The instruction it falls over on is an IMPLICT_DEF that also happens
to be the only instruction in its lexical scope. That LexicalScope has
never been created because its range is empty. This patch skips over
all meta-instructions instead of just DBG_VALUEs.
Thanks to David Blaikie for providing a testcase!
llvm-svn: 305853
For the following motivating example
bool c();
void f();
bool start() {
bool result = c();
if (!c()) {
result = false;
goto exit;
}
f();
result = true;
exit:
return result;
}
we would previously generate a single DW_AT_const_value(1) because
only the DBG_VALUE in the second-to-last basic block survived
codegen. This patch improves the heuristic used to determine when a
DBG_VALUE is available at the beginning of its variable's enclosing
lexical scope:
- Stop giving singular constants blanket permission to take over the
entire scope. There is still a special case for constants in the
function prologue that we also miight want to retire later.
- Use the lexical scope information to determine available-at-entry
instead of proximity to the function prologue.
After this patch we generate a location list with a more accurate
narrower availability for the constant true value. As a pleasant side
effect, we also generate inline locations instead of location lists
where a loacation covers the entire range of the enclosing lexical
scope.
Measured on compiling llc with four targets this doesn't have an
effect on compile time and reduces the size of the debug info for llc
by ~600K.
rdar://problem/30286912
llvm-svn: 305599
Summary:
This patch is part of 3 patches that together form a single patch, but must be introduced in stages in order not to break things.
The way that LLVM interprets DW_OP_plus in DIExpression nodes is basically that of the DW_OP_plus_uconst operator since LLVM expects an unsigned constant operand. This unnecessarily restricts the DW_OP_plus operator, preventing it from being used to describe the evaluation of runtime values on the expression stack. These patches try to align the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus with that of the DWARF definition, which pops two elements off the expression stack, performs the operation and pushes the result back on the stack.
This is done in three stages:
• The first patch (LLVM) adds support for DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The second patch (Clang) contains changes all its uses from DW_OP_plus to DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The third patch (LLVM) changes the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus to be in line with its DWARF meaning. This patch includes the bitcode upgrade from legacy DIExpressions.
Patch by Sander de Smalen.
Reviewers: echristo, pcc, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: fhahn, javed.absar, aprantl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33894
llvm-svn: 305386
This creates a new library called BinaryFormat that has all of
the headers from llvm/Support containing structure and layout
definitions for various types of binary formats like dwarf, coff,
elf, etc as well as the code for identifying a file from its
magic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33843
llvm-svn: 304864
This is really a workaround for ThinLTO in particular - since it can
import partial CUs that may end up looking very similar/the same as
the same partial import in another ThinLTO compile.
An alternative fix would be to change the DICompileUnit metadata to
include a "primary file" or the like - and when importing for ThinLTO
set the primary file to the name of the DICompileUnit that is being
imported into. This involves changing the schema and would reduce the
excessive uniqueness in the hash that this change creates - allowing
diagnosing of more duplicate CUs than will be caught with this change.
But duplicate CUs can still be caught in non-ThinLTO builds & are mostly
a nuisance rather than a particularly deliberate/effective tool for
finding broken code. (arguably the hash could always include the dwo
file and nothing in fission would break, I think..)
Reapply of r304119 after adding a triple to the test and moving it
to the X86 directory.
llvm-svn: 304130
When the only use of a CU is for a subprogram that's only emitted into
the using CU (to avoid cross-CU references in DWO files), avoid creating
that CU at all.
Reapply of r304111 after adding a triple to the test and moving it
to the X86 directory.
llvm-svn: 304129
This is really a workaround for ThinLTO in particular - since it can
import partial CUs that may end up looking very similar/the same as
the same partial import in another ThinLTO compile.
An alternative fix would be to change the DICompileUnit metadata to
include a "primary file" or the like - and when importing for ThinLTO
set the primary file to the name of the DICompileUnit that is being
imported into. This involves changing the schema and would reduce the
excessive uniqueness in the hash that this change creates - allowing
diagnosing of more duplicate CUs than will be caught with this change.
