Changing the date2 to an timezone independent value broke the test as the data formatters
uses the current time zone for the summary (so changing it to a time zone independent value
would again break the test in some time zones). We anyway just care about this for date2
which will be printed in a timezone-independent summary.
Summary:
This test creates its dates with `NSDate dateWithNaturalLanguageString` which is deprecated and uses the current time zone of the machine to
interpret the input string. This causes that the created NSDate has a different value depending on the locale of the machine
and we hardcoded the value for California's time zone (PST) but the data formatter gives out the GMT value as a string.
This just replaces the use with the timezone-independent dateWithTimeIntervalSince1970 (which we also use in the rest of the test)
to make this pass independently of the time zone of the machine running the test.
Reviewers: mib
Reviewed By: mib
Subscribers: lldb-commits, JDevlieghere
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74038
Summary:
Currently having a typedef for ObjC types is breaking member access in LLDB:
```
typedef NSString Str;
NSString *s; s.length; // OK
Str *s; s.length; // Causes: member reference base type 'Str *' (aka 'NSString *') is not a structure or union
```
This works for NSString as there the type building from `NSString` -> `NSString *` will correctly
build a ObjCObjectPointerType (which is necessary to make member access with a dot possible),
but for the typedef the `Str` -> `Str *` conversion will produce an incorrect PointerType. The reason
for this is that our check in TypeSystemClang::GetPointerType is not desugaring the base type,
which causes that `Str` is not recognised as a type to a `ObjCInterface` as the check only sees the
typedef sugar that was put around it. This causes that we fall back to constructing a PointerType
instead which does not allow member access with the dot operator.
This patch just changes the check to look at the desugared type instead.
Fixes rdar://17525603
Reviewers: shafik, mib
Reviewed By: mib
Subscribers: mib, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73952
My refactor caused some changes in error reporting that TestAddDsymCommand.py
was checking, so this restores some of the changes to preserve the old
behavior and to un-xfail the affected test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74001
Re-landing this now that (hopefully) all the failures this caused on the
bots have been addressed.
This patch changes the behavior of the substrs argument to self.expect.
Currently, the elements of substrs are unordered and as long as the
string appears in the output, the assertion passes.
We can be more precise by requiring that the substrings be ordered in
the way they appear. My hope is that this will make it harder to
accidentally pass a check because a string appears out of order.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73766
Value::GetValueByteSize() reports the size of a Value as the size of its
underlying CompilerType. However, a host buffer that backs a Value may
be smaller than GetValueByteSize().
This situation arises when the host is only able to partially evaluate a
Value, e.g. because the expression contains DW_OP_piece.
The cleanest fix I've found to this problem is Greg's suggestion, which
is to resize the Value if (after evaluating an expression) it's found to
be too small. I've tried several alternatives which all (in one way or
the other) tried to teach the Value/ValueObjectChild system not to read
past the end of a host buffer, but this was flaky and impractical as it
isn't easy to figure out the host buffer's size (Value::GetScalar() can
point to somewhere /inside/ a host buffer, but you need to walk up the
ValueObject hierarchy to try and find its size).
This fixes an ASan error in lldb seen when debugging a clang binary.
I've added a regression test in test/functionalities/optimized_code. The
point of that test is not specifically to check that DW_OP_piece is
handled a particular way, but rather to check that lldb doesn't crash on
an input that it used to crash on.
Testing: check-lldb, and running the added tests using a sanitized lldb
--
Thanks to Jim for pointing out that an earlier version of this patch,
which simply changed the definition of Value::GetValueByteSize(), would
interact poorly with the ValueObject machinery.
Thanks also to Pavel who suggested a neat way to test this change
(which, incidentally, caught another ASan issue still present in the
original version of this patch).
rdar://58665925
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73148
Specializations of the Platform class print the kernel after calling the
super method. By printing the kernel at the end in the super class, we
guarantee the order is the same on different platforms.
This patch changes the behavior of the substrs argument to self.expect.
Currently, the elements of substrs are unordered and as long as the
string appears in the output, the assertion passes.
We can be more precise by requiring that the substrings be ordered in
the way they appear. My hope is that this will make it harder to
accidentally pass a check because a string appears out of order.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73766
Currently the substrs parameter takes a list of strings that need to be
found but the ordering isn't checked. D73766 might change that so this
changes a several tests so that the order of the strings in the substrs
list is in the order in which they appear in the output.
Currently the substrs parameter takes a list of strings that need to be
found but the ordering isn't checked. D73766 might change that so this
changes a several tests so that the order of the strings in the substrs
list is in the order in which they appear in the output.
Currently the substrs parameter takes a list of strings that need to be
found but the ordering isn't checked. D73766 might change that so this
changes a several tests so that the order of the strings in the substrs
list is in the order in which they appear in the output.
Currently the substrs parameter takes a list of strings that need to be
found but the ordering isn't checked. D73766 might change that so this
changes a several tests so that the order of the strings in the substrs
list is in the order in which they appear in the output.
