When creating `EnumDecl`s from DWARF for Objective-C `NS_ENUM`s, the
Swift compiler tries to figure out if it should perform "swiftification"
of that enum (which involves renaming the enumerator cases, etc.). The
heuristics by which it determines whether we want to swiftify an enum is
by checking the `enum_extensibility` attribute (because that's what
`NS_ENUM` pretty much are). Currently LLDB fails to attach the
`EnumExtensibilityAttr` to `EnumDecl`s it creates (because there's not
enough info in DWARF to derive it), which means we have to fall back to
re-building Swift modules on-the-fly, slowing down expression evaluation
substantially. This happens around
4b3931c8ce/lib/ClangImporter/ImportEnumInfo.cpp (L37-L59)
To speed up Swift exression evaluation, this patch proposes encoding the
C/C++/Objective-C `enum_extensibility` attribute in DWARF via a new
`DW_AT_APPLE_ENUM_KIND`. This would currently be only used from the LLDB
Swift plugin. But may be of interest to other language plugins as well
(though I haven't come up with a concrete use-case for it outside of
Swift).
I'm open to naming suggestions of the various new attributes/attribute
constants proposed here. I tried to be as generic as possible if we
wanted to extend it to other kinds of enum properties (e.g., flag
enums).
The new attribute would look as follows:
```
DW_TAG_enumeration_type
DW_AT_type (0x0000003a "unsigned int")
DW_AT_APPLE_enum_kind (DW_APPLE_ENUM_KIND_Closed)
DW_AT_name ("ClosedEnum")
DW_AT_byte_size (0x04)
DW_AT_decl_file ("enum.c")
DW_AT_decl_line (23)
DW_TAG_enumeration_type
DW_AT_type (0x0000003a "unsigned int")
DW_AT_APPLE_enum_kind (DW_APPLE_ENUM_KIND_Open)
DW_AT_name ("OpenEnum")
DW_AT_byte_size (0x04)
DW_AT_decl_file ("enum.c")
DW_AT_decl_line (27)
```
Absence of the attribute means the extensibility of the enum is unknown
and abides by whatever the language rules of that CU dictate.
This does feel like a big hammer for quite a specific use-case, so I'm
happy to discuss alternatives.
Alternatives considered:
* Re-using an existing DWARF attribute to express extensibility. E.g., a
`DW_TAG_enumeration_type` could have a `DW_AT_count` or
`DW_AT_upper_bound` indicating the number of enumerators, which could
imply closed-ness. I felt like a dedicated attribute (which could be
generalized further) seemed more applicable. But I'm open to re-using
existing attributes.
* Encoding the entire attribute string (i.e., `DW_TAG_LLVM_annotation
("enum_extensibility((open))")`) on the `DW_TAG_enumeration_type`. Then
in LLDB somehow parse that out into a `EnumExtensibilityAttr`. I haven't
found a great API in Clang to parse arbitrary strings into AST nodes
(the ones I've found required fully formed C++ constructs). Though if
someone knows of a good way to do this, happy to consider that too.
Add a specification attribute to LLVM DebugInfo, which is analogous
to DWARF's DW_AT_specification. According to the DWARF spec:
"A debugging information entry that represents a declaration that
completes another (earlier) non-defining declaration may have a
DW_AT_specification attribute whose value is a reference to the
debugging information entry representing the non-defining declaration."
This patch allows types to be specifications of other types. This is
used by Swift to represent generic types. For example, given this Swift
program:
```
struct MyStruct<T> {
let t: T
}
let variable = MyStruct<Int>(t: 43)
```
The Swift compiler emits (roughly) an unsubtituted type for MyStruct<T>:
```
DW_TAG_structure_type
DW_AT_name ("MyStruct")
// "$s1w8MyStructVyxGD" is a Swift mangled name roughly equivalent to
// MyStruct<T>
DW_AT_linkage_name ("$s1w8MyStructVyxGD")
// other attributes here
```
And a specification for MyStruct<Int>:
```
DW_TAG_structure_type
DW_AT_specification (<link to "MyStruct">)
// "$s1w8MyStructVySiGD" is a Swift mangled name equivalent to
// MyStruct<Int>
DW_AT_linkage_name ("$s1w8MyStructVySiGD")
DW_AT_byte_size (0x08)
// other attributes here
```
An extra inhabitant is a bit pattern that does not represent a valid
value for instances of a given type. The number of extra inhabitants is
the number of those bit configurations.
