'nohost' is only valid on routine, and states that the compiler
shouldn't compile this routine for the host. It has no arguments, so no
checking is required besides putting it in the AST.
This statement level construct takes no clauses and has no associated
statement, and simply labels a number of array elements as valid for
caching. The implementation here is pretty simple, but it is a touch of
a special case for parsing, so the parsing code reflects that.
The 'declare' construct is the first of two 'declaration' level
constructs, so it is legal in any place a declaration is, including as a
statement, which this accomplishes by wrapping it in a DeclStmt. All
clauses on this have a 'same scope' requirement, which this enforces as
declaration context instead, which makes it possible to implement these
as a template.
The 'link' and 'device_resident' clauses are also added, which have some
similar/small restrictions, but are otherwise pretty rote.
This patch implements all of the above.
This merges the functionality of ResolvedUnexpandedPackExpr into
FunctionParmPackExpr. I also added a test to show that
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/125103 should be fixed with
this. I put the removal of ResolvedUnexpandedPackExpr in its own commit.
Let me know what you think.
Fixes#125103
Add initial parsing/sema support for new assumption clause so clause can
be specified. For now, it's ignored, just like the others.
Added support for 'no_openmp_construct' to release notes.
Testing
- Updated appropriate LIT tests.
- Testing: check-all
The atomic construct is a particularly complicated one. The directive
itself is pretty simple, it has 5 options for the 'atomic-clause'.
However, the associated statement is fairly complicated.
'read' accepts:
v = x;
'write' accepts:
x = expr;
'update' (or no clause) accepts:
x++;
x--;
++x;
--x;
x binop= expr;
x = x binop expr;
x = expr binop x;
'capture' accepts either a compound statement, or:
v = x++;
v = x--;
v = ++x;
v = --x;
v = x binop= expr;
v = x = x binop expr;
v = x = expr binop x;
IF 'capture' has a compound statement, it accepts:
{v = x; x binop= expr; }
{x binop= expr; v = x; }
{v = x; x = x binop expr; }
{v = x; x = expr binop x; }
{x = x binop expr ;v = x; }
{x = expr binop x; v = x; }
{v = x; x = expr; }
{v = x; x++; }
{v = x; ++x; }
{x++; v = x; }
{++x; v = x; }
{v = x; x--; }
{v = x; --x; }
{x--; v = x; }
{--x; v = x; }
While these are all quite complicated, there is a significant amount
of similarity between the 'capture' and 'update' lists, so this patch
reuses a lot of the same functions.
This patch implements the entirety of 'atomic', creating a new Sema file
for the sema for it, as it is fairly sizable.
This is an implementation of P1061 Structure Bindings Introduce a Pack
without the ability to use packs outside of templates. There is a couple
of ways the AST could have been sliced so let me know what you think.
The only part of this change that I am unsure of is the
serialization/deserialization stuff. I followed the implementation of
other Exprs, but I do not really know how it is tested. Thank you for
your time considering this.
---------
Co-authored-by: Yanzuo Liu <zwuis@outlook.com>
We used to always transform the pattern declaration for SizeOfPackExpr
to ensure the constraint expression's profile produced the desired
result. However, this approach failed to handle pack expansions when the
pack referred to function parameters. In such cases, the function
parameters were formerly expanded to 1 to avoid building Subst* nodes
(see e6974daa7). That workaround caused us to transform a pack without a
proper ArgumentPackSubstitutionIndex, leading to crashes when
transforming the pattern.
It turns out that profiling the pattern for partially substituted
SizeOfPackExprs is unnecessary because their transformed forms are also
profiled within the partial arguments.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/124161
A SYCL kernel entry point function is a non-member function or a static
member function declared with the `sycl_kernel_entry_point` attribute.
Such functions define a pattern for an offload kernel entry point
function to be generated to enable execution of a SYCL kernel on a
device. A SYCL library implementation orchestrates the invocation of
these functions with corresponding SYCL kernel arguments in response to
calls to SYCL kernel invocation functions specified by the SYCL 2020
specification.
The offload kernel entry point function (sometimes referred to as the
SYCL kernel caller function) is generated from the SYCL kernel entry
point function by a transformation of the function parameters followed
by a transformation of the function body to replace references to the
original parameters with references to the transformed ones. Exactly how
parameters are transformed will be explained in a future change that
implements non-trivial transformations. For now, it suffices to state
that a given parameter of the SYCL kernel entry point function may be
transformed to multiple parameters of the offload kernel entry point as
needed to satisfy offload kernel argument passing requirements.
Parameters that are decomposed in this way are reconstituted as local
variables in the body of the generated offload kernel entry point
function.
