This should be more portable, and avoids passing the option to
`clang-cl` when linking, because `clang-cl` accepts any `-W` flags
(normally warning flags) during linking (#118516).
Call `llvm::sys::PrintStackTraceOnErrorSignal` at the start of main to
1. Print a strack trace on crash
2. Disable the assertion failed popup in Windows Debug Builds
Other tools (for example clang-check or clang-query) already do this.
This fixes debug build bots on windows hanging (waiting for the popup to
be dismissed) and ultimately getting terminated due to timeout.
This PR introduces out-of-process (OOP) execution support for
Clang-Repl. With this enhancement, two new flags, `oop-executor` and
`oop-executor-connect`, are added to the Clang-Repl interface. These
flags enable the launch of an external executor
(`llvm-jitlink-executor`), which handles code execution in a separate
process.
The Intel C++ Compiler (ICX) passes linker flags through the driver
unlike MSVC and clang-cl, and therefore needs them to be prefixed with
`/Qoption,link` (the equivalent of -Wl, for gcc on *nix).
Use the `LINKER:` prefix for the `/EXPORT:` options in clang-repl, this
expands to the correct flag for ICX and nothing for MSVC / clang-cl.
RFC:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-cmake-linker-flags-need-wl-equivalent-for-intel-c-icx-on-windows/82446
clang-repl should stil work when LLVM is built with
-DLLVM_ENABLE_EXPORTED_SYMBOLS_IN_EXECUTABLES=Off.
This fix uses the approach implemented in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101741.
rdar://134910110
Fix the builds with LLVM_TOOL_LLVM_DRIVER_BUILD enabled.
LLVM_ENABLE_EXPORTED_SYMBOLS_IN_EXECUTABLES is not completely
compatible with export_executable_symbols as the later will be ignored
if the previous is set to NO.
Fix the issue by passing if symbols need to be exported to
llvm_add_exectuable so the link flag can be determined directly
without calling export_executable_symbols_* later.
`LLVM_ENABLE_EXPORTED_SYMBOLS_IN_EXECUTABLES` is not completely
compatible with `export_executable_symbols` as the later will be ignored
if the previous is set to NO.
Fix the issue by passing if symbols need to be exported to
`llvm_add_exectuable` so the link flag can be determined directly
without calling `export_executable_symbols_*` later.
Since C++14 has been released for about nine years and most standard
libraries have implemented sized deallocation functions, it's time to
make this feature default again.
This is another try of https://reviews.llvm.org/D112921.
The original commit cf5a8b4 was reverted by 2e5035a due to some
failures (see #83774).
Fixes#60061
Since C++14 has been released for about nine years and most standard
libraries have implemented sized deallocation functions, it's time to
make this feature default again.
This is another try of https://reviews.llvm.org/D112921.
Fixes#60061
This PR fixes the following issue when working with `clang-repl`:
```
fatal error: error in backend: Inline asm not supported by this streamer because we don't have an asm parser for this target
```
When working with the following input (named "unit.cpp"):
```cpp
__asm(".globl _ZSt21ios_base_library_initv");
int x;
```
and then in `clang-repl`:
```
#include "unit.cpp"
x = 10;
```
Signed-off-by: Andrew V. Teylu <andrew.teylu@vector.com>
These stem from 4821c90c24d52d4a42990fd9371caedb157bc58b.
When cross compiling, CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR is empty, if the
target processor hasn't been set when setting up the cross
compilation. Ideally, when setting up cross compilation with
CMake, the user is supposed to set CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR, but
so far, compilation has worked just fine even without it.
Quote the string where CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR is expanded, to
avoid argument errors when it expands to an empty string.
This patch contains changes from
002d471a4a3cd8b429e4ca7c84fd54a642e50e4c, in
addition to a bug fix that added a virtual destructor to
`CompletionContextHandler`
The original changes in the orginal commit piggybacks on clang's
semantic modules to enable semantic completion. In particular, we use
`CodeCompletionContext` to differentiate two types of code completion.
We also
extract the relevant type information from it.
This patch replaces uses of StringRef::{starts,ends}with with
StringRef::{starts,ends}_with for consistency with
std::{string,string_view}::{starts,ends}_with in C++20.
I'm planning to deprecate and eventually remove
StringRef::{starts,ends}with.
This re-applies e1a5bb59b91, which was reverted in e5f169f91a8 due to LSan
failures on some bots (see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/67586).
The LSan failures were not caused by this patch (just exposed by it), so LSan
was disabled for the failing test in 47625fea5e3. This should be safe to
re-land now.
This change means that debugger support only needs to be linked in if it's
used. The code size of debugger support is expected to increase as we improve
it (e.g. pulling in DWARF parsing), so making it an optional extra is useful
for controlling final binary sizes.
Original commit message:
"
This patch enabled code completion for ClangREPL. The feature was built upon
three existing Clang components: a list completer for LineEditor, a
CompletionConsumer from SemaCodeCompletion, and the ASTUnit::codeComplete method.
The first component serves as the main entry point of handling interactive inputs.
Because a completion point for a compiler instance has to be unchanged once it
is set, an incremental compiler instance is created for each code
completion. Such a compiler instance carries over AST context source from the
main interpreter compiler in order to obtain declarations or bindings from
previous input in the same REPL session.
