Currently, the occurrences of `__add_lvalue_reference_t` in
`__split_buffer` and `__assoc_state` are probably meaningless.
* In `__split_buffer`, the `__alloc_ref` and `__alloc_const_ref` member
typedefs are no longer used.
* In `__assoc_state`, we should simply use `_Rp&`, which must be
well-formed since it's already required that `sizeof(_Rp)` is
well-formed.
This PR removes the meaningless usages. The remaining occurrences in
`shared_ptr`, `unique_ptr`, and several type traits are meaningful.
Currently, the library-internal feature test macros are only defined if
the feature is not available, and always have the prefix
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_`. This patch changes that, so that they are always
defined and have the prefix `_LIBCPP_HAS_` instead. This changes the
canonical use of these macros to `#if _LIBCPP_HAS_FEATURE`, which means
that using an undefined macro (e.g. due to a missing include) is
diagnosed now. While this is rather unlikely currently, a similar change
in `<__configuration/availability.h>` caught a few bugs. This also
improves readability, since it removes the double-negation of `#ifndef
_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_FEATURE`.
The current patch only touches the macros defined in `<__config>`. If
people are happy with this approach, I'll make a follow-up PR to also
change the macros defined in `<__config_site>`.
This significantly simplifies the code, improves compile times and
improves the object layout of types using `__compressed_pair` in the
unstable ABI. The only downside is that this is extremely ABI sensitive
and pedantically breaks the ABI for empty final types, since the address
of the subobject may change. The ABI of the whole object should not be
affected.
Fixes#91266Fixes#93069
As time went by, a few files have become mis-formatted w.r.t.
clang-format. This was made worse by the fact that formatting was not
being enforced in extensionless headers. This commit simply brings all
of libcxx/include in-line with clang-format again.
We might have to do this from time to time as we update our clang-format
version, but frankly this is really low effort now that we've formatted
everything once.
This changes the `is_swappable` implementation to use variable templates
first and basing the class templates on that. This avoids instantiating
them when the `_v` versions are used, which are generally less resource
intensive.
These headers have become very small by using compiler builtins, often
containing only two declarations. This merges these headers, since
there doesn't seem to be much of a benefit keeping them separate.
Specifically, `is_{,_nothrow,_trivially}{assignable,constructible}` are
kept and the `copy`, `move` and `default` versions of these type traits
are moved in to the respective headers.
This patch runs clang-format on all of libcxx/include and libcxx/src, in
accordance with the RFC discussed at [1]. Follow-up patches will format
the benchmarks, the test suite and remaining parts of the code. I'm
splitting this one into its own patch so the diff is a bit easier to
review.
This patch was generated with:
find libcxx/include libcxx/src -type f \
| grep -v 'module.modulemap.in' \
| grep -v 'CMakeLists.txt' \
| grep -v 'README.txt' \
| grep -v 'libcxx.imp' \
| grep -v '__config_site.in' \
| xargs clang-format -i
A Git merge driver is available in libcxx/utils/clang-format-merge-driver.sh
to help resolve merge and rebase issues across these formatting changes.
[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-formatting-all-of-libc-once-and-for-all
This brings most of the enable_ifs in libc++ to the same style. It also has the nice side-effect of reducing the size of names of these symbols, since the depedent return type is shorter.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Spies: ldionne, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157787
We plan to add concepts for checking that iterators actually provide what they claim to. This is to avoid people thinking that these type traits actually check the iterator requirements in more detail.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: Mordante, libcxx-commits, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150801
- add the `from_range_t` constructors and the related deduction guides;
- add the `insert_range`/`assign_range`/etc. member functions.
(Note: this patch is split from https://reviews.llvm.org/D142335)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149826
Other macros that disable parts of the library are named `_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_WHATEVER`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143163
This was discussed on Discord with the consensus that we should rename the macros.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, avogelsgesang, jloser, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131498
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e77 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
Detected by evil-izing the widely used `MoveOnly` testing type.