This is used by Swift to save space when composing types. For example,
because Bool only needs 2 bit patterns to represent all of its values
(true and false), an Optional<Bool> only occupies 1 byte in memory by
using a bit configuration that is unused by Bool. Which bit patterns are
unused are part of the ABI of the language.
Since Swift generics are not monomorphized, by using dynamic libraries
you can have generic types whose size, alignment, etc, are known only
at runtime (which is why this feature is needed).
This patch adds num_extra_inhabitants to LLVM-IR debug info and in DWARF
as an Apple extension.
It is almost always simpler to use {} instead of std::nullopt to
initialize an empty ArrayRef. This patch changes all occurrences I could
find in LLVM itself. In future the ArrayRef(std::nullopt_t) constructor
could be deprecated or removed.
Patch [3/x] to fix structured bindings debug info in SROA.
This function computes a fragment, bit-extract operation if needed, and new
constant offset to describe a part of a variable covered by some memory.
This generalises, simplifies, and replaces at::calculateFragmentIntersect. That
version is still used as a wrapper for now though to keep this change NFC.
The new version takes doesn't have a DbgRecord parameter, instead using an
explicit address and address offset. The old version only operates on
dbg_assigns and this change means it can also operate on dbg_declare records
easily, which it will do in a subsequent patch.
The new version has a new out-param OffsetFromLocationInBits which is set to
the difference between the first bit of the variable location and the first
bit of the memory slice. This will be used in a subsequent patch in SROA to
determine the new offset to use in the address expression after splitting an
alloca.
Patch [2/x] to fix structured bindings debug info in SROA.
It extracts a constant offset from the DIExpression if there is one and fills
RemainingOps with the ops that come after it.
This function will be used in a subsequent patch.
Extend `DIBasicType` and `DISubroutineType` with additional field
`annotations`, e.g. as below:
```
!5 = !DIBasicType(name: "int", size: 32, encoding: DW_ATE_signed, annotations: !6)
!6 = !{!7}
!7 = !{!"btf:type_tag", !"tag1"}
```
The field would be used by BPF backend to generate DWARF attributes
corresponding to `btf_type_tag` type attributes, e.g.:
```
0x00000029: DW_TAG_base_type
DW_AT_name ("int")
DW_AT_encoding (DW_ATE_signed)
DW_AT_byte_size (0x04)
0x0000002d: DW_TAG_LLVM_annotation
DW_AT_name ("btf:type_tag")
DW_AT_const_value ("tag1")
```
Such DWARF entries would be used to generate BTF definitions by tools
like [pahole](https://github.com/acmel/dwarves).
Note: similar fields with similar purposes are already present in
DIDerivedType and DICompositeType.
Currently "btf_type_tag" attributes are represented in debug information
as 'annotations' fields in DIDerivedType with DW_TAG_pointer_type tag.
The annotation on a pointer corresponds to pointee having the attributes
in the final BTF.
The discussion in
[thread](https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87r0w9jjoq.fsf@oracle.com/) came to
conclusion, that such annotations should apply to the annotated type
itself. Hence the necessity to extend `DIBasicType` & `DISubroutineType`
types with 'annotations' field to represent cases like below:
```
int __attribute__((btf_type_tag("foo"))) bar;
```
This was previously tracked as differential revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D143966
This doesn't need any work to be done in SROA itself, but rather in
functions that it uses. Specifically:
* DIExpression::createFragmentExpression is made to understand
DW_OP_LLVM_extract_bits
* valueCoversEntireFragment is made to check the active bits instead of
the fragment size, so that it handles extract_bits correctly
This operation extracts a number of bits at a given offset and sign or
zero extends them, which is done by emitting it as a left shift followed
by a right shift.
