The main change is to allow a UCS scalar value as fill character.
Especially for char based formatting this increase the number of valid
characters. Originally this was to be expected ABI breaking, however the
current change does not seem to break the ABI.
Implements
- P2572 std::format() fill character allowances
Depends on D144499
Reviewed By: ldionne, tahonermann, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144742
As obvious from the paper's title this is an LWG issue and thus retroactively
applied to C++20. This change may the output for certain code points:
1 Considers 8477 extra codepoints as having a width 2 (as of Unicode 15)
(mostly Tangut Ideographs)
2 Change the width of 85 unassigned code points from 2 to 1
3 Change the width of 8 codepoints (in the range U+3248 CIRCLED NUMBER
TEN ON BLACK SQUARE ... U+324F CIRCLED NUMBER EIGHTY ON BLACK
SQUARE) from 2 to 1, because it seems questionable to make an exception
for those without input from Unicode
Note that libc++ already uses Unicode 15, while the Standard requires Unicode 12.
(The last time I checked MSVC STL used Unicode 14.)
So in practice the only notable change is item 3.
Implements
P2675 LWG3780: The Paper
format's width estimation is too approximate and not forward compatible
Benchmark before these changes
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations
--------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_ascii_text<char> 3928 ns 3928 ns 178131
BM_unicode_text<char> 75231 ns 75230 ns 9158
BM_cyrillic_text<char> 59837 ns 59834 ns 11529
BM_japanese_text<char> 39842 ns 39832 ns 17501
BM_emoji_text<char> 3931 ns 3930 ns 177750
BM_ascii_text<wchar_t> 4024 ns 4024 ns 174190
BM_unicode_text<wchar_t> 63756 ns 63751 ns 11136
BM_cyrillic_text<wchar_t> 44639 ns 44638 ns 15597
BM_japanese_text<wchar_t> 34425 ns 34424 ns 20283
BM_emoji_text<wchar_t> 3937 ns 3937 ns 177684
Benchmark after these changes
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations
--------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_ascii_text<char> 3914 ns 3913 ns 178814
BM_unicode_text<char> 70380 ns 70378 ns 9694
BM_cyrillic_text<char> 51889 ns 51877 ns 13488
BM_japanese_text<char> 41707 ns 41705 ns 16723
BM_emoji_text<char> 3908 ns 3907 ns 177912
BM_ascii_text<wchar_t> 3949 ns 3948 ns 177525
BM_unicode_text<wchar_t> 64591 ns 64587 ns 10649
BM_cyrillic_text<wchar_t> 44089 ns 44078 ns 15721
BM_japanese_text<wchar_t> 39369 ns 39367 ns 17779
BM_emoji_text<wchar_t> 3936 ns 3934 ns 177821
Benchmarks without "if(__code_point < (__entries[0] >> 14))"
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations
--------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_ascii_text<char> 3922 ns 3922 ns 178587
BM_unicode_text<char> 94474 ns 94474 ns 7351
BM_cyrillic_text<char> 69202 ns 69200 ns 10157
BM_japanese_text<char> 42735 ns 42692 ns 16382
BM_emoji_text<char> 3920 ns 3919 ns 178704
BM_ascii_text<wchar_t> 3951 ns 3950 ns 177224
BM_unicode_text<wchar_t> 81003 ns 80988 ns 8668
BM_cyrillic_text<wchar_t> 57020 ns 57018 ns 12048
BM_japanese_text<wchar_t> 39695 ns 39687 ns 17582
BM_emoji_text<wchar_t> 3977 ns 3976 ns 176479
This optimization does carry its weight for the Unicode and Cyrillic
test. For the Japanese tests the gains are minor and for emoji it seems
to have no effect.
Reviewed By: ldionne, tahonermann, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144499
The __cpp_lib_format_ranges feature-test macro only depends on P2286R8
and P2585R0. Note since LWG3750 only affects these two C++23 papers
there is nothing to do for older language versions.
(The __cpp_lib_format feature-test macro depends on the incomplete
formatting for chrono. So this part can't be marked as complete yet.)
This completes
- P2286R8 Formatting ranges
- P2585R0 Improving default container formatting
This partly implements
- LWG3750 Too many papers bump __cpp_lib_format
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147880
The paper
- P2286R8 Formatting ranges
is fully implemented modulo its feature test macro. This macro has been
revised by
- LWG3750 Too many papers bump __cpp_lib_format
The new macro depends on
- P2585R0 Improving default container formatting
This paper revises parts of P2286R8 and adds new formatter
specializations. The specialization for debug strings has some wording
issues, which is addresses in this paper
- P2733R0 Fix handling of empty specifiers in std::format
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142153
Claim some tasks for formatting and mark some parts as complete, which
was missed in the commits completing the task.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137014
This paper was accepted during the last plenary and is intended to be
backported to LLVM 15. When backporting the release notes in the branch
should be updated too.
Note the feature-test macro isn't updated since this will change; three
papers have updated the same macro in the same plenary.
Implements:
- P2508R1 Exposing std::basic-format-string
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130643
This adjust the version macro and sets it as completed. All parts of the paper
have been implemented, except for the parts replaced by later papers and
LWG-issues.
Adjusted the synopsis to match the synopsis in the Standard. Not yet
implemented parts of P2216 and P2418 still use the P0645 wording.
Completes:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D115991
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115999
During the review of D111166 I had a private discussion with @ldionne to
avoid the duplication of the C++2b issues in the Ranges and Format
status pages. The main reason for duplicating them is to make it easier to
find them. The title of the paper may not always make it clear to which
project the paper belongs.
This commit removes all LWG-issues from the Ranges and Format status page
and adds labels for these issue in the C++20/C++23 issues list.
A quick scan revealed there are some issues that are missing a label since
they weren't on the ranges issue list. These can be labelled in a separate
commit. In that commit I'll also look for issues for the spaceship operator
and chrono.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111458
Update the status with the approved papers and LWG-issues in the October 2021 plenary.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111166
Mark the now-done [cmp.result] in spaceship projects as complete;
normalize some status markers for papers and projects; fix alignment
and line breaks in spaceship projects, add links to standard
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108502
Updates the status pages with the LWG issues accepted in the Standard
during the June 2021 plenary session. The LWG papers for this meeting
have been added in D105103.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106529