I had to patch some tests that were themselves using its comma operator,
but I think that's a worthwhile cost in order to catch more places
in our headers that needed comma-proofing.
The trick here is that even `++ptr, SomeClass()` can find a comma operator
by ADL, if `ptr` is of type `Evil*`. (A comma between two operands
of non-class-or-enum type is always treated as the built-in
comma, without ADL. But if either operand is class-or-enum, then
ADL happens for _both_ operands' types.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109414
__split_buffer_common was entirely unused, and __deque_base_common
was unused except for two calls to __throw_out_of_range(), which have
been inlined.
The usual intent of the __xxx_base_common base classes is to localize
where the exception-throwing code is instantiated, however that wasn't
the case here because we never explicitly instantiated those base classes
in the shared library, unlike what we do for basic_string and vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108384
Moves:
* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
`__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges` and `std::iter_swap` into
`__algorithm/${FUNCTION_NAME}`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103734
I used a lot of `git grep` to find places where `std::` was being used
outside of comments and assert-messages. There were three outcomes:
- Qualified function calls, e.g. `std::move` becomes `_VSTD::move`.
This is the most common case.
- Typenames that don't need qualification, e.g. `std::allocator` becomes `allocator`.
Leaving these as `_VSTD::allocator` would also be fine, but I decided
that removing the qualification is more consistent with existing practice.
- Names that specifically need un-versioned `std::` qualification,
or that I wasn't sure about. For example, I didn't touch any code in
<atomic>, <math.h>, <new>, or any ext/ or experimental/ headers;
and I didn't touch any instances of `std::type_info`.
In some deduction guides, we were accidentally using `class Alloc = typename std::allocator<T>`,
despite `std::allocator<T>`'s type-ness not being template-dependent.
Because `std::allocator` is a qualified name, this did parse as we intended;
but what we meant was simply `class Alloc = allocator<T>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92250
This reverts commit 620adacf87a376ec536ccc66af59df5bb4dc3b38.
Fix: unsupport C++03 for the new test, define helpers before __swap_allocator
(1) Add _VSTD:: qualification to __swap_allocator.
(2) Add _VSTD:: qualification consistently to __to_address.
(3) Add some more missing _VSTD:: to <vector>, with a regression test.
This part is cleanup after d9a4f936d05.
Note that a vector whose allocator actually runs afoul of any of these ADL calls will
likely also run afoul of simple things like `v1 == v2` (which is also an ADL call).
But, still, libc++ should be consistent in qualifying function calls wherever possible.
Relevant blog post: https://quuxplusone.github.io/blog/2019/09/26/uglification-doesnt-stop-adl/
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91708
(1) Add _VSTD:: qualification to __swap_allocator.
(2) Add _VSTD:: qualification consistently to __to_address.
(3) Add some more missing _VSTD:: to <vector>, with a regression test.
This part is cleanup after d9a4f936d05.
Note that a vector whose allocator actually runs afoul of any of these ADL calls will
likely also run afoul of simple things like `v1 == v2` (which is also an ADL call).
But, still, libc++ should be consistent in qualifying function calls wherever possible.
Relevant blog post: https://quuxplusone.github.io/blog/2019/09/26/uglification-doesnt-stop-adl/
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91708
We don't support any compiler that doesn't support variadics and rvalue
references in C++03 mode, so these workarounds can be dropped. There's
still *a lot* of cruft related to these workarounds, but I try to tackle
a bit of it here and there.
This patch de-duplicates most compressed pair constructors
to use the same code in C++11 and C++03.
Part of doing that is deleting the "__second_tag()" and replacing
it with a "__value_init_tag()" which has the same effect, but
allows for the removal of the special "one-arg" first element
constructor.
This patch is intended to have no semantic change.
With the upcoming introduction of iterator concepts in ranges,
the meaning of "__is_contiguous_iterator" changes drastically.
Currently we intend it to mean "does it have this iterator category",
but it could now also mean "does it meet the requirements of this
concept", and these can be different.