This is being added for use in clang for C++ structured bindings of
bitfields that have offset or size that aren't a byte multiple. A new
operation is being added, instead of shifts being used directly, as it
makes correctly handling it in optimisations (which will be done in a
later patch) much easier.
DIExpressions can get very long and have a lot of redundant operations.
This function uses simple pattern matching to fold constant math that
can be evaluated at compile time.
The hope is that other people can contribute other patterns as well.
I also couldn't see a good way of combining this with
`DIExpression::constantFold` so it stands alone.
This is part of a stack of patches and comes after
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69768https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71717
This is the major rename patch that prior patches have built towards.
The DPValue class is being renamed to DbgVariableRecord, which reflects
the updated terminology for the "final" implementation of the RemoveDI
feature. This is a pure string substitution + clang-format patch. The
only manual component of this patch was determining where to perform
these string substitutions: `DPValue` and `DPV` are almost exclusively
used for DbgRecords, *except* for:
- llvm/lib/target, where 'DP' is used to mean double-precision, and so
appears as part of .td files and in variable names. NB: There is a
single existing use of `DPValue` here that refers to debug info, which
I've manually updated.
- llvm/tools/gold, where 'LDPV' is used as a prefix for symbol
visibility enums.
Outside of these places, I've applied several basic string
substitutions, with the intent that they only affect DbgRecord-related
identifiers; I've checked them as I went through to verify this, with
reasonable confidence that there are no unintended changes that slipped
through the cracks. The substitutions applied are all case-sensitive,
and are applied in the order shown:
```
DPValue -> DbgVariableRecord
DPVal -> DbgVarRec
DPV -> DVR
```
Following the previous rename patches, it should be the case that there
are no instances of any of these strings that are meant to refer to the
general case of DbgRecords, or anything other than the DPValue class.
The idea behind this patch is therefore that pure string substitution is
correct in all cases as long as these assumptions hold.
Reland #82363 after fixing build failure
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/5/builds/41428.
Memory sanitizer detects usage of `RawData` union member which is not
filled directly. Instead, the code relies on filling `Data` union
member, which is a struct consisting of signing schema parameters.
According to https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/union, this is
UB:
"It is undefined behavior to read from the member of the union that
wasn't most recently written".
Instead of relying on compiler allowing us to do dirty things, do not
use union and only store `RawData`. Particular ptrauth parameters are
obtained on demand via bit operations.
Original PR description below.
Emit `__ptrauth`-qualified types as `DIDerivedType` metadata nodes in IR
with tag `DW_TAG_LLVM_ptrauth_type`, baseType referring to the type
which has the qualifier applied, and the following parameters
representing the signing schema:
- `ptrAuthKey` (integer)
- `ptrAuthIsAddressDiscriminated` (boolean)
- `ptrAuthExtraDiscriminator` (integer)
- `ptrAuthIsaPointer` (boolean)
- `ptrAuthAuthenticatesNullValues` (boolean)
Co-authored-by: Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed@bougacha.org>
The appendToStack() function asserts that no DW_OP_stack_value or
DW_OP_LLVM_fragment operations are present in the operations to be
appended. The function did that by iterating over all elements in the
array rather than just the operations, leading it to falsely asserting
on the following input produced by getExt(), since 159 (0x9f) is the
DWARF code for DW_OP_stack_value:
{dwarf::DW_OP_LLVM_convert, 159, dwarf::DW_ATE_signed}
Fix this by using expr_op iterators.
Emit `__ptrauth`-qualified types as `DIDerivedType` metadata nodes in IR
with tag `DW_TAG_LLVM_ptrauth_type`, baseType referring to the type
which has the qualifier applied, and the following parameters
representing the signing schema:
- `ptrAuthKey` (integer)
- `ptrAuthIsAddressDiscriminated` (boolean)
- `ptrAuthExtraDiscriminator` (integer)
- `ptrAuthIsaPointer` (boolean)
- `ptrAuthAuthenticatesNullValues` (boolean)
Co-authored-by: Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed@bougacha.org>
According to its doc-comment `isImplicit` is meant to return true if the
expression is an implicit location description (describes an object or part of
an object which has no location by computing the value from available program
state).
