Claiming AArch64 support for llvm-exegesis is a bit of a stretch in my
opinion as only a couple of opcodes with GPR64 operands will work for
snippet benchmarking, so I propose to clarify that AArch64 support is
very experimental. Also added some clarifications about its libpfm4
dependency.
This patch adds a LLVM-EXEGESIS-LOOP-REGISTER snippet annotation which
allows a user to specify the register to use for the loop counter in the
loop repetition mode. This allows for executing snippets that don't work
with the default value (currently R8 on X86).
This patch replaces --num-repetitions with --min-instructions to make it
more clear that the value refers to the minimum number of instructions
in the final assembled snippet rather than the number of repetitions of
the snippet. This patch also refactors some llvm-exegesis internal
variable names to reflect the name change.
Fixes#76890.
This patch adds two new repetition modes to llvm-exegesis, particularly
loop and duplicate repetition modes of what I am terming the middle half
repetition mode. The middle half repetition mode essentially runs each
measurement twice, one with twice the number of iterations of the other.
These two measurements are then agregated by taking their difference.
This subtracts away any setup/overhead that is unrelated to the code in
the snippet, providing more accurate results.
Using this mode on a couple toy examples, I am able to get exact
(integer) throughput values on all of them in contrast to the default
duplicate/loop repetition modes which show a little bit of noise on the
snippet value.
This patch makes minor adjustments to the llvm-exegesis docs for
clarity. Particularly, an update is made to the list of snippet
annotations to list the correct number of annotations that was not
updated when the docs were originally updated for the snippet address
annotation. In addition, this patch changes a decimal value for the
snippet memory annotation example for an explicit hex value to emphasize
that the LLVM-EXEGESIS-MEM-DEF annotation takes a hex value for the
memory value.
Currently the llvm-exegesis docs use a mix of double dash and single
dash options with seemingly no pattern. This patch makes everything
double dash options as it has been suggested that we should be
advertising double dash long options exclusively in the documentation.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157641
llvm-exegesis has both a capture mode and an analysis mode that can be
used independently of each other. This patch makes it clear that
analysis mode will work on other platforms that LLVM supports in the
documentation which was unclear before.
Reviewed By: courbet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150536
Currently, there is no documentation on what platforms and architectures
llvm-exegesis is supported on. This patch adds in user-facing
documentation in the CommandGuide about what architectures are supported
as well as developer facing documentation detailing the technical
reasons for why certain platforms are supported and some aren't.
This is a follow-up after discussion in
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/clarification-on-platform-support-for-llvm-exegesis/70206.
Reviewed By: kpdev42
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149378
This patch adds in documentation for the --use-dummy-perf-counters
option (introduced in D146301).
Reviewed By: kpdev42
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D147842
Currently, the llvm-exegesis documentation page has all
snippet annotation information under an example. This patch refactors
the annotation documentation to a separate section to make things more
clear and to make adding future annotations easier. This patch also
significantly expands the documentation on the memory scratch space to
which a pointer can be passed through a register as the documentation on
this was quite sparse previously.
Reviewed By: courbet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146890
While "skip measurements mode" is super useful for test coverage,
i've come to discover it's trade-offs. It still calls back-end
to actually codegen the target assembly, and that is what is taking
80%+ of the time regardless of whether or not we skip the measurements.
On the other hand, just being able to see that exegesis can come up
with a snippet to measure something, is already very useful,
and takes maybe a second for a all-opcode sweep.
Reviewed By: gchatelet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140702
By default, all benchmark results are analysed, but sometimes it may be useful
to only look at those that to not involve memory, or vice versa. This option
allows to either keep all benchmarks, or filter out (ignore) either all the
ones that do involve memory (involve instructions that may read or write to
memory), or the opposite, to only keep such benchmarks.
Personally, so far i have found the benchmarks that do involve memory
to have dubious results. But the ones that do not involve memory,
are generally actionable. So i would like to have a toggle to declutter results.
