Currently ComputeNumSignBits returns the minimum number of sign bits for all elements of vector data, when we may only be interested in one/some of the elements.
This patch adds a DemandedElts argument that allows us to specify the elements we actually care about. The original ComputeNumSignBits implementation calls with a DemandedElts demanding all elements to match current behaviour. Scalar types set this to 1.
I've only added support for BUILD_VECTOR and EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT so far, all others will default to demanding all elements but can be updated in due course.
Followup to D25691.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31311
llvm-svn: 299219
Follow up to D25691, this sets up the plumbing necessary to support vector demanded elements support in known bits calculations in target nodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31249
llvm-svn: 299201
Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.
Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.
It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.
Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102
llvm-svn: 298393
This patch replaces ORs with getHighBits/getLowBits etc. with setLowBits/setHighBits/setBitsFrom.
In a few of the places we weren't ORing, but the KnownZero/KnownOne vectors were already initialized to zero. We exploit this in most places already there were just some that were inconsistent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30965
llvm-svn: 297860
Create nodes for smulwb and smulwt and move their selection from
DAGToDAG to DAG combine. smlawb and smlawt can then be selected
using tablegen. Added some helper functions to detect shift patterns
as well as a wrapper around SimplifyDemandBits. Added a couple of
extra tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30708
llvm-svn: 297716
The bug was introduced with:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL294863
...and manifests as a selection failure in x86, but that's actually
another bug. This fix prevents wrong codegen with -0.0, but in the
more common case when we have NSZ and NNAN (-ffast-math), we should
still be able to fold this setcc/compare.
llvm-svn: 294924
I don't know if anything other than x86 vectors is affected by this change, but this may allow
us to remove target-specific intrinsics for blendv* (vector selects). The simplification arises
from the fact that blendv* instructions only use the sign-bit when deciding which vector element
to choose for the destination vector. The mechanism to fold VSELECT into SHRUNKBLEND nodes already
exists in x86 lowering; this demanded bits change just enables the transform to fire more often.
The original motivation starts with a bug for DSE of masked stores that seems completely unrelated,
but I've explained the likely steps in this series here:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11210
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29687
llvm-svn: 294863
If a vector index is out of bounds, the result is supposed to be
undefined but is not undefined behavior. Change the legalization
for indexing the vector on the stack so that an out of bounds
index does not create an out of bounds memory access.
llvm-svn: 291604
Summary:
Most targets set the action for these nodes to Expand even though there
isn't actually any code for them in ExpandNode. Instead, targets simply
relied on the fact that no code generates these nodes as long as the
nodes aren't legal or custom.
However, generating these nodes can be useful e.g. for divide-by-constant
in wider integer types.
Expand of [US]MUL_LOHI will use MULH[US] when legal or custom, and
a sequence of half-width multiplications otherwise. Promote uses a wider
multiply.
This patch intends to not change the generated code, but indirect effects
are possible since expansions/promotions that were previously done in
DAGCombine may now be done in LegalizeDAG.
See D24822 for a change that actually uses the new expansion.
Reviewers: spatel, bkramer, venkatra, efriedma, hfinkel, ast, nadav, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, jyknight, nemanjai, wdng, nhaehnle, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24956
llvm-svn: 289050
We treat bitwise 'not' as a special operation and try not to reduce its all-ones mask.
Presumably, this is because a 'not' may be cheaper than a generic 'xor' or it may get
folded into another logic op if the target has those. However, if we can remove a logic
instruction by changing the xor's constant mask value, that should always be a win.
Note that the IR version of SimplifyDemandedBits() does not treat 'not' as a special-case
currently (although that's marked with a FIXME). So if you run this IR through -instcombine,
you should get the same end result. I'm hoping to add a different backend transform that
will expose this problem though, so I need to solve this first.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27356
llvm-svn: 288676
Summary: Further preparation for the expansion of MUL_LOHI added in D24956.
Reviewers: efriedma, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27064
llvm-svn: 288248
Implemented widening (v2f32) and splitting (v16f64).