There's a brief entry for `DW_OP_LLVM_tag_offset` in the LangRef and there's
some info in the original commit fb9ce100d19be130d004d03088ccd4af295f3435.
From what I can tell it doesn't look like `DW_OP_LLVM_tag_offset` affects
whether or not the location is implicit; the opcode doesn't get included in the
final location description but instead is added as an attribute to the variable.
This was tripping an assertion in the latest application of the fix to #76545,
#78606, where an expression containing a `DW_OP_LLVM_tag_offset` is split into
a fragment (i.e., describe a part of the whole variable).
Loop-rotate manually maintains dbg.value intrinsics -- it also needs to
manually maintain the replacement for dbg.value intrinsics, DPValue
objects. For the most part this patch adds parallel implementations
using the new type Some extra juggling is needed when loop-rotate hoists
loop-invariant instructions out of the loop: the DPValues attached to
such an instruction need to get rotated but not hoisted. Exercised by
the new test function invariant_hoist in dbgvalue.ll.
There's also a "don't insert duplicate debug intrinsics" facility in
LoopRotate. The value and correctness of this isn't clear, but to
continue preserving behaviour that's now tested in the "tak_dup"
function in dbgvalue.ll.
Other things in this patch include a helper DebugVariable constructor
for DPValues, a insertDebugValuesForPHIs handler for RemoveDIs
(exercised by the new tests), and beefing up the dbg.value checking in
dbgvalue.ll to ensure that each record is tested (and that there's an
implicit check-not).
This reverts commit 0fd5dc94380d5fe666dc6c603b4bb782cef743e7.
The original commit removed DIArgLists from being in an MDNode map, but did
not insert a new `delete` in the LLVMContextImpl destructor. This
reapply adds that call to delete, preventing a memory leak.
This patch changes the `DIArgList` class's inheritance from `MDNode` to
`Metadata, ReplaceableMetadataImpl`, and ensures that it is always
unique, i.e. a distinct DIArgList should never be produced.
This should not result in any changes to IR or bitcode parsing and
printing, as the format for DIArgList is unchanged, and the order in which it
appears should also be identical. As a minor note, this patch also fixes
a gap in the verifier, where the ValueAsMetadata operands to a DIArgList
would not be visited.
This was reverted because it broke the OCaml LLVM bindings.
Relanding the original patch but without changing the C-API.
They'll continue to work just fine as they do today. If in the
future there is a need to pass a new tag to the C-API for creating
static members, then we'll make the change to the OCaml bindings
at that time.
Original commit message:
"""
This patch adds the LLVM-side infrastructure to implement DWARFv5 issue
161118.1: "DW_TAG for C++ static data members".
The clang-side of this patch will simply construct the DIDerivedType
with a different DW_TAG.
"""
This reverts commit 9a9933fae23249fbf6cf5b3c090e630f578b7f98.
The OCaml bindings were using `LLVMDIBuilderCreateStaticMemberType`,
causing the API change in `9a9933fae23249fbf6cf5b3c090e630f578b7f98`
to break buildbots that built the bindings. Revert until we figure out
whether to fixup the bindings or just not change the C-API
This patch adds the LLVM-side infrastructure to implement DWARFv5 issue
161118.1: "DW_TAG for C++ static data members".
The clang-side of this patch will simply construct the DIDerivedType
with a different DW_TAG.
This reverts commit 957efa4ce4f0391147cec62746e997226ee2b836.
Original commit message below -- in this follow up, I've shifted
un-necessary inclusions of DebugProgramInstruction.h into being forward
declarations (fixes clang-compile time I hope), and a memory leak in the
DebugInfoTest.cpp IR unittests.
I also tracked a compile-time regression in D154080, more explanation
there, but the result of which is hiding some of the changes behind the
EXPERIMENTAL_DEBUGINFO_ITERATORS compile-time flag. This is tested by the
"new-debug-iterators" buildbot.
