types. Rank these conversions below other conversions. This allows overload
resolution when the only distinction is between a complex and scalar type. It
also brings the complex overload resolutin in line with GCC's.
llvm-svn: 97128
class types, dependent types, and namespaces. I had previously
weakened this invariant while working on parsing pseudo-destructor
expressions, but recent work in that area has made these changes
unnecessary.
llvm-svn: 97112
expressions that look like pseudo-destructors, e.g.,
p->T::~T()
where p has dependent type.
At template instantiate time, we determine whether we actually have a
pseudo-destructor or a member access, and funnel down to the
appropriate routine in Sema.
Fixes PR6380.
llvm-svn: 97092
CXXPseudoDestructorExpr.
Update template instantiation for pseudo-destructor expressions to use
this source information and to make use of
Sema::BuildPseudoDestructorExpr when the base expression is dependent
or refers to a scalar type.
llvm-svn: 97079
parser's data structures and the part that performs semantic analysis
and AST building, in preparation for improved template instantiation
of pseudo-destructor expressions.
llvm-svn: 97070
pseudo-destructor expressions, and builds the CXXPseudoDestructorExpr
node directly. Currently, this only affects pseudo-destructor
expressions when they are parsed, but not after template
instantiation. That's coming next...
Improve parsing of pseudo-destructor-names. When parsing the
nested-name-specifier and we hit the sequence of tokens X :: ~, query
the actual module to determine whether X is a type-name (in which case
the X :: is part of the pseudo-destructor-name but not the
nested-name-specifier) or not (in which case the X :: is part of the
nested-name-specifier).
llvm-svn: 97058
destructor calls, e.g.,
p->T::~T
We now detect when the member access that we've parsed, e.g.,
p-> or x.
may be a pseudo-destructor expression, either because the type of p or
x is a scalar or because it is dependent (and, therefore, may become a
scalar at template instantiation time).
We then parse the pseudo-destructor grammar specifically:
::[opt] nested-name-specifier[opt] type-name :: ∼ type-name
and hand those results to a new action, ActOnPseudoDestructorExpr,
which will cope with both dependent member accesses of destructors and
with pseudo-destructor expressions.
This commit affects the parsing of pseudo-destructors, only; the
semantic actions still go through the semantic actions for member
access expressions. That will change soon.
llvm-svn: 97045
C++98/03 and C++0x, since the '0x semantics break valid C++98/03
code. This new mess is tracked by core issue 399, which is still
unresolved.
Fixes PR6358 and PR6359.
llvm-svn: 96836
errors, e.g.:
t.c:1:21: error: redefinition of parameter 'x'
int test(int x, int x);
^
t.c:1:14: note: previous declaration is here
int test(int x, int x);
^
llvm-svn: 96769
fixing up a few callers that thought they were propagating NoReturn
information but were in fact saying something about exception
specifications.
llvm-svn: 96766
typedef int Int;
int *p;
p->Int::~Int();
This weakens the invariant that the only types in nested-name-specifiers are tag types (restricted to class types in C++98/03). However, we weaken this invariant as little as possible, accepting arbitrary types in nested-name-specifiers only when we're in a member access expression that looks like a pseudo-destructor expression.
llvm-svn: 96743
figure out how not to break lots of code using this. See PR6358 and PR6359 for
motivating examples. FIXME's left in the code and the test.
llvm-svn: 96733
are for out of line declarations more easily. This simplifies the logic and
handles the case of out-of-line class definitions correctly. Fixes PR6107.
llvm-svn: 96729
instead it crashes on them. We might extend this attribute to work on methods, but for
now fix the crasher. Addresses <rdar://problem/7670939>.
llvm-svn: 96723
from an instance method. Previously, we were following the Objective-C
name lookup rules for ivars, which are of course completely different
from and incompatible with the Objective-C++ rules.
For the record, the Objective-C++ rules are the sane ones.
This is another part of <rdar://problem/7660386>.
llvm-svn: 96677
to initializer expressions in an array allocated using ASTContext.
This plugs a memory leak when ASTContext uses a BumpPtrAllocator to
allocate memory for AST nodes.
In my mind this isn't an ideal solution; it would be nice to have
a general "vector"-like class that allocates memory using ASTContext,
but whose guts could be separated from the methods of InitListExpr
itself. I haven't gone and taken this approach yet because it isn't
clear yet if we'll eventually want an alternate solution for recylcing
memory using by InitListExprs as we are constructing the ASTs.
llvm-svn: 96642