Reviewed By: courbet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140734
Noticed while trying to use llvm-exegesis to get some accurate capture numbers on some old Atom/Silverment hardware as part of the work with D103695.
These targets' frontends are particularly poor and the use of the xmm8-xmm15 SSE registers results in longer instruction encodings which were affecting the latency/throughput estimates.
Thanks to @lebedev.ri for the --skip-measurements command line argument which made testing much easier!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138832
Sometimes we only want to ensure that we can produce snippets (all the way
through `SnippetRepetitor`!), but don't care for the execution.
E.g. all of our tests are this way.
I've built LLVM without PFM and removed my CPU from `X86PfmCounters.td`,
and this produces the expected results in that configuration.
Reviewed By: courbet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139448
I really needed this, like, factually, yesterday,
when verifying dependency breaking idioms for AMD Zen 3 scheduler model.
Consider the following example:
```
$ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=duplicate
Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-4a7e50.o
---
mode: inverse_throughput
key:
instructions:
- 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0'
config: ''
register_initial_values: []
cpu_name: znver3
llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
num_repetitions: 1000000
measurements:
- { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.31025, per_snippet_value: 0.31025 }
error: ''
info: ''
assembled_snippet: C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC0C3
...
```
What does it tell us?
So wait, it can only execute ~3 x86 AVX YMM PXOR zero-idioms per cycle?
That doesn't seem right. That's even less than there are pipes supporting this type of op.
Now, second example:
```
$ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=loop
Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-2418b5.o
---
mode: inverse_throughput
key:
instructions:
- 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0'
config: ''
register_initial_values: []
cpu_name: znver3
llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
num_repetitions: 1000000
measurements:
- { key: inverse_throughput, value: 1.00011, per_snippet_value: 1.00011 }
error: ''
info: ''
assembled_snippet: 49B80800000000000000C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC04983C0FF75F2C3
...
```
Now that's just worse. Due to the looping, the throughput completely plummeted,
and now we can only do a single instruction/cycle!?
That's not great.
And final example:
```
$ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --mode=inverse_throughput --snippets-file=/tmp/snippet.s --num-repetitions=1000000 --repetition-mode=loop --loop-body-size=1000
Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-c402e2.o
---
mode: inverse_throughput
key:
instructions:
- 'VPXORYrr YMM0 YMM0 YMM0'
config: ''
register_initial_values: []
cpu_name: znver3
llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
num_repetitions: 1000000
measurements:
- { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.167087, per_snippet_value: 0.167087 }
error: ''
info: ''
assembled_snippet: 49B80800000000000000C5FDEFC0C5FDEFC04983C0FF75F2C3
...
```
So if we merge the previous two approaches, do duplicate this single-instruction snippet 1000x
(loop-body-size/instruction count in snippet), and run a loop with 1000 iterations
over that duplicated/unrolled snippet, the measured throughput goes through the roof,
up to 5.9 instructions/cycle, which finally tells us that this idiom is zero-cycle!
Reviewed By: courbet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102522
Starting with Skylake, the LBR contains the precise number of cycles between the two
consecutive branches.
Making use of this will hopefully make the measurements more precise than the
existing methods of using RDTSC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77422
New change: check for existence of field `cycles` in perf_branch_entry before enabling this mode.
This should prevent compilation errors when building for older kernel whose headers don't support it.
From @erichkeane:
```
This patch doesn't seem to build for me:
/iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llvm-exegesis/lib/X86/X86Counter.cpp: In function ‘llvm::Error llvm::exegesis::parseDataBuffer(const char*, size_t, const void*, const void*, llvm::SmallVector<long int, 4>*)’:
/iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llvm-exegesis/lib/X86/X86Counter.cpp:99:37: error: ‘struct perf_branch_entry’ has no member named ‘cycles’
CycleArray->push_back(Entry.cycles);
I'm on RHEL7, so I have kernel 3.10, so it doesn't have 'cycles'.
