4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Raphael Isemann
9eedbc4f26 [lldb][NFC] Remove unused imports in python tests
llvm-svn: 367663
2019-08-02 08:06:22 +00:00
Stella Stamenova
756b91dc14 [lldbsuite] Un-xfail tests on Windows that are now passing
This is a set of tests that were all marked as failing becuse of pr24489. The bug is not fixed (as in more of the tests that were marked this way are failing), but this set is passing. It is possible that some of them are false positives, but there's a large number of unexpectedly passing tests on Windows, so I am doing a bulk un-xfail to get the buildbot to green.

llvm-svn: 349665
2018-12-19 19:04:01 +00:00
Raphael Isemann
9dd34c8385 Add descriptions to completed expressions
Summary:
Completing inside the expression command now uses the new description API
to also provide additional information to the user. For now this information
are the types of variables/fields and the signatures of completed function calls.

Reviewers: #lldb, JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52103

llvm-svn: 342385
2018-09-17 12:06:07 +00:00
Raphael Isemann
7482973411 Added initial code completion support for the expr command
Summary:
This patch adds initial code completion support for the `expr` command.

We now have a completion handler in the expression CommandObject that
essentially just attempts to parse the given user expression with Clang with
an attached code completion consumer. We filter and prepare the
code completions provided by Clang and send them back to the completion
API.

The current completion is limited to variables that are in the current scope.
This includes local variables and all types used by local variables. We however
don't do any completion of symbols that are not used in the local scope (or
in some other way already in the ASTContext).

This is partly because there is not yet any code that manually searches for additiona
information in the debug information. Another cause is that for some reason the existing
code for loading these additional symbols when requested by Clang doesn't seem to work.
This will be fixed in a future patch.

Reviewers: jingham, teemperor

Reviewed By: teemperor

Subscribers: labath, aprantl, JDevlieghere, friss, lldb-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48465

llvm-svn: 341086
2018-08-30 17:29:37 +00:00