For example, given the following SYCL kernel entry point function
definition:
```
template<typename KernelNameType, typename KernelType>
[[clang::sycl_kernel_entry_point(KernelNameType)]]
void sycl_kernel_entry_point(KernelType kernel) {
kernel();
}
```
and the following call:
```
struct Kernel {
int dm1;
int dm2;
void operator()() const;
};
Kernel k;
sycl_kernel_entry_point<class kernel_name>(k);
```
the corresponding offload kernel entry point function that is generated
might look as follows (assuming `Kernel` is a type that requires
decomposition):
```
void offload_kernel_entry_point_for_kernel_name(int dm1, int dm2) {
Kernel kernel{dm1, dm2};
kernel();
}
```
Other details of the generated offload kernel entry point function, such
as its name and calling convention, are implementation details that need
not be reflected in the AST and may differ across target devices. For
that reason, only the transformation described above is represented in
the AST; other details will be filled in during code generation.
These transformations are represented using new AST nodes introduced
with this change. `OutlinedFunctionDecl` holds a sequence of
`ImplicitParamDecl` nodes and a sequence of statement nodes that
correspond to the transformed parameters and function body.
`SYCLKernelCallStmt` wraps the original function body and associates it
with an `OutlinedFunctionDecl` instance. For the example above, the AST
generated for the `sycl_kernel_entry_point<kernel_name>` specialization
would look as follows:
```
FunctionDecl 'sycl_kernel_entry_point<kernel_name>(Kernel)'
TemplateArgument type 'kernel_name'
TemplateArgument type 'Kernel'
ParmVarDecl kernel 'Kernel'
SYCLKernelCallStmt
CompoundStmt
<original statements>
OutlinedFunctionDecl
ImplicitParamDecl 'dm1' 'int'
ImplicitParamDecl 'dm2' 'int'
CompoundStmt
VarDecl 'kernel' 'Kernel'
<initialization of 'kernel' with 'dm1' and 'dm2'>
<transformed statements with redirected references of 'kernel'>
```
Any ODR-use of the SYCL kernel entry point function will (with future
changes) suffice for the offload kernel entry point to be emitted. An
actual call to the SYCL kernel entry point function will result in a
call to the function. However, evaluation of a `SYCLKernelCallStmt`
statement is a no-op, so such calls will have no effect other than to
trigger emission of the offload kernel entry point.
Additionally, as a related change inspired by code review feedback,
these changes disallow use of the `sycl_kernel_entry_point` attribute
with functions defined with a _function-try-block_. The SYCL 2020
specification prohibits the use of C++ exceptions in device functions.
Even if exceptions were not prohibited, it is unclear what the semantics
would be for an exception that escapes the SYCL kernel entry point
function; the boundary between host and device code could be an implicit
noexcept boundary that results in program termination if violated, or
the exception could perhaps be propagated to host code via the SYCL
library. Pending support for C++ exceptions in device code and clear
semantics for handling them at the host-device boundary, this change
makes use of the `sycl_kernel_entry_point` attribute with a function
defined with a _function-try-block_ an error.
These two clauses just take a 'var-list' and specify where the variables
should be copied from/to. This patch implements the AST nodes for them
and ensures they properly take a var-list.
The 'self' clause is an unfortunately difficult one, as it has a
significantly different meaning between 'update' and the other
constructs. This patch introduces a way for the 'self' clause to work
as both. I considered making this two separate AST nodes (one for
'self' on 'update' and one for the others), however this makes the
automated macros/etc for supporting a clause break.
Instead, 'self' has the ability to act as either a condition or as a
var-list clause. As this is the only one of its kind, it is implemented
all within it. If in the future we have more that work like this, we
should consider rewriting a lot of the macros that we use to make
clauses work, and make them separate ast nodes.
This executable construct has a larger list of clauses than some of the
others, plus has some additional restrictions. This patch implements
the AST node, plus the 'cannot be the body of a if, while, do, switch,
or label' statement restriction. Future patches will handle the
rest of the restrictions, which are based on clauses.
A fairly simple one, only valid on the 'set' construct, this clause
takes an int expression. Most of the work was already done as a part of
parsing, so this patch ends up being a lot of infrastructure.
The 'set' construct is another fairly simple one, it doesn't have an
associated statement and only a handful of allowed clauses. This patch
implements it and all the rules for it, allowing 3 of its for clauses.
The only exception is default_async, which will be implemented in a
future patch, because it isn't just being enabled, it needs a complete
new implementation.
This is a very simple sema implementation, and just required AST node
plus the existing diagnostics. This patch adds tests and adds the AST
node required, plus enables it for 'init' and 'shutdown' (only!)
These two constructs are very simple and similar, and only support 3
different clauses, two of which are already implemented. This patch
adds AST nodes for both constructs, and leaves the device_num clause
unimplemented, but enables the other two.
The arguments to this are the same as for the 'wait' clause, so this
reuses all of that infrastructure. So all this has to do is support a
pair of clauses that are already implemented (if and async), plus create
an AST node. This patch does so, and adds proper testing.
