take two types, X and Y, which we wish to unify as input.
These types must have the same (qualified or unqualified) canonical
type.

We dive down fast through top-level type sugar nodes, to the
underlying canonical node. If these canonical nodes differ, we
build a common one out of the two, unifying any sugar they had.
Note that this might involve a recursive call to unify any children
of those. We then return that canonical node, handling any qualifiers.

If they don't differ, we walk up the list of sugar type nodes we dived
through, finding the last identical pair, and returning that as the
result, again handling qualifiers.

Note that this patch will not unify sugar nodes if they are not
identical already. We will simply strip off top-level sugar nodes that
differ between X and Y. This sugar node unification will instead be
implemented in a subsequent patch.

This patch also implements a few users of this mechanism:
* Template argument deduction.
* Auto deduction, for functions returning auto / decltype(auto), with
  special handling for initializer_list as well.

Further users will be implemented in a subsequent patch.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111283
2022-09-16 11:20:10 +02:00
Alexander Kornienko
637da9de4c Revert "[clang] template / auto deduction deduces common sugar"
This reverts commit d200db38637884fd0b421802c6094b2a03ceb29e, which causes a
clang crash. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D111283#3785755

Test case for convenience:
```
template <typename T>
using P = int T::*;

template <typename T, typename... A>
void j(P<T>, T, A...);

template <typename T>
void j(P<T>, T);

struct S {
  int b;
};
void g(P<S> k, S s) { j(k, s); }
```
2022-09-13 12:18:07 +02:00
Matheus Izvekov
d200db3863
[clang] template / auto deduction deduces common sugar
After upgrading the type deduction machinery to retain type sugar in
D110216, we were left with a situation where there is no general
well behaved mechanism in Clang to unify the type sugar of multiple
deductions of the same type parameter.

So we ended up making an arbitrary choice: keep the sugar of the first
deduction, ignore subsequent ones.

In general, we already had this problem, but in a smaller scale.
The result of the conditional operator and many other binary ops
could benefit from such a mechanism.

This patch implements such a type sugar unification mechanism.

The basics:

This patch introduces a `getCommonSugaredType(QualType X, QualType Y)`
method to ASTContext which implements this functionality, and uses it
for unifying the results of type deduction and return type deduction.
This will return the most derived type sugar which occurs in both X and
Y.

Example:

Suppose we have these types:
```
using Animal = int;
using Cat = Animal;
using Dog = Animal;

using Tom = Cat;
using Spike = Dog;
using Tyke = Dog;
```
For `X = Tom, Y = Spike`, this will result in `Animal`.
For `X = Spike, Y = Tyke`, this will result in `Dog`.

How it works:

We take two types, X and Y, which we wish to unify as input.
These types must have the same (qualified or unqualified) canonical
type.

We dive down fast through top-level type sugar nodes, to the
underlying canonical node. If these canonical nodes differ, we
build a common one out of the two, unifying any sugar they had.
Note that this might involve a recursive call to unify any children
of those. We then return that canonical node, handling any qualifiers.

If they don't differ, we walk up the list of sugar type nodes we dived
through, finding the last identical pair, and returning that as the
result, again handling qualifiers.

Note that this patch will not unify sugar nodes if they are not
identical already. We will simply strip off top-level sugar nodes that
differ between X and Y. This sugar node unification will instead be
implemented in a subsequent patch.

This patch also implements a few users of this mechanism:
* Template argument deduction.
* Auto deduction, for functions returning auto / decltype(auto), with
  special handling for initializer_list as well.

Further users will be implemented in a subsequent patch.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111283
2022-09-08 19:17:48 +02:00
Kazu Hirata
b7a7aeee90 [clang] Qualify auto in range-based for loops (NFC) 2022-09-03 23:27:27 -07:00
Erich Keane
95d94a6775 Revert "Re-apply "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation"""
This reverts commit d483730d8c3fa2e0d4192b2f3c61c761b124e6ad.

This allegedly breaks a significant part of facebooks internal build.
Reverting while we wait for them to provide a reproducer of this from
@wlei.
2022-08-19 12:47:34 -07:00
Erich Keane
d483730d8c Re-apply "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation""
This reverts commit 258c3aee54e11bc5c5d8ac137eb15e8d5bbcc7e4.