[DebugInfo][RemoveDIs] Add prototype storage classes for "new" debug-info
This patch adds a variety of classes needed to record variable location
debug-info without using the existing intrinsic approach, see the rationale
at [0].
The two added files and corresponding unit tests are the majority of the
plumbing required for this, but at this point isn't accessible from the
rest of LLVM as we need to stage it into the repo gently. An overview is
that classes are added for recording variable information attached to Real
(TM) instructions, in the form of DPValues and DPMarker objects. The
metadata-uses of DPValues is plumbed into the metadata hierachy, and a
field added to class Instruction, which are all stimulated in the unit
tests. The next few patches in this series add utilities to convert to/from
this new debug-info format and add instruction/block utilities to have
debug-info automatically updated in the background when various operations
occur.
This patch was reviewed in Phab in D153990 and D154080, I've squashed them
together into this commit as there are dependencies between the two
patches, and there's little profit in landing them separately.
[0] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-instruction-api-changes-needed-to-eliminate-debug-intrinsics-from-ir/68939
And some intervening fixups. There are two remaining problems:
* A memory leak via https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/236/builds/7120/steps/10/logs/stdio
* A performance slowdown with -g where I'm not completely sure what the cause it
These might be fairly straightforwards to fix, but it's the end of the day
hear, so I figure I'll clear the buildbots til tomorrow.
This reverts commit 7d77bbef4ad9230f6f427649373fe46a668aa909.
This reverts commit 9026f35afe6ffdc5e55b6615efcbd36f25b11558.
This reverts commit d97b2b389a0e511c65af6845119eb08b8a2cb473.
This patch adds a variety of classes needed to record variable location
debug-info without using the existing intrinsic approach, see the rationale
at [0].
The two added files and corresponding unit tests are the majority of the
plumbing required for this, but at this point isn't accessible from the
rest of LLVM as we need to stage it into the repo gently. An overview is
that classes are added for recording variable information attached to Real
(TM) instructions, in the form of DPValues and DPMarker objects. The
metadata-uses of DPValues is plumbed into the metadata hierachy, and a
field added to class Instruction, which are all stimulated in the unit
tests. The next few patches in this series add utilities to convert to/from
this new debug-info format and add instruction/block utilities to have
debug-info automatically updated in the background when various operations
occur.
This patch was reviewed in Phab in D153990 and D154080, I've squashed them
together into this commit as there are dependencies between the two
patches, and there's little profit in landing them separately.
[0] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-instruction-api-changes-needed-to-eliminate-debug-intrinsics-from-ir/68939
Revision c383f4d6550e enabled using variadic-form debug values to represent
single-location, non-stack-value debug values, and a further patch made all
DBG_INSTR_REFs use variadic form. Not all code paths were updated correctly to
handle the new syntax however, with entry values in still expecting an expression
that begins exactly DW_OP_LLVM_entry_value, 1.
A function already exists to select non-variadic-like expressions; this patch
adds an extra function to cheaply simplify such cases to non-variadic form, which
we use prior to any entry-value processing to put DBG_INSTR_REFs and DBG_VALUEs
down the same code path. We also use it for a few DIExpression functions that
check for whether the first element(s) of a DIExpression match a particular
pattern, so that they will return the same result for
DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 0, <ops>) as for DIExpression(<ops>).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158185
On Apple platforms, we generate .apple_names, .apple_types,
.apple_namespaces and .apple_objc Apple accelerator tables for DWARF 4
and earlier. For DWARF 5 we should generate .debug_names, but instead we
get no accelerator tables at all.
In the backend we are correctly determining that we should be emitting
.debug_names instead of .apple_names. However, when we get to the point
of emitting the section, if the CU debug name table kind is not
"default", the accelerator table emission is skipped.
This patch sets the DebugNameTableKind to Apple in the frontend when
target an Apple target. That way we know that the CU was compiled with
the intent of emitting accelerator tables. For DWARF 4 and earlier, that
means Apple accelerator tables. For DWARF 5 and later, that means .debug
names.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118754
On Apple platforms, we generate .apple_names, .apple_types,
.apple_namespaces and .apple_objc Apple accelerator tables for DWARF 4
and earlier. For DWARF 5 we should generate .debug_names, but instead we
get no accelerator tables at all.