According ot this: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.3/source/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h#L963 kernel 4.3 is the first time that 'cycles' appeared in this structure.
```
Starting with Skylake, the LBR contains the precise number of cycles between the two
consecutive branches.
Making use of this will hopefully make the measurements more precise than the
existing methods of using RDTSC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77422
Summary:
As noted in documentation, different repetition modes have different trade-offs:
> .. option:: -repetition-mode=[duplicate|loop]
>
> Specify the repetition mode. `duplicate` will create a large, straight line
> basic block with `num-repetitions` copies of the snippet. `loop` will wrap
> the snippet in a loop which will be run `num-repetitions` times. The `loop`
> mode tends to better hide the effects of the CPU frontend on architectures
> that cache decoded instructions, but consumes a register for counting
> iterations.
Indeed. Example:
>>! In D74156#1873657, @lebedev.ri wrote:
> At least for `CMOV`, i'm seeing wildly different results
> | | Latency | RThroughput |
> | duplicate | 1 | 0.8 |
> | loop | 2 | 0.6 |
> where latency=1 seems correct, and i'd expect the througput to be close to 1/2 (since there are two execution units).
This isn't great for analysis, at least for schedule model development.
As discussed in excruciating detail in
>>! In D74156#1924514, @gchatelet wrote:
>>>! In D74156#1920632, @lebedev.ri wrote:
>> ... did that explanation of the question i'm having made any sense?
>
> Thx for digging in the conversation !
> Ok it makes more sense now.
>
> I discussed it a bit with @courbet:
> - We want the analysis tool to stay simple so we'd rather not make it knowledgeable of the repetition mode.
> - We'd like to still be able to select either repetition mode to dig into special cases
>
> So we could add a third `min` repetition mode that would run both and take the minimum. It could be the default option.
> Would you have some time to look what it would take to add this third mode?
there appears to be an agreement that it is indeed sub-par,
and that we should provide an optional, measurement (not analysis!) -time
way to rectify the situation.
However, the solutions isn't entirely straight-forward.
We can just add an actual 'multiplexer' `MinSnippetRepetitor`, because
if we just concatenate snippets produced by `DuplicateSnippetRepetitor`
and `LoopSnippetRepetitor` and run+measure that, the measurement will
naturally be different from what we'd get by running+measuring
them separately and taking the min.
([[ https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28x%2By%29%2F2+%21%3D+min%28x%2C+y%29 | `time(D+L)/2 != min(time(D), time(L))` ]])
Also, it seems best to me to have a single snippet instead of generating
a snippet per repetition mode, since the only difference here is that the
loop repetition mode reserves one register for loop counter.
As far as i can tell, we can either teach `BenchmarkRunner::runConfiguration()`
to produce a single report given multiple repetitors (as in the patch),
or do that one layer higher - don't modify `BenchmarkRunner::runConfiguration()`,
produce multiple reports, don't actually print each one, but aggregate them somehow
and only print the final one.
Initially i've gone ahead with the latter approach, but it didn't look like a natural fit;
the former (as in the diff) does seem like a better fit to me.
There's also a question of the test coverage. It sure currently does work here:
```
$ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --opcode-name=CMOV64rr --mode=inverse_throughput --repetition-mode=duplicate
Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-8fb949.o
---
mode: inverse_throughput
key:
instructions:
- 'CMOV64rr RAX RAX R11 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RBP RBP R15 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RBX RBX RBX i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RCX RCX RBX i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RDI RDI R10 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RDX RDX RAX i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RSI RSI RAX i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R8 R8 R8 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R9 R9 RDX i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R10 R10 RBX i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R11 R11 R14 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R12 R12 R9 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R13 R13 R12 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R14 R14 R15 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R15 R15 R13 i_0x0'
config: ''
register_initial_values:
- 'RAX=0x0'
- 'R11=0x0'
- 'EFLAGS=0x0'
- 'RBP=0x0'
- 'R15=0x0'
- 'RBX=0x0'
- 'RCX=0x0'
- 'RDI=0x0'
- 'R10=0x0'
- 'RDX=0x0'
- 'RSI=0x0'
- 'R8=0x0'
- 'R9=0x0'
- 'R14=0x0'
- 'R12=0x0'
- 'R13=0x0'
cpu_name: bdver2
llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
num_repetitions: 10000
measurements:
- { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.819, per_snippet_value: 12.285 }
error: ''
info: instruction has tied variables, using static renaming.
assembled_snippet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
...
$ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --opcode-name=CMOV64rr --mode=inverse_throughput --repetition-mode=loop
Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-051eb3.o
---
mode: inverse_throughput
key:
instructions:
- 'CMOV64rr RAX RAX R11 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RBP RBP RSI i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RBX RBX R9 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RCX RCX RSI i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RDI RDI RBP i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RDX RDX R9 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RSI RSI RDI i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R9 R9 R12 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R10 R10 R11 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R11 R11 R9 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R12 R12 RBP i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R13 R13 RSI i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R14 R14 R14 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R15 R15 R10 i_0x0'
config: ''
register_initial_values:
- 'RAX=0x0'
- 'R11=0x0'
- 'EFLAGS=0x0'
- 'RBP=0x0'
- 'RSI=0x0'
- 'RBX=0x0'
- 'R9=0x0'
- 'RCX=0x0'
- 'RDI=0x0'
- 'RDX=0x0'
- 'R12=0x0'
- 'R10=0x0'
- 'R13=0x0'
- 'R14=0x0'
- 'R15=0x0'
cpu_name: bdver2
llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
num_repetitions: 10000
measurements:
- { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.6083, per_snippet_value: 8.5162 }
error: ''
info: instruction has tied variables, using static renaming.
assembled_snippet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
...
$ ./bin/llvm-exegesis --opcode-name=CMOV64rr --mode=inverse_throughput --repetition-mode=min
Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-c7a47d.o
Check generated assembly with: /usr/bin/objdump -d /tmp/snippet-2581f1.o
---
mode: inverse_throughput
key:
instructions:
- 'CMOV64rr RAX RAX R11 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RBP RBP R10 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RBX RBX R10 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RCX RCX RDX i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RDI RDI RAX i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RDX RDX R9 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr RSI RSI RAX i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R9 R9 RBX i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R10 R10 R12 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R11 R11 RDI i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R12 R12 RDI i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R13 R13 RDI i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R14 R14 R9 i_0x0'
- 'CMOV64rr R15 R15 RBP i_0x0'
config: ''
register_initial_values:
- 'RAX=0x0'
- 'R11=0x0'
- 'EFLAGS=0x0'
- 'RBP=0x0'
- 'R10=0x0'
- 'RBX=0x0'
- 'RCX=0x0'
- 'RDX=0x0'
- 'RDI=0x0'
- 'R9=0x0'
- 'RSI=0x0'
- 'R12=0x0'
- 'R13=0x0'
- 'R14=0x0'
- 'R15=0x0'
cpu_name: bdver2
llvm_triple: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
num_repetitions: 10000
measurements:
- { key: inverse_throughput, value: 0.6073, per_snippet_value: 8.5022 }
error: ''
info: instruction has tied variables, using static renaming.
assembled_snippet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
...
```
but i open to suggestions as to how test that.
I also have gone with the suggestion to default to this new mode.
This was irking me for some time, so i'm happy to finally see progress here.
Looking forward to feedback.
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet, gchatelet
Subscribers: mstojanovic, RKSimon, llvm-commits, courbet, gchatelet
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76921
Summary:
This adds a `-max-configs-per-opcode` option to limit the number of
configs per opcode.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68642
llvm-svn: 374054
Summary: Removed excess new lines from documentations. As far as I can tell, it seems as though restructured text is agnostic to new lines, the use of new lines was inconsistent and had no effect on how the files were being displayed.