This is a clause that is only valid on 'host_data' constructs, and
identifies variables which it should use the current device address.
From a Sema perspective, the only thing novel here is mild changes to
how ActOnVar works for this clause, else this is very much like the rest
of the 'var-list' clauses.
'delete' is another clause that has very little compile-time
implication, but needs a full AST that takes a var list. This patch
ipmlements it fully, plus adds sufficient test coverage.
This is another new clause specific to 'exit data' that takes a pointer
argument. This patch implements this the same way we do a few other
clauses (like attach) that have the same restrictions.
The 'if_present' clause controls the replacement of addresses in the
var-list in current device memory. This clause can only go on
'host_device'. From a Sema perspective, there isn't anything to do
beyond add this to AST and pass it on.
This is a very simple clause as far as sema is concerned. It is only
valid on 'exit data', and doesn't have any rules involving it, so it is
simply applied and passed onto the MLIR.
These constructs are all very similar and closely related, so this patch
creates the AST nodes for them, serialization, printing/etc.
Additionally the restrictions are all added as tests/todos in the tests,
as those will have to be implemented once we get those clauses implemented.
Combined constructs (OpenACC 3.3 section 2.11) are a short-cut for
writing a `loop` construct immediately inside of a `compute` construct.
However, this interaction requires we do additional work to ensure that
we get the semantics between the two correct, as well as diagnostics.
This patch adds the semantic analysis for the constructs (but no
clauses), as well as the AST nodes.
The 'vector' clause specifies the iterations to be executed in vector or
SIMD mode. There are some limitations on which associated compute
contexts may be associated with this and have arguments, but otherwise
this is a fairly unrestricted clause.
It DOES have region limits like 'gang' and 'worker'.
The worker clause specifies iterations of the loop/ that are executed in
parallel by distributing the iterations among the multiple works within
a single gang.
The sema rules for this type are simply that it cannot be combined with
a `kernel` construct with a `num_workers` clause, child `loop` clauses
cannot contain a `gang` or `worker` clause, and that the argument is oly
allowed when associated with a `kernel`.
The 'gang' clause is used to specify parallel execution of loops, thus
has some complicated rules depending on the 'loop's associated compute
construct. This patch implements all of those.
Add the permutation clause for the interchange directive which will be
introduced in the upcoming OpenMP 6.0 specification. A preview has been
published in
[Technical Report12](https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/openmp-TR12.pdf).
The 'tile' clause shares quite a bit of the rules with 'collapse', so a
followup patch will add those tests/behaviors. This patch deals with
adding the AST node.
The 'tile' clause takes a series of integer constant expressions, or *.
The asterisk is now represented by a new OpenACCAsteriskSizeExpr node,
else this clause is very similar to others.
The 'collapse' clause on a 'loop' construct is used to specify how many
nested loops are associated with the 'loop' construct. It takes an
optional 'force' tag, and an integer constant expression as arguments.
There are many other restrictions based on the contents of the loop/etc,
but those are implemented in followup patches, for now, this patch just
adds the AST node and does basic argument checking on the loop-count.
HLSL output parameters are denoted with the `inout` and `out` keywords
in the function declaration. When an argument to an output parameter is
constructed a temporary value is constructed for the argument.
For `inout` pamameters the argument is initialized via copy-initialization
from the argument lvalue expression to the parameter type. For `out`
parameters the argument is not initialized before the call.
In both cases on return of the function the temporary value is written
back to the argument lvalue expression through an implicit assignment
binary operator with casting as required.
This change introduces a new HLSLOutArgExpr ast node which represents
the output argument behavior. The OutArgExpr has three defined children:
- An OpaqueValueExpr of the argument lvalue expression.
- An OpaqueValueExpr of the copy-initialized parameter.
- A BinaryOpExpr assigning the first with the value of the second.
Fixes#87526
---------
Co-authored-by: Damyan Pepper <damyanp@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: John McCall <rjmccall@gmail.com>
By the OpenMP standard, `num_teams` clause can only accept one
expression (for now). In this patch, we extend it to allow to accept
multiple expressions when it is used with `target teams ompx_bare`
construct. This will allow to launch a multi-dim grid, same as CUDA/HIP.
This is a minimal patch to support parsing for "omp assume" directives.
These are meant to be hints to a compiler's optimisers: as such, it is
legitimate (if not very useful) to ignore them. The patch builds on top
of the existing support for "omp assumes" directives (note spelling!).
Unlike the "omp [begin/end] assumes" directives, "omp assume" is
associated with a compound statement, i.e. it can appear within a
function. The "holds" assumption could (theoretically) be mapped onto
the existing builtin "__builtin_assume", though the latter applies to a
single point in the program, and the former to a range (i.e. the whole
of the associated compound statement).
