This is not yet part of any C++ working draft, and so is controlled by the flag
-fchar8_t rather than a -std= flag. (The GCC implementation is controlled by a
flag with the same name.)
This implementation is experimental, and will be removed or revised
substantially to match the proposal as it makes its way through the C++
committee.
llvm-svn: 331244
Following: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@329804
For C++17 the wording of [over.built] p4 excluded bool:
For every pair (T , vq), where T is an arithmetic type other than bool, there exist
candidate operator functions of the form
vq T & operator++(vq T &);
T operator++(vq T &, int);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45569
llvm-svn: 330254
As reported here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37033
Any usage of a builtin function that uses a va_list by reference
will cause an assertion when redeclaring it.
After discussion in the review, it was concluded that the correct
way of accomplishing this fix is to make attempts to redeclare certain
builtins an error. Unfortunately, doing this limitation for all builtins
is likely a breaking change, so this commit simply limits it to
types with custom type checking and those that take a reference.
Two tests needed to be updated to make this work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45383
llvm-svn: 330160
C++ [over.built] p4:
"For every pair (T, VQ), where T is an arithmetic type other than bool, and VQ is either volatile or empty, there exist candidate operator functions of the form
VQ T& operator--(VQ T&);
T operator--(VQ T&, int);
"
The bool type is in position LastPromotedIntegralType in BuiltinOperatorOverloadBuilder::getArithmeticType::ArithmeticTypes, but addPlusPlusMinusMinusArithmeticOverloads() was expecting it at position 0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44988
rdar://problem/34255516
llvm-svn: 329804
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
This reverts r328795 which introduced an issue with referencing __global__
function templates. More details in the original review D44747.
llvm-svn: 329099
This patch sets target specific calling convention for CUDA kernels in IR.
Patch by Greg Rodgers.
Revised and lit test added by Yaxun Liu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44747
llvm-svn: 328795
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before
sorting. This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined
sorting order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of
std::sort.
llvm-svn: 328636
Summary:
The relevant failing assertion message is:
../tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp:8411: PerformCopyInitialization(): Assertion `InitE && "No initialization expression?"' failed.
See the added test case for a repro.
Reviewers: bkramer, sammccall, ioeric, hokein
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44300
llvm-svn: 327134
Summary:
According to [dcl.init.list]p7:
A narrowing conversion is an implicit conversion
- ...
- from an integer type or unscoped enumeration type to a
floating-point type, except where the source is a constant
expression and the actual value after conversion will fit into
the target type and will produce the original value when
converted back to the original type, or
- ...
Currently clang does not handle the 'unscoped enumeration' case. This
patch fixes the corresponding check.
Reviewers: faisalv, rsmith, rogfer01
Reviewed By: rogfer01
Subscribers: rogfer01, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42545
llvm-svn: 325668
GCC's attribute 'target', in addition to being an optimization hint,
also allows function multiversioning. We currently have the former
implemented, this is the latter's implementation.
This works by enabling functions with the same name/signature to coexist,
so that they can all be emitted. Multiversion state is stored in the
FunctionDecl itself, and SemaDecl manages the definitions.
Note that it ends up having to permit redefinition of functions so
that they can all be emitted. Additionally, all versions of the function
must be emitted, so this also manages that.
Note that this includes some additional rules that GCC does not, since
defining something as a MultiVersion function after a usage has been made illegal.
The only 'history rewriting' that happens is if a function is emitted before
it has been converted to a multiversion'ed function, at which point its name
needs to be changed.
Function templates and virtual functions are NOT yet supported (not supported
in GCC either).
Additionally, constructors/destructors are disallowed, but the former is
planned.
llvm-svn: 322028
As discussed in the mail thread <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/
#!topic/std-discussion/T64_dW3WKUk> "Calling noexcept function throug non-
noexcept pointer is undefined behavior?", such a call should not be UB.
However, Clang currently warns about it.
This change removes exception specifications from the function types recorded
for -fsanitize=function, both in the functions themselves and at the call sites.
That means that calling a non-noexcept function through a noexcept pointer will
also not be flagged as UB. In the review of this change, that was deemed
acceptable, at least for now. (See the "TODO" in compiler-rt
test/ubsan/TestCases/TypeCheck/Function/function.cpp.)
To remove exception specifications from types, the existing internal
ASTContext::getFunctionTypeWithExceptionSpec was made public, and some places
otherwise unrelated to this change have been adapted to call it, too.
This is the cfe part of a patch covering both cfe and compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40720
llvm-svn: 321859
Previously, we would:
* compute the type of the conversion function and static invoker as a
side-effect of template argument deduction for a conversion
* re-compute the type as part of deduced return type deduction when building
the conversion function itself
Neither of these turns out to be quite correct. There are other ways to reach a
declaration of the conversion function than in a conversion (such as an
explicit call or friend declaration), and performing auto deduction causes the
function type to be rebuilt in the context of the lambda closure type (which is
different from the context in which it originally appeared, resulting in
spurious substitution failures for constructs that are valid in one context but
not the other, such as the use of an enclosing class's "this" pointer).