This should fix the libc++ issue that caused the revert, by re-designing
slightly how we determined when we should evaluate the constraints.
Additionally, many of the other components to the original patch (the
NFC parts) were committed separately to shrink the size of this patch
for review.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907
2022-08-17 06:24:40 -07:00
Ilya Biryukov
fba88adc89 [Sema] Always perform ADL when searching for transormed operators in C++20
This fixes compilation errors in the following code with
latest libc++ and libstdc++:
```cpp

int main() {
  std::tuple<std::string> s;
  std::tuple<std::string_view> sv;
  s < sv;
}
```

See https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/vGvEhxWvh for the error.

This used to happen because repeated template instantiations during
C++20 constraint satisfaction will cause a call to `RebuildCXXRewrittenBinaryOperator`
with `PerformADL` set to false, see 59351fe340/clang/lib/Sema/TreeTransform.h (L2737)

Committing urgently to unbreak breakages we see in our configurations.
The change seems relatively safe and the right thing to do.

However, I will follow-up with tests and investigation on whether we
need to do this extra semantic checking in the first place next week.
2022-08-12 16:07:02 +02:00
Fangrui Song
3f18f7c007 [clang] LLVM_FALLTHROUGH => [[fallthrough]]. NFC
With C++17 there is no Clang pedantic warning or MSVC C5051.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131346
2022-08-08 09:12:46 -07:00
Kadir Cetinkaya
df48e3fbcc
Revert "[clang] Pass FoundDecl to DeclRefExpr creator for operator overloads"
This reverts commit 4e94f6653150511de434fa7e29b684ae7f0e52b6.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D129973#3698969 for reasoning.
2022-08-04 12:14:43 +02:00
Gabriel Ravier
5674a3c880 Fixed a number of typos
I went over the output of the following mess of a command:

(ulimit -m 2000000; ulimit -v 2000000; git ls-files -z |
 parallel --xargs -0 cat | aspell list --mode=none --ignore-case |
 grep -E '^[A-Za-z][a-z]*$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n |
 grep -vE '.{25}' | aspell pipe -W3 | grep : | cut -d' ' -f2 | less)

and proceeded to spend a few days looking at it to find probable typos
and fixed a few hundred of them in all of the llvm project (note, the
ones I found are not anywhere near all of them, but it seems like a
good start).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130827
2022-08-01 13:13:18 -04:00
Danny Mösch
4e94f66531 [clang] Pass FoundDecl to DeclRefExpr creator for operator overloads
Without the "found declaration" it is later not possible to know where the operator declaration
was brought into the scope calling it.

The initial motivation for this fix came from #55095. However, this also has an influence on
`clang -ast-dump` which now prints a `UsingShadow` attribute for operators only visible through
`using` statements. Also, clangd now correctly references the `using` statement instead of the
operator directly.

Reviewed By: shafik

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129973
2022-07-26 21:22:18 +02:00
Chuanqi Xu
99daf6b263 [C++20] [Modules] Don't handle no linkage entities when overloading
The original implementation uses `ND->getFormalLinkage() <=
Linkage::InternalLinkage`. It is not right since the spec only says
internal linkage and it doesn't mention 'no linkage'. This matters when
we consider constructors. According to [class.ctor.general]p1,
constructors have no name so constructors have no linkage too.
2022-07-26 21:07:41 +08:00
Chuanqi Xu
15ddc09ef9 [C++20] [Modules] Handle linkage properly for specializations when overloading
Currently, the semantics of linkage in clang is slightly
different from the semantics in C++ spec. In C++ spec, only names
have linkage. So that all entities of the same should share
one linkage. But in clang, different entities of the same could
have different linkage.

It would break a use case where the template have external linkage and
its specialization have internal linkage due to its type argument is
internal linkage. The root cause is that the semantics of internal
linkage in clang is a mixed form of internal linkage and TU-local in
C++ spec. It is hard to solve the root problem and I tried to add a
workaround inplace.
2022-07-26 18:30:48 +08:00
Iain Sandoe
25558a1bfd [C++20][Modules] Update ADL to handle basic.lookup.argdep p4 [P1815R2 part 1]
This includes the revised provisions of [basic.lookup.argdep] p4

1. ADL is amended to handle p 4.3 where functions in trasitively imported modules may
become visible when they are exported in the same namespace as a visible type.

