374 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Simon Pilgrim
426f37584e [TTI][X86] Add X86TTIImpl::getScalarizationOverhead implementation.
This is a currently just a wrapper to the base type, I'll be adding ISD::BUILD_VECTOR costs in a future patch.
2020-04-14 12:58:19 +01:00
Craig Topper
2f60fbce6c [X86] Use a more realisitic cost for truncate v16i64->v16i8 with avx512f.
Still not great and we could probably codegen this better, but
11 was clearly ridiculous.
2020-04-13 21:09:43 -07:00
Craig Topper
535a566a01 [X86] Split AVX512 getCastInstrCost into tables that require useAVX512Regs() and those that just operate on 256 or smaller vectors.
Use useAVX512Regs() to skip lookups instead of using type legalization
action.
2020-04-13 21:09:42 -07:00
Craig Topper
071c64d68d [X86] Add a more accurate truncate cost for v8i64->v8i8 2020-04-13 21:09:41 -07:00
Simon Pilgrim
91bc50c0d7 [CostModel][X86] Improve InsertElement costs for sub-128bit vectors
If we're inserting into v2i8/v4i8/v8i8/v2i16/v4i16 style sub-128bit vectors ensure we don't use the SK_PermuteTwoSrc cost of the legalized value type - this is a followup to rG12c629ec6c59 which added equivalent sub-128bit shuffle costs
2020-04-10 14:55:46 +01:00
Craig Topper
5625e6ab37 [X86] Improve min/max reduction costs.
This is similar to what I recently did for getArithmeticReductionCost.

I'm trying to account for the narrowing from 512->256->128 as we go.

I've also added a new helper method getMinMaxCost that tries to
handle the cases where we have native min/max instructions and
fall back to cmp+select when we don't.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76634
2020-04-09 17:28:50 -07:00
Simon Pilgrim
12c629ec6c [CostModel][X86] Add shuffle costs for some common sub-128bit vectors
v2i8/v4i8/v8i8 + v2i16/v4i16 all show up in vectorizer code and by just using the legalized types (v16i8/v8i16) we're highly exaggerating the actual cost of the shuffle.
2020-04-09 19:57:06 +01:00
Clement Courbet
fb4aa30f27 [ExpandMemCmp] Allow overlaping loads in the zero-relational case.
Summary:
This allows doing `memcmp(p, q, 7)` with 2 loads instead of a call to
memcmp.
This fixes part of PR45147.

Reviewers: spatel

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76133
2020-04-02 11:20:47 +02:00
Craig Topper
f4c67dfa92 [X86] More accurately model the cost of horizontal reductions.
This patch attempts to more accurately model the reduction of
power of 2 vectors of types we natively support. This takes into
account the narrowing of vectors that occur as we go from 512
bits to 256 bits, to 128 bits. It also takes into account the use
of wider elements in the shuffles for the first 2 steps of a
reduction from 128 bits. And uses a v8i16 shift for the final step
of vXi8 reduction.

The default implementation uses the legalized type for the arithmetic
for all levels. And uses the single source permute cost of the
legalized type for all levels. This penalizes things like
lack of v16i8 pshufb on pre-sse3 targets and the splitting and
joining that needs to be done for integer types on AVX1. We never
need v16i8 shuffle for a reduction and we only need split AVX1 ops
when type the type wide and needs to be split. I think we're still
over costing splits and joins for AVX1, but we're closer now.

I've also removed all pairwise special casing because I don't
think we ever want to generate that on X86. I've also adjusted
the add handling to more accurately account for any type splitting
that occurs before we reach a legal type.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76478
2020-03-22 14:20:15 -07:00
Craig Topper
c13aa36bb7 [X86] Attempt to more accurately model the cost of a bool reduction of wide vector type.
Previously we multiplied the cost for the table entries by the number of splits needed. But that implies that each split goes through a reduction to scalar independently. I think what really happens is that the we AND/OR the split pieces until we're down to a single value with a legal type and then do special reduction sequence on that.

