TestHelloWorld seems to be passing now as far as I can tell. TestExitDuringStep is still hanging.
I have marked the relevant tests as flaky, which should handle the timeouts now as well. I'll be
monitoring the buildbots for fallout.
llvm-svn: 258114
I'm getting rid of the expected timeouts. I'll XFAIL/skip any tests that show up as failing after
this (I haven't seen any when running locally, but maybe the buildbot will disagree).
llvm-svn: 256827
I think it was timing out because of the attach deadlocks, which are now fixed. In any case, it
has passed last 200 buildbot runs, so I am enabling it.
llvm-svn: 256748
I believe the cause for this was the attach lockup fixed in r246756. I will enable this tests and
observe the buildbots for signs of problems.
llvm-svn: 256744
We've now seen the rerun test phase hang in a few
scenarios. Eliminate the serial test runner (which
is not exercised nearly as much as the others), by
using a multi-worker test runner strategy with a single
worker. This should rule out whether this is related
to the serial test runner strategy.
llvm-svn: 255880
Summary:
This adds ability to mark test that do not complete due to hangs, crashes, etc., as "expected",
to avoid flagging the build red for a known problem. Functionally, this extends the scope of the
existing expectedFailureXXX decorators to cover these states as well. Once this is in, I will
start replacing the magic list of failing tests in dosep.py with our regular annotations which
should hopefully make code simpler.
Reviewers: tfiala
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15530
llvm-svn: 255763
Use of --rerun-all-issues will enable any test method failure, not just
test methods marked with the flakey decorator, to rerun.
Currently this does not change the flakey logic's immediate rerun
attempt. I want to make sure this doesn't cause any significant issues
before changing that part.
The rerun reporting is only known to work properly with the
default (new) BasicResultsFormatter reporting. Once we work out
any issues, I'll go back and make sure the curses output handles
it properly as well.
llvm-svn: 255543
Also adds full path info for exceptional exits and timeouts when
no test method is currently running.
Adds --rerun-all-issues command line arg. If specified, all
test issues are eligible for rerun. If not specified, only tests
marked flakey are eligible for rerun.
The actual rerunning will occur in an upcoming change. This
change just handles tha accounting of what should be rerun.
llvm-svn: 255438
The main dotest.py should exit with a system return code of 1 on any
issue. This change fixes a place where I omitted counting the
exceptional exit value to determine if we should return 1 when using the
new summary results.
This change also puts a banner around the Issue Details section that comes
before the Test Result Summary.
llvm-svn: 255138
The results formatter system is now fed timeouts and exceptional process
exits (i.e. inferior dotest.py process that exited by signal on POSIX
systems).
If a timeout or exceptional exit happens while a test method is running
on the worker queue, the timeout or exceptional exit is charged and
reported against that test method. Otherwise, if no test method was
running at the time of the timeout or exceptional exit, only the test
filename will be reported as the TIMEOUT or ERROR.
Implements:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24830https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25703
In support of:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25450
llvm-svn: 255097
There is already a class called LLDBTestResults which I would like
to move into a separate file, but the most appropriate filename
was taken.
llvm-svn: 254946
Also cleans up some usages of strings where symbolic names
were safer and made more sense.