The most important API codeComplete in Interpreter/CodeCompletion is a thin
wrapper that calls with ASTUnit::codeComplete with necessary arguments, such as
a code completion point and a ReplCompletionConsumer, which communicates
completion results from SemaCodeCompletion back to the list completer for the
REPL.
In addition, PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and CCC_TopLevelOrExpression` top levels
were added so that SemaCodeCompletion can treat top level statements like
expression statements at the REPL. For example,
clang-repl> int foo = 42;
clang-repl> f<tab>
From a parser's persective, the cursor is at a top level. If we used code
completion without any changes, PCC_Namespace would be supplied to
Sema::CodeCompleteOrdinaryName, and thus the completion results would not
include foo.
Currently, the way we use PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and
CCC_TopLevelOrExpression is no different from the way we use PCC_Statement
and CCC_Statement respectively.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154382
"
The new patch also fixes clangd and several memory issues that the bots reported
and upload the missing files.
Original commit message:
"
This patch enabled code completion for ClangREPL. The feature was built upon
three existing Clang components: a list completer for LineEditor, a
CompletionConsumer from SemaCodeCompletion, and the ASTUnit::codeComplete method.
The first component serves as the main entry point of handling interactive inputs.
Because a completion point for a compiler instance has to be unchanged once it
is set, an incremental compiler instance is created for each code
completion. Such a compiler instance carries over AST context source from the
main interpreter compiler in order to obtain declarations or bindings from
previous input in the same REPL session.
The most important API codeComplete in Interpreter/CodeCompletion is a thin
wrapper that calls with ASTUnit::codeComplete with necessary arguments, such as
a code completion point and a ReplCompletionConsumer, which communicates
completion results from SemaCodeCompletion back to the list completer for the
REPL.
In addition, PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and CCC_TopLevelOrExpression` top levels
were added so that SemaCodeCompletion can treat top level statements like
expression statements at the REPL. For example,
clang-repl> int foo = 42;
clang-repl> f<tab>
From a parser's persective, the cursor is at a top level. If we used code
completion without any changes, PCC_Namespace would be supplied to
Sema::CodeCompleteOrdinaryName, and thus the completion results would not
include foo.
Currently, the way we use PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and
CCC_TopLevelOrExpression is no different from the way we use PCC_Statement
and CCC_Statement respectively.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154382
"
The new patch also fixes clangd and several memory issues that the bots reported.
This patch enabled code completion for ClangREPL. The feature was built upon
three existing Clang components: a list completer for LineEditor, a
CompletionConsumer from SemaCodeCompletion, and the ASTUnit::codeComplete method.
The first component serves as the main entry point of handling interactive inputs.
Because a completion point for a compiler instance has to be unchanged once it
is set, an incremental compiler instance is created for each code
completion. Such a compiler instance carries over AST context source from the
main interpreter compiler in order to obtain declarations or bindings from
previous input in the same REPL session.
The most important API codeComplete in Interpreter/CodeCompletion is a thin
wrapper that calls with ASTUnit::codeComplete with necessary arguments, such as
a code completion point and a ReplCompletionConsumer, which communicates
completion results from SemaCodeCompletion back to the list completer for the
REPL.
In addition, PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and CCC_TopLevelOrExpression` top levels
were added so that SemaCodeCompletion can treat top level statements like
expression statements at the REPL. For example,
clang-repl> int foo = 42;
clang-repl> f<tab>
From a parser's persective, the cursor is at a top level. If we used code
completion without any changes, PCC_Namespace would be supplied to
Sema::CodeCompleteOrdinaryName, and thus the completion results would not
include foo.
Currently, the way we use PCC_TopLevelOrExpression and
CCC_TopLevelOrExpression is no different from the way we use PCC_Statement
and CCC_Statement respectively.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154382
CUDA support can be enabled in clang-repl with --cuda flag.
Device code linking is not yet supported. inline must be used with all
__device__ functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146389
This patch allows the users to use backslash to tell clang-repl that more input
is coming. This would help support OpenMP directives which generally require to
be in separate lines.
CUDA support can be enabled in clang-repl with --cuda flag.
Device code linking is not yet supported. inline must be used with all
__device__ functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146389
This reverts commit 7158fd381a0bc0222195d6a07ebb42ea57957bda.
* Fixes endianness issue on big endian machines like PowerPC-bl
* Disable tests on platforms that having trouble to support JIT
Signed-off-by: Jun Zhang <jun@junz.org>
This is the second part of the below RFC:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-handle-execution-results-in-clang-repl/68493
This patch implements a Value class that can be used to carry expression
results in clang-repl. In other words, when we see a top expression
without semi, it will be captured and stored to a Value object. You can
explicitly specify where you want to store the object, like:
```
Value V;
llvm::cantFail(Interp->ParseAndExecute("int x = 42;"));
llvm::cantFail(Interp->ParseAndExecute("x", &V));
```
`V` now stores some useful infomation about `x`, you can get its real
value (42), it's `clang::QualType` or anything interesting.
However, if you don't specify the optional argument, it will be captured
to a local variable, and automatically called `Value::dump`, which is
not implemented yet in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Jun Zhang <jun@junz.org>
This commit adds the %lib <file> command to load a dynamic library to be
used by the currently running interpreted code.
For example `%lib libSDL2.so`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D141824
Without this patch, clang-repl incorrectly pass some tests when there's
error occured.
Signed-off-by: Jun Zhang <jun@junz.org>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130422