But duplicate CUs can still be caught in non-ThinLTO builds & are mostly
a nuisance rather than a particularly deliberate/effective tool for
finding broken code. (arguably the hash could always include the dwo
file and nothing in fission would break, I think..)
llvm-svn: 304119
When the only use of a CU is for a subprogram that's only emitted into
the using CU (to avoid cross-CU references in DWO files), avoid creating
that CU at all.
llvm-svn: 304111
Consistent with GCC and addresses a shortcoming with ThinLTO where many
imported CUs may end up being empty (because the functions imported from
them either ended up not being used (and were then discarded, since
they're imported as available_externally) or optimized away entirely).
Test cases previously testing empty CUs (either intentionally, or
because they didn't need anything more complicated) had a trivial 'int'
or similar basic type added to their retained types list.
This is a first order approximation - a deeper implementation could do
things like:
1) Be more lazy about construction of the CU - for example if two CUs
containing a single identical retained type are linked together, with
this change one of the two CUs will be produced but empty (since a
duplicate type won't be produced).
2) Go further and invert all the CU links the same way the subprogram
link is inverted - keep named CU lists of retained types, macros, etc,
and have those link back to the CU. Then if they're emitted, the CU is
emitted, but never otherwise - this would allow the metadata itself to
be dropped earlier too, though it seems unlikely that's an important
optimization as there shouldn't be many CUs relative to the number of
other entities.
llvm-svn: 304020
This produced 'strange' DWARF anyway - the CU would have no ranges (or
at least not a range including the inlined code) nor any subprogram or
inlined_subroutine - yet the line table would have entries for these
instructions.
(this actually becomes more relevant with changes coming after this,
where a CU without any contents will be omitted entirely - so there
would be no line table to put this on anyway)
llvm-svn: 304004
Previously this code was defensive to the situation in which the debug
info scopes would lead to a different subprogram from the subprogram in
the CU's subprogram list (this could've happened with linkonce
functions, etc as per the comment being removed). Since the CU<>SP link
reversal this is no longer possible.
llvm-svn: 303933
Turns out gold doesn't use the DW_AT_GNU_pubnames to decide whether to
parse the rest of the DIEs when building gdb-index. This causes gold to
trip over LLVM's output when there are DW_FORM_ref_addr present.
Gold does use the presence of a debug_gnu_pub{names,types} entry for the
CU to skip parsing the debug_info portion, so make sure that's included
even when empty (technically, when empty there couldn't be any ref_addr
anyway - it only came up when gmlt didn't produce any (even non-empty)
pubnames - but given what that reveals about gold's implementation, this
seems like a good thing to do for consistency).
llvm-svn: 303894
MachineInstructions that don't generate any code (such as
IMPLICIT_DEFs) should not generate any debug info either.
Fixes PR33107.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33107
This reapplies r303566 without any modifications. The stage2 build
failures persisted even after reverting this patch, and looking back
through history, it looks like these tests are flaky.
llvm-svn: 303575
MachineInstructions that don't generate any code (such as
IMPLICIT_DEFs) should not generate any debug info either.
Fixes PR33107.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33107
llvm-svn: 303566
Turns out that the Fission/Split DWARF package format (DWP) is currently
insufficient to handle cross-CU (ref_addr) references. So for now,
duplicate any debug info needed in these situations:
* inlined_subroutine's abstract_origin
* inlined variable's abstract_origin
* types
Keep the ref_addr behavior in general, including in the split DWARF
inline debug info that can be emitted into the object files for online
symbolication.
Keep a flag to use the old (ref_addr) behavior for testing ways of
addressing this limitation in the DWP tool (& for those not using DWP
packaging).
llvm-svn: 302858
Since Split DWARF needs to name the actual .dwo file that is generated,
it can't be known at the time the llvm::Module is produced as it may be
merged with other Modules before the object is generated and that object
may be generated with any name.
By passing the Split DWARF file name when LLVM is producing object code
the .dwo file name in the object file can match correctly.
The support for Split DWARF for implicit modules remains the same -
using metadata to store the dwo name and dwo id so that potentially
multiple skeleton CUs referring to different dwo files can be generated
from one llvm::Module.
llvm-svn: 301062
- introduced in r300522 and found via the Swift LLDB testsuite.