2. If a function is in a different modular TU, and has internal-linkage, we invalidate
its entry in an overload set.

[basic.lookup.argdep] p5 ex 2 now passes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129174
2022-07-25 14:28:59 +01:00
Erich Keane
258c3aee54 Revert "Re-apply "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation"""
This reverts commit befa8cf087dbb8159a4d9dc8fa4d6748d6d5049a.

Apparently this breaks some libc++ builds with an apparent assertion,
 so I'm looking into that .
2022-07-01 11:20:16 -07:00
Erich Keane
befa8cf087 Re-apply "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation""
This reverts commit d4d47e574ecae562ab32f8ac7fa3f4d424bb6574.

This fixes the lldb crash that was observed by ensuring that our
friend-'template contains reference to' TreeTransform properly handles a
TemplateDecl.
2022-07-01 06:51:38 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
d4d47e574e
Revert "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation"
This reverts commit 2f207439521d62d9551b2884158368e8b34084e5 because it
triggers an assertion when building an LLDB test program:

  Assertion failed: (InstantiatingSpecializations.empty() && "failed to
  clean up an InstantiatingTemplate?"), function ~Sema, file
  /Users/buildslave/jenkins/workspace/lldb-cmake/llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/Sema.cpp,
  line 458.

More details in https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907.
2022-06-30 11:43:10 -07:00
Erich Keane
2f20743952 Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation
This is a continuation of D119544.  Based on @rsmith 's feed back
showing me https://eel.is/c++draft/temp#friend-9, We should properly
handle friend functions now.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126907
2022-06-30 06:47:11 -07:00
Sven van Haastregt
663e47a50f [OpenCL] Reduce emitting candidate notes for builtins
When overload resolution fails, clang emits a note diagnostic for each
candidate.  For OpenCL builtins this often leads to many repeated note
diagnostics with no new information.  Stop emitting such notes.

Update a test that was relying on counting those notes to check how
many builtins are available for certain extension configurations.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127961
2022-06-27 09:55:44 +01:00
Kazu Hirata
ca4af13e48 [clang] Don't use Optional::getValue (NFC) 2022-06-20 22:59:26 -07:00
Kazu Hirata
452db157c9 [clang] Don't use Optional::hasValue (NFC) 2022-06-20 10:51:34 -07:00
Jan Svoboda
b02d970b43 [clang][sema] Generate builtin operator overloads for (volatile) _Atomic types
We observed a failed assert in overloaded compound-assignment operator resolution:

```
Assertion failed: (Result.isInvalid() && "C++ binary operator overloading is missing candidates!"), function CreateOverloadedBinOp, file SemaOverload.cpp, line 13944.
...
frame #4: clang` clang::Sema::CreateOverloadedBinOp(..., Opc=BO_OrAssign, ..., PerformADL=true, AllowRewrittenCandidates=false, ...) at SemaOverload.cpp:13943
frame #5: clang` BuildOverloadedBinOp(..., Opc=BO_OrAssign, ...) at SemaExpr.cpp:15228
frame #6: clang` clang::Sema::BuildBinOp(..., Opc=BO_OrAssign, ...) at SemaExpr.cpp:15330
frame #7: clang` clang::Sema::ActOnBinOp(..., Kind=pipeequal, ...) at SemaExpr.cpp:15187
frame #8: clang` clang::Parser::ParseRHSOfBinaryExpression(..., MinPrec=Assignment) at ParseExpr.cpp:629
frame #9: clang` clang::Parser::ParseAssignmentExpression(..., isTypeCast=NotTypeCast) at ParseExpr.cpp:176
frame #10: clang` clang::Parser::ParseExpression(... isTypeCast=NotTypeCast) at ParseExpr.cpp:124
frame #11: clang` clang::Parser::ParseExprStatement(...) at ParseStmt.cpp:464
```

A simple reproducer is:

```
_Atomic unsigned an_atomic_uint;

enum { an_enum_value = 1 };

void enum1() { an_atomic_uint += an_enum_value; }
```

This patch fixes the issue by generating builtin operator overloads for (volatile) _Atomic types.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125349
2022-06-20 11:03:29 +02:00
Maryam Moghadas
711a71d1ab PowerPC] Emit warning for incompatible vector types that are currently diagnosed with -fno-lax-vector-conversions
This patch is the last prerequisite to switch the default behaviour to -fno-lax-vector-conversions in the future.
The first path ;D124093; fixed the altivec implicit castings.