On splitting, I use "popcnt" to calculate memory increment.
More type legalization work will come in the next patches.
llvm-svn: 287761
Fixed an issue with vector usage of TargetLowering::isConstTrueVal / TargetLowering::isConstFalseVal boolean result matching.
The comment said we shouldn't handle constant splat vectors with undef elements. But the the actual code was returning false if the build vector contained no undef elements....
This patch now ignores the number of undefs (getConstantSplatNode will return null if the build vector is all undefs).
The change has also unearthed a couple of missed opportunities in AVX512 comparison code that will need to be addressed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26031
llvm-svn: 286238
This bug was exposed by using nsw/nuw for more aggressive folds in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284844
The changes mimic the IR demanded bits logic in InstCombiner::SimplifyDemandedUseBits(),
but we can't just flip flag bits in the DAG; we have to create a new node that has the
bits cleared.
This should fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30841
llvm-svn: 285656
Summary:
The main purpose of this new helper is to enable simplifying operations that
have multiple uses. SimplifyDemandedBits does not handle multiple uses
currently, and this new function makes it possible to optimize:
and v1, v0, 0xffffff
mul24 v2, v1, v1 ; Multiply ignoring high 8-bits.
To:
mul24 v2, v0, v0
Where before this would not be optimized, because v1 has multiple uses.
Reviewers: bogner, arsenm
Subscribers: nhaehnle, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24964
llvm-svn: 284266
Add the ability to computeKnownBits and SimplifyDemandedBits to extract the known zero/one bits from BUILD_VECTOR, returning the known bits that are shared by every vector element.
This is an initial step towards determining the sign bits of a vector (PR29079).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24253
llvm-svn: 280927
Following the discussion on D22038, this refactors a PowerPC specific setcc -> srl(ctlz) transformation so it can be used by other targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23445
llvm-svn: 278799
We used to combine "sext(setcc x, y, cc) -> (select (setcc x, y, cc), -1, 0)"
Instead, we should combine to (select (setcc x, y, cc), T, 0) where the value
of T is 1 or -1, depending on the type of the setcc, and getBooleanContents()
for the type if it is not i1.
This fixes PR28504.
llvm-svn: 277371
The following condition expression ( a >> n) & 1 is converted to "bt a, n" instruction. It works on all intel targets.
But on AVX-512 it was broken because the expression is modified to (truncate (a >>n) to i1).
I added the new sequence (truncate (a >>n) to i1) to the BT pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22354
llvm-svn: 275950
Summary:
Instead, we take a single flags arg (a bitset).
Also add a default 0 alignment, and change the order of arguments so the
alignment comes before the flags.
This greatly simplifies many callsites, and fixes a bug in
AMDGPUISelLowering, wherein the order of the args to getLoad was
inverted. It also greatly simplifies the process of adding another flag
to getLoad.
Reviewers: chandlerc, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, jyknight, dsanders, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22249
llvm-svn: 275592
I think this converts all the simple cases that really just care about
the generated code being position independent or not. The remaining
uses are a bit more complicated and are checking things like "is this
a library or executable" or "can this symbol be preempted".
llvm-svn: 274055
The setCallee function will set the number of fixed arguments based
on the size of the argument list. The FixedArgs parameter was often
explicitly set to 0, leading to a lack of consistent value for non-
vararg functions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20376
llvm-svn: 273403
This used to be free, copying and moving DebugLocs became expensive
after the metadata rewrite. Passing by reference eliminates a ton of
track/untrack operations. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 272512
There are at least 2 places (DAGCombiner, X86ISelLowering) where this could be used instead
of ad-hoc and watered down code that is trying to match a power-of-2 pattern.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20439
llvm-svn: 270073
After looking at D19087 again, it occurred to me that we can do better. If we consolidate
the valueHasExactlyOneBitSet() transforms, we won't incur extra overhead from calling it a
2nd time, and we can shrink SimplifySetCC() a bit. No functional change intended.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20050
llvm-svn: 268932