Try a test run with something like this to check out the new
basic results formatter (not used by default):
time test/dotest.py --executable `pwd`/build/Debug/lldb --results-formatter lldbsuite.test.basic_results_formatter.BasicResultsFormatter --results-file stdout
This will yield something like:
Testing: 1 test suites, 8 threads
1 out of 1 test suites processed - TestHelp.py
Test Results
Total Test Methods Run (excluding reruns): 13
Test Method rerun count: 0
===================
Test Result Summary
===================
Success: 13
Expected Failure: 0
Failure: 0
Error: 0
Unexpected Success: 0
Skip: 0
Whereas something with a bit of error will look more like this:
42 out of 42 test suites processed - TestSymbolTable.py
Test Results
Total Test Methods Run (excluding reruns): 166
Test Method rerun count: 0
===================
Test Result Summary
===================
Success: 93
Expected Failure: 10
Failure: 2
Error: 2
Unexpected Success: 0
Skip: 59
Details:
FAIL:
TestModulesInlineFunctions.ModulesInlineFunctionsTestCase.test_expr_dsym
(/Users/tfiala/work/lldb-tot/git-svn/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lang/objc/modules-inline-functions/TestModulesInlineFunctions.py)
FAIL:
TestModulesInlineFunctions.ModulesInlineFunctionsTestCase.test_expr_dwarf
(/Users/tfiala/work/lldb-tot/git-svn/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lang/objc/modules-inline-functions/TestModulesInlineFunctions.py)
ERROR: TestObjCCheckers.ObjCCheckerTestCase.test_objc_checker_dsym
(/Users/tfiala/work/lldb-tot/git-svn/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lang/objc/objc-checker/TestObjCCheckers.py)
ERROR: TestObjCCheckers.ObjCCheckerTestCase.test_objc_checker_dwarf
(/Users/tfiala/work/lldb-tot/git-svn/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lang/objc/objc-checker/TestObjCCheckers.py)
The Details header only prints if there are any issues to report. The
Details section has tags that should get picked up using the normal
issue text scrapers (e.g. buildbot).
Test numbers reported are strictly test method runs.
The rerun bit at the top is in support of the multi-pass test
runner code (to run the low-load, single worker test pass for
tests that failed the first run), which I'll be able to put up
for review after this.
ResultsFormatters now have the ability to indicate they replace
the legacy summary, as this one does.
Once we come to agreement on the exact format, I will switch
us over to using this by default.
llvm-svn: 254530
We still see "Too many file handles" errors on Windows even with
lower numbers of cores. It's not clear what the right balance is,
and the bar seems to move as more tests get added. So just use
the strategy that works until we can investigate more deeply.
llvm-svn: 252325
Absolute imports were introduced in Python 2.5 as a feature
(e.g. from __future__ import absolute_import), and made default
in Python 3.
When absolute imports are enabled, the import system changes in
a couple of ways:
1) The `import foo` syntax will *only* search sys.path. If `foo`
isn't in sys.path, it won't be found. Period. Without absolute
imports, the import system will also search the same directory
that the importing file resides in, so that you can easily
import from the same folder.
2) From inside a package, you can use a dot syntax to refer to higher
levels of the current package. For example, if you are in the
package lldbsuite.test.utility, then ..foo refers to
lldbsuite.test.foo. You can use this notation with the
`from X import Y` syntax to write intra-package references. For
example, using the previous locationa s a starting point, writing
`from ..support import seven` would import lldbsuite.support.seven
Since this is now the default behavior in Python 3, this means that
importing from the same directory with `import foo` *no longer works*.
As a result, the only way to have portable code is to force absolute
imports for all versions of Python.
See PEP 0328 [https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0328/] for more
information about absolute and relative imports.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14342
Reviewed By: Todd Fiala
llvm-svn: 252191
This module was originally intended to be imported by top-level
scripts to be able to find the LLDB packages and third party
libraries. Packages themselves shouldn't need to import it,
because by the time it gets into the package, the top-level
script should have already done this. Indeed, it was just
adding the same values to sys.path multiple times, so this
patch is essentially no functional change.
To make sure it doesn't get re-introduced, we also delete the
`use_lldb_suite` module from `lldbsuite/test`, although the
original copy still remains in `lldb/test`
llvm-svn: 251963
packages/Python/lldbsuite is now a Python package, and it relies
on its __init__.py being called to do package-level initialization.
If you exec packages/Python/lldbsuite/dotest.py directly, you won't
get this package level initialization, and things will fail. But
without this patch, this is exactly what dosep itself does. To
launch the multi-processing fork, it was hardcoding a path to
dotest.py and exec'ing it from inside the package.
The fix here is to get the path of the top-level script, and
then exec'ing that instead. A more robust solution would involve
refactoring the code so that dosep execs some internal script that
imports lldbsuite, but that's a bit more involved.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14157
Reviewed by: Todd Fiala
llvm-svn: 251819
This is the conclusion of an effort to get LLDB's Python code
structured into a bona-fide Python package. This has a number
of benefits, but most notably the ability to more easily share
Python code between different but related pieces of LLDB's Python
infrastructure (for example, `scripts` can now share code with
`test`).
llvm-svn: 251532
