We were not making any distinction between e.g. the "Apple-flavored"
libc++ built from trunk and the system-provided standard library on
Apple platforms. For example, any test that would be XFAILed on a
back-deployment target would unexpectedly pass when run on that
deployment target against the tip of trunk Apple-flavored libc++. In
reality, that test would be expected to pass because we're running
against the latest libc++, even if it is Apple-flavored.
To solve this issue, we introduce a new feature that describes whether
the Standard Library in use is the one provided by the system by
default, and that notion is different from the underlying standard
library flavor. We also refactor the existing Lit features to make a
distinction between availability markup and the library we're running
against at runtime, which otherwise limit the flexibility of what we can
express in the test suite. Finally, we refactor some of the
back-deployment versions that were incorrect (such as thinking that LLVM
10 was introduced in macOS 11, when in reality macOS 11 was synced with
LLVM 11).
Fixes#82107
Add UNSUPPORTED to pass tests on VE. VE uses SjLj libunwind, so
_Unwind_Backtrace and _Unwind_ForcedUnwind are not implemented.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, #libc_abi, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D159446
The use_system_cxx_lib Lit feature was only used for back-deployment
testing. However, one immense hole in that setup was that we didn't
have a proper way to test Apple's own libc++ outside of back-deployment,
which was embodied by the fact that we needed to define _LIBCPP_DISABLE_AVAILABILITY
when testing (see change in libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/params.py).
This led to the apple-system testing configuration not checking for
availability markup, which is obviously quite bad since the library
we ship actually has availability markup.
Using stdlib=<VENDOR>-libc++ instead to encode back-deployment restrictions
on tests is simpler and it makes it possible to naturally support tests
such as availability markup checking even in the tip-of-trunk Apple-libc++
configuration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146366
_Unwind_ForcedUnwind is not mandated by the EHABI but for compatibilty
reasons adding so the interface to higher layers would be the same.
Dropping EHABI specific _Unwind_Stop_Fn definition since it is not defined by EHABI.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89570
Now that Lit supports regular expressions inside XFAIL & friends, it is
much easier to write Lit annotations based on the triple.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104747
This fixes a long standing issue where the triple is not always set
consistently in all configurations. This change also moves the
back-deployment Lit features to using the proper target triple
instead of using something ad-hoc.
This will be necessary for using from scratch Lit configuration files
in both normal testing and back-deployment testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102012
Before this patch, we could only link against the back-deployment libc++abi
dylib. This patch allows linking against the just-built libc++abi, but
running against the back-deployment one -- just like we do for libc++.
Also, add XFAIL markup to flag expected errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91069
Added __cxxabi_config.h includes to resolve _LIBCXXABI_ARM_EHABI and
proper building the forces_unwindX.cpp tests for the ARM/EHABI targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96378
libunwind ARM EHABI does not support _Unwind_ForcedUnwind yet.
In addition, ARM EHABI makes `_Unwind_Exception` a typedef so
`struct _Unwind_Exception*` cannot be used.
Forced unwinding is like a foreign exception, which can be caught by `catch (...)` and rethrown.
If not rethrown, `__cxa_end_cath` will call `_Unwind_DeleteException` to destroy the object.
The behavior going through empty `throw()` and non-empty `throw(int)` is not
clear (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98785), so I do not add such
tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95200