Reviewers: jhenderson, rupprecht, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63971
llvm-svn: 365105
Sphinx allows for definitions of command-line options using
`.. option <name>` and references to those options via `:option:<name>`.
However, it looks like there is no scoping of these options by default,
meaning that links can end up pointing to incorrect documents. See for
example the llvm-mca document, which contains references to -o that,
prior to this patch, pointed to a different document. What's worse is
that these links appear to be non-deterministic in which one is picked
(on my machine, some references end up pointing to opt, whereas on the
live docs, they point to llvm-dwarfdump, for example).
The fix is to add the .. program <name> tag. This essentially namespaces
the options (definitions and references) to the named program, ensuring
that the links are kept correct.
Reviwed by: andreadb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63873
llvm-svn: 364538
Summary:
This is an alternative to D59539.
Let's suppose we have measured 4 different opcodes, and got: `0.5`, `1.0`, `1.5`, `2.0`.
Let's suppose we are using `-analysis-clustering-epsilon=0.5`.
By default now we will start processing the `0.5` point, find that `1.0` is it's neighbor, add them to a new cluster.
Then we will notice that `1.5` is a neighbor of `1.0` and add it to that same cluster.
Then we will notice that `2.0` is a neighbor of `1.5` and add it to that same cluster.
So all these points ended up in the same cluster.
This may or may not be a correct implementation of dbscan clustering algorithm.
But this is rather horribly broken for the reasons of comparing the clusters with the LLVM sched data.
Let's suppose all those opcodes are currently in the same sched cluster.
If i specify `-analysis-inconsistency-epsilon=0.5`, then no matter
the LLVM values this cluster will **never** match the LLVM values,
and thus this cluster will **always** be displayed as inconsistent.
The solution is obviously to split off some of these opcodes into different sched cluster.
But how do i do that? Out of 4 opcodes displayed in the inconsistency report,
which ones are the "bad ones"? Which ones are the most different from the checked-in data?
I'd need to go in to the `.yaml` and look it up manually.
The trivial solution is to, when creating clusters, don't use the full dbscan algorithm,
but instead "pick some unclustered point, pick all unclustered points that are it's neighbor,
put them all into a new cluster, repeat". And just so as it happens, we can arrive
at that algorithm by not performing the "add neighbors of a neighbor to the cluster" step.
But that won't work well once we teach analyze mode to operate in on-1D mode
(i.e. on more than a single measurement type at a time), because the clustering would
depend on the order of the measurements.
Instead, let's just create a single cluster per opcode, and put all the points of that opcode into said cluster.
And simultaneously check that every point in that cluster is a neighbor of every other point in the cluster,
and if they are not, the cluster (==opcode) is unstable.
This is //yet another// step to bring me closer to being able to continue cleanup of bdver2 sched model..
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40880 | PR40880 ]].
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, jdoerfert, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59820
llvm-svn: 357152
Summary:
Up until the point i have looked in the source, i didn't even understood that
i can disable 'cluster' output. I have always silenced it via ` &> /dev/null`.
(And hoped it wasn't contributing much of the run time.)
While i expect that it has it's use-cases i never once needed it so far.
If i forget to silence it, console is completely flooded with that output.
How about not expecting users to opt-out of analyses,
but to explicitly specify the analyses that should be performed?
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57648
llvm-svn: 353021
Summary:
The pfm counters are now in the ExegesisTarget rather than the
MCSchedModel (PR39165).
This also compresses the pfm counter tables (PR37068).
Reviewers: RKSimon, gchatelet
Subscribers: mgrang, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52932
llvm-svn: 345243
Summary:
We try to recover gracefully on instructions that would crash the
program.
This includes some refactoring of runMeasurement() implementations.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53371
llvm-svn: 344695
Summary:
This is a step towards fixing PR38048.
Note that right now the measurements are given per instruction. We'll
need to give measurements a per code snippet and update the analysis (PR38731).
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52041
llvm-svn: 342947
