Add a convenience 'expectedFailureNetBSD' decorator and mark all tests
currently failing on NetBSD with it. Also skip a few tests that hang
the test suite. This should establish a baseline for the test suite
and get us closer to enabling tests on buildbot. This will help us
catch regressions while we still have a lot of work to do to get tests
working.
It seems that there are also some flaky tests. I am going to address
them later on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58527
llvm-svn: 355320
Summary:
The compilation of the TestDataFormatterLibcxxListLoop.py currently fails with this error:
```
functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-stl/libcxx/list/loop/main.cpp:19:24: error: no member named '__value_' in 'std::__1::__list_node_base<int, void *>'
assert(third_elem->__value_ == 3);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
```
It seems the internal structure of list has changed with the 3.8 release. This patch makes the test compile with the current libc++ and with the previous libc++.
Reviewers: shafik, zturner, labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: christof, jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58273
llvm-svn: 354202
The new LLVM header is one line shorter than the old one, which lead to
some test failures. Ideally tests should rely on line numbers for
breakpoints or output, but that's a different discussion. Hopefully this
turns the bots green again.
llvm-svn: 351779
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This is a set of tests that were all marked as failing becuse of several different bugs. A couple of the bugs are now resolved as fixed since all the tests that were failing associated with the bug are now passing. It is possible that some of them are false positives, but there's a large number of unexpectedly passing tests on Windows, so I am doing a bulk un-xfail to get the buildbot to green.
llvm-svn: 349713
A couple of new tests have been added that use existing class names. This causes failures on Windows if the tests run at the same time and on any platform it results in the logs being overwritten.
llvm-svn: 347717
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
Before inspecting the contents of a list, make sure that we've stepped
past the push_back() that inserts the element we're interested in.
llvm-svn: 343899
Add a "filecheck" method to the LLDB test base. This allows test authors
to pattern match command output using FileCheck, making it possible to
write stricter tests than what `self.expect` allows.
For context (motivation, examples of stricter checking, etc), see the
lldb-dev thread: "Using FileCheck in lldb inline tests".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50751
llvm-svn: 342508
This applies the same workaround as r321271 to other tests. The root
problem is that lldb finds an internal symbol with the same name in the
debug info of system libraries, and then fails to disambiguate between
the two.
llvm-svn: 341235
On macOS, some of the <optional> APIs used by the test are available only
starting on macOS 10.14 when using exceptions. Build the test with
-fno-exceptions so that the test builds on older systems too.
rdar://problem/43700544
llvm-svn: 340676
- Added LibcxxFunctionSummaryProvider
- Removed LibcxxFunctionFrontEnd
- Modified data formatter tests to test new summary functionality
Patch by Shafik Yaghmour!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50864
llvm-svn: 340543
Patch by Shafik Yaghmour!
This reapplies an earlier version after addressing some post-commit feedback.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49271
llvm-svn: 339828
Summary:
The test suite has often unnecessary trailing whitespace, and sometimes
unnecessary trailing lines or a missing final new line. This patch just strips
trailing whitespace/lines and adds missing newlines at the end.
Subscribers: ki.stfu, JDevlieghere, christof, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49943
llvm-svn: 338171
This broke a linux bot which doesn't support -std=c++17. The solution
is to add a decorator to skip these tests on machines with older compilers.
llvm-svn: 338162
This should have all the correct files now.
<rdar://problem/41471112>
Patch by Shafik Yaghmour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49271
llvm-svn: 338156
clang recently started diagnosing "exception specification in
declaration does not match previous declaration" errors. Unfortunately
old libc++ versions had a bug, where they violated this rule, which
means that tests using this library version now fail due to build
errors.
Since it was easy to work around the bug by compiling this test with
-fno-exceptions, I do that here. If supporting old libc++ versions
becomes a burden, we'll have to revisit this.
llvm-svn: 337173
The synthetic child providers for these classes had a type expression that matched
pointers & references to the type, but the Front End only worked on the actual object.
I fixed this by adding a way for the Synthetic Child FrontEnd provider to request dereference,
and then had these formatters use that mode.