Currently the substrs parameter takes a list of strings
that need to be found but the ordering isn't checked. D73766
might change that so this changes a several tests so that
the order of the strings in the substrs list is in the order
in which they appear in the output.
Currently if 'expect' fails and a custom msg is supplied, then lldbtest
will not print the actual command output. This makes it impossible to know
why the test actually failed. This just prints the command output even
if the msg parameter was supplied.
Summary:
There was a bug on LLDB VSCode where there was the following behavior:
//Code
```
struct foo {
int bar:
};
...
foo my_foo = {10};
```
Trying to auto-complete my_foo.b with my_foo.bar resulted instead with my_foo.my_foo.bar
This diff fixes this bug and adds some tests to check correct behavior.
It also fixes the same bug using the arrow operator (->) when user manually requests completions.
TODO: Fix bug where no recommended completions are automatically shown with arrow operator
{F11249959}
{F11249958}
Reviewers: wallace
Reviewed By: wallace
Subscribers: teemperor, labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73506
Summary:
Currently we crash in Clang's CodeGen when we call functions with covariant return types with this assert:
```
Assertion failed: (DD && "queried property of class with no definition"), function data, file clang/include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h, line 433.
```
when calling `clang::CXXRecordDecl::isDerivedFrom` from the `ItaniumVTableBuilder`.
Clang seems to assume that the underlying record decls of covariant return types are already completed.
This is true during a normal Clang invocation as there the type checker will complete both decls when
checking if the overloaded function is valid (i.e., the return types are covariant).
When we minimally import our AST into the expression in LLDB we don't do this type checking (which
would complete the record decls) and we end up trying to access the invalid record decls from CodeGen
which makes us trigger the assert.
This patch just completes the underlying types of ptr/ref return types of virtual function so that the
underlying records are complete and we behave as Clang expects us to do.
Fixes rdar://38048657
Reviewers: lhames, shafik
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73024
When a thread stops, this checks depending on the platform if the top frame is
an abort stack frame. If so, it looks for an assert stack frame in the upper
frames and set it as the most relavant frame when found.
To do so, the StackFrameRecognizer class holds a "Most Relevant Frame" and a
"cooked" stop reason description. When the thread is about to stop, it checks
if the current frame is recognized, and if so, it fetches the recognized frame's
attributes and applies them.
rdar://58528686
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73303
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
We want that the *.py names for the tests have unique names but
the current ones are sometimes very simple (e.g., "TestUniquePtr.py")
and could collide with unrelated tests. This just gives all these
tests a "FromStdModule" suffix to make these collisions less likely.
BreakpointSites know they're backed by hardware based on whether the
"hardware index" is set. This does not appear the to be done for
arm/aarch64.
https://llvm.org/PR44659
Include whether or not a breakpoint is a hardware breakpoint in the
breakpoint location. This will show up in things like the breakpoint
list.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73389
Recognize hardware breakpoints as breakpoints instead of just mach
exceptions. The mach exception is the same for watch and breakpoints, so
we have to try each to figure out which is which.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73401
The test was printing a char[3] variable without a terminating nul. The
memory after that variable (an unnamed bitfield) was not initialized. If
the memory happened to be nonzero, the summary provider for the variable
would run off into the next field.
This is probably not the right behavior (it should stop at the end of
the array), but this is not the purpose of this test. I have filed
pr44649 for this bug, and fixed the test to not depend on this behavior.
We ran into an assert when debugging clang and performing an expression on a class derived from DeclContext. The assert was indicating we were getting the offsets wrong for RecordDeclBitfields. We were getting both the size and offset of unnamed bit-field members wrong. We could fix this case with a quick change but as I extended the test suite to include more combinations we kept finding more cases that were being handled incorrectly. A fix that handled all the new cases as well as the cases already covered required a refactor of the existing technique.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72953
calls to commonly un-overridden methods into a function that checks whether
the method is overridden anywhere and if not directly dispatches to the
NSObject implementation.
That means if you do override any of these methods, "step-in" will not step
into your code, since we hit the wrapper function, which has no debug info,
and immediately step out again.
Add code to recognize these functions as "trampolines" and a thread plan that
will get us from the function to the user code, if overridden.
<rdar://problem/54404114>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73225
Summary:
This commit renames ClangASTContext to TypeSystemClang to better reflect what this class is actually supposed to do
(implement the TypeSystem interface for Clang). It also gets rid of the very confusing situation that we have both a
`clang::ASTContext` and a `ClangASTContext` in clang (which sometimes causes Clang people to think I'm fiddling
with Clang's ASTContext when I'm actually just doing LLDB work).
I also have plans to potentially have multiple clang::ASTContext instances associated with one ClangASTContext so
the ASTContext naming will then become even more confusing to people.