This patch fixes sollve's OpenMP 5.1 "omp assume"-based tests.
Add the reverse directive which will be introduced in the upcoming
OpenMP 6.0 specification. A preview has been published in [Technical
Report 12](https://www.openmp.org/wp-content/uploads/openmp-TR12.pdf).
---------
Co-authored-by: Alexey Bataev <a.bataev@outlook.com>
This commit implements the entirety of the now-accepted [N3017
-Preprocessor
Embed](https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3017.htm) and
its sister C++ paper [p1967](https://wg21.link/p1967). It implements
everything in the specification, and includes an implementation that
drastically improves the time it takes to embed data in specific
scenarios (the initialization of character type arrays). The mechanisms
used to do this are used under the "as-if" rule, and in general when the
system cannot detect it is initializing an array object in a variable
declaration, will generate EmbedExpr AST node which will be expanded by
AST consumers (CodeGen or constant expression evaluators) or expand
embed directive as a comma expression.
This reverts commit
682d461d5a.
---------
Co-authored-by: The Phantom Derpstorm <phdofthehouse@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Ballman <aaron@aaronballman.com>
Co-authored-by: cor3ntin <corentinjabot@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: H. Vetinari <h.vetinari@gmx.com>
This commit implements the entirety of the now-accepted [N3017 -
Preprocessor
Embed](https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3017.htm) and
its sister C++ paper [p1967](https://wg21.link/p1967). It implements
everything in the specification, and includes an implementation that
drastically improves the time it takes to embed data in specific
scenarios (the initialization of character type arrays). The mechanisms
used to do this are used under the "as-if" rule, and in general when the
system cannot detect it is initializing an array object in a variable
declaration, will generate EmbedExpr AST node which will be expanded
by AST consumers (CodeGen or constant expression evaluators) or
expand embed directive as a comma expression.
---------
Co-authored-by: Aaron Ballman <aaron@aaronballman.com>
Co-authored-by: cor3ntin <corentinjabot@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: H. Vetinari <h.vetinari@gmx.com>
Co-authored-by: Podchishchaeva, Mariya <mariya.podchishchaeva@intel.com>
These three clauses are all quite trivial, as they take no parameters.
They are mutually exclusive, and 'seq' has some other exclusives that
are implemented here.
The ONE thing that isn't implemented is 2.9's restriction (line 2010):
'A loop associated with a 'loop' construct that does not have a 'seq'
clause must be written to meet all the following conditions'.
Future clauses will require similar work, so it'll be done as a
followup.
This patch implements the 'loop' construct AST, as well as the basic
appertainment rule. Additionally, it sets up the 'parent' compute
construct, which is necessary for codegen/other diagnostics.
A 'loop' can apply to a for or range-for loop, otherwise it has no other
restrictions (though some of its clauses do).
'reduction' has a few restrictions over normal 'var-list' clauses:
1- On parallel, a num_gangs can only have 1 argument when combined with
reduction. These two aren't able to be combined on any other of the
compute constructs however.
2- The vars all must be 'numerical data types' types of some sort, or a
'composite of numerical data types'. A list of types is given in the
standard as a minimum, so we choose 'isScalar', which covers all of
these types and keeps types that are actually numeric. Other compilers
don't seem to implement the 'composite of numerical data types', though
we do.
3- Because of the above restrictions, member-of-composite is not
allowed, so any access via a memberexpr is disallowed. Array-element and
sub-arrays (aka array sections) are both permitted, so long as they meet
the requirements of #2.
This patch implements all of these for compute constructs.
device_type, also spelled as dtype, specifies the applicability of the
clauses following it, and takes a series of identifiers representing the
architectures it applies to. As we don't have a source for the valid
architectures yet, this patch just accepts all.
Semantically, this also limits the list of clauses that can be applied
after the device_type, so this implements that as well.
This reverts commit 06f04b2e27f2586d3db2204ed4e54f8b78fea74e.
This reapplies commit c4a9a374749deb5f2a932a7d4ef9321be1b2ae5d.
The build failures were caused by the patch depending on the order of
evaluation of arguments to a function. This reapplication separates out
the capture of one of the values.
This reverts commit c4a9a374749deb5f2a932a7d4ef9321be1b2ae5d.
This and the followup patch keep hitting an assert I wrote on the build
bots in a way that isn't clear. Reverting so I can fix it without a
rush.
device_type, also spelled as dtype, specifies the applicability of the
clauses following it, and takes a series of identifiers representing the
architectures it applies to. As we don't have a source for the valid
architectures yet, this patch just accepts all.
Semantically, this also limits the list of clauses that can be applied
after the device_type, so this implements that as well.
'wait' takes a few int-exprs (well, a series of async-arguments, but
those are effectively just an int-expr), plus a pair of tags. This
patch adds the support for this to the AST, and does the appropriate
semantic analysis for them.