So to model that this patch takes the number of splits minus one multiplied by the cost of a AND/OR at the legal element count and adds that on top of the table lookup.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76400
2020-03-19 09:31:05 -07:00
Craig Topper
b2da1ddaef [X86] Add a non-zero cost for truncating v32i16->v32i8 on avx512bw. 2020-03-15 17:18:46 -07:00
Simon Pilgrim
a2db388dce [CostModel][X86] Improve ISD::CTTZ costs accounting for BSF/TZCNT implementations 2020-03-13 16:51:13 +00:00
Anna Welker
a6d3bec83f [TTI][ARM][MVE] Refine gather/scatter cost model
Refines the gather/scatter cost model, but also changes the TTI
function getIntrinsicInstrCost to accept an additional parameter
which is needed for the gather/scatter cost evaluation.
This did require trivial changes in some non-ARM backends to
adopt the new parameter.
Extending gathers and truncating scatters are now priced cheaper.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75525
2020-03-11 10:23:41 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
5cbddf7cbc [X86][SSE] Add more accurate costs for fmaxnum/fminnum codegen
Based off llvm-mca reports on codegen in llvm\test\CodeGen\X86\fmaxnum.ll + llvm\test\CodeGen\X86\fminnum.ll
2020-03-10 11:59:40 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
168a44a70e [CostModel][X86] Improve extract/insert element costs (PR43605)
This tries to improve the accuracy of extract/insert element costs by accounting for subvector extraction/insertion for >128-bit vectors and the shuffling of elements to/from the 0'th index.

It also adds INSERTPS for f32 types and PINSR/PEXTR costs for integer types (at the moment we assume the same cost as MOVD/MOVQ - which isn't always true).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74976
2020-02-27 15:54:13 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
b82438872b [CostModel][X86] We don't need a scale factor for SLM extract costs
D74976 will handle larger vector types, but since SLM doesn't support AVX+ then we will always be extracting from 128-bit vectors so don't need to scale the cost.
2020-02-24 14:23:04 +00:00
Craig Topper
35625464c6 [X86] Fix the cost model for v16i16->v16i32 zero_extend/sign_extend with AVX2
We seem to be inheriting the cost from sse4.1. But if we have 256-bit registers we should be able to do this with just one extract to split the 16i16 and two v8i16->v8i32 operations so our cost should be 3 not 4.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73646
2020-01-29 15:52:10 -08:00
Simon Pilgrim
5d986a68a5 [CostModel][X86] Add missing scalar i64->f32 uitofp costs 2020-01-06 13:17:02 +00:00
Craig Topper
ecbaf152f8 [X86] Custom widen 128/256-bit vXi32 fp_to_uint on avx512f targets without avx512vl. Similar for vXi64 on avx512dq without avx512vl.
Summary:
Previously we did this with isel patterns that used garbage in
the widened part of the source. But that's not valid for strictfp.
So now we custom widen and use zeroes for the widened elemens for
strictfp.

This replaces D71864.

Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, andrew.w.kaylor, pengfei, LiuChen3

Reviewed By: pengfei

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71879
2019-12-26 22:04:40 -08:00
Anna Welker
7cd1cfdd6b [NFC][TTI] Add Alignment for isLegalMasked[Gather/Scatter]
Add an extra parameter so alignment can be taken under
consideration in gather/scatter legalization.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71610
2019-12-18 09:14:39 +00:00
Reid Kleckner
85ba5f637a Rename TTI::getIntImmCost for instructions and intrinsics
Soon Intrinsic::ID will be a plain integer, so this overload will not be
possible.

Rename both overloads to ensure that downstream targets observe this as
a build failure instead of a runtime failure.

Split off from D71320

Reviewers: efriedma

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71381
2019-12-11 18:00:20 -08:00
David Green
be7a107070 [ARM] Teach the Arm cost model that a Shift can be folded into other instructions
This attempts to teach the cost model in Arm that code such as:
  %s = shl i32 %a, 3
  %a = and i32 %s, %b
Can under Arm or Thumb2 become:
  and r0, r1, r2, lsl #3

So the cost of the shift can essentially be free. To do this without
trying to artificially adjust the cost of the "and" instruction, it
needs to get the users of the shl and check if they are a type of
instruction that the shift can be folded into. And so it needs to have
access to the actual instruction in getArithmeticInstrCost, which if
available is added as an extra parameter much like getCastInstrCost.