Reviewed By: amyk

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126540
2022-06-16 20:28:34 -05:00
Erich Keane
017abbb258 Revert ""Re-apply 4b6c2cd642 "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation"""""
This reverts commit a425cac31e2e4cee8e14b7b9a99c8ba17c1ebb52.

There is another libc++ test, that this time causes us to hit an
assertion. Reverting, likely for a while this time.
2022-05-09 09:12:05 -07:00
Erich Keane
a425cac31e "Re-apply 4b6c2cd642 "Deferred Concept Instantiation Implementation""""
This includes a fix for the libc++ issue I ran across with friend
declarations not properly being identified as overloads.

This reverts commit 45c07db31cc76802a1a2e41bed1ce9c1b8198181.
2022-05-09 06:29:47 -07:00
Nick Kreeger
afa20aff6e Reverting accidental git-revert commits.
Revert "Revert "Revert "Revert "[Concepts] Fix overload resolution bug with constrained candidates""""

This reverts commit cfc2c5905ec11a501cdfc9502f503ab494c200b6.
2022-04-23 20:12:15 -05:00
Nick Kreeger
2d80889b2a Reverting accidental git-revert commits.
Revert "Revert "Revert "[Concepts] Fix overload resolution bug with constrained candidates"""

This reverts commit a0636b5855f5ba1f7033670dc32c956d63baaa51.
2022-04-23 20:11:58 -05:00
Nick Kreeger
d1b73f3412 Reverting accidental git-revert commits.
Revert "Revert "[Concepts] Fix overload resolution bug with constrained candidates""

This reverts commit f6af446b6625657b1b9046273f5b33bc1173a97c.
2022-04-23 20:11:27 -05:00
Nick Kreeger
cfc2c5905e Revert "Revert "Revert "[Concepts] Fix overload resolution bug with constrained candidates"""
This reverts commit a0636b5855f5ba1f7033670dc32c956d63baaa51.
2022-04-23 19:36:51 -05:00
Nick Kreeger
a0636b5855 Revert "Revert "[Concepts] Fix overload resolution bug with constrained candidates""
This reverts commit f6af446b6625657b1b9046273f5b33bc1173a97c.
2022-04-23 19:35:50 -05:00
Nick Kreeger
f6af446b66 Revert "[Concepts] Fix overload resolution bug with constrained candidates"
This reverts commit 807e418413a0958ad1ea862093fb262673b2afa1.
2022-04-23 19:35:41 -05:00
Roy Jacobson
807e418413 [Concepts] Fix overload resolution bug with constrained candidates
When doing overload resolution, we have to check that candidates' parameter types are equal before trying to find a better candidate through checking which candidate is more constrained.
This revision adds this missing check and makes us diagnose those cases as ambiguous calls when the types are not equal.

Fixes GitHub issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53640

Reviewed By: erichkeane

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123182
2022-04-23 17:24:59 -04:00
Richard Smith
72315d02c4 Treat std::move, forward, etc. as builtins.
This is extended to all `std::` functions that take a reference to a
value and return a reference (or pointer) to that same value: `move`,
`forward`, `move_if_noexcept`, `as_const`, `addressof`, and the
libstdc++-specific function `__addressof`.

We still require these functions to be declared before they can be used,
but don't instantiate their definitions unless their addresses are
taken. Instead, code generation, constant evaluation, and static
analysis are given direct knowledge of their effect.

This change aims to reduce various costs associated with these functions
-- per-instantiation memory costs, compile time and memory costs due to
creating out-of-line copies and inlining them, code size at -O0, and so
on -- so that they are not substantially more expensive than a cast.
Most of these improvements are very small, but I measured a 3% decrease
in -O0 object file size for a simple C++ source file using the standard
library after this change.