Reviewers: #lldb, aprantl, shafik, clayborg, labath, JDevlieghere, davide, espindola, jdoerfert, xiaobai
Reviewed By: clayborg, labath, xiaobai
Subscribers: wuzish, emaste, nemanjai, mgorny, kbarton, MaskRay, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, jingham, xiaobai, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72684
This error is caused by a combination of a couple of factors:
- the test accidentally creating a list with a single (empty) FileSpec
instead of an empty list
- lldb overzeleously converting empty strings into nullptrs
- asan overzeleously validating symlink(2) arguments (the real symlink
call would just fail with EFAULT)
I fix this by using FileSpec::GetPath instead of GetCString. This avoids
the nullptr and also avoids inserting the path into the global string
pool.
I also enhance the test case to test both empty paths and empty lists.
Summary:
The ValueObject code checks for a special `$$dereference$$` synthetic
child to allow formatter providers to implement a natural
dereferencing behavior in `frame variable` for objects like smart
pointers.
This support was broken when used directly throught the Python API and
not trhough `frame variable`. The reason is that
SBFrame.FindVariable() will return by default the synthetic variable
if it exists, while `frame variable` will not do this eagerly. The
code in `ValueObject::Dereference()` accounted for the latter but not
for the former. The fix is trivial. The test change includes
additional covergage for the already-working bahevior as it wasn't
covered by the testsuite before.
This commit also adds a short piece of documentatione explaining that
it is possible (even advisable) to provide this synthetic child
outstide of the range of the normal children.
Reviewers: jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73053
Summary:
Add setting target.auto-install-main-executable that controls whether
the main executable should be automatically installed when connected to
a remote platform even if it does not have an explicit install path
specified. The default is true as the current behaviour.
Reviewers: omjavaid, JDevlieghere, srhines, labath, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: kevin.brodsky, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71761
Summary:
Add setting target.auto-install-main-executable that controls whether
the main executable should be automatically installed when connected to
a remote platform even if it does not have an explicit install path
specified. The default is true as the current behaviour.
Reviewers: omjavaid, JDevlieghere, srhines, labath, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: kevin.brodsky, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71761
The way the IO handlers are currently managed by the debugger is wrong. The
implementation lacks proper synchronization between RunIOHandlerSync and
RunIOHandlers. The latter is meant to be run by the "main thread", while the
former is meant to be run synchronously, potentially from a different thread.
Imagine a scenario where RunIOHandlerSync is called from a different thread
than RunIOHandlers. Both functions manipulate the debugger's IOHandlerStack.
Although the push and pop operations are synchronized, the logic to activate,
deactivate and run IO handlers is not.
While investigating PR44352, I noticed some weird behavior in the Editline
implementation. One of its members (m_editor_status) was modified from another
thread. This happened because the main thread, while running RunIOHandlers
ended up execution the IOHandlerEditline created by the breakpoint callback
thread. Even worse, due to the lack of synchronization within the IO handler
implementation, both threads ended up executing the same IO handler.
Most of the time, the IO handlers don't need to run synchronously. The
exception is sourcing commands from external files, like the .lldbinit file.
I've added a (recursive) mutex to prevent another thread from messing with the
IO handlers wile another thread is running one synchronously. It has to be
recursive, because we might have to source another file when encountering a
command source in the original file.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72748
Summary:
CXXRecordDecls that have a move constructor but no copy constructor need to
have their implicit copy constructor marked as deleted (see C++11 [class.copy]p7, p18)
Currently we don't do that when building an AST with ClangASTContext which causes
Sema to realise that the AST is malformed and asserting when trying to create an implicit
copy constructor for us in the expression:
```
Assertion failed: ((data().DefaultedCopyConstructorIsDeleted || needsOverloadResolutionForCopyConstructor())
&& "Copy constructor should not be deleted"), function setImplicitCopyConstructorIsDeleted, file include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h, line 828.
```
In the test case there is a class `NoCopyCstr` that should have its copy constructor marked as
deleted (as it has a move constructor). When we end up trying to tab complete in the
`IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr` constructor, Sema realises that the `IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr`
has no implicit copy constructor and tries to create one for us. It then realises that
`NoCopyCstr` also has no copy constructor it could find via lookup. However because we
haven't marked the FieldDecl as having a deleted copy constructor the
`needsOverloadResolutionForCopyConstructor()` returns false and the assert fails.
`needsOverloadResolutionForCopyConstructor()` would return true if during the time we
added the `NoCopyCstr` FieldDecl to `IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr` we would have actually marked
it as having a deleted copy constructor (which would then mark the copy constructor of
`IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr ` as needing overload resolution and Sema is happy).
This patch sets the correct mark when we complete our CXXRecordDecls (which is the time when
we know whether a copy constructor has been declared). In theory we don't have to do this if
we had a Sema around when building our debug info AST but at the moment we don't have this
so this has to do the job for now.
Reviewers: shafik
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: aprantl, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72694