We otherwise limit it to shifts with a single user, which should
hopefully handle most of the cases. The list of instruction that the
shift can be folded into include ADC, ADD, AND, BIC, CMP, EOR, MVN, ORR,
ORN, RSB, SBC and SUB. This translates to Add, Sub, And, Or, Xor and
ICmp.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70966
2019-12-09 10:24:33 +00:00
Sanjay Patel
7ff0fcb53f [x86] add cost model special-case for insert/extract from element 0
This is a follow-up to D70607 where we made any
extract element on SLM more costly than default. But that is
pessimistic for extract from element 0 because that corresponds
to x86 movd/movq instructions. These generally have >1 cycle
latency, but they are probably implemented as single uop
instructions.

Note that no vectorization tests are affected by this change.
Also, no targets besides SLM are affected because those are
falling through to the default cost of 1 anyway. But this will
become visible/important if we add more specializations via cost
tables.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71023
2019-12-06 13:50:25 -05:00
Craig Topper
f688570d5c [X86] Remove ProcIntelGLM/ProcIntelGLP/ProcIntelTRM and replace them with a single feature flag covers the two places they were used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71048
2019-12-05 10:58:57 -08:00
Sanjay Patel
5c166f1d19 [x86] make SLM extract vector element more expensive than default
I'm not sure what the effect of this change will be on all of the affected
tests or a larger benchmark, but it fixes the horizontal add/sub problems
noted here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59710?vs=227972&id=228095&whitespace=ignore-most#toc

The costs are based on reciprocal throughput numbers in Agner's tables for
PEXTR*; these appear to be very slow ops on Silvermont.

This is a small step towards the larger motivation discussed in PR43605:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43605

Also, it seems likely that insert/extract is the source of perf regressions on
other CPUs (up to 30%) that were cited as part of the reason to revert D59710,
so maybe we'll extend the table-based approach to other subtargets.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70607
2019-11-27 14:08:56 -05:00
Craig Topper
a4b7613a49 [X86] Remove setOperationAction for FP_TO_SINT v8i16.
This is no longer needed after widening legalization as we
custom legalize v8i8 ourselves.

Added entries to the cost model, but bumped the cost slightly
to account for the truncate shuffle that wasn't costed before.
2019-11-12 22:45:52 -08:00
Dávid Bolvanský
dad7a18510 [X86TargetTransformInfo] Fixed warning: Expression 'ISD == ISD::UREM' is always true. NFCI. 2019-11-06 20:10:29 +01:00
Simon Pilgrim
a091f70610 [CostModel][X86] Improve add vXi64 + fadd vXf64 reduction tests for SLM
As noted on D59710 we weren't handling the high costs of these operations on SLM.
2019-11-06 17:55:38 +00:00
Craig Topper
103968d147 [X86] Lower the cost of avx512 horizontal bool and/or reductions to 2*log2(bitwidth)+1 for legal types.
This better represents the kshift+binop we'd get for each stage
before the final extract. Its likely we'll do even better by
doing a kmov and a cmp with a GPR, but this is a good start.

The default handling was costing a worst case single source
permute shuffle of the vector before the binop. This worst
case assumes the shuffle might have to be emulated with
extracts and inserts. But since we know we're doing a reduction
we can assume we'll get kshift lowering.

There's still some room for improvement here, but this is
much better than it was.
2019-11-04 22:58:04 -08:00
David Zarzycki
cb6822c9de
[X86] Reland: Enable YMM memcmp with AVX1
Update TargetTransformInfo to allow AVX1 to use YMM registers for memcmp.

This is a follow up to D68632 which enabled XOR compares which made this possible.

This also updates the memcmp-optsize.ll test unlike the first patch.

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69658
2019-11-01 08:58:48 +02:00
Simon Pilgrim
04813ded98 Revert rG0e252ae19ff8d99a59d64442c38eeafa5825d441 : [X86] Enable YMM memcmp with AVX1
Breaks build bots

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69658
2019-10-31 19:05:04 +00:00
David Zarzycki
0e252ae19f [X86] Enable YMM memcmp with AVX1
Update TargetTransformInfo to allow AVX1 to use YMM registers for memcmp.

This is a follow up to D68632 which enabled XOR compares which made this possible.