We now automatically infer the `const` and `nothrow` attributes on these
now-builtin functions, in particular meaning that we get a warning for
an unused call to one of these functions.

In C++20 onwards, we disallow taking the addresses of these functions,
per the C++20 "addressable function" rule. In earlier language modes, a
compatibility warning is produced but the address can still be taken.

The same infrastructure is extended to the existing MSVC builtin
`__GetExceptionInfo`, which is now only recognized in namespace `std`
like it always should have been.

This is a re-commit of
  fc3090109643af8d2da9822d0f99c84742b9c877,
  a571f82a50416b767fd3cce0fb5027bb5dfec58c,
  64c045e25b8471bbb572bd29159c294a82a86a2, and
  de6ddaeef3aaa8a9ae3663c12cdb57d9afc0f906,
and reverts aa643f455a5362de7189eac630050d2c8aefe8f2.
This change also includes a workaround for users using libc++ 3.1 and
earlier (!!), as apparently happens on AIX, where std::move sometimes
returns by value.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345

Revert "Fixup D123950 to address revert of D123345"

This reverts commit aa643f455a5362de7189eac630050d2c8aefe8f2.
2022-04-20 17:58:31 -07:00
David Tenty
98d911e01f Revert "Treat std::move, forward, etc. as builtins."
This reverts commit b27430f9f46b88bcd54d992debc8d72e131e1bd0 as the
    parent https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345 breaks the AIX CI:

    https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/214/builds/819
2022-04-20 19:14:37 -04:00
Roy Jacobson
76410040b9 Revert "[Concepts] Fix overload resolution bug with constrained candidates"
This reverts commit 454d1df9423c95e54c3a2f5cb58d864096032d09.
2022-04-19 07:51:21 -04:00
Roy Jacobson
454d1df942 [Concepts] Fix overload resolution bug with constrained candidates
When doing overload resolution, we have to check that candidates' parameter types are equal before trying to find a better candidate through checking which candidate is more constrained.
This revision adds this missing check and makes us diagnose those cases as ambiguous calls when the types are not equal.

Fixes GitHub issue https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53640

Reviewed By: erichkeane

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123182
2022-04-19 04:45:28 -04:00
Richard Smith
b27430f9f4 Treat std::move, forward, etc. as builtins.
This is extended to all `std::` functions that take a reference to a
value and return a reference (or pointer) to that same value: `move`,
`forward`, `move_if_noexcept`, `as_const`, `addressof`, and the
libstdc++-specific function `__addressof`.

We still require these functions to be declared before they can be used,
but don't instantiate their definitions unless their addresses are
taken. Instead, code generation, constant evaluation, and static
analysis are given direct knowledge of their effect.

This change aims to reduce various costs associated with these functions
-- per-instantiation memory costs, compile time and memory costs due to
creating out-of-line copies and inlining them, code size at -O0, and so
on -- so that they are not substantially more expensive than a cast.
Most of these improvements are very small, but I measured a 3% decrease
in -O0 object file size for a simple C++ source file using the standard
library after this change.

We now automatically infer the `const` and `nothrow` attributes on these
now-builtin functions, in particular meaning that we get a warning for
an unused call to one of these functions.

In C++20 onwards, we disallow taking the addresses of these functions,
per the C++20 "addressable function" rule. In earlier language modes, a
compatibility warning is produced but the address can still be taken.

The same infrastructure is extended to the existing MSVC builtin
`__GetExceptionInfo`, which is now only recognized in namespace `std`
like it always should have been.

This is a re-commit of
  fc3090109643af8d2da9822d0f99c84742b9c877,
  a571f82a50416b767fd3cce0fb5027bb5dfec58c, and
  64c045e25b8471bbb572bd29159c294a82a86a25
which were reverted in
  e75d8b70370435b0ad10388afba0df45fcf9bfcc
due to a crasher bug where CodeGen would emit a builtin glvalue as an
rvalue if it constant-folds.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345
2022-04-17 13:26:16 -07:00
Vitaly Buka
e75d8b7037 Revert "Treat std::move, forward, and move_if_noexcept as builtins."
Revert "Extend support for std::move etc to also cover std::as_const and"
Revert "Update test to handle opaque pointers flag flip."