The fix is to set the location kind to memory whenever an FrameIndex
location is emitted.
rdar://problem/31707602
llvm-svn: 300793
- introduced in r300522 and found via the Swift LLDB testsuite.
The fix is to set the location kind to memory whenever an FrameIndex
location is emitted.
rdar://problem/31707602
llvm-svn: 300790
The DWARF specification knows 3 kinds of non-empty simple location
descriptions:
1. Register location descriptions
- describe a variable in a register
- consist of only a DW_OP_reg
2. Memory location descriptions
- describe the address of a variable
3. Implicit location descriptions
- describe the value of a variable
- end with DW_OP_stack_value & friends
The existing DwarfExpression code is pretty much ignorant of these
restrictions. This used to not matter because we only emitted very
short expressions that we happened to get right by accident. This
patch makes DwarfExpression aware of the rules defined by the DWARF
standard and now chooses the right kind of location description for
each expression being emitted.
This would have been an NFC commit (for the existing testsuite) if not
for the way that clang describes captured block variables. Based on
how the previous code in LLVM emitted locations, DW_OP_deref
operations that should have come at the end of the expression are put
at its beginning. Fixing this means changing the semantics of
DIExpression, so this patch bumps the version number of DIExpression
and implements a bitcode upgrade.
There are two major changes in this patch:
I had to fix the semantics of dbg.declare for describing function
arguments. After this patch a dbg.declare always takes the *address*
of a variable as the first argument, even if the argument is not an
alloca.
When lowering a DBG_VALUE, the decision of whether to emit a register
location description or a memory location description depends on the
MachineLocation — register machine locations may get promoted to
memory locations based on their DIExpression. (Future) optimization
passes that want to salvage implicit debug location for variables may
do so by appending a DW_OP_stack_value. For example:
DBG_VALUE, [RBP-8] --> DW_OP_fbreg -8
DBG_VALUE, RAX --> DW_OP_reg0 +0
DBG_VALUE, RAX, DIExpression(DW_OP_deref) --> DW_OP_reg0 +0
All testcases that were modified were regenerated from clang. I also
added source-based testcases for each of these to the debuginfo-tests
repository over the last week to make sure that no synchronized bugs
slip in. The debuginfo-tests compile from source and run the debugger.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32382
<rdar://problem/31205000>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31439
llvm-svn: 300522
Also add an assertion for the case that there are multiple FI
expressions with a DW_OP_LLVM_fragment; which should violate internal
constraints in DbgVariable.
llvm-svn: 298518
In doing so, clean up the MD5 interface a little. Most
existing users only care about the lower 8 bytes of an MD5,
but for some users that care about the upper and lower,
there wasn't a good interface. Furthermore, consumers
of the MD5 checksum were required to handle endianness
details on their own, so it seems reasonable to abstract
this into a nicer interface that just gives you the right
value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31105
llvm-svn: 298322
and mark the methods as protected.
Besides reducing the surface area of DwarfExpression, this is in
preparation for an upcoming bugfix in the DwarfExpression
implementation, for which it will be necessary to defer emitting
register operations until the rest of the expression is known.
NFC
llvm-svn: 298309
This reverts commit r242302. External type refs of this form were
never used by any LLVM frontend so this is effectively dead code.
(They were introduced to support clang module debug info, but in the
end we came up with a better design that doesn't use this feature at
all.)
rdar://problem/25897929
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30917
llvm-svn: 297684
This fixes PR31381, which caused an assertion and/or invalid debug info.
This affects debug variables that have multiple fragments in the MMI
side (i.e.: in the stack frame) table.
rdar://problem/30571676
llvm-svn: 295486
While looking to add support for placing singular types (types that will
only be emitted in one place (such as attached to a strong vtable or
explicit template instantiation definition)) not in type units (since
type units have overhead) I stumbled across that change causing an
increase in pubtypes.
Turns out we were missing some types from type units if they were only
referenced from other type units and not from the debug_info section.