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69658
2019-10-31 20:07:07 +02:00
Craig Topper
1ce8a5b385 [X86] Only look up boolean reduction cost tables if the reduction is not pairwise.
Summary:
We don't pattern match pairwise shuffles in SelectionDAG. So we
should only return the optimized costs if its not a pairwise
shuffle.

I think SLP vectorizer gives priority to non pairwise shuffle if
the cost is the same. And the look up for reduction intrinsics
passes false for the pairwise flag. So this probably has no real
effect today.

Reviewers: RKSimon

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69083
2019-10-26 16:41:19 -07:00
Guillaume Chatelet
a4783ef58d [Alignment][NFC] getMemoryOpCost uses MaybeAlign
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, MaskRay, jsji, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69307
2019-10-25 21:26:59 +02:00
Simon Pilgrim
1385b27e92 [CostModel][X86] Add CTLZ scalar costs
Add specific scalar costs for CTLZ instructions, we can't discriminate between CTLZ and CTLZ_ZERO_UNDEF so we have to assume the worst. Given how BSR is often a microcoded nightmare on some older targets we might still be underestimating it.

For targets supporting LZCNT (Intel Haswell+ or AMD Fam10+), we provide overrides that assume 1cy costs.

llvm-svn: 374786
2019-10-14 16:30:17 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
151bbba758 [CostModel][X86] Add CTPOP scalar costs (PR43656)
Add specific scalar costs for ctpop instructions, these are based on the llvm-mca's SLM throughput numbers (the oldest model we have).

For targets supporting POPCNT, we provide overrides that assume 1cy costs.

llvm-svn: 374775
2019-10-14 14:07:43 +00:00
Sam Parker
527a35e155 [NFC][TTI] Add Alignment for isLegalMasked[Load/Store]
Add an extra parameter so the backend can take the alignment into
consideration.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68400

llvm-svn: 374763
2019-10-14 10:00:21 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
1b59a16c0b [CostModel][X86] Improve sum reduction costs.
I can't see any notable differences in costs between SSE2 and SSE42 arches for FADD/ADD reduction, so I've lowered the target to just SSE2.

I've also added vXi8 sum reduction costs in line with the PSADBW codegen and discussions on PR42674.

llvm-svn: 374655
2019-10-12 13:21:50 +00:00
Zi Xuan Wu
9802268ad3 recommit: [LoopVectorize][PowerPC] Estimate int and float register pressure separately in loop-vectorize
In loop-vectorize, interleave count and vector factor depend on target register number. Currently, it does not
estimate different register pressure for different register class separately(especially for scalar type,
float type should not be on the same position with int type), so it's not accurate. Specifically,
it causes too many times interleaving/unrolling, result in too many register spills in loop body and hurting performance.

So we need classify the register classes in IR level, and importantly these are abstract register classes,
and are not the target register class of backend provided in td file. It's used to establish the mapping between
the types of IR values and the number of simultaneous live ranges to which we'd like to limit for some set of those types.

For example, POWER target, register num is special when VSX is enabled. When VSX is enabled, the number of int scalar register is 32(GPR),
float is 64(VSR), but for int and float vector register both are 64(VSR). So there should be 2 kinds of register class when vsx is enabled,
and 3 kinds of register class when VSX is NOT enabled.

It runs on POWER target, it makes big(+~30%) performance improvement in one specific bmk(503.bwaves_r) of spec2017 and no other obvious degressions.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67148

llvm-svn: 374634
2019-10-12 02:53:04 +00:00
Jinsong Ji
9912232b46 Revert "[LoopVectorize][PowerPC] Estimate int and float register pressure separately in loop-vectorize"
Also Revert "[LoopVectorize] Fix non-debug builds after rL374017"

This reverts commit 9f41deccc0e648a006c9f38e11919f181b6c7e0a.
This reverts commit 18b6fe07bcf44294f200bd2b526cb737ed275c04.

