constructor. This isn't quite perfect (as usual, we don't handle default
arguments correctly yet, and we don't deal with copy/move constructors for
arguments correctly either, but this will be fixed when we implement core issue
1351.
This completes our support for inheriting constructors.
llvm-svn: 179154
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-gdb went back green
before it processed the reverted 178663, so it could not have been the culprit.
Revert "Revert 178663."
This reverts commit 4f8a3eb2ce5d4ba422483439e20c8cbb4d953a41.
llvm-svn: 178682
For variables and functions clang used to store two storage classes. The one
"as written" in the code and a patched one, which, for example, propagates
static to the following decls.
This apparently is from the days clang lacked linkage computation. It is now
redundant and this patch removes it.
llvm-svn: 178663
overriding a non-deleted virtual function. The existing check for this doesn't
catch this case, because it fires before we mark the method as deleted.
llvm-svn: 178563
uninstantiated exception specification when a special member within a class
template is both defaulted and given an exception specification on its first
declaration.
llvm-svn: 178103
When Sema::RequireCompleteType() is given a class template
specialization type that then fails to instantiate, it returns
'true'. On subsequent invocations, it can return false. Make sure that
this difference doesn't change the result of
Sema::CompareReferenceRelationship, which is expected to remain stable
while we're checking an initialization sequence.
llvm-svn: 178088
picking up cleanups from earlier in the statement. Also fix a
crash-on-invalid where a reference to an invalid decl from an
enclosing scope was causing an expression to fail to build, but
only *after* a cleanup was registered from that statement,
causing an assertion downstream.
The crash-on-valid is rdar://13459289.
llvm-svn: 177692
Introduce a new AST Decl node "EmptyDecl" to model empty-declaration. Have attributes from attribute-declaration appertain
to the EmptyDecl node by creating the AST representations of these attributes and attach them to the EmptyDecl node so these
attributes can be sema checked just as attributes attached to "normal" declarations.
llvm-svn: 175900
attributes yet, so just issue the appropriate diagnostics. Also generalize the
fixit for attributes-in-the-wrong-place code and reuse it here, if attributes
are placed after the access-specifier or 'virtual' in a base specifier.
llvm-svn: 175575
The TypeLoc hierarchy used the llvm::cast machinery to perform undefined
behavior by casting pointers/references to TypeLoc objects to derived types
and then using the derived copy constructors (or even returning pointers to
derived types that actually point to the original TypeLoc object).
Some context is in this thread:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-December/056804.html
Though it's spread over a few months which can be hard to read in the mail
archive.
llvm-svn: 175462
If the member has an initializer, assume it was probably intended to be static
and suggest/recover with that.
If the member doesn't have an initializer, assume it was probably intended to
be const instead of constexpr and suggest that.
(if the attempt to apply these changes fails, don't make any suggestion &
produce the same diagnostic experience as before. The only case where this can
come up that I know of is with a mutable constexpr with an initializer, since
mutable is incompatible with static (but it's already incompatible with
const anyway))
llvm-svn: 173873
never key functions. We did not implement that rule for the
iOS ABI, which was driven by what was implemented in gcc-4.2.
However, implement it now for other ARM-based platforms.
llvm-svn: 173515
expressions which have undefined behavior due to multiple unsequenced
modifications or an unsequenced modification and use of a variable.
llvm-svn: 172690
ActOnFinishFullExpr that some of its checks only apply to discarded-value
expressions. This adds missing checks for unexpanded variadic template
parameter packs to a handful of constructs.
llvm-svn: 172485
copy-list-initialization (and doesn't add an additional copy step):
Fill in the ListInitialization bit when creating a CXXConstructExpr. Use it
when instantiating initializers in order to correctly handle instantiation of
copy-list-initialization. Teach TreeTransform that function arguments are
initializations, and so need this special treatment too. Finally, remove some
hacks which were working around SubstInitializer's shortcomings.
llvm-svn: 170489
This does limit these typedefs to being sequences, but no current usage
requires them to be contiguous (we could expand this to a more general
iterator pair range concept at some point).
Also, it'd be nice if SmallVector were constructible directly from an ArrayRef
but this is a bit tricky since ArrayRef depends on SmallVectorBaseImpl for the
inverse conversion. (& generalizing over all range-like things, while nice,
would require some nontrivial SFINAE I haven't thought about yet)
llvm-svn: 170482
definition, rather than at the end of the definition of the set of nested
classes. We still defer checking of the user-specified exception specification
to the end of the nesting -- we can't check that until we've parsed the
in-class initializers for non-static data members.
llvm-svn: 169805
the cases where we can't determine whether special members would be trivial
while building the class, we eagerly declare those special members. The impact
of this is bounded, since it does not trigger implicit declarations of special
members in classes which merely *use* those classes.
In order to determine whether we need to apply this rule, we also need to
eagerly declare move operations and destructors in cases where they might be
deleted. If a move operation were supposed to be deleted, it would instead
be suppressed, and we could need overload resolution to determine if we fall
back to a trivial copy operation. If a destructor were implicitly deleted,
it would cause the move constructor of any derived classes to be suppressed.
As discussed on cxx-abi-dev, C++11's selected constructor rules are also
retroactively applied as a defect resolution in C++03 mode, in order to
identify that class B has a non-trivial copy constructor (since it calls
A's constructor template, not A's copy constructor):
struct A { template<typename T> A(T &); };
struct B { mutable A a; };
llvm-svn: 169673