It crashes on libcxx tests https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/85/builds/8174

This reverts commit fc3090109643af8d2da9822d0f99c84742b9c877.
This reverts commit a571f82a50416b767fd3cce0fb5027bb5dfec58c.
This reverts commit 64c045e25b8471bbb572bd29159c294a82a86a25.
2022-04-16 00:27:51 -07:00
Richard Smith
64c045e25b Treat std::move, forward, and move_if_noexcept as builtins.
We still require these functions to be declared before they can be used,
but don't instantiate their definitions unless their addresses are
taken. Instead, code generation, constant evaluation, and static
analysis are given direct knowledge of their effect.

This change aims to reduce various costs associated with these functions
-- per-instantiation memory costs, compile time and memory costs due to
creating out-of-line copies and inlining them, code size at -O0, and so
on -- so that they are not substantially more expensive than a cast.
Most of these improvements are very small, but I measured a 3% decrease
in -O0 object file size for a simple C++ source file using the standard
library after this change.

We now automatically infer the `const` and `nothrow` attributes on these
now-builtin functions, in particular meaning that we get a warning for
an unused call to one of these functions.

In C++20 onwards, we disallow taking the addresses of these functions,
per the C++20 "addressable function" rule. In earlier language modes, a
compatibility warning is produced but the address can still be taken.

The same infrastructure is extended to the existing MSVC builtin
`__GetExceptionInfo`, which is now only recognized in namespace `std`
like it always should have been.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123345
2022-04-15 14:09:45 -07:00
Yaxun (Sam) Liu
d41445113b [CUDA][HIP] Fix hostness check with -fopenmp
CUDA/HIP determines whether a function can be called based on
the device/host attributes of callee and caller. Clang assumes the
caller is CurContext. This is correct in most cases, however, it is
not correct in OpenMP parallel region when CUDA/HIP program
is compiled with -fopenmp. This causes incorrect overloading
resolution and missed diagnostics.

To get the correct caller, clang needs to chase the parent chain
of DeclContext starting from CurContext until a function decl
or a lambda decl is reached. Sema API is adapted to achieve that
and used to determine the caller in hostness check.

Reviewed by: Artem Belevich, Richard Smith

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121765
2022-03-24 15:19:47 -04:00
Benjamin Kramer
5d2ce7663b Use llvm::append_range instead of push_back loops where applicable. NFCI. 2022-03-18 01:25:34 +01:00
Roy Jacobson
bc7034c1ec [Concepts] Fix an assertion failure while diagnosing constrained
function candidates

See: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54379

I tried to see if I can reuse ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction for
explicit function instantiation and so I managed to hit this ICE.

Bug was the diagnostic required an argument (%0) and specific code path
didn't pass an argument.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121646
2022-03-15 13:11:32 -07:00
Eli Friedman
27a5749625 [Sema][Windows] Don't special-case void* in __unaligned conversions.
As far as I can tell, MSVC allows the relevant conversions for all
pointer types. Found compiling a Windows SDK header.

I've verified that the updated errors in MicrosoftExtensions.cpp match
the ones that MSVC actually emits, except for the one with a FIXME. (Not
sure why this wasn't done for the patch that added the tests.)

To make up for the missing error, add a warning that triggers on
conversions that drop the __unaligned qualfier.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120936
2022-03-10 14:49:16 -08:00
Corentin Jabot
c151225096 [C++2b] Implement multidimentional subscript operator
Implement P2128R6 in C++23 mode.

Unlike GCC's implementation, this doesn't try to recover when a user
meant to use a comma expression.

Because the syntax changes meaning in C++23, the patch is *NOT*
implemented as an extension. Instead, declaring an array with not
exactly 1 parameter is an error in older languages modes. There is an
off-by-default extension warning in C++23 mode.

Unlike the standard, we supports default arguments;

Ie, we assume, based on conversations in WG21, that the proposed
resolution to CWG2507 will be accepted.

We allow arrays OpenMP sections and C++23 multidimensional array to
coexist:

[a , b] multi dimensional array
[a : b] open mp section
[a, b: c] // error

The rest of the patch is relatively straight forward: we take care to
support an arbitrary number of arguments everywhere.
2022-02-08 12:10:47 -05:00