In the backend we are correctly determining that we should be emitting
.debug_names instead of .apple_names. However, when we get to the point
of emitting the section, if the CU debug name table kind is not
"default", the accelerator table emission is skipped.
This patch sets the DebugNameTableKind to Apple in the frontend when
target an Apple target. That way we know that the CU was compiled with
the intent of emitting accelerator tables. For DWARF 4 and earlier, that
means Apple accelerator tables. For DWARF 5 and later, that means .debug
names.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118754
salvageDebugInfo is a function that allows us to reatin debug info for
instructions that have been optimized out. Currently, it doesn't support
salvaging the debug information from icmp instrcutions, but DWARF
expressions can emulate an icmp by using the DWARF conditional
expressions. This patch adds support for salvaging debug information
from icmp instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150216
This commit removes constness from DILocation::getMergedLocation and
fixes all its users accordingly.
Having constness on the parameters forced the return type to be const
as well, which does force usage of `const_cast` when the location needs
to be used in metadata nodes.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149942
A DebugVariableAggregate is a DebugVariable that discards FragmentInfo; it
represents a whole variable instance.
Reviewed By: StephenTozer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D146298
For example, if you have a chain of inlined funtions like this:
1 #include <stdlib.h>
2 int g1 = 4, g2 = 6;
3
4 static inline void bar(int q) {
5 if (q > 5)
6 abort();
7 }
8
9 static inline void foo(int q) {
10 bar(q);
11 }
12
13 int main() {
14 foo(g1);
15 foo(g2);
16 return 0;
17 }
with optimizations you could end up with a single abort call for the two
inlined instances of foo(). When merging the locations for those inlined
instances you would previously end up with a 0:0 location in main().
Leaving out that inlined chain from the location for the abort call
could make troubleshooting difficult in some cases.
This patch changes DILocation::getMergedLocation() to try to handle such
cases. The function is rewritten to first find a common starting point
for the two locations (same subprogram and inlined-at location), and
then in reverse traverses the inlined-at chain looking for matches in
each subprogram. For each subprogram, the merge function will find the
nearest common scope for the two locations, and matching line and
column (or set them to 0 if not matching).
In the example above, you will for the abort call get a location in
bar() at 6:5, inlined in foo() at 10:3, inlined in main() at 0:0 (since
the two inlined functions are on different lines, but in the same
scope).
I have not seen anything in the DWARF standard that would disallow
inlining a non-zero location at 0:0 in the inlined-at function, and both
LLDB and GDB seem to accept these locations (with D142552 needed for
LLDB to handle cases where the file, line and column number are all 0).
One incompatibility with GDB is that it seems to ignore 0-line locations
in some cases, but I am not aware of any specific issue that this patch
produces related to that.
With x86-64 LLDB (trunk) you previously got:
frame #0: 0x00007ffff7a44930 libc.so.6`abort
frame #1: 0x00005555555546ec a.out`main at merge.c:0
and will now get:
frame #0: 0x[...] libc.so.6`abort
frame #1: 0x[...] a.out`main [inlined] bar(q=<unavailable>) at merge.c:6:5
frame #2: 0x[...] a.out`main [inlined] foo(q=<unavailable>) at merge.c:10:3
frame #3: 0x[...] a.out`main at merge.c:0
and with x86-64 GDB (11.1) you will get:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff7a44930 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00005555555546ec in bar (q=<optimized out>) at merge.c:6
#2 foo (q=<optimized out>) at merge.c:10
#3 0x00005555555546ec in main ()
Reviewed By: aprantl, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142556
The conversion of dbg.declare into dbg.values doesn't take into account
the DIExpression attached to the intrinsic. In particular, when
converting:
```
store %val, ptr %alloca
dbg.declare(ptr %alloca, !SomeVar, !DIExpression())
```
Mem2Reg will try to figure out if `%val` has the size of `!SomeVar`. If
it does, then a non-undef dbg.value is inserted:
```
dbg.value(%val, !SomeVar, !DIExpression())
```
This makes sense: the alloca is _the_ address of the variable. So a
store to the alloca is a store to the variable. However, if the
expression in the original intrinsic is a `DW_OP_deref`, this logic is
not applicable:
```
store ptr %val, ptr %alloca
dbg.declare(ptr %alloca, !SomeVar, !DIExpression(DW_OP_deref))
```
Here, the alloca is *not* the address of the variable. A store to the
alloca is *not* a store to the variable. As such, querying whether
`%val` has the same size as `!SomeVar` is meaningless.