This fixes that, following GCC's line of describing the offset of such
entities as the CU die (since there's no compile unit-relative offset
that would describe such an entity - they aren't in the CU). Also like
GCC, this change prefers to describe the type stub within the CU rather
than the "just use the CU offset" fallback where possible. This may give
the DWARF consumer some opportunity to find the extra info in the type
stub - though I'm not sure GDB does anything with this currently.
The size of the pubnames/pubtypes sections now match exactly with or
without type units enabled.
This nearly triples (+189%) the pubtypes section for a clang self-host
and grows pubnames by 0.07% (without compression). For a total of 8%
increase in debug info sections of the objects of a Split DWARF build
when using type units.
llvm-svn: 293971
LTO. Replace it with a related assertion, ensuring that abstract
variables appear only in abstract scopes.
Part of PR31437.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D29430
llvm-svn: 293841
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades and a change
to the Bitcode record for DIGlobalVariable, that makes upgrading the
old format unambiguous also for variables without DIExpressions.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
llvm-svn: 290153
This reverts commit 289920 (again).
I forgot to implement a Bitcode upgrade for the case where a DIGlobalVariable
has not DIExpression. Unfortunately it is not possible to safely upgrade
these variables without adding a flag to the bitcode record indicating which
version they are.
My plan of record is to roll the planned follow-up patch that adds a
unit: field to DIGlobalVariable into this patch before recomitting.
This way we only need one Bitcode upgrade for both changes (with a
version flag in the bitcode record to safely distinguish the record
formats).
Sorry for the churn!
llvm-svn: 289982
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
This reapplies r289902 with additional testcase upgrades.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
llvm-svn: 289920
This patch implements PR31013 by introducing a
DIGlobalVariableExpression that holds a pair of DIGlobalVariable and
DIExpression.
Currently, DIGlobalVariables holds a DIExpression. This is not the
best way to model this:
(1) The DIGlobalVariable should describe the source level variable,
not how to get to its location.
(2) It makes it unsafe/hard to update the expressions when we call
replaceExpression on the DIGLobalVariable.
(3) It makes it impossible to represent a global variable that is in
more than one location (e.g., a variable with multiple
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment-s). We also moved away from attaching the
DIExpression to DILocalVariable for the same reasons.
<rdar://problem/29250149>
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31013
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26769
llvm-svn: 289902
Follow-up to r289256, address a FIXME to avoid resetting the column
number. This reduced .debug_line by 2.6% in a RelWithDebInfo
self-build of clang.
llvm-svn: 289620
DWARF specifies that "line 0" really means "no appropriate source
location" in the line table. By default, use this for branch targets
and some other cases that have no specified source location, to
prevent inheriting unfortunate line numbers from physically preceding
instructions (which might be from completely unrelated source).
Updated patch allows enabling or suppressing this behavior for all
unspecified source locations.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D24180
llvm-svn: 289468
LLVM's use of DW_OP_bit_piece is incorrect and a based on a
misunderstanding of the wording in the DWARF specification. The offset
argument of DW_OP_bit_piece refers to the offset into the location
that is on the top of the DWARF expression stack, and not an offset
into the source variable. This has since also been clarified in the
DWARF specification.
This patch fixes all uses of DW_OP_bit_piece to emit the correct
offset and simplifies the DwarfExpression class to semi-automaticaly
emit empty DW_OP_pieces to adjust the offset of the source variable,
thus simplifying the code using DwarfExpression.
While this is an incompatible bugfix, in practice I don't expect this
to be much of a problem since LLVM's old interpretation and the
correct interpretation of DW_OP_bit_piece differ only when there are
gaps in the fragmented locations of the described variables or if
individual fragments are smaller than a byte. LLDB at least won't
interpret locations with gaps in them because is has no way to present
undefined bits in a variable, and there is a high probability that an
old-form expression will be malformed when interpreted correctly,
because the DW_OP_bit_piece offset will be outside of the location at
the top of the stack.
As a nice side-effect, this patch enables us to use a more efficient
encoding for subregisters: In order to express a sub-register at a
non-zero offset we now use a DW_OP_bit_piece instead of shifting the
value into place manually.
This patch also adds missing test coverage for code paths that weren't
exercised before.
<rdar://problem/29335809>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27550
llvm-svn: 289266