This patch switches us to use a different strategy: as before, we use the
declared type of the operator() to form the type of the conversion function and
invoker, but we now populate that type as part of return type deduction for the
conversion function. And the invoker is now treated as simply being an
implementation detail of building the conversion function, and isn't given
special treatment by template argument deduction for the conversion function
any more.
llvm-svn: 321683
(Re-submission of D39937 with fixed tests.)
Adjust wording for const-qualification mismatch to be a little more clear.
Also add another diagnostic for a ref qualifier mismatch, which previously produced a useless error (this error path is simply very old; see rL119336):
Before:
error: cannot initialize object parameter of type 'X0' with an expression of type 'X0'
After:
error: 'this' argument to member function 'rvalue' is an lvalue, but function has rvalue ref-qualifier
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41646
llvm-svn: 321609
Summary:
Adjust wording for const-qualification mismatch to be a little more clear.
Also add another diagnostic for a ref qualifier mismatch, which previously produced a useless error (this error path is simply very old; see rL119336):
Before:
error: cannot initialize object parameter of type 'X0' with an expression of type 'X0'
After:
error: 'this' argument to member function 'rvalue' is an lvalue, but function has rvalue ref-qualifier
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39937
llvm-svn: 321592
In the PR, Clang ended up in a situation where it tried to mangle the
__float128 type, which isn't supported when targetingt MSVC, because
Clang instantiated a variable template with that type when searching for
a conversion to use in an arithmetic expression.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39579
llvm-svn: 318309
Given a choice between a constructor call and a conversion function in C++17,
we prefer the constructor for direct-initialization and the conversion function
for copy-initialization, matching the behavior in C++14 and before. The
guaranteed copy elision rules were not intended to change the meaning of such
code (other than by removing unnecessary copy constructor calls).
This tweak will be raised with CWG.
llvm-svn: 317066
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33904
Happens when static function is accessed via the class variable. That leads to incorrect overloads number because the variable is considered as the first argument.
struct Bar {
static void foo(); static void foo(int);
};
int main() {
Bar b;
b.foo(/*complete here*/); // did not work before
Bar::foo(/*complete here*/); // worked fine
}
Patch by Ivan Donchevskii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36390
llvm-svn: 316646
In order to identify the copy deduction candidate, I considered two approaches:
- attempt to determine whether an implicit guide is a copy deduction candidate by checking certain properties of its subsituted parameter during overload-resolution.
- using one of the many bits (WillHaveBody) from FunctionDecl (that CXXDeductionGuideDecl inherits from) that are otherwise irrelevant for deduction guides
After some brittle gymnastics w the first strategy, I settled on the second, although to avoid confusion and to give that bit a better name, i turned it into a member of an anonymous union.
Given this identification 'bit', the tweak to overload resolution was a simple reordering of the deduction guide checks (in SemaOverload.cpp::isBetterOverloadCandidate), in-line with Jason Merrill's p0620r0 drafting which made it into the working paper. Concordant with that, I made sure the copy deduction candidate is always added.
References:
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34970
See http://wg21.link/p0620r0
llvm-svn: 316292
If we resolve an overloaded operator call to a specific function during
template definition, don't perform ADL during template instantiation.
Doing so finds overloads that we're not supposed to find.
llvm-svn: 315005
When selecting constructors for initializing an object of type T from a single
expression of class type U, also consider conversion functions of U that
convert to T (rather than modeling such conversions as calling a conversion
function and then calling a constructor).
This approach is proposed as the resolution for the defect, and is also already
implemented by GCC.
llvm-svn: 314231
The attribute informs the compiler that the annotated pointer parameter
of a function cannot escape and enables IRGen to attach attribute
'nocapture' to parameters that are annotated with the attribute. That is
the only optimization that currently takes advantage of 'noescape', but
there are other optimizations that will be added later that improves
IRGen for ObjC blocks.
This recommits r313722, which was reverted in r313725 because clang
couldn't build compiler-rt. It failed to build because there were
function declarations that were missing 'noescape'. That has been fixed
in r313929.
rdar://problem/19886775
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32210
llvm-svn: 313945
This reverts commit r313722.
It looks like compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_libdispatch_mac.cc cannot be
compiled because some of the functions declared in the file do not match
the ones in the SDK headers (which are annotated with 'noescape').
llvm-svn: 313725
The attribute informs the compiler that the annotated pointer parameter
of a function cannot escape and enables IRGen to attach attribute
'nocapture' to parameters that are annotated with the attribute. That is
the only optimization that currently takes advantage of 'noescape', but
there are other optimizations that will be added later that improves
IRGen for ObjC blocks.
rdar://problem/19886775
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32210
llvm-svn: 313722
The attribute informs the compiler that the annotated pointer parameter
of a function cannot escape and enables IRGen to attach attribute
'nocapture' to parameters that are annotated with the attribute. That is
the only optimization that currently takes advantage of 'noescape', but
there are other optimizations that will be added later that improves
IRGen for ObjC blocks.
rdar://problem/19886775
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32520
llvm-svn: 313720
devirtualized.