<rdar://problem/40849836>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49279
llvm-svn: 337035
On systems where it's not supported.
As far as I understand Linux is the only systems which now ships
with libstdcxx (maybe NetBSD?, but I'm not entirely sure of the
state of lldb on the platform).
We could make this more fine grained looking for the header as
we do for libcxx. This is a little tricky as there's no such
thing as /usr/include/c++/v1, but libstdcxx encodes the version
number in the path (i.e. /usr/include/c++/5.4). I guess we might
match a regex, but it seems fragile to me.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49110
llvm-svn: 336724
This generalizes a bunch of target-specific tests. MacOS has no
libstdcxx anymore, and neither does FreeBSD (or Windows).
<rdar://problem/41896105>
llvm-svn: 336463
This test was trying to stop at a variety of std::vector calls. It looks like the test
was failing because various inlined std functions left no line table entries for the line that
invoked the inlined function. The author worked around that by undefining _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY.
That's an internal libcxx macro, we really shouldn't be playing around with it. Better to just force
ourselves to stop where we want using some other non-inlineable statement. printf seems a good candidate...
<rdar://problem/41867390>
llvm-svn: 336397
This patch adds a data formatter for NSDecimalNumber. The latter is a
Foundation object used for representing and performing arithmetic on
base-10 numbers that bridges to Decimal.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48114
llvm-svn: 334638
Summary: Check case when _M_t child member is not present.
Reviewers: labath, tberghammer
Reviewed By: labath, tberghammer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47932
Patch by Aleksandr Urakov <aleksandr.urakov@jetbrains.com>.
llvm-svn: 334411
In r265181 the test for the NSCFBoolean data formatter was removed.
Later, in r279353 and r279446 a new implementation was provided for the
formatter, which I believe never worked (and this wasn't caught because
the test was never re-enabled).
This commit fixes the bug and re-enables the old test case.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47014
llvm-svn: 332700
TestLibcxxListLoop - fails because the evil "define private public"
trick does not work with gmodules. The purpose of the test is not to
test debug info parsing so I just mark it as no_debug_info_testcase.
In the long term it may be interesting to write a mock std::list which
will allow us to test bad inputs to data formatters more easily.
TestGModules - seems to be a genuine bug. Filed pr36107 and xfailed.
llvm-svn: 323520
Stale global module caches cause problems for the bots. The modules
become invalid when clang headers are updated by version control, and
tests which use these modules fail to compile, e.g:
fatal error: file '.../__stddef_max_align_t.h' has been modified since the module file '/var/.../Darwin.pcm' was built
note: please rebuild precompiled header '/var/.../Darwin.pcm'
Eventually we should transition to having just a single module cache to speed
tests up. This patch should be just enough to fix the spurious bot failures due
to stale caches.
rdar://36479805, also related to llvm.org/PR36048
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42277
llvm-svn: 323450
Summary:
This flag is on by default for darwin and freebsd, but off for linux.
Without it, clang will sometimes not emit debug info for types like
std::string. Whether it does this, and which tests will fail because of
that depends on the linux distro and c++ library version.
A bunch of tests were already setting these flags manually, but here
instead I take a whole sale approach and enable this flag for all tests.
Any test which does not want to have this flag (right now we have one
such test) can turn it off explicitly via
CFLAGS_EXTRAS+=$(LIMIT_DEBUG_INFO_FLAGS)
This fixes a bunch of data formatter tests on red-hat.
Reviewers: davide, jankratochvil
Subscribers: emaste, aprantl, krytarowski, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40717
llvm-svn: 319653
Summary:
std::queue is just a fancy wrapper around another container, so all we
need to do is to delegate to the it.
Reviewers: jingham, EricWF
Subscribers: srhines, mgorny, lldb-commits, eugene
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35666
llvm-svn: 317099
Summary:
This adds a data formatter for the implementation of forward_list in
libc++. I've refactored the existing std::list data formatter a bit to
enable more sharing of code (mainly the loop detection stuff).
Reviewers: jingham, EricWF
Subscribers: srhines, eugene, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35556
llvm-svn: 316992
