CPlusPlusNameParser is used in several places on of them is during IR execution and setting breakpoints to pull information C++ like the basename, the context and arguments.
Currently it does not handle templated operator< properly, because of idiosyncrasy is how clang generates debug info for these cases.
It uses clang::Lexer which will tokenize operator<<A::B> into:
tok::kw_operator
tok::lessless
tok::raw_identifier
Later on the parser in ConsumeOperator() does not handle this case properly and we end up failing to parse.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76168
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
There is likely also an underlying bug in all code that calls
CPlusPlusNameParser with nullptrs, but this patch can also stand for
itself.
rdar://problem/49072829
llvm-svn: 362177
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
Now incorrect type argument that looks like T<A><B> doesn't
cause an assert, but just a parsing error.
Bug: 36224
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42939
llvm-svn: 324380
Current implementation of CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName::Parse() doesn't
get anywhere close to covering full extent of possible function declarations.
It causes incorrect behavior in avoid-stepping and sometimes messes
printing of thread backtrace.
This change implements more methodical parsing logic based on clang
lexer and simple recursive parser.
Examples:
void std::vector<Class, std::allocator<Class>>::_M_emplace_back_aux<Class const&>(Class const&)
void (*&std::_Any_data::_M_access<void (*)()>())()
Previous version of this change (D31451) was rolled back due to an issue
with Objective-C selectors being incorrectly recognized as a C++ identifier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31451
llvm-svn: 299721
This caused a failure in the test case:
functionalities/breakpoint/objc/TestObjCBreakpoints.py
When we are parsing up names we stick interesting parts of the names
in various buckets, one of which is the ObjC selector bucket. The new
C++ name parser must be interfering with this process somehow.
<rdar://problem/31439305>
llvm-svn: 299489
Current implementation of CPlusPlusLanguage::MethodName::Parse() doesn't
get anywhere close to covering full extent of possible function declarations.
It causes incorrect behavior in avoid-stepping and sometimes messes
printing of thread backtrace.
This change implements more methodical parsing logic based on clang
lexer and simple recursive parser.
Examples:
void std::vector<Class, std::allocator<Class>>::_M_emplace_back_aux<Class const&>(Class const&)
void (*&std::_Any_data::_M_access<void (*)()>())()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31451
llvm-svn: 299374