The patch is breaking PowerPC internal build, checked with author, reverting
on behalf of him for now due to timezone.

llvm-svn: 374091
2019-10-08 17:32:56 +00:00
Zi Xuan Wu
9f41deccc0 [LoopVectorize][PowerPC] Estimate int and float register pressure separately in loop-vectorize
In loop-vectorize, interleave count and vector factor depend on target register number. Currently, it does not
estimate different register pressure for different register class separately(especially for scalar type,
float type should not be on the same position with int type), so it's not accurate. Specifically,
it causes too many times interleaving/unrolling, result in too many register spills in loop body and hurting performance.

So we need classify the register classes in IR level, and importantly these are abstract register classes,
and are not the target register class of backend provided in td file. It's used to establish the mapping between
the types of IR values and the number of simultaneous live ranges to which we'd like to limit for some set of those types.

For example, POWER target, register num is special when VSX is enabled. When VSX is enabled, the number of int scalar register is 32(GPR),
float is 64(VSR), but for int and float vector register both are 64(VSR). So there should be 2 kinds of register class when vsx is enabled,
and 3 kinds of register class when VSX is NOT enabled.

It runs on POWER target, it makes big(+~30%) performance improvement in one specific bmk(503.bwaves_r) of spec2017 and no other obvious degressions.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67148

llvm-svn: 374017
2019-10-08 03:28:33 +00:00
David Zarzycki
03b216d854 [X86] Enable inline memcmp() to use AVX512
llvm-svn: 373706
2019-10-04 07:42:34 +00:00
Craig Topper
1069c01924 [X86] Remove -x86-experimental-vector-widening-legalization command line flag
This was added back to allow some performance regressions to be
investigated. The main perf issue was fixed shortly after adding
this back and no other major issues have been reported. So I
think its safe to remove this again.

llvm-svn: 373174
2019-09-29 23:32:37 +00:00
Guillaume Chatelet
18f805a7ea [Alignment][NFC] Remove unneeded llvm:: scoping on Align types
llvm-svn: 373081
2019-09-27 12:54:21 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
d7f0207d73 [CostModel][X86] Fix SLM <2 x i64> icmp costs
SLM is 2 x slower for <2 x i64> comparison ops than other vector types, we should account for this like we do for SLM <2 x i64> add/sub/mul costs.

This should remove some of the SLM codegen diffs in D43582

llvm-svn: 372954
2019-09-26 10:14:38 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
4d486156e7 [Cost][X86] Add more missing vector truncation costs
The AVX512 cases still need some work to correct recognise the PMOV truncation cases.

llvm-svn: 372514
2019-09-22 16:46:15 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim
665ccbff60 [Cost][X86] Add v2i64 truncation costs
We are missing costs for a lot of truncation cases, I'm hoping to address all the 'zero cost' cases in trunc.ll

I thought this was a vector widening side effect, but even before this we had some interesting LV decisions (notably over indvars) being made due to these zero costs.

llvm-svn: 372498
2019-09-22 12:04:38 +00:00
Guillaume Chatelet
33671ceffa [LLVM][Alignment] Convert isLegalNTStore/isLegalNTLoad to llvm::Align
Summary:
This is patch is part of a serie to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790

Reviewers: courbet

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67223

llvm-svn: 371063
2019-09-05 13:09:42 +00:00
Craig Topper
b915109043 [X86] Simplify the setOperationAction handling for fp_to_uint by improving the Custom handler a bit.
This merges the 32-bit and 64-bit mode code to just use Custom
for both i32 and i64. We already had most of the handling in
the custom handling due to the AVX512 having legal fp_to_uint.
Just needed to add the i32->i64 promotion handling. Refactor
the fp_to_uint code in the custom handler to simplify the
number of times we check things.

Tweak cost model tables to match the default handling we were
getting due to Expand before.

llvm-svn: 370700
2019-09-03 05:57:22 +00:00
Craig Topper
d420616313 [X86] Lower the cost of v2i32->v2f64 sint_to_fp under vector widening legalization.
I don't really understand the costs we're using for fp_to_sint,
but prior to widening legalization we used 20 as the cost for this
via the v2i64->v2f64 entry. That number seems better than the 40
we got with widening legalization. So now we need either a
v2i32->v2f64 entry or a v4i32->v2f64 entry depending on whether
AVX is enabled or not since we skip the first SSE2 table look up
under AVX.

llvm-svn: 369628
2019-08-22 08:18:45 +00:00