When we are building modules, there are cases where the only way to determine
validity of access is by comparing primary interface names. This is because we need
to be able to associate a primary interface name with an imported partition, but
before the primary interface module is complete - so that textual comparison is
necessary.
If this turns out to be needed many times, we could cache the result, but it seems
unlikely to be significant (at this time); cases with very many imported partitions
would seem unusual.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118598
We cannot export partition implementation CMIs, but we can export the content
of partition interface CMIs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118588
Partition implementations are special, they generate a CMI, but it
does not have an 'export' line, and we cannot export anything from the
it [that is it can only make decls available to other members of the
owning module, not to importers of that].
Add initial testcases for partition handling, derived from the examples in
Section 10 of the C++20 standard, which identifies what should be accepted
and/or rejected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118587
This implements the parsing and recognition of module partition CMIs
and removes the FIXMEs in the parser.
Module partitions are recognised in the base computation of visibility,
however additional amendments to visibility follow in subsequent patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118586
This is an initial enabling patch for module partition support.
We add enumerations for partition interfaces/implementations.
This means that the module kind enumeration now occupies three
bits, so the AST streamer is adjusted for this. Adding one bit there
seems preferable to trying to overload the meanings of existing
kinds (and we will also want to add a C++20 header unit case later).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114714
In C++20 modules imports must be together and at the start of the module.
Rather than growing more ad-hoc flags to test state, this keeps track of the
phase of of a valid module TU (first decl, global module frag, module,
private module frag). If the phasing is broken (with some diagnostic) the
pattern does not conform to a valid C++20 module, and we set the state
accordingly.
We can thus issue diagnostics when imports appear in the wrong places and
decouple the C++20 modules state from other module variants (modules-ts and
clang modules). Additionally, we attempt to diagnose wrong imports before
trying to find the module where possible (the latter will generally emit an
unhelpful diagnostic about the module not being available).
Although this generally simplifies the handling of C++20 module import
diagnostics, the motivation was that, in particular, it allows detecting
invalid imports like:
import module A;
int some_decl();
import module B;
where being in a module purview is insufficient to identify them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118893
In C++20 modules imports must be together and at the start of the module.
Rather than growing more ad-hoc flags to test state, this keeps track of the
phase of of a valid module TU (first decl, global module frag, module,
private module frag). If the phasing is broken (with some diagnostic) the
pattern does not conform to a valid C++20 module, and we set the state
accordingly.
We can thus issue diagnostics when imports appear in the wrong places and
decouple the C++20 modules state from other module variants (modules-ts and
clang modules). Additionally, we attempt to diagnose wrong imports before
trying to find the module where possible (the latter will generally emit an
unhelpful diagnostic about the module not being available).
Although this generally simplifies the handling of C++20 module import
diagnostics, the motivation was that, in particular, it allows detecting
invalid imports like:
import module A;
int some_decl();
import module B;
where being in a module purview is insufficient to identify them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118893
Since the serialization code would recognize modules by names and the
name of all global module fragment is <global>, so that the
serialization code would complain for the same module.
This patch fixes this by using a unique global module fragment in Sema.
Before this patch, the compiler would fail on an assertion complaining
the duplicated modules.
Reviewed By: urnathan, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115610
This patch fixes a crash due to following simple program:
> export struct Unit {
> bool operator<(const Unit&);
> };
It would crash since the compiler would set the module ownership for
Unit. And the declaration with a module ownership is assumed to own a
module. But here isn't one. So here is the crash.
This patch fixes this by exiting early if it finds the export decl is
already invalid.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117093
In C++20 Modules, imported module which doesn't get exported wouldn't be
recorded. This patch would record such modules to avoid possible
incorrect visibility problems.
Reviewed By: urnathan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116098
In C++20 Modules, imported module which doesn't get exported wouldn't be
recorded. This patch would record such modules to avoid possible
incorrect visibility problems.
Reviewed By: urnathan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116098
According to [module.unit]p7.2.3, a declaration within a linkage-specification
should be attached to the global module.
This let user to forward declare types across modules.
Reviewed by: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110215
Change `Module::ASTFile` and `ModuleFile::File` to use
`Optional<FileEntryRef>` instead of `const FileEntry *`. One of many
steps toward removing `FileEntry::getName`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89836
Partial revert of r372681 "Support for DWARF-5 C++ language tags".
The change introduced new external linkage languages ("C++11" and
"C++14") which not supported in C++.
It also changed the definition of the existing enum to use the DWARF
constants. The problem is that "LinkageSpecDeclBits.Language" (the field
that reserves this enum) is actually defined as 3 bits length
(bitfield), which cannot contain the new DWARF constants. Defining the
enum as integer literals is more appropriate for maintaining valid
values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69935
This patch provides support for DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_11,
DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14 tags in the Clang C++ frontend.
Patch by Sourabh Singh Tomar!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67613
Reapplies r372663 after adapting a failing test in the LLDB testsuite.
llvm-svn: 372681
This patch provides support for DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_11,
DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_14 tags in the Clang C++ frontend.
Patch by Sourabh Singh Tomar!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67613
llvm-svn: 372663