This patch addresses the issue by:
1. Allowing the conversion when the expression is _only_ a `DW_OP_deref`
without any other expressions (see code comment).
2. Checking that the expression does not start with a `DW_OP_deref`
before applying the logic that checks whether the value being stored and
the variable have the same length.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142160
This patch modifies SelectionDAG and FastISel to produce DBG_INSTR_REFs with
variadic expressions, and produce DBG_INSTR_REFs for debug values with variadic
location expressions. The former essentially means just prepending
DW_OP_LLVM_arg, 0 to the existing expression. The latter is achieved in
MachineFunction::finalizeDebugInstrRefs and InstrEmitter::EmitDbgInstrRef.
Reviewed By: jmorse, Orlando
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133929
Following support from the previous patches in this stack being added for
variadic DBG_INSTR_REFs to exist, this patch modifies LiveDebugValues to
handle those instructions. Support already exists for DBG_VALUE_LISTs, which
covers most of the work needed to handle these instructions; this patch only
modifies the transferDebugInstrRef function to correctly track them.
Reviewed By: jmorse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133927
Prior to this patch, variadic DIExpressions (i.e. ones that contain
DW_OP_LLVM_arg) could only be created by salvaging debug values to create
stack value expressions, resulting in a DBG_VALUE_LIST being created. As of
the previous patch in this patch stack, DBG_INSTR_REF's syntax has been
changed to match DBG_VALUE_LIST in preparation for supporting variadic
expressions. This patch adds some minor changes needed to allow variadic
expressions that aren't stack values to exist, and allows variadic expressions
that are trivially reduceable to non-variadic expressions to be handled
similarly to non-variadic expressions.
Reviewed by: jmorse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133926
Use deduction guides instead of helper functions.
The only non-automatic changes have been:
1. ArrayRef(some_uint8_pointer, 0) needs to be changed into ArrayRef(some_uint8_pointer, (size_t)0) to avoid an ambiguous call with ArrayRef((uint8_t*), (uint8_t*))
2. CVSymbol sym(makeArrayRef(symStorage)); needed to be rewritten as CVSymbol sym{ArrayRef(symStorage)}; otherwise the compiler is confused and thinks we have a (bad) function prototype. There was a few similar situation across the codebase.
3. ADL doesn't seem to work the same for deduction-guides and functions, so at some point the llvm namespace must be explicitly stated.
4. The "reference mode" of makeArrayRef(ArrayRef<T> &) that acts as no-op is not supported (a constructor cannot achieve that).
Per reviewers' comment, some useless makeArrayRef have been removed in the process.
This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D140896 that introduced
the deduction guides.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140955
This patch adds a new function that can be used to check all the
properties, other than the machine values, of a pair of debug values for
equivalence. This is done by folding the "directness" into the
expression, converting the expression to variadic form if it is not
already in that form, and then comparing directly. In a few places which
check whether two debug values are identical to see if their ranges can
be merged, this function will correctly identify cases where two debug
values are expressed differently but have the same meaning, allowing
those ranges to be correctly merged.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136173
This utility will be useful in subsequent patches, as such we expose it
in the DebugInfoMetadata header.
Depends on D139669
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139670
getCanonicalMDString() also returns a nullptr for empty strings, which
tripped over the getSource() method. Solve the ambiguity of no source
versus an optional containing a nullptr by simply storing a pointer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138658