The code to detect devirtualized calls is already in IRGen, so move the
code to lib/AST and make it a shared utility between Sema and IRGen.
This commit fixes a linkage error I was seeing when compiling the
following code:
$ cat test1.cpp
struct Base {
virtual void operator()() {}
};
template<class T>
struct Derived final : Base {
void operator()() override {}
};
Derived<int> *d;
int main() {
if (d)
(*d)();
return 0;
}
rdar://problem/33195657
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34301
llvm-svn: 307883
When enable_if disables a particular overload resolution candidate,
rummage through the enable_if condition to find the specific condition
that caused the failure. For example, if we have something like:
template<
typename Iter,
typename = std::enable_if_t<Random_access_iterator<Iter> &&
Comparable<Iterator_value_type<Iter>>>>
void mysort(Iter first, Iter last) {}
and we call "mysort" with "std::list<int>" iterators, we'll get a
diagnostic saying that the "Random_access_iterator<Iter>" requirement
failed. If we call "mysort" with
"std::vector<something_not_comparable>", we'll get a diagnostic saying
that the "Comparable<...>" requirement failed.
llvm-svn: 307196
The only use in-tree I can find for BuiltinTypes.ResultTy is a single
store to it. We otherwise just recompute what it should be later on (and
sometimes do things like argument conversions in the process of
recomputing it).
Since it's impossible to test if the value stored there is sane, and we
don't use it anyway, we should probably just drop the field.
I'll do a follow-up patch to rename BuiltinTypes.ParamTypes ->
BuiltinParamTypes in a bit. Wanted to keep this patch relatively
minimal.
Thanks to Petr Kudryavtsev for bringing this up!
llvm-svn: 304996
This is an initial commit to allow using it with constant expressions, a follow-up commit will enable full support for it in ObjC methods.
llvm-svn: 303712
We were sometimes doing a function->pointer conversion in
Sema::CheckPlaceholderExpr, which isn't the job of CheckPlaceholderExpr.
So, when we saw typeof(OverloadedFunctionName), where
OverloadedFunctionName referenced a name with only one function that
could have its address taken, we'd give back a function pointer type
instead of a function type. This is incorrect.
I kept the logic for doing the function pointer conversion in
resolveAndFixAddressOfOnlyViableOverloadCandidate because it was more
consistent with existing ResolveAndFix* methods.
llvm-svn: 302506
Do not add an overload if the function doesn't have a prototype; this
can happen if, for instance, a misplaced/malformed call site is
considered like a declaration for recovery purposes.
rdar://problem/31306325
llvm-svn: 301453
For OpenCL, the private address space qualifier is 0 in AST. Before this change, 0 address space qualifier
is always mapped to target address space 0. As now target private address space is specified by
alloca address space in data layout, address space qualifier 0 needs to be mapped to alloca addr space specified by the data layout.
This change has no impact on targets whose alloca addr space is 0.
With contributions from Matt Arsenault, Tony Tye and Wen-Heng (Jack) Chung
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31404
llvm-svn: 299965
object types should be preferred over conversions to other object pointers
This change ensures that Clang will select the correct overload for the
following code sample:
void overload(Base *b);
void overload(Derived *d);
void test(Base<Base *> b) {
overload(b); // Select overload(Base *), not overload(Derived *)
}
rdar://20124827
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31597
llvm-svn: 299648
- Replace documented return values (true/false) with what's actually
returned
- Doxygenify the comment
- Reflow said comment to 80 cols
Not overly familiar with Doxygen, so nits are welcome. :)
llvm-svn: 299603
- also replace direct equality checks against the ConstantEvaluated enumerator with isConstantEvaluted(), in anticipation of adding finer granularity to the various ConstantEvaluated contexts and reinstating certain restrictions on where lambda expressions can occur in C++17.
- update the clang tablegen backend that uses these Enumerators, and add the relevant scope where needed.
llvm-svn: 299316
If there is an unresolved member access AST node, and the base is
implicit, do not access/use it for generating candidate overloads for
code completion results.
Fixes PR31093.
llvm-svn: 298903
Sema holds the current FPOptions which is adjusted by 'pragma STDC
FP_CONTRACT'. This then gets propagated into expression nodes as they are
built.
This encapsulates FPOptions so that this propagation happens opaquely rather
than directly with the fp_contractable on/off bit. This allows controlled
transitioning of fp_contractable to a ternary value (off, on, fast). It will
also allow adding more fast-math flags later.
This is toward moving fp-contraction=fast from an LLVM TargetOption to a
FastMathFlag in order to fix PR25721.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31166
llvm-svn: 298877
